Just in Time for Daydream, YouTube Launches Its Standalone VR App (techcrunch.com) 18
An anonymous reader writes: Coinciding with the debut of Google's new Daydream View VR headset, YouTube this morning announced the launch of its YouTube VR app, which is available first on Daydream. The standalone application turns all of YouTube's content into an immersive experience, even if the videos weren't built for VR viewing. To do so, YouTube VR will display standard videos in a virtual movie screen in app's new theater mode. Of course, 360 degree videos on YouTube will work best in this app. In the theater mode, the video itself fills the main portion of the screen, while video information -- like the title and description -- is off on one side. The other side of the screen displays your queue so you can see what's coming up next. Player controls are down at the bottom. This way, you can watch and browse at the same time, says Google.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Priorities (Score:3)
As you know, there is only one programmer working at Google, and he can only work on one issue at a time. That's why the vr program's development delayed your big fix.
Re: (Score:2)
"Slip some goggles on him during his 1/2 hour of sleep per night. Nobody tell the fucking idiot it's not real, let's see how long we can make it last."
Too late, he has been in his own virtual reality for 70 years now.
The VR fad (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's the hipster thing to do at the moment. What they fail to understand, is that these headsets aren't like the old school HMDs. Computers now are really freakishly fast, environments are super realistic, FOV is wider than ever, and there is better, faster (not at all sickening), head tracking, to the degree that if you just have one eyeball, you can still get that intense, engrossing experience.
These people don't get that. They think of that Lawnmower Man movie, and all the VR hype of the 80s and early 90
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The most compelling argument you can make for VR is to put a helmet on someone's head and let them play around for a few minutes. So far, 100% of the people who've
Re: (Score:2)
Without VR you don't have anything that does all three of those. You would have to choose between a mobile device with a small screen for portablity, or a large tv/projector which you can't move to a different room easily.
That seems like a valid use case to me and not something that has to be a fad.
Wow, how innovative (Score:2)
In the theater mode, the video itself fills the main portion of the screen, while video information -- like the title and description -- is off on one side. The other side of the screen displays your queue so you can see what's coming up next. Player controls are down at the bottom. This way, you can watch and browse at the same time, says Google.
Uh, you mean just like looking at it in a browser? With "what's next" or suggestions on the right, title and comments below? That way, you can watch and browse at the same time!
Re: (Score:2)
Yes but this is on the Internet, in a browser, in 3D and in VR so it's probably eligible for fifteen different patents.
Re: (Score:2)
It's even more retarded than that: Youtube's browser view on a normal monitor is 50% whitespace, so apparently users want everything crammed together instead of having the interface utilize the available screen estate.