US ISP Goes Down As Two Malware Families Go To War Over Its Modems (bleepingcomputer.com) 93
An anonymous reader writes from a report via Bleeping Computer: Two malware families battling for turf are most likely the cause of an outage suffered by Californian ISP Sierra Tel at the beginning of the month, on April 10. The attack, which the company claimed was a "malicious hacking event," was the work of BrickerBot, an IoT malware family that bricks unsecured IoT and networking devices. "BrickerBot was active on the Sierra Tel network at the time their customers reported issues," Janit0r told Bleeping Computer in an email, "but their modems had also just been mass-infected with malware, so it's possible some of the network problems were caused by this concomitant activity." The crook, going by Janit0r, tried to pin some of the blame on Mirai, but all the clues point to BrickerBot, as Sierra Tel had to replace bricked modems altogether, or ask customers to bring in their modems at their offices to have them reset and reinstalled. Mirai brought down over 900,000 Deutsche Telekom modems last year, but that outage was fixed within hours with a firmware update. All the Sierra Tel modems bricked in this incident were Zyxel HN-51 models, and it took Sierra Tel almost two weeks to fix all bricked devices.
No te metas en mi territorio (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your argument is that paying customers were given a choice in the matter and so should vote with their feet. Normally I would agree with that assertion except that most ISPs don't offer a choice of modem to customers or even alert them that they have a choice. Often they'll grumble about incompatibility issues if a new customer says, "I already have a modem."
Modems are just another way for ISPs to milk money out of their customers. e.g.: ISPs bulk buy these modems from whomever they can source them for $10
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
it steals the owner's ability to use the device. i don't need to move your car to prevent you using it.
Not a bad thing when you in a neighborhood full of criminals who'll steal that car and use it for crime a couple of days after you bought it.
Re: (Score:1)
No link to relevant article about sierratel (Score:3)
but there is alink about previous incident in Deutsche Telekom?
What gives?
the level of the editors keeps getting lower or what?
Beadhull, get away from that Keyboard, you need a few cups of coffee! Now!
Re: (Score:2)
Yet another case for VPN tunnels (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
A VPN would not have saved anyone in this case. The Brickerbot went after the physical DSL/Cable modem/gateways.
If you've ever used one of these ISP issued things, there is typically a default username, and the password is derived from the device MAC address. It's also not a new thing, as you could also have your modem hacked just by visiting a rogue website that connects to 192.160.0.1 over websockets.
Re: (Score:1)
A VPN would not have saved anyone in this case. The Brickerbot went after the physical DSL/Cable modem/gateways.
If you've ever used one of these ISP issued things, there is typically a default username, and the password is derived from the device MAC address. It's also not a new thing, as you could also have your modem hacked just by visiting a rogue website that connects to 192.160.0.1 over websockets.
Yes, but only if you're dumb enough to run every random script from every unverifiable web site. Seriously, this is a solved problem. A good adblocker (which often include options for filtering malicious sites) and/or NoScript can easily prevent this.
Have you modified your toaster yet? (Score:4, Insightful)
1) I was unaware that website currently require that you manually execute each script
2) Show me a commercial OS with a supplied browser that includes a good adblocker and a NoScript installed and properly configured by default.
Computers are basically appliances for 80% of the users on the internet now. I can mod my toaster and replace the plug with a grounded type, and only plug it into a GFCI outlet to reduce the risk of shock, but everybody else just plugs theirs in and makes toast. Until OS makers start putting actual, safe browsers on their products, instead of the two-bare-wires versions they currently include, the problem isn't actually with the users. It's with the negligent programmers.
Re: (Score:3)
The ISP manages their own devices from the WAN side, how else could they do it?
Another poster mentioned SNMP; I did not know that, I thought it was some non TCP/IP protocol unique to cable modems. But either way they bear at least some responsibility for deploying these things in a way that allows these attacks to succeed so widely.
Re: Yet another case for VPN tunnels (Score:1)
Most ISPs I know of have two VLANs where one of them is only accessible by the ISP itself. (The router/modem has 2 IPs...)
Re: Yet another case for VPN tunnels (Score:1)
How we do management is that we have more than 1pvc. A primary pvc os set up for subscriber internet but the second faces a locked down management network . The modem has acl in place to prevent access on the primary internet facing pvc and another to permit access from the management side.
Re: (Score:2)
While true, that's insufficient and impractical (Score:3)
True, it would be much more secure (in one way) if administration was only possible from the local, lan-side port. However, that's neither practical nor sufficient.
First, some people can't effectively and reliably admin their own modem. They need the cable ISP to manage it. The ISP is on the external side. So the ISP needs access from the outside. That *should* be secured reasonably well, though.
Second, iframe src=http://192.168.1.1/admin/changepasswd.php?newpass=yourfucked
Putting that into any web page wil
Linux Fails It (Score:1)
This is why I only use Windows IOT Core based devices.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, a Windows device would never just reboot to apply a new windows-upda"/(*)/)"(/ç"ç
NO CARRIER
Re: (Score:2)
Bricked or not? (Score:5, Insightful)
All the Sierra Tel modems bricked in this incident were Zyxel HN-51 models, and it took Sierra Tel almost two weeks to fix all bricked devices.
If the bricked devices were fixed, then they really were not bricked.
free repetition of doubtful words (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Bricked means the device is unsalvagable (by the end user.) You can typically salvage such devices by returning them to the manufacturer and having them JTAG the device to replace the firmware. Most cable/DSL modems can be updated via TFTP, but only if the device hasn't been wrecked beyond recovery.
For example, any wireless router/modem can be destroyed permanently by setting the radios to maximum power and then connecting to each other so that they generate excessive amounts of EM radiation and eventually
Re: (Score:2)
* E.g. us
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you can ever permanently "brick" something. In this case they probably reflashed the firmware through the JTAG port or something similar. Bricked to the consumer but not the supplier.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think you can ever permanently "brick" something. In this case they probably reflashed the firmware through the JTAG port or something similar. Bricked to the consumer but not the supplier.
You can permanently brick a device, even without hardware damage. Phones, for example, should have JTAG completely disabled for security (though many OEMs fail to do this), and depending on various bits of low-level config devices can get into a completely unflashable state. If the onboard firmware that accepts flashed images does something like sign the images with a key embedded in the SoC, and the ROM refuses to run unsigned firmware, and you can't flash normally any more, then even removing the flash me
Re: (Score:1)
Bricked: "You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means"
Since when are modems IoT devices? (Score:1)
Modems are not "Things." They are necessary infrastructure.
Re: (Score:1)
Walks like a duck, talks like a duck. Modems were the first "things" of the internet.
Re: (Score:2)
Companies deploy hardware without any upgrade plan (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At work we have a att ADSL2+ modem with the software modified to disable the disconnection redirect and disable updates.
They really really want their modem to brag every time it loses connection which would be ok but they don't have no cache set so once the connection resets you have to close out of whatever your doing to get it to stop redirecting to the modem status page.
They issued a firmware update to the modem so you couldn't modify it but didn't add the no-cache option required to fix the problem that
Liability (Score:5, Interesting)
There are many things that are considered bad practice (or outright stupidity) that make it into the consumer market, these should be punished.
The lack of timely firmware updates (or even any updates), should be punished.
Hardcoded accounts/passwords should be punished
Telnet/SSH access from the DSL side on by default should be punished
Wireless not requiring a password (a complex one !) before the wireless can be enabled should be punished
If manufacturers had to shell out $1000 per item for this sort of behaviour a lot would go to the wall, the others would clean up their act quickly.
And NO, manufacturers can not opt-out/contract out of this (if they try, make it $5000 an item).
Sure, no software is perfect, but thats not the problem, its that so much junk is put out there with no attempt to make it secure. The average home user can not be expected to do this themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is why I prefer to contribute money v
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except any website that relies on the ad revenue to operate.
Re: (Score:2)
What would actually happen is websites would demand indemnity from the ad networks. Any ad network that wanted to actually push ads to anyone would be forced to accept that term. Then, with the financial burden being on them, they might actually screen the ads they serve.
Re: (Score:2)
My New Zealand ISP has no problems with people upgrading the firmware, especially those that know enough to do it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By the time the unit is in the consumers hands its already too late, the effort needs to be made right at the concept stage right through to manufacturing.
Most ISPs regard the modem as throw away items, its cheaper for them to supply something new than to support something old. The manufacturers work on the basis that they want to sell something new and not support something old.
Neither the manufac
Re: (Score:1)
*applause*
I want to go a step further: fuck firmware. Make the god damn controllers work properly in the first place. Test every way imaginable even if it adds months before the manufacturing process. If you fuck up, send your customers replacement ROMs. If they don't know how to desolder the old one and install the new one properly, fuck them, too because they're worthless pieces of shit. Take consumer high tech out of the fucking dark ages.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Won't happen in any broad sense. Imagine this scenario, which would quickly go into effect if any statutes were passed or frequent civil liability suits gave judgments against them:
Shell company sells a new modem, licensing the name of some well-known company (e.g. Belkin). They produce the modem for 2 years, releasing periodic updates for the firmware. Upon product discontinuation, the shell company folds, and the liability now rests on a nonexistent company. Every product has its own associated shell comp
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I wouldn't care if they were. I was highly entertained and informed by this story. I might break karma just to mod down your lousy comment as flamebait.
Re: (Score:2)
"At the beginning of the month... (Score:1)
... on April 10."
Come for the nerd-news; stay hard for the WTFs.
Good... (Score:1)
Maybe all these folks that have been affected will start demanding more from manufacturers in regards to making sure these devices are secure and that security updates are provided on a regular and timely basis.
King Graham has fallen so far! =( (Score:4, Informative)
For those not in the know, this company is the heir to Sierra On-Line/Sierra Entertainment/Yosemite Entertainment in Oakhurst, CA. They created King's Quest, Space Quest, Police Quest, Leisure Suit Larry, et al. After the studio joined Codemasters they remained in Oakhurst until at some point it became an ISP. I'm not sure if any of the original folk are still there.
Relevant Wikipedia Entry [wikipedia.org]
(The Sierra name lives on as a trademark of Activision, but in name only. The hallowed halls of that great studio are now an ISP.)
Re: (Score:3)
To clarify, at one point Sierra tried to create their own online gaming network. This was *NOT* an internet-based network, but something you could connect to directly via dialup with a POTS modem. This later on became the ImagiNation network, which was purchased by AT&T.
https://blog.codinghorror.com/... [codinghorror.com]
As I understand it, the facilities originally created for this (since upgraded to support DSL service) were repurposed by the people involved into an ISP. All of this is based in the old Sierra headquarte
Comment on Bleeping... (Score:2)
woody188:
Wish Janit0r would change phase two so that it instead redirects all outbound requests to a page explaining what is wrong with the device and to contact their ISP. At least for modems/routers this would be much more preferable to just bricking a device and would empower the person to get help and maybe even salvage their device should an update be available. Vigilantes don't hurt the innocent! You listening Janit0r?
Nice idea. Ideally someone else should host that site.
You left your car unlocked... (Score:1)
You left your car unlocked, so I've removed the engine to prevent anyone from stealing it!
concomitant (Score:2)
Brilliant (Score:2)
I just adore BrickerBot more and more each story I read about it. This is the best solution, and sadly the financial impact is the only way to make these companies take security seriously.
Embarrasing for Sierra Tel (Score:2)
So this ISP was handing out shoddy insecure modems by the truckload, leaving all their customers susceptible to attack.
It's bad enough that this kinds of crappy device exist on the market in the first place, but for an ISP to peddle the things... that's inexcusable. IMO the ISP needed this firm punch in the nose.