Windows 10 Now On 500 Million Devices, Up By 200 Million in a Year (arstechnica.co.uk) 123
At Build developer conference in Seattle today, Microsoft announced that Windows 10 is now running on 500 million monthly active devices. From a report: Little over a year ago, the company said that the operating system had reached 300 million systems. As the operating system nears the end of its second full year on the market, it's clear that it's going to fall a long way short of the company's original estimates. At launch, the ambition was to reach 1 billion devices over the first two to three years of availability, but this estimate assumed that Windows 10 Mobile would be a going concern, selling something of the order of 50 million or more devices a year.
Forced upgrades. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Uh...I can sell you that upgrade for a lot less. In fact, I'll GIVE it to you for nothing. See: https://www.linux.org/ [linux.org]
When a company repeatedly screws you over and over, it's downright foolish to continue using them. Try to learn from the past!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Only if you point me to the Linux version of all my favorite games.
Oh, you can't? Then you're not offering a solution, you're just a fanboy praising for his team.
Re: (Score:2)
Run Linux on a CPU that has a built-in GPU (most Intel CPUs, any AMD "APU").
Also get a real GPU.
Run Windows in a VM, and pass the real GPU directly to the VM.
Re: (Score:2)
Run Windows in a VM, and pass the real GPU directly to the VM.
and then we're right back where we started
Re: (Score:2)
No, you get a lot more control, and you only run Windows when needed.
You can easily firewall off all of the bullshit "telemetry" from the Windows VM, block the forced updates, etc. while still having it function normally online for games and other shit. With an actual Windows 10 install, you need an external firewall to do this. The host OS handles it in this case. (Though you could still use an external firewall if you're already doing that, or you have multiple Windows 10 shits you need to block, etc.)
Re: (Score:1)
Its called "putting Windows into a straightjacket"... Ghod KNOWS thats where it (and the maroons in Redmond who wrote it) belongs....
Re:Forced upgrades. (Score:4, Interesting)
The point is to have games and whatever other Windows-only critical applications you need when you need them, but to get away from Windows and it's "telemetry" whenever you can. With Windows in a VM, you can block the forced updates and spying. Windows as a host OS will subvert your attempts to block these things, and you'd have to run an external firewall. By running Windows in a VM, the external firewall is simply on the host OS.
Re: (Score:2)
As far as I know, at least with AMD cards, there's no more chore.
You run your monitor off of the built-in GPU, and your dedicated GPU is given wholesale to the VM. Then you just run the VM fullscreen when you want to play a game. The game gets full access to the GPU, and your VM player pipes it all back out to the built-in GPU. I don't know if any noticeable latency is introduced, but I do know performance in game is supposed to be as good as native now.
Running network for a Windows box through an extern
Re: (Score:2)
wine has a rather large list of retail games with a platinum rating....
Re: (Score:2)
wine has a rather large list of retail games with a platinum rating....
I've lost track of the number of times a game has performed well below its wine rating. Enough times to where I stopped trying, and just accepted that I would have a Windows PC. But it's running Windows 7, and I'm not planning to upgrade, so I'm also not planning to buy any games which won't run on Windows 7... or Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't had a linux desktop as my default for probably 15 years so I couldn't tell you how well wine works now... but I used it for a lot of games back then.
Re: (Score:1)
"The contract states that the show will cost $500 with rehearsal."
"How much without the rehearsal?"
"You can't afford it."
Re: (Score:2)
I'd pay $50 for a final "never try upgrading this PC to Anniversary Edition" fix. The forced upgrades when they fail again and again and again and again and again is a huge pain.
I got that for free last July when the free "upgrade" program ended. Sounds like Win10 got a -$50 value right there. Sadly despite the occasional good news on Linux games, it looks like Linux gaming is going nowhere with 0.76% market share on latest Steam survey. Some games are now starting to come out as DX12 exclusives while the list of Vulkan games remain very, very short and usually in beta as an alternative rendering path.
Re:Forced upgrades. (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, I use my computer mostly for working purposes, I run Linux, I'm no fan of MS, and I'm not a video/computer gamer, but I have to say you're making an unfair judgment.
There are people who enjoy computer games. There is nothing wrong with that. No doubt you, Mr. AC, enjoy some forms of recreation. What would make your choice better than someone else's?
If a person enjoys a video game, more power to them. If that person needs to run Windows to enjoy a particular game of choice, that's a valid decision. Yes, it comes with some downsides, but it's nonetheless valid and who are we to say it's not?
I don't and won't run Windows, but if someone else chooses to run an OS different from mine, or chooses a recreation different from mine, that's their business and their right.
Re: Forced upgrades. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, so that is only 499,999,999 devices too many.
Windows 10 is the worst OS MS every released. I'm so happy that I no longer have to use it at all.
Re: (Score:1)
It's pretty easy to hit that milestone when you force people to upgrade without their consent. Don't get me wrong - I have Windows 10 on both my desktop (dual boot) and personal laptop; I have it on one of my work laptops (the other is Windows 7/Linux dual boot). I'm probably one of the few people who like it, but I don't pretend like what MS didn't wasn't disgraceful.
It is funny how Microsoft announces the Windows 10 adoption when other sites [netmarketshare.com] state that Windows 10 is still around 26% with Windows 7 (48.5%) and other versions of Windows including "XP", 8.0 and 8.1 taking 15.58%. It appears Microsoft only give out figures if it suits them.
The information I have given was in April 2017.
BTW. All my computing devices have a Linux kernel. I don't run Microsoft anything although to be fair I have Windows 10 in a virtual machine and all up I have run that operating system
Re: (Score:2)
Re: How many new PCs? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I realize I'm in the minority here, but I actually like using Windows 10 .
Well.. sure, Windows 10 arguably *looks* pretty spiffy and may actually *work* fairly well on appropriate hardware, but if you either don't realize (or don't care) about what a nightmare 10 is, prvacy-wise with its "telemetry", you are what I'd call a "sheep"... Those of us who know (and care) about this blatant in-your-face privacy violation by MS, don't use Windows.. In other words, the ONLY way to win with MS products, is to NOT PLAY.....
Statistics on VOLUNTARY installations? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you count all those computers that came with it pre-installed? After all, it was installed by the OEM...
Re: (Score:2)
And does it count all the ones where users never actually ran Windows 10 and just installed a different OS?
My current laptop came with Windows 10 installed, and a Windows 7 DVD if you wanted to upgrade... but I just pulled the hard drive out and plugged in an SSD with Linux installed on it.
All that said, we finally replaced our old XP iTunes machine with a Windows 10 machine at the weekend, and it didn't suck as bad as Windows 8. So there does seem to be some progress in Redmond.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you count all those computers that came with it pre-installed? After all, it was installed by the OEM...
An offer they can't refuse, so yes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who cares? Voluntary or not doesn't come into it if they actively have a Windows 10 machine and have chosen not to throw it into the bottom of the ocean.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And it's still irrelevant. Using Windows 10 out of ignorance is still using Windows 10. Advertisers and investors don't care why you're using it.
Personally I like it, but I also understand many people don't and that it's rollout could only be desribed a "dick move" but that doesn't change the numbers that MS reports to the people who give them money. ... Sadly .
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you one of those people who aren't bothered by how much you're being surveilled in public places
You're reading things that I didn't say and didn't imply. This is a story about MS talking about how awesome they are. This is a thread about the relevance of MS's forcing actions. My entire point is and was that whether or not the user chose to install something or not is irrelevant to MS advertising it's figures.
I've said nothing about privacy. I've said nothing about the impact to end users. I've said nothing about how I feel about the situation at all and only explained from a neutral point that the sta
Re: (Score:2)
As to your last poke at me: Shove it up y
Re: (Score:2)
Disingenuous to who? Not to investors, not to partners, not to developers, and not to shareholders. These 4 groups are the only reason you would make a statement on your install base. They don't care if customers love your stuff, or customers use it because there's a gun to their head. They don't care if it's legitimate, they only care if its correct.
As to your last poke at me
I merely poked back. Doesn't feel good does it.
Yay! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Most impressive (Score:1)
and a testament to the effectiveness of the automatic / forced update system.
Re: (Score:2)
Forced? Microsoft decided to not allow most customers to upgrade to 10.
Users of retail/OEM copies of windows 7 were pushed strongly upgrading to windows 10. There were certainly at least accusations of outright forced upgrades though I don't know how credible those were.
Users of 7 enterprise OTOH were not given the free upgrade. If they wanted to upgrade they had to do it through their volume license agreement and media (and depending on their status in said volume license agreement posiblly pay MS money).
I'm not sure what happened regarding users of 7 pro whose systems were a
Re: (Score:2)
Newegg has several ThinkPad laptops for less than $2k with 64 GB of memory.
Interesting,
Sager has offered them for many years albeit at a much higher price.
Afaict the first Intel laptop/mainstream desktop platform to support 64GB was Skylake released in September 2015. Afaict the first Intel high-end desktop platform to support was sandy-bridge-e with the x79 chipset released in November 2011.
It seems my previous post was off a little, On the one hand I found an reference to an x79 laptop only a few months after x79 was released but OTOH looking closer at the x79 laptops I found they seem to be listing a max memory of 32GB. I guess the manufacturer
Depressing... (Score:2)
I just can't believe Windows is still a thing in 2017. At least Linux still has them beat, thanks to Android!
Re: Depressing... (Score:1)
Re: Depressing... (Score:1)
Wow...
Android is not GNU. There is no GNU/Linux involved. They were quite clearly referencing Android.
Go away.
Oh fuck off (Score:4, Informative)
It is now virtually impossible to get anything *other* than Windows 10 on computers. Newer machines with Kaby Lake or Ryzen processors effectively *force* you to get Windows 10. Microsoft is figuratively holding a gun to people's heads and saying, "You use Windows 10, or nothing at all."
In other news, taco sales are through the roof! The fact that it's now mandatory for people to eat Tacos for dinner every day has *nothing* to do with it.
Assholes.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess that depends on your definition of computers. I haven't used a laptop or desktop or mobile device running Windows since around the turn of the century.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm ignoring Macs, Linux and Android for simplicity.
Like it or not, Windows is still the 100lbs gorilla in the computer world.
Re: (Score:2)
"Windows is still the 100lbs gorilla in the computer world."
Windows is a tiny niche product in the computer world.
Most phones and tablets run BSD or Linux. Most servers run Linux. Only the legacy desktop market is still a big win for Microsoft.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait... what? There are far more computers running a variant of Unix (Linux, Android, iOS, MacOs, and all the other Unix distros) than running Windows. Just the install base for Android outstrips Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
That is true, but the key factor is, "What's it used for?"
The overwhelming majority of those unix variant system are used for playing Candy Crush Saga and Flappy Bird, or browsing Facebook. They are primarily consumption devices. While there have some inroads towards empowering those devices to do more (eg: Office 365, google apps, etc), they are still overwhelmingly used for consumption.
I'm willing to bet that there are more computerized temperature control systems are at least equal to the number of des
It's being forced, basically (Score:2)
In all but an official announcement, Microsoft is telgraphing that Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 are completely dead. They want nothing to do with supporting downlevel operating systems at this point (because Windows as a Service) and anyone who wants to remain on Windows 7 is just not going to be tolerated for much longer. I'm getting the impression that the farthest back Microsoft is going to go in terms of support is the last LTSB release, and even then grudgingly so.
Holdouts on the business side of things don't
I guess the stats for stupidity are in: (Score:3)
Devices you say ? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Given we run 30 windows Vm's on a 3 node KVM cluster (Proxmox) I'd say someone had no idea how to configure windows for virtualisation. It runs just fine, windows 7, 2008/R2 and 10, desktop and servers.
Xeon E5-2620, 64GB RAM
Comment (Score:5, Funny)
Cheap grab for attention/points/karma/laughs:
Hello, Windows developer. Please select one of the following options for the new Windows "Free" Initiative:
( . ) Free as in freedom
( . ) Free as in beer
( X ) Free as in herpes
^ Thank you for your selection. Have a nice day!
Re:Comment (Score:4, Insightful)
( . ) Free as in freedom
( . ) Free as in beer
( X ) Free as in herpes
(x) Free as in convicted sex offender on parole
Re: (Score:2)
You know what we mean: sex offender like a 50 year old football coach groping pre-teen boys in the shower [wikipedia.org] or a 70 year old presidential candidate using pick-up lines [dailymail.co.uk] on a ten year old.
Weak (Score:2)
Especially considering Microsoft's monopoly power over OEMs, you would think it would be four or five times this number. After all, Android arrives on over a billion new devices a year these days. Seems inescapable to conclude that Microsoft is now firmly second-rate.
Re: (Score:2)
Especially considering Microsoft's monopoly power over OEMs,...
That and business licenses. I'm wondering if my business' 5000 seats are listed in there as technically we're buying that many Windows 10 installs*
*With the right to downgrade to something else because our software requires it, but that probably isn't recorded anywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you eight years old? It is a matter of record that Microsoft exercises monopoly power in the personal computer market segment.
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot is for people with an Above average IQ.
You being here would seem to contradict that.
In other news, 200 million PC's have been sold (Score:2)
Taken with a pinch of salt. (Score:1)
Maybe so... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not terribly old (43), but Trump is one of the best, and most clever, presidents we have had in a long time. He was absolutely in the right with firing Comey and eventually the country will see that.
I have no doubt that in eight years we will sadly say goodbye to one of the greatest presidents. He won't be impeached. In fact, his ratings will only go up.
Re: (Score:1)
How do you determine a bot's age?
Re: (Score:2)
Offences traditionally considered worthy of impeachment are treated with more lenience since the landmark decision in Clinton vs morality 2016.
Re: (Score:1)
SJWs always double-down on the stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Like I said, you always double down.