RIP AIM: AOL Instant Messenger Dies in December (usatoday.com) 117
It's the end of an era: as of December 15, AOL's Instant Messenger will no longer exist. From a report: In a statement from Oath, the new entity formed under Verizon combining AOL with the recently-acquired Yahoo, the service will be discontinued. "AIM tapped into new digital technologies and ignited a cultural shift, but the way in which we communicate with each other has profoundly changed," said Michael Albers, VP of Communications Product at Oath. AIM was a staple of personal computers since first launching in 1997, serving as a precursor to popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. However, AIM couldn't make the seamless transition to mobile, where most users rely on instant messaging services. Users will be able to manually download any images or files on AIM before the service shuts down. However, users won't be able to export or save their Buddy List, the group of contacts available on AIM.
AIM still exists?? (Score:5, Funny)
I honestly thought it had died years ago.
Re: (Score:1)
The last person using it forgot to turn it off when they left.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I honestly thought it had died years ago.
IKR? I couldn't believe it was still a thing.....
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean you didn't fill in the AIM username on your Slashdot profile and failed to keep the client open 24/7 in case someone needs to chat with you?
Yeah, me neither.
Re: (Score:2)
That or they already keep Pidgin open in the background (perhaps for other reasons) and have an AIM account loaded into Pidgin.
Re: (Score:1)
I put a bump stock on my fleshlight. You can take it away when you wrest it from my cold, dead hands.
Re: (Score:1)
Be careful. Chimpanzees are known to bite those things entirely off.
Re: (Score:1)
... or was the whole thing just a waste of a few million peoples lives and cash ?
Maybe it'd be better for you if you never find out the answer to this.
What will I do without my buddy list? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
It would just be a list of people's AIM names that don't work anymore. No real loss.
Re: (Score:1)
When I am ready to head out in the boat I always head on over here [antiquefishingtackle.net] to get My Buddy.
RIP (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Haven't used in almost a decade. Would've been nice if they'd spun it off instead of killing something still used by millions though. (quoted as single-digit millions by someone from AOL back in February) [arstechnica.com]
No one would bother taking it. with people using third party aim clients to block ads, there's no money to be made to offset the expense of running the servers.
Re: (Score:2)
Haven't used in almost a decade. Would've been nice if they'd spun it off instead of killing something still used by millions though. (quoted as single-digit millions by someone from AOL back in February) [arstechnica.com]
No one would bother taking it. with people using third party aim clients to block ads, there's no money to be made to offset the expense of running the servers.
Funny what happens when you don't put some thought into "Hey, maybe my ads are annoying, obnoxious, and rude?"
RIP AIM (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Meh, 80's kid me understood that IRC was more than good enough for chatting.
(Cue 70's kid's perspective)
Re: (Score:2)
Buddy List (Score:2)
"However, users won't be able to export or save their Buddy List
The point of being able to export or save a list of "screen names" for a service that no longer exists would be what exactly anyway? People who had contacts that were actual AOL users probably have them as e-mail contacts anyway in whatever e-mail app they use.
I mean I guess take a screenshot for posterity, if you feel like waxing nostalgic about all those conversations you had on AIM at some point in the future.
Holy crap... (Score:3)
..I am old. I remember ICQ and all the rest, too. Fuck, now I need some 18 year old scotch to help me forget. :-p
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
But make sure it's really 18 year old scotch. I once went home with something I thought was 18 but ... not worth the hassle, trust me, so not worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
But make sure it's really 18 year old scotch. I once went home with something I thought was 18 but ... not worth the hassle, trust me, so not worth it.
ROTFLMFAO! Good one!
Re: (Score:2)
Well, after half a bottle I sounded like a Scot (i.e. nobody sober could understand me), so I'd say it was.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I remember ICQ
I miss ICQ.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, ICQ actually still works, it is just that most people have moved away from it. Still remeber my UIN better than my phone number.
Re: (Score:3)
AOL also sold ICQ to mail.ru years ago, it probably doesn't use the AIM servers anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
AOL bought ICQ years ago and integrated it with AIM, I'm curious if Yahoo is planning too kill ICQ as well (assuming they are since it uses the same servers as AIM, they probably didn't even realize they bought it.) Haven't used AIM in years but still check in to ICQ daily.
They probably virtualized those servers long ago and a simple press of the 'Delete' key will put those out of their misery.
Re: (Score:2)
ICQ Still works. I'm logged in right now.
Re: (Score:2)
Modern-day ICQ is nothing like the original ICQ. That's why their current user base is 10% of what it used to be.
I miss the old ICQ.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At your age, you probably shouldn't be drinking.
not from my view, it wasn't. (Score:1)
AIM was a staple of personal computers since first launching in 1997
Well... no. IRC started nearly 10 years before that, so AIM was a late comer. IRC was where all the cool people were. AIM was to IM what AOL was to the internet: a dumbed down non-federated service for the post-eternal-september crowd who didn't know any better, and mostly thought the internet was AOL. The intelligent discussion, and almost everything technical, was happening on IRC. Not to mention that anyone could start their own IRC server.
Coincidentally, IRC is still going, and AIM is now dead.
Re: (Score:1)
Ah yes and the eggdrops in our channel would immediately kick-ban any @aol.com users - All Only Lamers. Fun times.
No EFnet to Freenode federation (Score:2)
AIM was to IM what AOL was to the internet: a dumbed down non-federated service [...] anyone could start their own IRC server.
But how easily can users on one network of IRC servers talk to users on another network, such as EFnet to Freenode?
Re: (Score:2)
The point isn't that every last network was connected, it was that YOU, the user, could talk to any of them or all of them at once, interact with people on several networks at the same time
And Pidgin is a multiprotocol client that lets YOU, the user, talk to AIM, Skype, or any other server for which a plug-in is available, just as easily as with multiple IRC or XMPP servers. So what's the practical difference between AIM closing down and a widely used IRC network closing down?
I see three key differences between multiple IRC servers and multiple own-protocol servers. Which did I miss?
Multiple devices in IRC (Score:2)
I run a private IRC network for about a dozen of my friends. I cannot do that with YIM or AIM or the others.
So how do "a dozen of [your] friends" communicate with others who don't use your network? As far as I can tell, they'd have to add another IRC server to their copies of Pidgin, just as they'd have to add Skype or whatever to Pidgin.
IRC handles multiple devices just fine.
I thought privileges in a channel were associated with a nickname, and only one connection to a server could use a particular nickname at once. What IRC server software doesn't have this limit? And what IRC server software stores and allows retrieval of a log of older messages, s
Re: (Score:2)
Most of us used it at some point (Score:2)
...the market they helped define got filled up by better or more ubiquitous options.
Personal messaging: Texting or social media. Everybody I know has a phone now. And if you use Facebook/Twitter, you're already connected to a majority of people you know.
Work messaging: Newer apps like Slack that management settles on for everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
SMS Text is mapped to a Phone Number which can be mapped to a real person.
Multi-billion dollar free service (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Email tends to have some lag, and you won't necessarily know if the person on the other end is going to be avalible to read it now or will be going "huh" upon finding it in their spam folder a week or two later.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That doesn't surprise me in the least... they come from the "get sh!t done quickly" group ...
As I've aged, I've gotten to the "if it works..." stage with technology. These guys have been using AIM for two decades because the damn thing works, solves their problem and does so without causing any heartburn. We actually use it at work for very similar reasons. Sure, we have Slack and Jabber and Skype and email and all that -- but most of my team clings to AIM because it works ...
I totally get it... not sure
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, unsecured IM protocol!
Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? (Score:3)
Why not Open Source this and Classic Yahoo? Allow people to start their own OSCAR Services the AIM or YIM Clients are compatible with, but, change the host name to whatever you want?
Currently, YIM is inoperative on Pidgin, soon AIM will be too. For Pidgin, this really doesn't matter. Some people liked the AIM and YIM Client software, a compatible "gateway" with connections to XMPP or Slack as a backend.
I get it AOL/Oath doesn't want to maintain the service. Open Source it, and let independent organizations host their own.
Re: (Score:3)
Is there something OSCAR does that the Jabber protocol doesn't?
Re: (Score:2)
An unwillingness of end users to install other programs.
Unfortunate (Score:1)
I've kept active on this service for many years now, through third party clients like Pidgin in Linux. I've never been a supporter of AOL, but use of the AIM service was almost standard for a while there, and I've since used it to converse with a number of friends who have thus far refused to embrace many other options. With the death of AIM, there's a real chance that my communication with some of these stubborn friends will take a step backward to indirect, less immediate interaction such as email. The
Re: (Score:1)
Why would they buy out a competitor just to set it free to grow larger?
Obviously AIM isn't an aspect of the buyout they were particularly interested in...
Re: (Score:2)
I've kept active on this service for many years now, through third party clients like Pidgin in Linux. I've never been a supporter of AOL, but use of the AIM service was almost standard for a while there, and I've since used it to converse with a number of friends who have thus far refused to embrace many other options. With the death of AIM, there's a real chance that my communication with some of these stubborn friends will take a step backward to indirect, less immediate interaction such as email. The only consolation of all of this, strangely, is that one of the main persons I've kept in most frequent contact with through AIM just got himself a prison sentence of a duration I'm not yet certain of (possibly multi year), so I've unexpectedly just lost one of my main needs for the service already this last month. So, strangely good timing, but really it is overall unfortunate, especially since they should just hand the service over to the open source crowd and let it grow in unexpected ways or die naturally, rather than just killing off something that not everyone has an acceptable alternative to.
You (and I) pretty much part of the reason that Oath is driving a stake through AIM's heart. Since you used Pidgin, you weren't contributing to AIM's ad revenue. In essence, you used resources without providing a return.
Re: (Score:1)
I had a friend back when it was really popular that steadfastly insisted on using the official AIM client, that is, until it woke him up in the middle of the night with ads, he was on Trillian in no time flat after that. Hard to say if it is really OUR fault their client didn't see more usage, they kind of had their chance on that one and blew it themselves. It is hardly anarchist to want to use something that just works, they still could have leveraged us in some other way, they had an installed base wit
Memberberries (Score:2)
This marks the end of an era.... (Score:2)
Their own doing... (Score:2)
I've had Pidgin on/off my 3 accounts over the last 15+ years. Haven't touched AOL's actual software in longer than that. Oh well...FB, G+/Hangouts and IRC FTW.
(I'd say Skype to...but I can't get into my Skype account since Microsoft linked it to their accounts...)
Re: (Score:2)
Third-party clients can connect to AIM just fine. My Adium is connected to it.
There was an issue earlier this year when they disabled a very old insecure auth method and blocked clients that used it, but all the clients had to do was update to the new (like, five year old) method.
What really killed AIM (Score:3)
And in 1998 corporate IT departments were busy trying to eradicate AOL from office computers because the AOL installation process replaced many Windows drivers with their own AOL-eccentric drivers. To IT departments, AOL was more like malware in that it took over the computer, thus AOL was banned from most workplaces.
When Time-Warner and AOL merged back in 2000, one of the conditions forced on the merger by the FTC was that AOL had to make AIM compatible with other IM systems. Remember at the time of the merger, the majority of internet users (esp AOL) were still on dial up and TW cable was one of the few providers with an intact network poised to bring high speed internet to the masses. FTC officials feared that the merger of the world's largest internet company and the world's largest cable provider would put too much power in the hands of a single company. TW/AOL never did make a good faith effort to open AIM to IM rivals which was one reason they never made the transition to mobile - they resisted the urge to let AOL members to breach the "walled garden" of AOL, because advertising revenue inside that garden was their dominant monetizing strategy.
Another condition that the FTC imposed was that TW had to open their network to competitors like EarthLink before AOL could be made available on their cable pipelines. TW/AOL never made that compromise, so AOL was stuck in dial-up.
I was never fond of AOL because of their over-aggressive marketing, but I was never short on drink coasters from their CD-ROMs. They always arrived free in the mail and you could readily find them at the post office.
AOL (Score:1)
@aim.com continues working (Score:1)
Anyone with an @aim address can continue using that email address: https://help.aol.com/articles/... [aol.com]
Ha ha (Score:2)
I just signed up for an account on AIM last night. I need a messenger program on the PC to chat with my woman in private. Microsoft has messed Skype up so badly it is now practically unusable.
Oh well, any recommendations? Something off the beaten trail but can do chat and send photographs? Maybe a few emojis tossed in as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Gaim (Score:1)
Memories - thanks for all the fish (Score:2)
I started using AIM in 1998, around the time I graduated from high school.
I did a study abroad while in college. It was the most cost effective way to have a semi real time chat with friends/family back here in the States.
Goodbye (Score:5, Insightful)
Will ICQ remain? (Score:1)
I don't know how they are connected.
Could log into AIM with my e-mail but what I want to do is find my ICQ UIN and see if I can find an old friend there.
Skype for Pidgin (Score:2)
A third-party plug-in for Pidgin [github.com] supports Skype.