ISIS Is Dropping Bombs With Drones In Iraq (popsci.com) 199
In addition to rifles, mortars, artillery and suicidal car bombs, ISIS has recently added commercial drones, converted into tiny bombs, into the mix of weapons it uses to fight in Iraq. In October, The New York Times reported that the Islamic State was using small consumer drones rigged with explosives to fight Kurdish forces in Iraq. Two Kurdish soldiers died dismantling a booby-trapped ISIS drone. Several months later and it appears the use of drones on the battlefield is becoming more prevalent. Popular Science reports: Previously, we've seen ISIS scratch-build drones, and as Iraqi Security Forces retook parts of Mosul, they discovered a vast infrastructure of workshops (complete with quality control) for building standardized munitions, weapons, and explosives. These drone bombers recently captured by Iraqi forces and shared with American advisors appear to be commercial, off-the-shelf models, adapted to carry grenade-sized payloads. "It's not as if it is a large, armed UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] that is dropping munitions from the wings -- but literally, a very small quadcopter that drops a small munition in a somewhat imprecise manner," [Col. Brett] Sylvia, commander of an American military advising mission in Iraq, told Military Times. "They are very short-range, targeting those front-line troops from the Iraqis." Because the drones used are commercial models, it likely means that anti-drone weapons already on hand with the American advisors are sufficient to stop them. It's worth noting that the bomb-dropping drones are just a small part of how ISIS uses the cheap, unmanned flying machines. Other applications include scouts and explosive decoys, as well as one-use weapons. ISIS is also likely not the first group to figure out how to drop grenades from small drones; it's a growing field of research and development among many violent, nonstate actors and insurgent groups. Despite the relative novelty, it's also likely not the deadliest thing insurgents can do with drones.
In violation... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
And therein lies the answer. We choke ISIS out with an army of deadwood patent attorneys.
Re: (Score:2)
And therein lies the answer. We choke ISIS out with an army of deadwood patent attorneys.
I thought you were going to say "choke ISIS out with an army of returned Li ion explosive batteries"... wow. I guess I'm thinking of a way of disposing of dangerous waste products in a way that's inhuman and unacceptable to anyone but a group like ISIS... but hey... patent attorneys was a much more realistic ending to the sentence my brain's pre-read. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
The people commonly referred to as "terrorists" are better described as "psychotic serial murderers".
Unless fighting one of our enemies, in which case they are called "freedom fighters".
Re: (Score:2)
Also US may not be the bad guys, but having "bad guys" as enemies doesn't make you part of the good guys.
Explain bombing the shit out of violent dictator on country A while having good relations with neighbor violent dictator in country B (Gadafi vs al-Ásad)
Explain supporting de facto governments in LATAM.
Explain Cuba.
Remember to regster your drone! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Still, they have to register it in the US and if they don't, they must not fly it where US troops are fighting or pay a fine!
Re: (Score:2)
They do not need to make then, but they could. Plans are all over the internet.
That requires a supply chain and a manufacturing base. Eastern Syria has neither.
Re: (Score:3)
They do not need to make then, but they could. Plans are all over the internet.
That requires a supply chain and a manufacturing base. Eastern Syria has neither.
So you're telling me that a terrorist army that can smuggle firearms and even heavy arms across multiple national boards is suddenly going to have trouble bringing in a few cheap drone and component in?
Re: (Score:3)
And for those who can't afford to buy a kit, you can get free plans [aerofred.com] off the internet. I'm pretty sure you could build it out of toothpicks and tissue paper if you couldn't find balsa.
I think I saw DJI Phantom 4s for sale (Score:2)
on woot! for $800 last week. Sure I know it's a refurb, but how long does it have to work?
Trap and Skeet anyone? (Score:3)
Suddenly extremely applicable life skills outside of bird hunting.
matter of time (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
this was only a matter of time, with IMU's and position sensors so widespread and cheap today, all we can do is to try and restrict export to these countries, but sooner or later it will get out there too.
This is FUD.
I read that as the US buying every single part that might be made into a copter drone, or a Model airplane, then burning them or something. We are not the only country in the world, we might as well ban lead, iron, and brass - the basic materials of firearms and their ammunition.
We can hardly ban the export when it is other countries that have them to export. Unless we plan on Fighting the entire world, a remarkably bad idea since we are in the middle of the longest war in US history, af
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
all we can do is to try and restrict export to these countrie
We import these sensors - most are made in Asia.
Creative (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Otherwise they might use their talents to hurt someone.
Imprecisely dropping hand grenades seems like more of an act of desperation than strategy.
What next? Sticking M80's into Estes model rockets (like we did as kids)?
Re: (Score:2)
Only a fraction of US munitions... (Score:3, Insightful)
Our Nobel Peace Prize President dropped 26,000 bombs (real bombs, not little hand grenades) last year on various brown people (even though we are not at war).
This effort by ISIS is a pittance in comparison.
BTW, has anyone considered that it might be preferable to address their grievances rather than just bomb them?
Re:Only a fraction of US munitions... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
So, nothing to do with all of the US troops and bases occupying their territory?
Re: (Score:2)
The majority US troops pulled out in 2010 per Iraqi agreements. Then shia Iraqis started writing g religious laws that affected sunni Iraqis more than shia Iraqi. The sunnis tribal leaders got pissed and invited in India to assist in force the shias to back off. Instead ISIS took military control of sunni areas. If you look you can find sunni tribal leaders saying they could stop ISIS in the very early days. Those leaders were killed after that.
For the record Iran is primary shia, and suadi is sunni.
Re: (Score:2)
" invited in India to assist in force the shias to back off"
Did you mean someone else or did India really get involved?
Re: (Score:2)
The majority US troops pulled out in 2010 per Iraqi agreements.
These people are fighting a many thousands of years old war with each other. 2010? Might as well be the present. I personally believe that they should be allowed to kill each other off without our intervention. I think it is a genetic predisposition, a sort of ability to forever hold a grudge, coupled with humanitie's love for killing other humans. Let 'em have their fun - not our business unless they get ouside their borders.
Re: (Score:2)
Islam is only 1437. Like Christianity is 2016 years old
So a multi thousand year warranty is wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Technically, he never said it started with Islam.
And it definitely didn't. This is a mighty violent place, irrespective of which desert deity one prays too. Their god is a psychotic mental infant who loves to kill his creation. This is because man makes God in his own image.
Re: (Score:2)
Islam is only 1437. Like Christianity is 2016 years old
So a multi thousand year warranty is wrong.
You figure that they only warred with each other after Islam was created? Don't confuse current religions with the ongoing fighting in the middle east.
From the multiple Byzantine-Sassanid wars. The third Century AD was constant warfare in southern Arabia going back further to pre Christian times, we have the Kingdom of Hadhramaut conqured by the Himyarites (somewhere around 300 BCE Anyhow, I don't want to bore you to death with the names and places - I'd suggest looking up the history of the middle east
Re: (Score:2)
I think it is a genetic predisposition
It's the food. Have you ever had tabbouleh?
Re: (Score:2)
I think it is a genetic predisposition
It's the food. Have you ever had tabbouleh?
Good point!
Re:Only a fraction of US munitions... (Score:4, Informative)
So, nothing to do with all of the US troops and bases occupying their territory?
Boy, people have short memories. Iraq didn't renew a security agreement back in 2011 [wikipedia.org] for political reasons. The local population didn't want it. The US was mostly withdrawn from Iraq at the end of December 2011. It took about 6 months [wikipedia.org]before ISIS took advantage of the situation.
From 2nd link-
In July 2012, al-Baghdadi released an audio statement online announcing that the group was returning to former strongholds from which US troops and the Sons of Iraq had driven them in 2007 and 2008.[219] He declared the start of a new offensive in Iraq called Breaking the Walls, aimed at freeing members of the group held in Iraqi prisons.[219] Violence in Iraq had begun to escalate in June 2012, primarily with AQI's car bomb attacks, and by July 2013, monthly fatalities exceeded 1,000 for the first time since April 2008.[220]
I'm too lazy to look up when the US sent sizable forces back to Iraq, but it was only on request and permission of the Iraqi government.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just Iraq. The US has bases in most middle east countries.
It's our oil, after all and we need to protect it.
http://fpif.org/u-s-empire-bas... [fpif.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You do realise that 16% of 20 millions of barrels a day is still a fuckton? That is, in fact, as much as the total oil consumption of Germany. Moreover the oil market is a global market, meaning that if a source of oil disappears, oil prices rise everywhere, not just in the countries that were direct customers of that particular source.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm too lazy to look up when the US sent sizable forces back to Iraq, but it was only on request and permission of the Iraqi government.
So you figure tha twe have to be th epolice there in perpetuity? Because they aren't going to behave themselves unless a much superior force is there to enforce a martial law.
We could be there a hundred years, and as soon as we left, they'd be at it again. We'd just have delayed it by 100 years, and both sides would consider us their enemy. The only real hope - and it isn't much of one - is to let them kill each other off to the point of mutual exhaustion.
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, can we get rid of religious baggage at home first or are we going to do like we did with Germany where we swept the floor with those racist bastards without getting rid of the domestic ones?
Re: (Score:2)
In this case, their grievance is that we exist. ISIS wants a new caliphate to control the entire Middle East and they want to pursue holy war, you can't really negotiate around either of those even if they wanted to.
I think you misspelled "the world", basically their strategy is to generate so much resentment towards Muslims (you know, 1.6 billion people - bigger than declaring war on China) that they get two new recruits for every one that's killed. The only reason it's not working is that so far we haven't taken the bait. We grieve for the dead, increase the military effort but we don't lash out in revenge. I sorta expected some militant nutters to go postal in a mosque or to burn them to the ground but apart from a
Re: (Score:2)
Seems unfair to let the people who want nothing to do with such extremists suffer at the hands of them.
Sure is. Lot's of things are unfair. The people who want nothing to do with the extremists need to rise up against them. It'll be bloody for certain, but all a third intervening country will do is gain new enemies.
Re: Only a fraction of US munitions... (Score:5, Insightful)
Dude, we did fuck it up. Big time. A century ago I could have agreed with you, but we spent the last 100 years or so messing the place up in ways that even their religious bullshit couldn't. British mandate in Palestine rings a bell?
We started by arbitrarily drawing lines on a map without considering who is living there. We basically divided the Kurds up (who were, by the way, our allies in that war and we promised them if they bash the Turks we'd hand them their own country) between three successor states and didn't give a shit about where which tribes wanted to live together or couldn't stand each other. Then we fucked them over again with Israel. It's easy to hand over land that ain't yours, granted, but it's still bullshit. And when oil became interesting we pumped the juice out of their soil without even really asking whether that's ok.
Iran (back then Persia) until 1979, then the Iran-Iraq war 80-88, then the whole bullshit with Afghanistan 'til the 90s, then turning our back on them when we made peace with the Russians... Let's face it, folks, we have been bullshitting them for about a century now, I can understand that they're kinda pissed.
Re: (Score:2)
British mandate in Palestine rings a bell?
It does, only the British backed off from the plan after T.E. Lawrence told them it would be a bad idea, and we're the ones who implemented it. That makes it seem a bit disingenuous to call it a British mandate.
Re: (Score:2)
We started by arbitrarily drawing lines on a map without considering who is living there.
The lines weren't arbitrary. They were specifically drawn to enclose multiple smaller distributions of each faction so as to implement (the wildly successful, to this day) "divide and rule" strategy among all of the resulting states. That's a classic British technique, along with plantation.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Our Nobel Peace Prize President dropped 26,000 bombs (real bombs, not little hand grenades)
Probably a lot more than that. You're not understanding the usefulness of air strikes on this sort of combatant.
on various brown people
Right, right. It's because of their skin pigment! For reference, resorting to lazy race baiting doesn't really win arguments (see the most recent election results as an example)
(even though we are not at war).
Yes, I can see you're having some trouble grasping current events. Please don't do anything dangerous to other people in the future. Like, voting.
Re: (Score:2)
http://fpif.org/u-s-empire-bas... [fpif.org]
"Thirty-six years into the U.S. base build-up in the Greater Middle East, military force has failed as a strategy for controlling the region, no less defeating terrorist organizations."
Re: (Score:2)
Number of people killed by Rumsfeld+Cheney's war in iraq over a 110000 [wikipedia.org]. A difference of 2 orders of magnitude.
Re: (Score:3)
"Our Nobel Peace Prize President dropped 26,000 bombs (real bombs, not little hand grenades) last year on various brown people (even though we are not at war)."
Why make it about skin colour? Your president was the same colour but he very clearly didn't bomb himself, so that was obviously not a factor in determining targets so why bring it up?
"BTW, has anyone considered that it might be preferable to address their grievances rather than just bomb them?"
Whilst I'd always agree for rational actors such as the
Re: (Score:3)
BTW, has anyone considered that it might be preferable to address their grievances rather than just bomb them?
The grievances of psychopaths that kill small children, rape and torture girls, burn alive people only because they are of the wrong religion or the wrong shade of Islam? Fuck them and fuck you. Nobody is interested in their grievances except Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
Re: (Score:2)
Stop belittling them! If they had the biggest war industry on the planet, I'm sure they would easily drop as many bombs, but they're doing as much as they can with the little they have!
Re: (Score:2)
This effort by ISIS is a pittance in comparison.
BTW, has anyone considered that it might be preferable to address their grievances rather than just bomb them?
I think people like daesh have put themselves into a position where they no longer are relevant to that discussion. I mean - do they think they address the abuses of the West and their many inequalities and wrongdoing by blowing up defenceless people in Syria and Iraq? Or by claiming responsibility for whichever sickening atrocity against women and children is carried out by deranged killers? Whatever anybody is going to do to address the grievances of the oppressed people of the world, it is clear that dae
reforming ISIS (Score:2, Insightful)
Good point. This is precisely the point about the Sharansky Doctrine that everybody missed. President Bush and others around him naively believed that if they unleased democracy in the Middle East, everything would be hunky dory. The factor they missed out completely: Islam. Which is NOT a democratic or pluralistic religion, and which specifically is opposed to democracy in the Quran itself (18:26).
Becoming democratic worked in Latin America and helped those countries like Chile and Argentina become c
Re:reforming ISIS (Score:5, Insightful)
By an accident of birth, I'm British. I guess you are American? What about all the non-Muslims who, by an accident of birth, live in the area you've left as a free-for-all? I'd be OK if they were free to leave the area, but (a) they can't leave, and (b) they have nowhere welcoming to go to. As citizens of the world, should we not try to ensure all people who want to live free can, and then leave those who choose to fight this war to get on with it as you describe?
Mind you, between Brexit and Trump, we seem to be trying to level the playing field so that accidents of birth are less telling ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, that's the only people in the region that I'm sympathetic to, and who I'd let emigrate to the West - or anywhere else they like. The non-Muslims. Except that most Jihadist organizations in the region, like ISIS, are open to infiltrating them and trying to get them across, although it's easier to vet those. One way would be to give the Kurds an independent Kurdistan carved out of all the 4 countries they live in - Syria, Iraq, Iran and yeah, even Turkey, on the condition that they take in all n
Re:reforming ISIS (Score:5, Insightful)
President Bush and others around him naively believed that if they unleased democracy in the Middle East, everything would be hunky dory.
Iran was becoming more secular and democratic until we stepped in to manipulate oil prices. Un-leasing democracy, indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
Iraq was no more democratic than North Korea before the war. Unless you consider the elections that gave Saddam 96% of the vote as democratic.
As far as secular, there is an important thing to know about the Baathists in both Iraq and Syria. Essentially, they constitute minority Muslim sects - be it the Sunnis in Iraq or the Alawites in Syria, in coalition w/ other groups, including Christians and Druze, which give them the appearance of being secular. Saddam was by no means secular in an absolute sen
Re: (Score:2)
If it's any consolation I enjoyed reading your post
It's more efficient to congratulate your other personalities internally, son.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Learning (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Killing people with remote control aircraft, I wonder where they got that idea. They're getting almost as good at killing people as Americans.
Well now - did you see that mighty "drone" they make? A freaking cheap RC model airplane. Hard to imagine a simple mortar not being a lot more effective. A lot more firepower, longer range, more reliable. This is silly season FUD, designed to make it look like ISIS has learned something from the US.
Re: (Score:2)
Well now - did you see that mighty "drone" they make? A freaking cheap RC model airplane. Hard to imagine a simple mortar not being a lot more effective.
Can you steer a mortar shell as it falls? Perhaps you lack imagination.
Re: (Score:2)
Well now - did you see that mighty "drone" they make? A freaking cheap RC model airplane. Hard to imagine a simple mortar not being a lot more effective.
Can you steer a mortar shell as it falls? Perhaps you lack imagination.
Perhaps I do lack imagination. What my idea of how one preosecutes this sort of thing do is send a lot of mortar bombs to to visit your friends. I mean, I looked at the "drones", and it was a really cheap radio controlled airplane, another is a commercial quadcopter. And dropping the equivalent of a hand grenade. Like World War One biplanes tossing bomblets over the side by hand.
As Americans with nubile teenage daughters who sunbathe in the back yard, and are bothered by drones can tell us, taking out a
Re: (Score:2)
I looked at the "drones", and it was a really cheap radio controlled airplane, another is a commercial quadcopter.
Yes, if you give them autonomy then poof! They're drones. That's how it works! I have a really cheap radio airplane-cum-drone right here, it's based on an old school Apprentice, before they included a RX with an integrated flight controller. So I integrated a mini Arduino Mega 2560, and a 9DOF board (I forget which one), and a BMP280 which at the time had the sweet spot for price/performance, now I would use a MS6511 or whatever it is.
And dropping the equivalent of a hand grenade. Like World War One biplanes tossing bomblets over the side by hand.
No! It's the opposite of that! You need to be either within sight or spen
Re: Learning (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good point - Americans still kill far more people than terrorists.
And? Killing other humans is a core competency of humans, and one which humans enjoy greatly, and have enjoyed the practice pretty much since we've been humans. And your acting as if teh evilz 'murrdericans are somehow the only people on earth that kill other humans is just indicitive of some jealousy or need for you to allowyourself a little bit of that other core competency of humans, hatred.
So when Americans and only Americans and no other humans go around and kill each other in an organized fashion,
Asymmetric Warfare (Score:2)
This is a great case study.
stop calling R/C model a DRONE (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
test run (Score:2)
Which manufacturing capacity does ISIS have left? Which engineers have not yet run away from the sinking ship?
Someone is using ISIS as a test run for their latest toy, and it's not the Russians (they would test by themselves). Expect the US or some of its allies to use weaponized small drones in the next war against the next terrorists, the result of "years of military research".
Re: (Score:3)
Or you could address the problem....
WTF am I saying? Why address issues when you can nuke them! (sigh..)
Are you suggesting we address ISIL's problem with the Iraqi Security Forces? If I'm not mistaken ISIL has a problem with non-sharia governments and wants to carve out part of the land in Iraq (and Syria) to establish a Caliphate. How would you propose we address ISIL's problem?
Not that nuking them would solve any problem, but some problems aren't for us to solve...
Re: (Score:3)
ISIS is not a centralized enemy as we once had way back in WW II. They're a bunch of little "cells" that are doing their own thing. It would be impossible to "nuke them" as "they" aren't in any one place or country.
Even the nutty Muslims have no centralized governing body. They're interpreting their religion on the fly with likely thousands of nutjobs coming up with their own interpretation of what is "right" and "wrong" so it's impossible to put pressure on any leadership because there is none.
Since WW
Re:Won't be long now (Score:4, Insightful)
Do you honestly think it will work?
After all, they are hardly going to obey a tweet saying "Could all ISIS members stand at these coordinates please - Signed Donald". I mean, you may get some but mostly you are just going to piss them off even more.
I have no idea why the US is so reluctant to deal with the actual issues but I am fairly sure dropping nukes isn't going to help.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I have no idea why the US is so reluctant to deal with the actual issues
Because there is money being made. It's as simple as that.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't know why not. Nukes worked perfectly well last time we used them. How many Japanese terrorists are there now, especially outside of Japan?
More than there were in 1945.
Known Japanese groups designated as terrorist organizations include Aum Shinrikyo [wikipedia.org] and Nihon Sekigun.
Re: (Score:2)
How many do you think you'd have if you bombed the Tenno?
The solution is much easier. Take a look at this map [wikimedia.org], you might even see it yourself.
We'd first have to change a lot in our foreign politics, though. That's the part that isn't easy.
Re:Won't be long now (Score:5, Insightful)
So, what's your proposal to drag Islam from the Middle Ages all the way to the 21st century?
Easy, here it is:
1. stop bombing the living shit out of them
2. stop invading random countries to pump their oil
3. stop assassinating local leaders we don't like
4. don't install puppet governments in place of assassinated leaders we didn't like.
Path to stability needs to be.... stable. I mean if you are out to bomb them then also please occupy, name them your colony and be responsible for what happens over the next few decades, rather than retreating and letting local warlords slug it off for dominance circa 1269.
Re: (Score:2)
But that's how the game is played now.
Colonies cost money. You have to run them, police them, defend them, and all for what? Ungrateful peasants that only want to revolt. It's far more profitable to let them run their own country (under your supervision and tutelage, of course), have them pay for all those expenses and pay for those expenses with their raw materials, sold at a price that you dictate.
Why do you think colonies have fallen out of use? Because we're above that now and we're so much better and m
Re: (Score:2)
This is actually a good tact, but it involves teaching them that Islam is little more than the self-aggrandizement of its founder Mohammed
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right. They lover THEIR freedom to impose their ridiculous beliefs on rest of us, charge a tax for non believers, or just kill us if we don't convert (depends on circumstances).
If you can be killed by what someone is thinking on the other side of the world or their thoughts somehow impose themselves on your thoughts so that you are unable to sustain your pre-existing beliefs, then I'm - no, wait. No. No, No, I have no words for how stupid that sounds. Let me get back to you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They buy them from Amazon.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They'll keep them. If you don't like that, you can come and try to repo them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone predicted this.
It was predicted 25 years ago. If a prediction takes that long to be realized, it shouldn't count. Terror-by-drone is such an obvious idea, that I am amazed that it took them this long. I think this is proof that terrorists are a lot dumber and incompetent than we often assume.
I am also amazed that they still self-destruct in suicide car bombs. Haven't they ever seen The Dead Pool [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
We need to counter with a landshark.
Re: (Score:2)
We need to counter with a landshark.
Telegram for Mr Abdulla!
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone, with very moderate skills can build an aircraft to fly anywhere within a few dozen kilometers and 'land' within a 2m radius.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well calling I.S.I.S. Islamic State is not ideal either. There are several other islamic states around the world. "Daesh" might be a useful name to use, while the BBC's choice of "so-called islamic state" is a bit of a mouthful.
Re: (Score:2)
Is "the nutjobs" taken already?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Do the suicide drones get 72 virgins in Paradis (Score:5, Funny)
Technically yes, they get 72 drone operators.
Re: (Score:2)