Digg Reader To Shut Down This Month -- Latest RSS Service To Bite the Dust (betanews.com) 109
Digg announced this week that it's shutting down Digg Reader, an app which allows users to follow RSS feeds from sites. From a report: Following the closure of Google Reader, RSS fans flocked to the likes of Feedly, The Old Reader, Digg Reader and Inoreader. Now Digg Reader has announced that it is to close, and users are being advised to export their feeds so they can be imported into an alternative service. Users do not have a great deal of time to grab their data and take it elsewhere. The RSS reader is due to close on March 26, meaning there's less than two weeks to go. No reason has been given for the closure, but presumably the venture either didn't prove as popular as expected, or it was rather more costly to run than anticipated.
No big deal (Score:1)
I'll just stay on AIM and ICQ, while listening to my 8-track tapes.
Re: (Score:2)
Come on over, I have Groundhog Day on VHS.
RSS for the masses? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:RSS for the masses? (Score:5, Informative)
I mostly use it to view a collection of articles from various sources, and comics from various sources. Instead of having to visit each and every site and keeping track of which articles I have read and not read an RSS reader does that for me.
Visiting one link I can view all the slashdot tech articles, lifehacker, dilbert comics, commitstrip, etc. There may be other ways to emulate this on social media platforms but the fact I can pick and choose exactly what I want to read makes it so much easier to keep track of exactly what I want.
Re:RSS for the masses? (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem: Where is the ad revenue in that?
Re: (Score:2)
It's a good point.
For example, I tend to use RSS with comics. It's nice because I get notified when there's a new comic. Of course, what I want is to actually see the new comic. But, like you said, where's the money in that?
So, yeah, it's not the best. But it certainly beats going to the website to see if there's a new comic.
Re: (Score:2)
Can be a handy way to provide a big load to test a network connection as well, just by doing that Ctrl-click one level higher.
Re: (Score:2)
That's another way to attack the problem, but you can see in itself the advantage for an RSS reader - it doesn't have to load a whole ton of pages and their formats, it's easier on limited dataplans and on the browser itself. :D
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, using an RSS reader for most sites does reduce ad revenue.
Instead of visiting the home page of the site, and seeing all the top tier front page ads and the click-bait paid articles and opening a few tabs of interesting content (and seeing the ads again) and generally lingering, you're heading straight into one page of the content.
Sites make less ad revenue from RSS readers because you're not hanging around.
Re: (Score:2)
That actually depends on source. Some blogs/websites display full content, some don't. You still have to click through if you wanna make a comment, for instance.
Re: (Score:2)
Simple - if I didn't use an RSS reader, I would rarely visit any of the sites I'm keeping track of.
Clicking through to the site when a story interests me and/or I want to comment on it, they are getting more traffic out of me using an RSS reader than if I didn't.
Better financial model to suppoort RSS (Score:2)
Imagine that the people who wanted to use this RSS service were routed to an ongoing-cost project to support the service. If enough of the people who want to use it agree to pay the costs, perhaps $10 each, then the service would continue.
My take is that the problem is bad financial models, and if you [Opportunist] actually earned that insightful moderation it is only for a light touch on the root of the problem. I think advertising is fundamentally lies, and it is crazy even to try to fund truth (in journa
Re: (Score:3)
The same as every other service - injected into the feed as an article or inline with another article.
Oh, you mean using analytics to spy on whether I actually read an article or not? Yeah RSS isn't so good for that.
Re: (Score:2)
From my perspective, this is really all that I want anyway. RSS is a great way to stay notified.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately it's way more interesting for them (and reaches a lot more people, too) to ask for your mail address to keep you informed...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
It brings the content (or at least the first few paragraphs or so) of all my news sites into one place, without any ads.
People who manually click open 20 sites to read them are not geeks. end of.
Precisely. RSS lets me monitor the content of 33 websites that I frequently find interesting content on a real-time basis in a single small window, rather than having to have 33 tabs open constantly refreshing them. And as you pointed out, it provides a quick-to-read, easily digestible summary to decide to read the full article or not, with a non-visualized simple user experience. RSS is made for information addicts.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:RSS for the masses? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This. I use TT-RSS installed on an rPi2 at home that doubles as my proxy from work. You'd be surprised how much compelling content is still out there on RSS - Slashdot included. I have images turned off and it just appears as text.
Re: (Score:3)
Tried it, hated it. What I wanted was a RSS reader that was smart enough to use regular expressions / follow the damn links to the content, but instead got something which was half-email / half-webbrowser.
For instance, there are, perhaps, several dozen webcomics that use RSS; Dilbert might publish the actual image inside the RSS feed, while Slightly Damned might include a link to their latest webcomic; in either case, it's annoying -> I want to be able to tell the RSS reader to grab ONLY the images (from
Re: (Score:2)
Tried it, hated it. What I wanted was a RSS reader that was smart enough to use regular expressions / follow the damn links to the content, but instead got something which was half-email / half-webbrowser.
For instance, there are, perhaps, several dozen webcomics that use RSS; Dilbert might publish the actual image inside the RSS feed, while Slightly Damned might include a link to their latest webcomic; in either case, it's annoying -> I want to be able to tell the RSS reader to grab ONLY the images (from wherever), and to display it all like on the cartoon pages of a newspaper (back when we had those; use a grid layout or something).
Same things with major stories: I want paragraphs...the reader I was using would give it to you in a line, like email -> I want the headline + a customizable amount of text following that, ala a newspaper.
Instead it just became unnecessary work. Reuter's homepage had things more properly organized than I could make them in the reader. As for the comics, I hate having to read a post, to find a link, that says that you have the latest up on your website (so take me there)...it's an unnecessary amount of clicking.
If you know regular expressions, you can probably just write your own reader in your language of choice that has easy XML parsing. Unfortunately--and I'm not sure which--either RSS is a super loose standard, or very few content providers adhere to the standard.
Re: (Score:1)
You just can write input parser. For some feeds i replace thumbnail pictures with actual large pictures, so i don't have to open them in new tab. Liferea supports that
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't go to sites to check "is there something new, no, let me come back 5 minutes later to see if there's something new" for multiple sources that would be unmanageable, I follow in Inoreader, the RSS reader that I use, a lot of sources and I can see when new things pop up without having to check different sites, it's very efficient and I can mark items as read or unread so it's easy to manage what I want to read.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:RSS for the masses? (Score:5, Informative)
Something like 90% of my browsing gets done through RSS. I'm happily subscribed to INOreader, in the hopes that it will stay alive for a long time. Here is how I use RSS. On one page, I get the following notifications, bundled into the appropriate folders:
* All of my mainstream news from a half dozen different websites, with a headline and 1-2 sentence intro. This allows me to decide which ones are worth reading, and which ones to skip. It is super quick to get through a lot of news this way, and I avoid going to all of the different websites, their shitastic auto-playing videos, poorly laid out pages, etc.
* All of my web comics. About 2/3 display right in the reader, the other 1/3 I have to go to. But all in one folder, so no bookmarking, opening in tabs, etc.
* The limited social media feeds I follow, both Twitter and Facebook. Just the posts from the creators, none of the reposts, retweets, replies, or any of that shit. It's a minimal way to keep up with asshats who insist on using social media. (Hello local brewery, which only posts their taplist and hours on facebook...)
* Stupid shit that I keep around for when I need some lowbrow entertainment. Cat memes and failure gifs.
* STEM websites posting content I may or may not be interested in. The posts build up in that folder until I'm feeling sciency, then I can browse through a bunch of different fields and some of the new stuff coming out.
Having all of that in one place limits the mental energy it takes to track down all those disparate things. When I want to read my comics, pop open the comic folder, and I can read a couple of weeks of comics. When I want science, I can do that with science. I don't have to bookmark a thousand pages and open them in different tabs, and try to figure out how long it's been since I've been there.
Most places do a crappy job with archives. RSS lets me save and favorite things for later. And unread things are all in date order, so when I get around to it, I have an idea how old it is.
Trying to take in most modern websites is brain-fuzzing. Graphics and moving shit, boxes of articles, teasers and the like, infinite scrolling, etc. Every one is different, and they all suck. RSS gives me every website in the same format. Small image, title, couple of sentences.
Scrolling past a headline and it's marked as read. Unless I unmark it. And if I go to long and have 500 unread articles, I can just mark ones older than X days, weeks, months as read. It really simplifies how one interacts with content on the web. It's just so easy and organized. I really can't be bothered to do the web without RSS.
Oh, and INOreader has a great mobile app too, so I have the same thing on my browser as on my phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Can someone who really uses RSS feeds shed some light on it's benefits for a mass market? Is there any? I find RSS doesn't really fit into any internet habits I currently have. I've never really used RSS other than trying it out a few times and I never found it to be helpful in anyway. I'm sure there are lots of people who love RSS. Not being one of them I'd like to hear the positives from someone who actually uses it regularly.
I use QuiteRSS [quiterss.org]; it's how I got to this article.
Why do I use it? It allows me to aggregate new posts from a bunch of different sites and home in on stuff I'm particularly interested in; e.g. QuiteRSS can tag articles about development languages and tools I use (using keywords or regular expressions that I specify) making it easy to quickly see new articles about, say, python. There's a lot of new content published every day and a good RSS reader makes that "fire hose" more manageable.
Re: (Score:3)
I think if you mainly only visit a handful of sites regularly then RSS doesn't have much value. If you're one of those people that bounces between Slashdot, Reddit, Hackaday and CNN (or whatever news you prefer). Then RSS is not worth setting up.
If you're like me and you track 40 blogs that are only periodically updated, then RSS is a real time saver. (the blogs are related to my hobbies, not anything news worthy).
As for how someone monetizes it? I don't care. I'm from the era when nearly everything on the
Re: (Score:2)
RSS is my primary source of new, analyses, and opinions. I find blogs and websites that consistently publish well-written, reliable, well-researched content that I'm interested in and find their RSS feed URL. I then add it to my personal list of feeds in my email client (Mozilla Thunderbird) so I can check up on new articles when I've finished doing my emails. The only other places I look for news are /. and Twitter, where I only follow people who consistently find and/or write "good" articles.
Keeping up to
Re: (Score:2)
The reason I saw this article is because of RSS (I use Feedly). In fact, the only way I see *any* /. articles is through my RSS reader. I really don't have the time or the Interest to randomly click around to every site that I subscribe to in order to see if there are new articles. There are about 25 sites that I subscribe to. Perhaps if they went away, I'd "Like" or "Follow" them on Facebook, but scrolling through the Facebook newsfeed would be a lot less efficient than just seeing the headlines in Fee
Re: (Score:2)
I want to read news from my favourite news sites. I just click open bookmarks, mouseover my favourite site and scan the headlines.
Welcome to firefox RSS bookmarks integration.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno about mass market, but the RSS reader advantages from early days remain true, and there isn't a proper replacement for it to this day. I might miss some stuff here, but I think they are:
1. Speed and efficiency - the ability to read through multiple news sources updates fast, in a non-polluted platform. My reader is setup like webmail/Gmail. Most readers offer keyboard shortcuts that once you learn and start using makes going through the list even faster. So it's a really good tool for people who rea
Re: (Score:2)
I used iGoogle and now I use NetVibes. They are RSS aggregator "personal homepage" pages. They allow for there to be a single page of all of my favorite RSS feeds (Slashdot, soylent, gmail). There is then another page for entertainment (reddit /r/jokes, /r/firstworldproblems, zenhabits, Art of Manliness, etc.). There is then another page for work stuff (AI news, tech pushes, etc.).
RSS is the internet plumbing that enables me to see the content from 10+ pages in headline format (click to know more) witho
If you are looking for a replacement try newsblur (Score:2)
https://newsblur.com/ [newsblur.com] Yes is costs a small amount of money but it works well. I have no other relation than being an early and still happy customer.
Re: (Score:2)
https://newsblur.com/ [newsblur.com] Yes is costs a small amount of money but it works well. I have no other relation than being an early and still happy customer.
Bonus, because it costs money instead of selling ads, you're the actual customer and not a product being sold to someone else.
Also a customer, with 165 feeds, including Slashdot.
Irony (for me at least) (Score:3, Interesting)
I suppose I could try the pay version of Feedly and ditch the ads, but for some reason, an RSS reader isn't worth 1/2 of the monthly price of Netflix to me (that's just an example). I suppose it's only "pennies a day" but a penny saved is a penny earned, as they say.
Re: (Score:2)
I use Feedly (free, I don't pay anything) and have yet to see any 'fake article' type injected entries.
Do you use an AdBlocker? I always will have either uBlock or AdBlock Plus depending on which device which may explain it. Although I also use the Feedly Android app and haven't seen anything there either.
What were these injected ads like?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you sure they're not ads in the RSS content you're reading? I've seen nothing like the behaviour you're describing.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much this. One of the few remaining reasons to use firefox. The integration of RSS into bookmarks is excellent.
There's always TinyTiny RSS (Score:1)
Heavy User of RSS (Score:1)
Writing on the wall (Score:2)
I need to understand why RSS is not working in the real world.
It is because people just don't read any more? Or because publishers don't care about less-engaged RSS visitors versus high-engaged direct website visits and facebook referrals? Or because the hub is too expensive to run versus the advertising revenue (which Digg didn't have)?
---
Originally RSS was thought to be a many-to-many protocol. Apply quickly taught the world that many-to-one-to-many is a superior model and it is how you get push notificat
Re: (Score:2)
Recently tried to duplicate that capability to track some authors and had to get a twitter account because notifications of new articles was sent through that.
Re: (Score:2)
Totally - just create a Twitter list of sources (or multiple topical lists) and group your interests there (Sports / Tech / General News / Sleaze). Virtually all info sources (real and clickbait) publish regularly there with links to content. For most users at least as good as RSS readers.
Dilbert (Score:2)
Tiny Tiny RSS, then MiniFlux (Score:3)
I was dependent on Google Reader for the daily news (including Slashdot).
When it shutdown, I did not want to go to yet another online service that can shutdown, so I opted for a self hosted solution.
First, I used Tiny Tiny RSS [wikipedia.org] for a few years. It worked well. I ran it on my home server. Written in PHP and using MySQL made it easy to host.
One day, it was choking on feeds from a certain site, and stopped updating.
So I switched to the original MiniFlux [github.com] reader. Again, it is written in PHP, so easy to host. It can use either SQLite, MySQL, and other databases.
The same developer has gone in a different direction, with MiniFlux 2 [github.com], which uses Go, and PostgreSQL (only!). The developer describes it as 'opinionated!'
Using Go is an odd choice here, since this is not an application that has to be super fast. The slowest parts will be retrieving feeds (limited by the speed of the network and servers that host the feeds), or reading the database. Moreover, being a single executable, it does not integrate with your existing Apache or Nginx (if you already have them and want to use existing SSL certificates, ...etc.) and therefore has to run on a different port. PostgreSQL only is higher maintenance than MySQL, and if I don't not run PostgreSQL already, then I will not install, configure and maintain PostgreSQL just for the this one application.
So for now, the original MiniFlux does the job adequately, running behind SSL and password protected, so not much chance for a vulnerability getting exploited. Tiny Tiny RSS had a better user interface, but you get used to MiniFlux quickly. It even uses short cut keys that are like vim (j, k, ...)
G2Reader (Score:1)
I tried a couple readers after Google Reader shutdown, most were flashy, i wanted something i could read quickly, not flashy graphics. I settled on G2reader. Very minimalist, good support from developer. I did like the Old reader, but they seemed concerned about social groups. If g2reader shutdown, i'd head back to the old reader.
Problem.. (Score:2)
The problem with the RSS model is how companies can't find a good way of profitting out of it, which is unfortunate.
I've been using RSS readers before Google Reader even existed (I remember using Foxmail and some other types of RSS readers in the past), currently on Feedly, but already have TinyTiny RSS reader as a backup strategy and I'm trying to also see if I can make my Synology NAS work with Selfoss... no success so far.
For those wondering what's good about it, once you are used to the format it's kind
When RSS supports offline storage... (Score:1)
Newsblur (Score:2)
Newblur.com
Switched to it when Google Reader died. Haven't regretted it. RSS is a HUGE part of my daily internet. Allows me to keep on top of thousands of sites.
Re: (Score:1)
look it up
RSS has been dying for 15 years, face reality and facts
Re: (Score:2)
You're funny, we're not talking about me and my Chrome browser that dropped rss support years ago, but the world:
https://trends.google.com/tren... [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
wrong, RSS is dying, look at any graph of # of site, it's plummeted in last 15 years.
It's dead, Jim
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.ighome.com/
Re:face it you RSS dinosaurs (Score:5, Insightful)
the protocol did not catch on, you're a geek using a niche tech that is dying.
move on, the rest of us have
What did you move on to, exactly? RSS is still everywhere, by the way.
Re: (Score:2)
no, number of RSS sites peaked in 2006 and it has been dying off since, social media push killed it
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know about peaked, but about 90% of the news sites and blogs I go to have RSS. I get 500+ articles a day from about 100 feeds. For sites which only use Twitter inoreader [inoreader.com] incorporates them into the feed.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm an RSS dinosaur (Score:2)
Open the door, get on the floor
Everybody walk the dinosaur
I don't really get why people don't use it more to aggregate content from many sites. These days you don't even have to install a special app to do it, it is build in some browsers or you can get a web based one like Feedly [feedly.com] and visit it from your phone and desktop browser.
I think it will be easy for me to be an RSS dinosaur as long as popular frameworks for blogging continue to support it. I doubt the RSS support in a project like WordPress is very high maintenance so what incentive is there to remove the s
Re: I'm an RSS dinosaur (Score:1)