NSA Sent Coded Messages From Its Twitter To Communicate With Foreign Spies (gizmodo.com) 108
Matt Novak reports via Gizmodo: During the first Cold War, American and British spies would sometimes place coded messages in newspaper classified ads to communicate with each other. And according to new reports in the New York Times and The Intercept, the National Security Agency (NSA) has updated the tactic, using its public Twitter account to send secret messages to at least one Russian spy. That's just one relatively small detail in much more salacious articles about NSA and CIA agents traveling to Germany in an effort to recover cyberweapons that had been stolen from U.S. intelligence agencies. A Russian spy allegedly offered up the stolen cyber tools to the Americans in exchange for $10 million, eventually lowering his price to just $1 million. The Russian spy allegedly claimed to even have dirt on President Trump.
According to the reports, the unnamed Russian met with U.S. spies in person in Germany, and the NSA sometimes communicated with the Russian spy by sending roughly a dozen coded messages from the NSA's Twitter account. The one important question: Were the messages sent via direct message or were they sent out as public tweets? The New York Times report leaves some ambiguity, but according to James Risen in The Intercept they were very public.
According to the reports, the unnamed Russian met with U.S. spies in person in Germany, and the NSA sometimes communicated with the Russian spy by sending roughly a dozen coded messages from the NSA's Twitter account. The one important question: Were the messages sent via direct message or were they sent out as public tweets? The New York Times report leaves some ambiguity, but according to James Risen in The Intercept they were very public.
Meh. (Score:5, Informative)
The Russian spy allegedly claimed to even have dirt on President Trump.
Who doesn't?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Intelligence services will usually keep a foreign agent in place, where they can follow the flow of information. And now, with the change in Page's legal team, it appears that he's cut a deal with the FBI to give up someone more senior.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm well-paid, my friend. Well-paid.
Re:Russia collusion (Score:5, Informative)
There is plenty of evidence against Carter Page that we know about. The evidence we don't know about, which was used to get a FISA warrant against him, is in the Intelligence Committee Memo that the Democrats want to put out but Donald Trump refuses to allow. But as I said, what we know is plenty:
https://www.politico.com/magaz... [politico.com]
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If the Democrats on the HPSCI had evidence that FISA warrants were obtained under un-impeachable circumstances then, why did they wait to publish their findings until after the Republicans published their summary memo? Really. Why wait?
How and why could the the dossier (have you read it?) be used, in any capacity, without un-impeachable verification, to get a FISA warrant to surveil a presidential campaign and administration?
What will you say when Trump's administration uses FISA warrants to surveil the D
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I've read it, and you can too. Here is the full text:
https://www.documentcloud.org/... [documentcloud.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, you've read the "dossier." Then you know it looks like something from the Onion, You should know it's still in "largely unverified" status (meaning it names people and places that really exist but the events described in it are not verified).
We do not know who Steele's sources were. We do not know whether they were from the FSB, FBI/CIA, DOJ, U.S. Department of State, etc.
I'm not going to click on the Newspeak link. Why don't you provide a summary of what's at the link?
What will you say when the Tru
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Oh dear, you sad semi-literate Trumpie, you missed all the references (not one of them is Reddit). Here they are so you can improve your reading skills.
1) The Guardian - Trump Tower meeting with Russians treasonous, Bannon says in explosive book [theguardian.com]
2) NBC - A Panama tower carries Trump’s name and ties to organized crime [nbcnews.com]
3) Global Witness - Narco-A-Lago: Money Laundering At The Trump Ocean Club Panama [globalwitness.org]
4) The Guardian - Trumps Panama tower used for money laundering by condo owners, reports say [theguardian.com]
5) Sketchy [youtube.com]
Re: Russia collusion (Score:4, Funny)
Sorry, nothing from Breitbart or RU.com.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Meh. (Score:5, Funny)
Trump needing to fit code words in proper order into his tweets would explain a lot.
Certainly would settle the debate about: covfefe
Re: (Score:1)
Actually communication directly via twitter makes no sense what so ever, defiantly no spy vs spy. What you do is encrypt the message going from other people to other people and just listen in. So not from 1st party to 2nd party but from 3rd party to 4th party and in return from 5th party to 6th party and you just listen in. You read from listening in and you send via the 3rd and 5th parties, who a pretty secure because they do nothing and it is just a temporary contact with you, say at a regularised locatio
Re:Meh. (Score:4, Informative)
Actually communication directly via twitter makes no sense what so ever, defiantly no spy vs spy.
The NSA is using Twitter as a Numbers Station: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Nothing new or exciting about this.
Re: (Score:2)
Not really.
"Fuck you. I'm better than you."
See? I can do it in fewer characters than he can!
Re: Meh. (Score:2)
All Christians are RUSSIAN AGENTS!!!1!!1!!
Thanks for that insightful commentary, Comrade Wang.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Meh. (Score:5, Informative)
Famous Soviet/Russian UVB-76, "The Buzzer" where someone was sitting at a chair and pushing a key every second or two
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcv_cGLjxCY [youtube.com]
Chinese numbers station
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhpqZpfb03c [youtube.com]
A C= decoding one being used in CW mode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pawOMIlMfIw [youtube.com]
Some being jammed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGxEnnzrwmc [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:1)
>But his apparent eagerness to sell the Trump “kompromat” — a Russian term for information used to gain leverage over someone — to American spies raised suspicions among officials that he was part of an operation to feed the information to United States intelligence agencies and pit them against Mr. Trump. Early in the negotiations, for instance, he dropped his asking price from about $10 million to just over $1 million. Then, a few months later, he showed the American businessman
Re: Meh. (Score:4, Interesting)
This happened in June of 2017, so it's much more likely that Trump was using the NSA and CIA to try to get this kompromat and bury it. Remember, by that time, they were working for Trump.
Odd... (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not surprised that Twitter / Facebook and so on are used like this, the Bot Nets have been using them for Command and Control for ages. But why use the "official" NSA Twitter Twaddle? It's pedestrian to discover who accesses specific sites... Why not something more benign like Britney Speers Twitter?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not surprised that Twitter / Facebook and so on are used like this, the Bot Nets have been using them for Command and Control for ages. But why use the "official" NSA Twitter Twaddle? It's pedestrian to discover who accesses specific sites... Why not something more benign like Britney Speers Twitter?
Because it's the official NSA Twitter account.
Think about it from the Russian's perspective, are you talking to some low level spy who doesn't actually have the authority to send the money you're after? An ex-spook like Steele? A Russian counter-intelligence operative?
An official NSA tweet tells you that a very powerful person at the agency is backing the operation. That it's important enough that they're willing to screw with their Twitter account. And you're still relatively indistinguishable from all the
Re: (Score:2)
Then the other nation just has to watch for everyone interesting in their own nation reading the "official" US gov social media.
Plant a few must have, top secret new fake project names and see what the USA gets as results.
A short list of information given to the USA and who has such gov project access in the
Re: (Score:2)
Other nations just see their population are using social media all day, everyday.
That other nations fail to have the granulated per account real time collection to show a person visited a section of social media.
That other nations can only bait and trap their citizens on social media over time with fake accounts not log all soc
Classified (Score:3)
Turns out that's the origin of the word "classified" for secret documents. Lol.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Numbers stations have long been used to send coded messages to spies, who decided them with one time pads.
Has this ever been verified? It seems a pretty likely possibility, especially when you look at the location of many of these stations. But does anyone really know?
Re: (Score:2)
Check out Spycraft by Robert Wallace, H. Keith Melton and Henry R. Schlesinger [amazon.com] it is well sourced and quite informative.
Long story short, yes this use of number stations has been confirmed by multiple sources, including operators and "users". It is a well known, and confirmed, fact that a Cuban spyring operating out of Florida (IIRC) was controlled by a number station.
To all our friends on Slashdot (Score:4, Insightful)
I repeat: Peace of mind comes without Twitter..
Re:To all our friends on Slashdot (Score:4, Funny)
Peace of mind comes without Twitter.
I repeat: Peace of mind comes without Twitter..
Your inspirational message would reach more people if you tweeted it.
Coordinating the French Resistance (Score:2)
Biased political bullshit from the CIA (Score:1)
The "cyberweapons" is a bullshit cover story.
NSA and CIA agents traveling to Germany in an effort to recover cyberweapons that had been stolen from U.S. intelligence agencies. A Russian spy allegedly offered up the stolen cyber tools to the Americans in exchange for $10 million, eventually lowering his price to just $1 million. The Russian spy allegedly claimed to even have dirt on President Trump.
Why would you pay anything for a copy of "stolen cyber tools"?!?!?! The Russians aren't about to give the CIA their last copy no matter how they're paid, and the NSA and the CIA already have them and don't need another copy.
After the transaction, the CIA gets a disk of "stolen cyber tools" that they already have, and the Russian still have them too.
So it's a bullshit cover story.
So what did the CIA pay for?
This was the CIA trying to get dirt on Trump - no more,
Re:Biased political bullshit from the CIA (Score:5, Interesting)
The "cyberweapons" is a bullshit cover story.
NSA and CIA agents traveling to Germany in an effort to recover cyberweapons that had been stolen from U.S. intelligence agencies. A Russian spy allegedly offered up the stolen cyber tools to the Americans in exchange for $10 million, eventually lowering his price to just $1 million. The Russian spy allegedly claimed to even have dirt on President Trump.
Why would you pay anything for a copy of "stolen cyber tools"?!?!?! The Russians aren't about to give the CIA their last copy no matter how they're paid, and the NSA and the CIA already have them and don't need another copy.
Even if you think the NSA should offer patches for every bug they found the NSA doesn't agree.
If the NSA knows exactly what was stolen that does 3 things for them.
1) They know which tools are now useless (or if they work you might have hacked a honeypot).
2) The more you know about what was stolen the easier to figure out who stole it and how they did it.
3) You know which vulnerabilities you need to patch.
This was the CIA trying to get dirt on Trump - no more, no less.
According to the article the CIA was against the investigation because the head of the CIA is a Trump loyalist who didn't want dirt on the President. I wouldn't be surprised if the CIA was the source of the leak for this story.
Fair New York Times article (Score:2)
This is getting unusual: the New York Times paper is not obviously anti-russian.
Of course they're public. (Score:5, Informative)
The one important question: Were the messages sent via direct message or were they sent out as public tweets? The New York Times report leaves some ambiguity, but according to James Risen in The Intercept they were very public.
Of course they're public. The whole point is that no one can see who is receiving the messages. They're coded, of course, so only the intended recipient will know what they mean, but possibly even the sender doesn't know who that person is. If DMs were used, that would entirely defeat the purpose: might as well use a secure communications app. The points of classified ads in the past, or tweets today, is that they can be read anonymously, even from a public computer terminal without typing in any login credentials.
Re: (Score:2)
The points of classified ads in the past, or tweets today, is that they can be read anonymously, even from a public computer terminal
Publicly pulling out the spool of silk OTP encodings, and then burning it, is slightly suspicious, however.
Re: (Score:2)
The points of classified ads in the past, or tweets today, is that they can be read anonymously, even from a public computer terminal
Publicly pulling out the spool of silk OTP encodings, and then burning it, is slightly suspicious, however.
Just write down the tweet, or photograph it, then do your OTP decoding at home.
Coded Message (Score:4, Funny)
I-ay, avehay the irtday on umptray! Eepay apetay!
Re: (Score:3)
I just realized that this hasn't been modded down because Russian trolls don't understand Pig Latin.
Sigh. (Score:4, Interesting)
If they're coded messages, it literally doesn't matter.
In fact, that's kind of the point of encrypted and coding - people can read your message AND STILL not understand what it says.
Sending as direct message would link the two parties conclusively. Putting a public message doesn't - literally anyone who viewed it could have been the intended recipient and there's no way to tell who it was.
Stupid headline/summary/article is stupid.
Any agency that wanted to get a message to an agent who can't reveal themselves would often find the best way to do so would be to publicly broadcast a coded message using a system that only that agent has the facility / knowledge / key to understand.
Everything from numbers stations, to messages in newspapers, to Twitter... it's the right way to do it without revealing the message, or the intended recipient.
Encrypt the message. Don't try to obfuscate/obscure the medium. Anything radio can be captured, anything visible can be photographed, anything written can be intercepted, anything electronic can be sniffed, anything audible canbe recorded. Pretty much the entire basis of things like TLS, SSH, etc. - who cares if the underlying medium is secure... form a secure channel over it using methods that EXPECT it to be actively monitored by an enemy (e.g. Diffie-Hellman, etc.).
The walruses are cold (Score:2)
in Pyongyang today.
Who the hell... (Score:1)
...pays money to "buy back" stolen hacking tools. The cover story is obviously a lie.
Humint (Score:2)
Since when does the NSA run human intelligence operations? I guess when your budget is classified you can just do whatever the hell you want.
Hey, don't blow up their spot. (Score:2)
OH NOES! (Score:1)
Begs the Question (Score:1)
Defined!!! (Score:2)