Ellen Pao Launches Advocacy Group To Improve Diversity In The Tech Industry (theverge.com) 265
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Ellen Pao, a former Silicon Valley venture capitalist, today announced the launch of Project Include, an advocacy group aimed at improving diversity in the technology industry. The group was started by Pao and fellow female engineers and executives, including members of Slack, Pinterest, and other Bay Area VC firms. The initiative will focus on providing startups and established tech companies with information on making hiring more inclusive, improving retention, and examining bias in the workplace. Pao became embroiled in one of the most divisive debates in tech last year after suing her former employer, VC firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, for gender discrimination. She lost at trial and, later, stepped down from her position as interim CEO of Reddit following a severe harassment campaign. Project Include is also accepting as many as 18 startups, who can apply to receive recommendations through a program called Start-Up Include.
Fuck anyone with a penis! (Score:5, Funny)
If you disagree then you're part of the patriarchy.
Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! (Score:4, Informative)
To an SJW, disagreement is synonymous with harassment.
Re: (Score:3)
Something tells me that this new Ellen Pao group to advocate for diversity is not going to sit well with the Anonymous Cowards on Slashdot.
Just a hunch.
Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How dare men have a sex drive that doesn't conform to marxism-feminism! Those filthy fascists! Time to build an iron curtain!
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, what? I thought we were to be accepting of all sexual proclivities so long as they're performed by consensual adults? Why is it okay for you to denigrate someone's sexual preferences? It's not like they have a choice in who or what they're attracted to - those are innate, born to them, and to be respected.
Or is that not the case for this particular group and, if not, why not?
Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! (Score:4, Informative)
If this were true we wouldn't be seeing this 'sjw-transsexual-feminist conspiracy' oozing from every major media orifice.
1. Game conferences wouldn't be canceled just because there weren't enough vaginas. Valid job applicants wouldn't be terminated days later because their privately/financially expressed political views made someone 'feel uncomfortable.'
2. Politicians wouldn't be taking statistics out of context and passing law.
3. University professors would not be calling for policy to force men to let women speak first in all public discourse, and to cancel such meetings if not enough women are present.
4. TV shows and commercials wouldn't be loaded with 'empowered' women labeling men as 'stupid dad' and 'manpig' stereotypes and ordering them around, or making sure that if the narrative calls for someone to show fear or emotion, it must be the man, with the 'empowered' woman consoling him like he's a child.
5. Sweden (and south carolina) wouldn't be micromanaging how people go to the bathroom.
6. Bruce Jenner would not have been in the news again. Somehow a psychological need to amputate a part of your body is considered a sign of mental illness, but if it's male genitalia, we're supposed to 'celebrate the diversity.' Figure that one out..
If there're chicken littles and conspiracies meant to alter the way we think, they're definitely on the SJW side these days. The religious right tried this same tactic up through the 80s to push its crazy on us and failed. Now I guess it's the left wing's turn to push its brand of crazy. In light of this, it can be hard to remember that all of this hubris has no basis as long as society places individual rights ahead of groupthink ideology. Once we lose that, it's a race to the bottom.
Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! (Score:4, Interesting)
Can you cite some specific examples of these things happening. I'm genuinely interested, especially in some of the political stuff because it sounds quite concerning if politicians are undermining efforts to increase equality like that.
I think I can guess what you are referring to in a few cases though.
1. Game conferences wouldn't be canceled just because there weren't enough vaginas. Valid job applicants wouldn't be terminated days later because their privately/financially expressed political views made someone 'feel uncomfortable.'
Which conference? In the job applicant case, would that be Eich? In which case I'd point out that freedom of speech (i.e. criticism) trumps him feeling comfortable in his job, even if he means he feels his position is no longer tenable.
4. TV shows and commercials wouldn't be loaded with 'empowered' women labeling men as 'stupid dad' and 'manpig' stereotypes and ordering them around
There are some great videos on YouTube where feminists and others often labelled as "SJWs" deconstruct those adverts. It's sad that advertisers are so dumb and feel that insulting their audience is a good idea.
6. Bruce Jenner would not have been in the news again. Somehow a psychological need to amputate a part of your body is considered a sign of mental illness
I'm afraid medical science is against you on this one. It's a lot like "shell shock" (now known as PTSD) in the 1910s. Cowards trying to get off the front line, not a complex psychological condition. Attach the electrodes, that'll get them talking again.
The most interesting part of all this is the conspiracy theory you have constructed to link all these things by portraying them as some kind of attack. I've said it before - people who accuse others of being "SJWs" usually do all the things they attribute to SJWs.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, I hadn't seen that before. Looks like an unfortunate mistake. Makes little sense to cancel it on those grounds.
Re: (Score:3)
Ignore his arguments and take my word that they're totes easy to refute. Then fallacy fallacy and ad hominem fallacy.
Classic.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean North Carolina. SC has yet to pass any of these "bathroom laws".
The OP self-identified as commenting on South Carolina, and we shouldn't try to force him into talking about one particular state or another.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think I finally understand (Score:2, Funny)
This woman is having the longest period ever.
Re:I think I finally understand (Score:4, Funny)
That's exactly the kind of misogynist hatespeech that's proof that this initative is needed. Ellen Pao is a hero and you should be fired.
Re: I think I finally understand (Score:2, Funny)
It's not bigotry if it's true.
Re:I think I finally understand (Score:5, Insightful)
The shit Ellen Pao has done in the past has done so much harm to the image of women in tech leadership roles than this bullshit campaign can ever fix.
Really? (Score:2)
The shit Ellen Pao has done in the past has done so much harm to the image of women in tech leadership roles than this bullshit campaign can ever fix.
Just because you find her unsympathetic and her case was lost, doesn't mean she's wrong or did bad things (you call it "shit").
Or do you have proof? Citations/links please.
Thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
Err... Wouldn't proof be her lost case?
I might be missing something - I've not really kept up as I don't even have a Reddit account. I did learn that there is a KGIII on Reddit but, alas, I'm not that person but I don't begrudge them the use of my moniker - I wasn't going to use it there. I don't know if they're trying to pretend to be me, I kind of doubt it, as they appear to be fond of basketball which is not something folks would expect of me. I have, on the other hand, had people try to impersonate me i
Re:I think I finally understand (Score:5, Informative)
Hilary "Yahoo!Mail" Clinton
Re:I think I finally understand (Score:5, Interesting)
Correction: he should be fired quietly and he should not make a tweet or post a single comment on Reddit to report it.
We don't want to repeat the Donglegate incident where Adria Richards, after being psychologically raped by a private discussion made behind her in a room full of 300 people, was victimized a second time by people who unfairly called her a cunt for getting a guy fired over such bullshit.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Adria Richards did not get that guy fired. The Internet mob of crazy got them both fired.
Right. It's not the person that pulled the trigger, it's the crazy bullets that killed the victims. Someone should call Clinton right quick, her platform of gun control is a sham, she should go full tilt on bullet control.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think Ellen Pao is particularly heroic, she was out for herself but she did point out real problems in KP and the industry.
Pointing out problems is one thing. Jumping from problem to conclusion without no intermediate is quite another.
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno... I like to antagonize people (sometimes on either side but I do have my preferences) because it's good to get them to see the absurdity of that which they represent, or claim to, but I don't really have a dog in this fight. I have to say, I thought it was pretty funny. Maybe I have a warped sense of humor? I don't know. Probably - but that doesn't mean I didn't find it amusing.
As an aside, it's fun to watch the folks change over time. They fight and rail against the things you point out, they decr
When you can't do real work.... (Score:5, Informative)
Start an advocacy group to harass people who can.
Re:When you can't do real work.... (Score:5, Insightful)
If this "project" follows the standard race-hustling/gender-hustling formula, it will look something like this:
1) They approach your company and ask for you to sponsor them, or hire them to provide diversity training, or pay them to do a diversity study of your company (aka they'll shake you down for money)
2) If you do sponsor/hire them, they'll call you progressive and give you a social justice free pass (a real commodity in ultra-liberal Silicon Valley)
3) If you don't, they'll cite you as an example of a company that's not "embracing diversity" and is clearly racist/sexist/homophobic blah blah. You must be, otherwise you would have embraced diversity by giving them money, right?
Re:When you can't do real work.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Painting them with mob tactics. This is frighteningly accurate and come to think of it, not the first time I've heard of social issues being falsely used for personal financial/commercial gain; See Anita Sarkeesian.
Re: (Score:2)
I have seen Sarkeesian's work. It seems you are unfamiliar with it.
Re: (Score:2)
Step 1 to improving your company (Score:5, Insightful)
Never hire Ellen Pao.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
...and never invest money with her husband. [wikipedia.org]
Grifters like Pao and Fletcher are why we can't have nice things.
Gay husband (Score:2)
Did you see the "Personal Life" section in the wikipedia article. Her husband, besides being a terrible businessman and suing people over racial allegations, used to be married to a guy, for 10 years.
I don't know what, as a society, we've done wrong to make this kind of couple possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
She has made herself difficult to employ now. It's a shame because it just makes it even harder for other people to complain about discrimination, for fear of ending up the same way.
Maybe she can find another job like Reddit. I think she was brought in to make necessary changes and absorb the backlash. It worked brilliantly, Reddit is better off now and the screaming mob think they "won" by forcing her out. I just wonder if she was in on this plan before she accepted the job.
Re: (Score:2)
because it just makes it even harder for other people to complain about discrimination
This is the real tragedy. Just like any false claim that appear to be on the rise. http://www.breitbart.com/milo/... [breitbart.com]
Take Brietbart for what its worth but the links are at the bottom.
The whole "ends justify the means" or "there are no wrong tactics just bad targets" is counter productive and destructive.
If you believe what Anita believes that "Everything is racist. Everything is sexist. Everything is homophobic." then it is no wonder people see it where it is not.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks. It warms my bleeding heart to know I'm missed.
If you work for a big company (Score:2)
You are still a problem if you are a critical part of a team...
Re: (Score:3)
Being inclusive is not a pre-requisite or a moral obligation. Being inclusive is a game that people with too much time and money on their hands play because they're too afraid to tackle real social problems (like homeless people who live in terrible conditions or ISIS sympathizers who open fire in large crowds).
If you decide to play the inclusive game when you don't have time and money, you'll lose.
How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? (Score:5, Informative)
agism is the elephant in the room (I'm biased, I'm over 50 and unemployed in the bay area). I see lots of women where I was previous employed (at pretty much any place); but if you look for grey hair guys and girls, no, there are some token hires or maybe some rock star that happens to be old; but for the most part, if you are over 35 and looking to stay technical in this area of the country, LOTSA LUCK to you.
the other elephant (yeah, its crowded in this room) is that if you are born in the west, especially the US, employers mostly prefer to NOT hire you and instead take an h1b or other form of import. its not about race; its about being brought up here and knowing your rights, knowing you can say NO to your boss for that 4th weekend request in a row of his, knowing lots of things that foreigners who were not raised in the US culture simply don't know.
employers leverage the HELL out of that fact. most people outside the US who are from asia, for example, has zero idea what freedom really is. they are perfectly fine with being eavesdropped, spied, directed, micromanaged and then disposed of. they think its normal. US born folks know better, and so we are not the first choice when it comes to hiring.
the cries of DIVERSITY! is bullshit and yet another distraction to hide what is really going on. war on middle class; and that mostly means folks born here and who have a vested interest in what happens here in the next 10, 20, 50 years. but we are being passed over for most of the core hiring in the valley.
btw, indians who end up staying here and having kids; YOUR kids are now americans and they will be passed over just like I and my friends are, now. think long and hard about that, immigrants; and think again if you really should hire yet more h1b's or if you should, maybe give some locals a chance at some of those jobs. later on, your kids will be the locals. think about it.
I haven't spoken to her recently... (Score:2, Interesting)
But I actually know someone exactly like that. Late 50s, has worked in every facet of QA, administration, and even mid-range scripting (never really got into dev work, but could do basically every other role you'd need to round out your team.)
She got laid off around the '08 downturn and hasn't been able to get a hire since, despite having 20 years of techwork under her belt and staying up to date on the OSes, software, etc for which she'd be responsible.
Maybe the real issue isn't all the old people being 'w
Re: (Score:2)
If you're over 50 and in the interview, it's obvious that you're up to date (that doesn't mean knowing the API of the latest trendy bullshit, but it does mean you don't think SVN is new and scary), and you have the skills of someone with 25+ years of experience, not only will you get an offer before you have time to get in your car, in any of the tech hubs (not just SV and the west coast), the conversation will start at over 300k total comp and you'll be able to milk them up from there.
The problem is that t
Beware of Slack (Score:4, Insightful)
Here's a tweet from their talented "Lead Growth", who's also founder of "Women in Product":
Day three of using a Windows machine: was totally mentally exhausted last night, dreaded work this morning. Struggling to do small things.
https://twitter.com/merci/stat... [twitter.com]
How fucking entitled can someone get?
When I see people like that, I seriously wonder if I should consider another career than IT. Those idiots just ruin the entire industry.
Re: (Score:2)
Using a Windows machine should be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
More seriously, using an OS/application/whatever that one isn't used to or familiar with that works in a way that one isn't accustomed to can cause frustrations that lead to stress and mental exhaustion.
Haven't you ever figuratively "fried your brain" trying to diagnose/fix some problem? This is the same thing.
Re: (Score:3)
Using a Windows machine should be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
More seriously, using an OS/application/whatever that one isn't used to or familiar with that works in a way that one isn't accustomed to can cause frustrations that lead to stress and mental exhaustion.
Haven't you ever figuratively "fried your brain" trying to diagnose/fix some problem? This is the same thing.
I once spent a week using a crippled desktop that had only the serial port and the keyboard as a way to exchange data with the outside world, and it was running a dated CDE stuck in German or Dutch. I managed to do my job and I complained less than that poor little girl who had to OMG use Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Complaining about Windows in the most exaggerated way possible is a long standing geek tradition. But when someone you like does it, suddenly it's entitlement.
I note that you have complained numerous times about Windows right here on Slashdot.
Let's shift that focus a little (Score:5, Insightful)
The article is a bit light in detail as to what Pao's trying to accomplish, but from her history, I'm assuming it's about gender
But maybe we should focus on diversity of skills and experience rather than diversity of physical characteristics?
Re:Let's shift that focus a little (Score:5, Insightful)
The article is a bit light in detail as to what Pao's trying to accomplish
My guess would be to extort businesses to give her money under the threat of calling them sexist-racists if they don't. You know, the standard race-hustling, gender-hustling modus operandi.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why would they? You're probably not a lesbian midget Eskimo.
It's like those people who say, "Oh, that lesbian stuff turns me on!" Umm... Why? They're lesbians. They are not interested in you and they'll only let you watch if they're fake lesbians who are porn actresses or otherwise in it for the money - which might be a good thing but certainly doesn't mean what they seem to think it means.
And no, no you can't fuck a lesbian straight.
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot Still Fooled by Harassment Narratives? (Score:5, Informative)
She lost at trial and, later, stepped down from her position as interim CEO of Reddit following a severe harassment campaign
Please. Here's an outline of the shitshow that Pao and the rest of the Reddit regime (which is still largely intact) caused, leading to her ouster:
https://news.slashdot.org/comm... [slashdot.org]
Enough with Diversity (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, there are many schemes and incentives aimed at getting more men into nursing. Ditto teaching, especially for very young children.
The thing about hiring the "best" candidate is that you need to define "best" somehow. You could argue that it should be the most qualified or most experienced or who does best on a test, but in practice businesses have to consider many other factors.
Is it worth paying top dollar for this job? Will this person fit in with the rest of the team? What non-technical skills a
Re: (Score:2)
In the US, there is a push to get men into nursing. Nursing (may) involve(s) a lot of physical labor, and having men that can move 300+ pound patients is an unfortunate necessity.
Re: (Score:2)
It's interesting to read that while male nurses are 6% to 10% of the total, female nurses still make less than a male nurse makes.
http://nursinglink.monster.com... [monster.com]
"About 6 percent of nurses in the United States are men. However, men are represented in much higher numbers in nursing specialties that also pay higher salaries. For example, 49 percent of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) in the U.S. are men. In 2005, the average salary for CRNAs was $160,000, significantly higher than the average
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Enough with Diversity (Score:2)
Get back to me when the President of the United States launches a drive to get more men into nursing and teaching.
Well, THIS should engender thoughtful discussion. (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate it when the handlers don't warn the bystanders before they throw in the raw meat.
Re: (Score:2)
You couldn't tell from the headline?
Re: (Score:2)
better products through diversity (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, this is typical of the horseshit dumped on us by the anti-diversity crowd. No-one is suggesting hiring people who aren't qualified to do the actual job.
Then that seemingly reasonable straw man is used to launch into some transphobic and racist bullshit. Nice.
Re: (Score:2)
a better answer... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
An AH64 Apache? Really?
Personally, I sexually Identify as an Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being an attack plane is Impossible and Iâ(TM)m fucking retarded but I donâ(TM)t care, Iâ(TM)m beautiful. Iâ(TM)m having a plastic surgeon install jet engines, a 30mm GAU-8/A Avenger cannon and AGM-65 Maverick missiles on my body. From now on I
Fuck Ellen Pao (Score:2, Informative)
Yeah, just for some background. Ellen Pao was no-one. She wasn't a long term user of the site. They tried to make it look like that, but it was a transparent attempt. She was one of these Ivy League fucking for-no-other-reason climbers. They tried to give her a back story as a long term "one of us" people. That only made it worse. And when there was the inevitable pushback against her inevitable claims of sexism, there was an inevitable escalation of those claims. That's all you need to know, other than tha
lower cost housing? (Score:2)
Follow your own advice to prove it is good. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but that takes hard work. Much easier to hustle, con, and sue.
Chairman Pao (Score:5, Insightful)
Over on Reddit they started calling her "Chairman Pao" for the censorious regime Ms Pao imposed. She also 'purged' pro-Free Speech moderators. We gotta fight such people, the authoritarians "doing it for our own good" or because it "hurts someones feelings".
Free Speech is the whole ballgame. Lose that and no-one gets to "talk Truth to Power".
What would help diversity (Score:4, Interesting)
What would help diversity (among other things) is not extorting a multimillion dollar settlement out of your employer by filing a lawsuit about things you've made up.
Method to "Improve Diversity?" (Score:2)
You mean like learning how to tolerate outsized egos and intrusive innuendos so the Pao's of the world don't quit?
No matter where you are, you learn to fit in or you become a crybaby and leave.
She should try improving her own competency (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Women are laughing all the way to the bank now. (Score:3)
While there's problems everywhere, since the biggest issue is long before any tech company can get (directly) involved (how parents raise kids, school, TV, etc), there's starting to be statistics showing that women right of college are starting to make quite a bit more than men (because of all the big tech companies under fire desperately trying to hire them).
So unless you're critically incompetent, right now if you come out of CS and you're a girl, you're basically an instant-hire and you can negotiate your salary to oblivion.
Welp, since my wife is a pretty successful software engineer, I indirectly benefit...but...
Re: (Score:2)
forcing diversity = discrimination (Score:3)
if you are looking to recruit people based on their skin color, sex, age, etc. then what you are actually doing is discriminating against the majority. racism/sexism/ageism/etc. are not magically acceptable because you have good intentions. instead of forcing diversity people should be looking to reduce selection bias for everything except their merits.
Good (Score:2)
I'm glad to see she'll be doing something where she can't effect or harm other people. Hopefully it'll be a few decades before she realizes that everybody is ignoring her.
Uhm I don't think you want this (Score:2)
Where I am adding diversity would mean giving visible minority jobs to western Europeans.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Fuck anyone with a penis! if you disagree then you're part of the patriarchy
Use apps! only apps can apps apps, NOT LUDDITE feminists! Apps!
I think i finally understand this woman is have the longest period ever
When you can't do real work... start an advocacy group to harass people who can
hire more gay linux nerds who like hard cocks in their rectums
Can you not fathom how there just might be some discrimination happening in the tech world?
Oh I can. I see strong discrimination in favor of employing and promoting 'diversity' candidates. That means STFs (Senior Technical Female), black, native American and disabled. It's not my imagination. It's written down corporate policy. As a hiring manager I would get dinged for not discriminating in this way.
Re: (Score:2)
Against who, though? I'm getting old now, and for my entire life women around me have been given extra opportunities. Free tutoring in college, extra consideration for jobs, easier paths to promotion. It takes a lot of gall to complain about discrimination when you'd still be working in the proverbial mail room without it.
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Many people reply to comments in order to change peoples minds; to cause either the parent, or readers of the thread to reconsider things. If you're gonna word things in such a way that both sides just dismiss you, it doesn't sound nearly as
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because somebody put them in front of a computer when they were little and OFF THEY WENT.
Okay, but what if the person's parents were poor?
Or what if their parents had a gendered view of tech and didn't put a little girl in front of a computer because that was a "Boy Thing"
Re: (Score:2)
Also, with the exception of the Amish, and the addition of lots more in that "etc." group, you've pretty much just described New York City; one of the largest and most successful cities in the world.
Re: (Score:2)