Facebook Needs To Protect Human Rights Issue, Civil Groups Say (cnet.com) 47
Facebook needs to be more forthcoming about the kinds of content it takes down. That's according to 73 organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Black Lives Matter, SumOfUs and more, who signed a letter sent to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. From a report on CNET: The group asks for more clarity on the social networking giant's position on removing video and other content that highlight civil rights issues at the behest of authorities. The growing importance of Facebook in your life means it plays a central role in the news, video and content you see. That was made horrifyingly clear over the summer when its Facebook Live streaming video tool was used to broadcast the shooting of a black man by a police officer in Minnesota. The next day, the medium was used to broadcast a sniper firing shots at police officer at another civil rights demonstration. "With the onset of Facebook Live, your company is taking on an increasingly central role in controlling media that circulates through the public sphere," the letter said. "News is not just getting shared on Facebook: it's getting broken there."
Re: (Score:2)
I'm waiting for what feels like will soon be Facebook becoming passe. Does anyone care about the Facebook live garbage? Does anyone find ANY useful content there at all?
Sure, there's a place for your cousin's kids' Halloween pics, but the content you mildly care about is drowned in a sea of garbage, political nonsense, rants and raves, and a news feed that is almost exclusively "XXX shared XXX" anymore. (Facebook is suffering from many maladies, not the least of which is being ruined by "Shared" the way the
Re: (Score:2)
Hey look, 18 friends are on Facebook Live at the same time! Everybody wants to be a rockstar!
Re: (Score:2)
Well, yes and no.
The children and hipster types will have long since moved on, but it is still massively used for older folks (25 yrs and up) to keep in touch with their family members... and that much-higher-disposable-income demographic is probably much more to Facebook's liking insofar as advertising revenue is concerned.
Given that, I don't think Facebook particularly cares right now if the kids think it's passe', because even the younger crowd will likely still keep an account handy, if only to talk to
Re:Shocking (Score:4, Informative)
The irony is that many of those same SJW's want Facebook, Twitter, et. al. to take down content that disagrees with them ("disagrees with my position = "hate speech" in SJW-World, of course). So, a more accurate summary might be "SJW's demand to know what content Facebook is taking down so they can make sure that they're is only taking down anti-SJW content."
Re: (Score:2)
"I have a right not to be offended!"
Re: (Score:2)
News Flash - SJWs think Facebook should push their causes more.
I am a bit astonished someone might rely on FB for news at all.
Are you really astonished, when so many people rely on Stephen Colbert, whatever they're calling The Daley Show now, and Saturday Night Live for news?
Re: (Score:2)
I am a bit astonished someone might rely on FB for news at all.
Why? - Every news organisation on the planet has a FB page.
Forest for the trees (Score:1)
"News is not just getting shared on Facebook: it's getting broken there." That sounds like a quote from the news industry not real people. The news gets broken when it goes to the networks, everyone knows it yet here we are talking about facebook again.
Re:Forest for the trees (Score:5, Insightful)
MSM stopped reporting the news a long time ago. It is now just propaganda for the power class. See WikiLeaks for evidence.
It is Hackers breaking news, and the "networks" trying to keep a lid on it all.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
MSM stopped reporting the news a long time ago. It is now just propaganda for the power class.
...and the people too old/lazy/busy to get it anywhere else than their TV set. Until the baby-boom generation is dead, it'll still have that influence for a very long time (that is, the 'TV and papers are the only place to get legitimate news' mindset.)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I am a "baby boomer" (supposedly, and depending on when the end date actually is).
A lot of babyboomers (people older than me) have disconnected from the MSM (Newspapers, TV) completely. They aren't getting "news" at all, because they find it unreliable. The REAL people in love with MSM are the progressives who love pointing to the echo chamber of the MSM for all their own view points.
For instance, these people are the ones that cannot formulate a single coherent reason why Clinton should be president, excep
Re:Forest for the trees (Score:5, Interesting)
The REAL people in love with MSM are the progressives who love pointing to the echo chamber
This.
Last Sunday night at 9PM ET an outfit operating from a spare bedroom in Alabama streamed a Trump rally from NM to Facebook. No MSM filter. No MSM commentary condemning everything said as RaYSiSt!!1.
3.2 million views in less than 2 hours..... on a Sunday night. Several times more eyeballs than all of the cable news echo chamber combined during the same period.
ESPN SJW crap and malcontent NFL players are driving away viewers so fast that Major League Baseball is starting to win the ratings war for the first time in thirty years. The last reason many people had to pay for cable — pro football — is being ruined by the echo chamber and 621,000 subscriptions ended last month.
Re: (Score:2)
She could be involved in child sex slavery and they would still vote for her.
You're probably right about that. I recently came across a FB "share" originating from "Occupy Democrats". Can't remember it verbatim, but it was along the lines of "If Hillary were found trading blowjobs and state secrets for crack cocaine in the parking lot of a middle eastern 7-11, I'd still vote for her." Most of the comments were of the "LOL, true dat" variety.
Re: (Score:2)
In my experience it has always been difficult to get the full story from anyone, but the web does allow you to hear the story from the horse's mouth on all sides.
Re: (Score:1)
But I can't read Cyrillic.
Re: (Score:1)
Hillary has more in common with Russia than Trump does. But don't let the facts get in the way of a good troll right?
Re: (Score:2)
That's exactly why Putin wants Trump to be president.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo... [thehill.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Pathetic... Seriously... Are we supposed to believe, Trump will be better for Russia, than the alternative, who:
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And the emails on Huma Abedin's laptop could, might, what if contain some evidence of wrongdoing.
Also known as FUD.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny, how you choose to ignore, what I posted and attack instead, what I did not. Strawman much?
Common sense (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And you know this from pings "emanating" from a Russian bank?.. Right...
Uphold Journalistic Standards (Score:5, Funny)
(Thank goodness nobody can see my face as I typed that)
We wouldn't have these problems (Score:2, Insightful)
We wouldn't need to make a company do the people's bidding if people made use of the Internet instead of Zuckernet. Stop putting everything behind those walls.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
We wouldn't need to make a company do the people's bidding if people made use of the Internet instead of Zuckernet. Stop putting everything behind those walls.
Please address the Farcebook community properly as idiots.
We "people" don't consider the amplification of narcissism via social media as a viable or accurate channel for news.
Re:We wouldn't have these problems (Score:5, Insightful)
No, they don't (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
List of organizations (Score:2)
Power grabs! Power grabs everywhere! (Score:1)
"The growing importance of Facebook in your life means it plays a central role in the news, video and content you see." (aka they have too much power over what you see so we want some of it too)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"Issue"? (Score:2)
Facebook Needs To Protect Human Rights Issue, Civil Groups Say
That headline seems to have got a bit garbled. They're not being told to protect "a human rights issue", whatever that means, but just "human rights."
Why just Facebook? (Score:2)
Twitter [washingtonpost.com] and Youtube [newsbusters.org] are rather lousy in this regard too...
Follow the funding (Score:2)
Users think they are using a free, protected US platform.
Or will a clean up of any negative comments be policy to keep the easy funding flowing?