Now Even Russian Lawmakers Want a Piece of Mark Zuckerberg (qz.com) 73
PolygamousRanchKid shares a report from Quartz: In an ironic twist in the saga of Facebook's troubles, Russian lawmakers have declared that they, too, would like to question Mark Zuckerberg. According to the Moscow Times, senator Anton Belyakov yesterday offered to invite the Facebook CEO to address the upper chamber of the Russian parliament. "After all, he spoke about information security, not giving access to personal data, preventing the dissemination of harmful content," Belyakov reportedly said, referring to Zuckerberg's meetings with the U.S. Congress and European Parliament. Another reason for those meetings was to discuss whether the social network facilitated Russian meddling in foreign elections.
The U.S. company is in trouble with Russian authorities for disobeying a 2015 law that requires it to store the data of Russian citizens on the country's soil. In April, the state communications watchdog threatened that if Facebook didn't comply, it would face the same fate as LinkedIn, which was banned in the country last year. Much to the chagrin of UK politicians, he (Zuckerberg) has not agreed to multiple calls, and even a mild threat, to testify in front of a UK parliamentary committee.
The U.S. company is in trouble with Russian authorities for disobeying a 2015 law that requires it to store the data of Russian citizens on the country's soil. In April, the state communications watchdog threatened that if Facebook didn't comply, it would face the same fate as LinkedIn, which was banned in the country last year. Much to the chagrin of UK politicians, he (Zuckerberg) has not agreed to multiple calls, and even a mild threat, to testify in front of a UK parliamentary committee.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
If you call someone a traitor for supporting a lawfully elected leader of the country, you should leave.
Re: (Score:1)
Hey, do you have any proof that this changed the course of the election at all?
Also, why were you made an editor here? This is a tech site. Why would they enlist a poltiical hack?
Re: Vladimir Putin! (Score:1)
Only idiots believe the russians had anything to do the election. But you know that already.
-geekpoet
Re: (Score:1)
I get the impression (Score:1)
That Facebook is too big to care about the Russian requirement, and that it is effectively calling Russia's bluff by realising that too many Russians 'depend' on Facebook and the act of blocking it would be hugely unpopular. To some extent all this is true with the UK too; it is so ingrained that most action against it would be deeply unpopular.
In short, Facebook doesn't really need Russia and doesn't really care what it's legislators think. It's perhaps slightly different matter with the EU, which is a mor
Re: (Score:1)
+1,000,000,000,000
Re: (Score:2)
people use it to talk shit about the government.
Thailand one isp blocked facebook for an afternoon by "accident" (they were supposed to block a single page within facebook but it doesn't work that way...). a shitstorm ensued. sure, you can block elections indefinitely but you better not touch something people actually use or they might start asking about those elections....
people use fb for messaging and stuff..and to talk shit about the goverment.
sure.. uh.. they could use eh let's say whatsapp for mess
Re: (Score:1)
Global power is not about military strength.
And yet it is.
And why should anyone care what Russia does?
Spoken like a man who does not border those barbarian hords.
Re: (Score:3)
And why should anyone care what Russia does? They are on their way to becoming a third world country with a nuclear arsenal.
This is one of those depressingly common cases where you answer your own question, and still don't get it.
Re: (Score:2)
Facebook is not that important in Russia, certainly not as much as in Europe or NA. They have only about 35% of the market penetration compared to almost almost 61% of VKontakte (source: https://www.statista.com/stati... [statista.com]) so they can be reasonably blocked without massive issues. I also expect that most of those seriously affected would be outside Putin's power base.
Re: (Score:2)
What if government in China has social media questions?
UK government?
Never Happen (Score:4, Insightful)
And we all sit by and let it happen...
Re: (Score:2)
Now Russia invites US social media to Russia to make US social media look bad as part of a cover story?
So Russian accounts can use US social media again next election?
Only Russian anthropologists and computer experts have the skills to post on US social media?
Considering how many people in the USA use social media everyday, Russian university system must graduate many top US experts every year.
So smart they pass as
Re: (Score:1)
It's bad, but it's nowhere near as dangerous as allowing non-citizens who have no vested interest in the good of the country to participate. If you can't figure out why that's orders of magnitude worse you're probably a completely psychopathic douchebag, or just lying about which country you're really from. (Which is how this all started, essentially.)
Re: (Score:2)
Woah woah woah, easy there, Tex. Struck a real chord with you, didn't that? Take a few deep breaths and ask yourself what would happen if you had to seriously consider the possibility that it's all true. Now read that part again carefully. I'm not saying to bother thinking about whether it's true or not. I'm just saying to consider how it would affect you if it wasn't a forgone conclusion to you. How would that change your behavior? How would it affect your judgement if you had to take this all seriously. What would it mean about you? Think you could cope?
There. See what you just learned?
Dang. You are seriously full of yourself.
If I thought the whole oh noes Russia thing was real, I'd hire every single Russian involved. To sell chewing gum. They are clearly the best and most cost effective advertisers who ever lived on Earth.
Re: (Score:1)
My statement obviously applies doubly to you. If you knew the tiniest thing about advertising you'd realize this is actually super easy to do. Doesn't require lots of money or expertise. Just requires man hours and a way to skirt US laws that normally protect citizens from this type of thing.
Re: (Score:2)
So people all over the USA who comment on domestic politics are really Russian accounts?
Nope. Interference doesn't have to be complete and total, most propaganda techniques involve a slow drip feed over time. When you're in for the long game, a 1% swing in opinion is enough to make a difference (for example the 2016 election was decided by less than 100000 votes ( 0.1%), the 2000 election was less than 1000 votes). Manipulation is thing, and the Internet is the perfect tool for allowing foreign powers to interfere in domestic politics, so it would be foolish to just pretend it isn't possible.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand barnyard references. Can you use a car analogy?
Re: (Score:2)
FB know that they are the primary propaganda method for Russia to influence American politics. Posting some aggressive Alt-right ads while also posting some pro SJW/BLM message is genius. The Russian continue to divide Americans for their own gain and FB gets rich while America and it's western Allies lose. And we all sit by and let it happen...
If Russia wants to blow up the US even more than they already have, a good troll would be to give Zuckerberg the current equivalent of "Hero of the Soviet Union" for furthering Russia's goals in the 2016 election. They're already going to lose Facebook as an influence vector-with the changes Facebook is doing it will be nowhere near as effective at best-so might as well get out of it what they can. The furor in the media(both mainstream and alt-right) alone would be worth it for Russia, and it might even
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's hard to think of any way in which Facebook being damaged would hurt the US economy...
Just the sheer size of it and it's market valuation. Any time a company of that size loses value it creates a ripple effect.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's hard to think of any way in which Facebook being damaged would hurt the US economy...
Just the sheer size of it and it's market valuation. Any time a company of that size loses value it creates a ripple effect.
So we shouldn't prosecute drug dealers for the same reasons? I'm being deliberately obtuse here because one of my pet hates is how big business gets away with a lot because of fear of economic impact but the same rules don't apply to the narcotics trade. Consistency would be good.
Re: (Score:2)
If Russia wants to blow up the US even more than they already have, a good troll would be to give Zuckerberg the current equivalent of "Hero of the Soviet Union" for furthering Russia's goals in the 2016 election.
I'm not sure how you think that would work. Espionage is a lot more subtle and smarter than that.
Re: (Score:1)
Well I for one am strengthening America. I don't use Facebook. Propaganda that Russian, or Republicans, or Democrats, or...
What piece you take? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? (Score:1)
Why would Markdroid Zuckerberg testify before the UK? The EU I understand since it is an important entity. Russia I understand as well since they are also big and important. UK however? It's a little shithole that's becoming smaller with each decade, run by retards for retards. A shithole full of incresing acid attacks, underage sex slave grooming gangs, porn blocks while broadcasting shit like Naked Attraction, a shithole where pirating a song nets you more years in prison than raping a child. It's an irre
Zuccy no worry (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
While the UK wants to thank him in person for providing a spy platform for their Orwellian shittery, an addiction that came after seeing how China does it and taking a lick at that surveillance dick that made them grow a taste for it.
The USA also wants to thank him for providing a platform to screen illegal immigrants who are so dumbfuck that they reveal themselves on Facebook in bouts of stupidity, or accidental emotional bouts after being baited into revealing themselves. Most often reported by legal migr
lol @ Russian "lawmakers" (Score:1)
Russia doesn't have rule of law. They are run by a fucking mob, and the mob pick the judges. They kill whoever speaks ills of them.
Of course, the slashdot neckbeards love them because they somehow think that allies with their dumbass conservatism/libertarianism. You're just traitors. Some republicans aren't complicit - Mueller for example. The rest? Scum actively working against US interests.
He's coming for Moscow Donnie, don't worry about that. Bigly fucking so.
Dickheads.
Seems fashinable right now ... (Score:3)
Inviting Zuckerberg to bore him with toothless pointless questions and then have a selfie with him. The EU crew were a bunch of undereducated sissies and whimps, no better than US congress. They should've grilled him and put him on the spot with regards to privacy.
Bottom line: I am very disappoint with my legislators right now. That the russians want to have a big nothing-sandwich with his highness Grandmaster of Zuck is just as fitting.