Google To Take On Uber With New Ride-Share Service (cnbc.com) 69
Finally, a major company is planning to compete with Uber in the ride-sharing service space. The Wall Street Journal reports today that Google is planning to debut its own ride-hailing service in San Francisco at "far cheaper rates." (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled, here's an alternate source.) The Mountain View-based company began a pilot program around its California headquarters in May, and enabled several thousand area workers at specific firms to use the Waze navigation app to connect with fellow commuters. Expect Google's service in the coming weeks, says the report. One key difference in Google's approach is that it aims to connect riders with drivers who are already headed in the same direction. The project is in compliance with Waze's aims to "make fares low enough to discourage drivers from operating as taxi drivers." From the report: Still, Google's push into ride-sharing could portend a clash with Uber, a seven-year-old firm valued at roughly $68 billion that largely invented the concept of summoning a car with a smartphone app. Google and Uber were once allies -- Google invested $258 million in Uber in 2013 -- but increasingly see each other as rivals. Alphabet executive David Drummond said Monday that he resigned from Uber's board because of the increasing competition between the companies. Uber, which has long used Google's mapping software for its ride-hailing service, recently began developing its own maps.Game on, Uber.
Finally! (Score:4, Insightful)
Finally, a major company is planning to compete with Uber in the ride-sharing service space.
I guess Lyft [lyft.com] doesn't count?
Re: (Score:2)
Google Ventures invested $258 million in uber in 2013.
Re: Finally! (Score:2)
They will build in Waze integration and then acquire Uber for their market share. Then as soon as millions of people start using it they will kill it off.
Re: (Score:2)
But to me, Uber is priced just right....don't get me wrong, I love a good deal, but if the fares were any lower, I'd start to feel obliged to tip the driver every time...whereas the beauty of Uber is, I'm not expected to tip.
I have tipped before, especially if I was riding hammered...but also if the person was really cool, or maybe knew some good ways around traffic (and in New Orleans those special skills of drive-fu during Mardi G
Re: (Score:3)
I've not tried Lyft yet, I'm assuming they're on par with Uber price wise?
I use Lyft and avoid Uber. The prices are about the same, and the responsiveness is about the same. Even many of the drivers are the same, since many drivers do both. I use Lyft for two reasons: 1. They treat their drivers better, not necessarily with more money, but at least with more respect. 2. By using the smaller company I am helping to keep the market competitive.
Re: (Score:2)
That's interesting.
What /How does Lyft treat their drivers 'better'? What do you mean by 'more respect'? I'm seriously curious.
I always ask the uber drivers I have here in town that I ride with, and ALL of them seem to like driving for Uber and none have told me a bad experience with the company. So, curious what you've heard is bad from Uber towards their employees.
Re: (Score:1)
Former Lyft driver here, with a lot of Lyft/Uber driver friends.
Uber likes to implement policy changes that are beneficial to Uber, and not their Independent Driver Partners (DPs). One such change was, before they had an Android app, start charging the driver for use of the Uber-only iPhone that they were sending their DPs that did not have an iPhone to run their Driver Mode app. $10 a week, gone, on top of Uber's take per ride. This was done with very, very minimal notification -- about 7-10 days of notice
Re: (Score:2)
whereas the beauty of Uber is, I'm not expected to tip.
Yes, the beauty of Uber is that they told all their customers there is no need to tip and prevented drivers from accepting tips (some would anyways but doing so risked getting kicked off forever) because Uber wants to treat their drivers as neither employees nor contractors. They just settled a huge class action lawsuit a few months ago (might not be finalized yet, too lazy to look) over the "no tips" thing because they mislead customers to believe that tips are already included in the fair (they aren't) an
Re: (Score:2)
Uber abuses the hell out of their drivers all in the name of keeping fares low, riders happy, and their own profits up.
That's the problem with a job where 97% of the adult population meets the qualifications. Have a driver's license, a car, and insurance. Be able to follow turn-by-turn directions. All while listening to headphones sitting in your comfortable climate controlled car.
There's a large supply of potential Uber drivers. Of course the compensation is going to be minimal. Uber is going to pay exactly what's required to have driver coverage and not a cent more. The same thing any business would do.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not expected to tip
It really depends on who you ask. Uber's official line is that tipping is not required, but the drivers feel quite differently.
Hopefully they'll call it (Score:5, Funny)
Goober :P
So, really seems to be "ride-sharing" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
According to their paki CFO they are.
Re: (Score:2)
According to their paki CFO they are.
Diverted into ISI and ISIL ... which are really the same thing
Re: (Score:2)
That's what Uber was supposed to be until they became an international taxicab company
Are you sure about that? The company was launched under the name UberCab, and as far as I can tell it was a car-hailing app from the beginning. I can find no evidence it was ever a carpooling app.
It seems to me that the challenge with an actual ridesharing app is getting to critical mass. You need enough cars participating that anyone looking for a ride is likely to find someone to pick them up most of the time. That's something of a problem for a car-hailing app like Uber, but not as much because it depe
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I'm totally not agreeing with the way slashdot is trying to sell this, as some sort of competition with uber.
Uber is a taxi company that differentiates by pretending to be a "ride sharing" company. The existing thing that is actually "ride sharing" is called "craigslist" and there is no special app for ride-sharing.
What Google is doing appears to be actual ride sharing. If they do it well, I might participate; after all, I already stop for many hitchhikers.
Re: (Score:2)
So no difference to Uber (when it was a new start-up).
Re: (Score:2)
How to make it cheaper? (Score:3)
Being that Uber is already a minimum wage job outside of the weekend bar hours (Fri and Sat 5pm-3am averages $22 hr gross in the MSP metro and is the only time you can actually make decent money), I don't know what they have up their sleeve to make it even cheaper.
Re: (Score:2)
I take you you didn't even bother reading the anything past the headline. This is a carpooling application meant to share the cost of two people heading in the same direction. Its not meant as a part time job.
Re: (Score:2)
I see the carpooling part, but the summary also mentions charging fares, not splitting costs. Presumably the car owner is for hire and accepts them, Google just uses something along the lines of "Uber Pool" and "Lyft Line" which also matches riders going in the same direction. Which isn't a differentiator at all, as the article claims.
Re: (Score:2)
I see the carpooling part, but the summary also mentions charging fares, not splitting costs. Presumably the car owner is for hire and accepts them, Google just uses something along the lines of "Uber Pool" and "Lyft Line" which also matches riders going in the same direction. Which isn't a differentiator at all, as the article claims.
The difference is that no the much lower fares will be too low to motivate anyone to take driving on as a job. If the fare value is so low that it doesn't even cover the full value of vehicle fuel and wear and tear, much less the driver's time, then no one will try to make money at it. Instead, it will just be a way to defray part of the cost of a journey one was making anyway. In other words, ride sharing.
Re: (Score:2)
Being that Uber is already a minimum wage job outside of the weekend bar hours
My sister drives for Uber and averages about $18/hr. That is way more than minimum wage, and is pretty good for a no skill job with flexible hours. Like most Uber drivers, she does it part time, and it is not her main source of income.
Re: (Score:2)
pretty good before costs and you don't get paid for dead time / waiting time.
Re: (Score:2)
My sister drives for Uber and averages about $18/hr. That is way more than minimum wage, and is pretty good for a no skill job with flexible hours. Like most Uber drivers, she does it part time, and it is not her main source of income.
$18 / hour. Minus gas. Minus car repairs. Minus car maintenance (oil changes, tires, breaks, etc). Minus insurance. Minus licensing fees. Minus depreciation on your car (you are putting miles on it reducing it's worth). Minus accidents (of course you'll have more if you are driving professionally). You are lucky if you break even.
Re: (Score:2)
I've got to say though - Uber seems like it pays much better than most courier services used to pay drivers to deliver things!
I tried working for one of them, once -- and quit within a week. During the lunch rush, they had us delivering boxed lunches to various locations where we were only compensated about $1.50 for each successful delivery. Since you had to seek out people, parking your vehicle and taking things into buildings to them, you wasted a lot of time too.
The vehicle maintenance is always a facto
Re: (Score:2)
I think most rationalize some of it away, so to speak.
Sure, they see short term gains. Things like the insurance bill, big repair bills, new tires, accidents, and so on. Those don't come immediately. So it seems like pure profit at first.
Re: (Score:2)
So long Uber... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Exactly, same way Google+ destroyed Facebook.
Actually Ridesharing (Score:2)
And that would actually be ridesharing, as opposed to what Uber is, which let's you be a part time Taxi service.
Re: (Score:2)
Sharing never meant you get stuff for free, it always implied somebody involved had bought the thing. And often, those costs were shared by the parents.
If you're splitting up the transportation bill, that is absolutely sharing. Even if there is a little bit of overhead in making the connection.
You probably thought that one of the kids' parents just bought all that pizza and "shared" it, but usually the parents were also sharing the bill behind the scenes. See how that word works on both sides?
The difference
And next week... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
google is just throwing money around, and poking fingers into everyone's business ( not to mention politics and bloody regime changes ), because it is not being held accountable by anyone due to its success in its main competence ; ad pushing online.
but while wasting money on anything and everything, it has lost all focus and is neglecting its core competencies.
some of the other big tech corps have the same defect.
they will start refocusing once their cash cow businesses stop expanding and/or profits become
Re: (Score:2)
google is just throwing money around, and poking fingers into everyone's business ( not to mention politics and bloody regime changes ), because it is not being held accountable by anyone due to its success in its main competence
How do you suggest they "be held accountable" for this ride sharing app?
Re: (Score:2)
you seem to have not understood.
google is not being held accountable, and is wasting its own money, earned through success in its core competencies(mainly ad pushing ), in various kinds of projects which usually turn out mediocre or fails(compared with other companies that have those projects as a core competency). google then abandons them. it has happened again and again .
old conglomerates that tried to do everything also faced the same problem, and after years of lower return on capital, compared to bro
Re: (Score:2)
google is not being held accountable
So, Google can't create a ride-sharing app? It's an immoral venture? They need to be held accountable for this ride sharing app? You think they will regret devoting a few engineers for a few months to write this app? Somehow I doubt that.
Google's business model is to throw shit at the wall and see if it sticks, and don't shed a tear if it doesn't. It's a great strategy. It's also not too hard to see that most of what they do is to prop up their ad revenue business in one way or another. Android is all about
Re: (Score:2)
you do have a problem with comprehension, since you are replying to imaginary points i never made , when you go on about "can't create", "immoral venture", "regret", etc.
if you can read and understand, you will see my point, from first, was that google do throw money to waste when they take up and drop projects(as does some of the other big techs). and they can do that, for now, because they are successful in their main competence ; ad pushing in google's case.but once that core business is no longer a cash
I'm skeptical (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
At $0.57/mile (and no per-minute fee) how many people are really going to want to deal with having a stranger in their car?
Ones who are already going that way, are OK with literal ride-sharing.
Think of it this way... "how many people are really going to..." stop for a hitchhiker? 1%? Less. Much, much less. And yet, there are lots of us who do stop. People can and do get where they are going by hitchhiking. And they're not even paying fifty cents a mile. If I could just check an app before I leave town, "is anybody trying to go my way right now?" and I'd even get paid. $.57/mile offsets the gas and vehicle maintenance, that basi
if there is a 'fare' it's not a RIDE SHARE (Score:1)
for fucks sake, it's a god damn taxi.
ride sharing..
that's when you see a notice on your work lunchroom's bulletin board, someone looking to SHARE a ride to work.. lives near you.. you take turns driving and picking each other up.. or if one of you is going to drive every day, then you might split the gas.
or it's a public transit agency that provides vans, vets a driver of that van, provides the insurance, and finds riders to fill it that are going from and to the same general area... all you do is, you gues
Who invented what now? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I have to take exception to the idea that Uber invented summoning a car with a phone app. I've been able to call taxi companies with the "make a phone call" app for decades.
Apparently the world is full of idiots who think that "a phone call" is functionally the same as "a smartphone app" .
If it were , why is it that NOW that Uber (and friends) exist, all the taxi companies have Me Too "smartphone apps"?
Re: (Score:2)
Curious how you think Google being predator by providing an app that allows commuters to share rides.
Google's interest is self driving cars. They've poured a ton of cash into it and aren't keen to see Uber beat them to the punch. They are putting a monkey wrench into Uber's business model. They won't make any money from this, but they will hurt Uber's profits. That's what happens when the core of your business is an app that a few good engineers could put together in a month.
Re: (Score:2)
They won't have Uber's revenue, but they'll make money on it. Just like craigslist manages to make a little money on ride-sharing.
If all they make is the ad money they get from the app... that's what they do. They earn ad money. It might be enough for them to be happy to compete.
Especially when they have low overhead by not having it be a major commercial service; if they're literally just connecting the people and handling the billing for the gas split, then they don't need *any* local employees anywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Only difference being, Google is now the predator doing this to Uber, rather than Uber alone being the predator doing this to everyone else.
Yeah, I read that. Competing in business isn't being a "predator". Is Coke predating Pepsi? I hope you get it now.
Re: (Score:2)
The main technologies used here are:
Searching, mapping, messaging, billing, and presumably in-app advertising.
Which of those is not "the things [they're] best at?"
PS: the moment a better search engine is released... nobody will even know about it, or be interested in trying The Next Altavista-Killer. There are already other search engines that half of slashdot will assert are better, and nobody who shaves their neck cares.
Your first point is wrong because of your second (Score:2)
In GENERAL businesses should focus on their core competency. To what extent depends on a) available cash and b) projections for future growth in the core competency.
Google has a shit ton of cash. More cash than they can reasonably spend on search and adwords development. How about question (b), the future of search?
> The moment a better search engine is released their goose is cooked.
Indeed there have been many kings of search. Yahoo was on top at one point, and Altavista, and Hotbot. As you say, Yahoo
Interesting .... but .... (Score:2)
As others commented, this really seems to just be part of a "long play", ensuring a piece of the self-driving taxi business once it becomes possible. As heavily as Google has invested in self-driving vehicles, it seems obvious they wouldn't want to just give the whole market for self-driving cabs up to business like Uber or Lyft.
If they just want to establish their name in the market, in the meantime? Google could operate something like this at a loss, considering that "marketing expenses", as they evolve t
Uber is not "ride sharing" (Score:2)
Every time Uber is mentioned it is called a ride sharing service, when it is demonstrably nothing of the sort. Ride sharing has existed for decades, and is entirely different to being a taxi service.