Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
GNOME

GNOME Web Browser is Adding a Reader Mode (omgubuntu.co.uk) 65

An anonymous reader writes: An experimental reader mode will ship in the next version of GNOME Web, aka Epiphany. The feature is already available to try in the latest development builds of the GTK Webkit-based web browser, released this week as part of the GNOME 3.29.3 milestone. Reader mode (also known as "reader view") is a toggle option that strips a web page down to its bare text. All bespoke styling, background images, buttons, branding and page ephemera is removed. You get a distraction-free, text version of a web page. Because reader mode use its own custom .css to present web content it is (sometimes) possible to adjust a page's text size, background color, and/or layout for improved readability. There's no indication (yet) of customisation options being available in GNOME Web's version.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

GNOME Web Browser is Adding a Reader Mode

Comments Filter:
  • There's still a gnome specific web browser?
    • by Anonymous Coward

      Yes, so what? There's a Windows one, and a macOS one, and an Android one. Many OS's and user UI's have a specifir web browser. What's the problem?

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I just learned gnome has its own fucking virtual filesystem for things like removable drives. That is something the OS should be handling not your goddamn window manager.

      • Don't worry, Red Hat is already doing this: they put Gnome components into the core of their new filesystem (Stratis).

        I don't know whether to laugh or weep.

      • I just learned gnome has its own fucking virtual filesystem for things like removable drives. That is something the OS should be handling not your goddamn window manager.

        I vaguely remember Gnome having a browser component, for things like help files (which I guess could make sense, and which KDE had as well).

      • It's because Gnome want's to be OS agnostic and so that you e.g can open a networked file over ssh with gedit, something that most OS:es require a mount for.
    • I see the gnome devs have arrived, lol
  • There's a GNOME browser now? :))
  • by Anonymous Coward

    So this pretty much does what HTML was originally designed for?

  • by jfdavis668 ( 1414919 ) on Friday June 22, 2018 @07:52AM (#56827700)
    Sounds so good, they should port it to Windows.
  • by johannesg ( 664142 ) on Friday June 22, 2018 @07:56AM (#56827718)

    What I really want in a browser is this: I want the window to be split horizontally into two panes. The left-hand pane contains a site, such as the Slashdot frontpage. Clicking on a link opens whatever you click on in the right-hand pane, replacing what was already there. It would let you skim articles quickly without opening an ungodly number of tabs.

    I suppose I would also be ok with decreasing memory usage per tab, but I guess that ship sailed long ago...

  • Of course it would (Score:5, Insightful)

    by OneHundredAndTen ( 1523865 ) on Friday June 22, 2018 @08:05AM (#56827770)
    Gnome developers are constantly thinking of new ways of needlessly using all the resources available in your system.
  • what's it called? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by 4im ( 181450 ) on Friday June 22, 2018 @08:12AM (#56827816)

    Stripping bare to text? Might just use one of the classics, like w3m, links, lynx.

    Or while we're at it, telnet to port 80, pipe through openssl as neccesary?

    No kidding though, I still regularly use w3m from the command line to circumvent "funny" JavaScript stuff used to block access if you visit a site "too often" (pay after limited use news sites), or just plain avoid all those pesky ads especially with pop-in video and such.

    For you web developers out there, this is also a rather healthy test of your websites - if it won't properly deliver content in such a text browser, they will also suck from a search engine perspective, and probably from the usability side too. Obvious exemptions for picture or video oriented websites.

    • by tepples ( 727027 )

      if it won't properly deliver content in such a text browser, they will also suck from a search engine perspective

      When was this last tested? Last I checked, Google both operated a web search engine and published a web browser supporting JavaScript. Also last I checked, Google Search indexed JS-only websites. I wonder if these are related.

      and probably from the usability side too

      At least the accessibility side of usability has this covered. Karl Groves, the author of Mother Effing Tool Confuser [mothereffi...nfuser.com], has explained that assistive web browsers nowadays run JavaScript.

  • This will be a nice feature for those with vision impairments. My mother is blind in one eye and only has limited vision in the other. If this can increase website text to be really large and boost the contrast, it would be a great help.
  • Somebody should invent Reader Mode for email.

    Seriously, just about every HTML mail message I get from my coworkers has small font size, non-default font face, non-black text, a humongous signature, or any combination of the above.

    Bonus points for also dealing with discrete contramotion whole-thread-in-reverse-order messages.

  • Gnome lost it, when they killed the kazehakase browser. This thing was vi for the web.. but it didn't fit with gnome's feature reducing pattern.

    for those curious:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

  • There has been plenty of web pages I've encountered that won't display even text unless you have javascript enabled for it (I use NoScript). Many other sites bundle the actual content along with the ads on the same server as the ads, so if you exclude the ads, it breaks the page and you don't see the content. Of course all of these problems are not the fault of this Gnome browser, it's a pernicious disease that's been infesting the Web for a long time now.
  • Is it just me, or does Gnome 3 look like garbage.
    Biggest offender of having non-Window controls in the title bar.

Keep up the good work! But please don't ask me to help.

Working...