57% of Tech Workers Are Suffering From Job Burnout, Survey Finds (bleepingcomputer.com) 317
An anonymous reader writes: A survey conducted among the tech workers, including many employees of Silicon Valley's elite tech companies, has revealed that over 57% of respondents are suffering from job burnout. The survey was carried out by the makers of an app that allows employees to review workplaces and have anonymous conversations at work, behind their employers' backs. Over 11K employees answered one question -- if they suffer from job burnout, and 57.16% said "Yes."
The company with the highest employee burnout rate was Credit Karma, with a whopping 70.73%, followed by Twitch (68.75%), Nvidia (65.38%), Expedia (65.00%), and Oath (63.03% -- Oath being the former Yahoo company Verizon bought in July 2017). On the other end of the spectrum, Netflix ranked with the lowest burnout rate of only 38.89%, followed by PayPal (41.82%), Twitter (43.90%), Facebook (48.97%), and Uber (49.52%).
The company with the highest employee burnout rate was Credit Karma, with a whopping 70.73%, followed by Twitch (68.75%), Nvidia (65.38%), Expedia (65.00%), and Oath (63.03% -- Oath being the former Yahoo company Verizon bought in July 2017). On the other end of the spectrum, Netflix ranked with the lowest burnout rate of only 38.89%, followed by PayPal (41.82%), Twitter (43.90%), Facebook (48.97%), and Uber (49.52%).
I hole-hardedly agree... (Score:3, Funny)
But, allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like itâ(TM)s a peach of cake.
-1 Troll? It is meant to be FUNNY! (Score:4, Insightful)
(There are areas where English is trashy. You may need to take a shower after you read this.)
Title: "I hole-hardedly agree..." -- I whole-heartedly agree...
"doubles advocate" -- devil's advocate
"all intensive purposes" -- all intents and purposes
"a diamond dozen" -- a dime a dozen
"a blessing in the skies" -- a blessing in disguise.
"on a petal stool" -- on a pedestal
"a bunch of pre-Madonnas" -- a bunch of primadonnas
"taking something very valuable for granite" -- taking something very valuable for granted"
"mustard up all the strength you can" -- muster up all the strength you can
"it is a doggy dog world" -- It is a dog-eat-dog world
"you have a huge ship on your shoulder." -- you have a huge chip on your shoulder.
" throw everything in but the kids Nsync" -- throw everything in but the kitchen sink
"you are having a feel day with this" -- you are having a field day with this
"I have a sick sense" -- I have a sixth sense
"I cannot turn a blonde eye" -- I cannot turn a blind eye
"I have zero taller ants" -- I have zero tolerance
"what comes around is all around" -- what comes around goes around [what goes around comes around]
"supply and command" -- supply and demand
"Make my words" -- Mark my words
"when you get down to brass stacks" -- when you get down to brass tacks
"it doesn't take rocket appliances" -- it doesn't take rocket science
"to get two birds stoned at once" -- to kill two birds with one stone
"who makes the pants in this relationship" -- who wears the pants in this relationship
"sometimes you just have to swallow your prize" -- sometimes you just have to swallow your pride
"come to this conclusion through denial and error" -- come to this conclusion through trial and error
"I swear on my mother's mating name" -- I swear on my mother's maiden name [not a usual expression]
"when you put the petal to the medal" -- when you put the pedal to the metal
"you will pass with flying carpets" -- you will pass with flying colors
"it's a peach of cake" -- it's a piece of cake
I just landed my first career IT gig (Score:2)
My blood pressure has never been higher!
Not to mention my managers who openly joke about how being stressed "is just something you deal with" and openly laugh about it in front of me anytime someone mentions it.
Fark this noise
Re:I just landed my first career IT gig (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Try working Emergency Management. Then you will know real pressure.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I just landed my first career IT gig (Score:5, Funny)
Try living in a paper bag in the middle of the lake and then talk to me about your resort shack!
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I just landed my first career IT gig (Score:5, Interesting)
We've recently had a few people come over to hardware management (I am a hardware developer). Both my manager and I told them, hardware projects change EVERY DAY. Every day its, "so and so (big customer) just had issues with this", or "The market is way behind on these parts and we are short", or "The product you just designed is failing ____ test right now, what are we doing to fix it".
I've watched it drive many people out. My own mentor told me when I first started "I'll tell you the first thing my Mentor told me, 'Get out now'". A bit much for a new engineer to take in, but now I know why he said it. Right before he left the company, he started telling me he wasn't sure how much longer he could handle the pressure.
Honestly, I don't care as much about the pay, the fancy benefits, or any of the fluff. What has nearly drove me out is when I feel like every day is just another barrage of unbounded problems. Like you're the guy on the track, your problem is the chains holding you there, and management is driving the train and they aren't slowing it down. You better get those chains undone.
I've been an auto mechanic, welder, machinist, and now EE. My back-up plan / exit strategy is machining. I enjoy it, it is so much more bounded (in my opinion), and still presents good challenges to keep me engaged. I already have a colleague in another company on his way. We've talked at length about it.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:I just landed my first career IT gig (Score:5, Interesting)
I worked for a large company that made networking equipment. My job was to run a sanity test framework for their operating system. Developers load the images in a queue, the system pulls them, loads them on real hardware, and executes a body of tests.
The problem was that a bad image would hose the system to where it couldn't reboot, and then it would not be able to correct itself. Every image after that would fail. My job was to come in, clean up the mess, and apologize to each developer. It was actually stressful.
I repeatedly told the manager how I could fix it, and he always said we didn't have time. I waited for him to travel for a week, I shut down the system, and fixed it so that the system got completely initialized between every run. From that point on, every failure was a real failure cause by that developer's changes.
My job became a cake walk. I find most of the stress in this industry is self induced by clueless fucks being in charge.
Re:I just landed my first career IT gig (Score:5, Insightful)
But the truth is that tech jobs can be stressful too. I imagine people in blue collar jobs believe we are living high on the hog with not a care in the world, but it's not really that way.
I was pulling long hours one week to try and finish a software update in time. The deadline was fast approaching and the outlook was grim. As usual, the cleaning lady came by to collect the trash that evening and we got to chit-chatting like we usually did (I arrived late and stayed late back then, so my being there when she did her rounds was perfectly normal). Part way through the conversation she paused for a moment, then said something to the effect of, "You know, before I started working here I used to think that you guys all had it easy with your cushy jobs and nice offices. But then I see people here with the look that you have in your eyes right now and I realize I was wrong. It's just as tough. Different, but just as tough, if not tougher."
I think I mustered a tired "Thanks?" in response.
I don't make any claim to having it tougher than anyone else (I have a MASSIVE appreciation for manual workers, among many other fields, since I couldn't do that work), but the only people I find suggesting that tech work is easy are those who either aren't in the field and have no awareness of what it entails, or those who are a burden on everyone else around them in the field.
Strawmen galore! (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, but the stress that tech people experience is completely fake. It REALLY doesn't matter if your work is done on time.
It does if you want to remain employed with your current company. If that doesn't matter to you then you probably aren't stressed to begin with. If anyone who worked for me expressed that attitude they would be "succeeding elsewhere" in short order.
No one is going to die if your software or network doesn't work.
I'd like to introduce you to some folks who work in medical IT who will disagree with you rather strongly. Same thing with software that controls/drives cars or airplanes or manned rockets or traffic signals or ocean navigation or food safety or electrical grids or nuclear reactor controls or.... The list is very long for things that actually do matter. Yeah, nobody probably cares if your word processor crashes but more than a few of us do things that have serious consequences.
Amazingly humans survived for thousands of years without IT or computers.
Ok we're done here. Claiming people shouldn't have stress because computers didn't exist 200 years ago is irrelevant and stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
You're painting a grim picture in saying that the work someone does does not matter but you are right that Jfetjunky is stressing himself out way too much, it's not that big of a deal if the deadline is met. I've met so many people people who do burn themselves out because somehow think that the world will come to an end if they don't hit that deadline.
The truth is that if you care about what you're doing and are clearly doing what you can about the situation then it's unlikely you'll get fired. If you do g
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, stressing over a software deadline to add more whitespace to your app to make it more "appy" 2 weeks before your nearest competitors app does the same thing is stupid. I'm starting to get a bit depressed that literally everything I do in software is ephemeral, and in 3 months - 5 years completely irrelevant. Why should I stress out if some overlord won't get his bonus because he pulled some deadline out os his ass?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of my deadlines are driven by real things.
Re: (Score:2)
Fallacy of relative privation (Score:3, Interesting)
Try working construction for minimum wage and not knowing where your next job will come from. Then have your blood pressure tested.
Ahh the "staving people in Africa" argument your mother made to get you to eat your vegetables. Great example of the fallacy of relative privation [tvtropes.org]. Just because other people have it worse doesn't mean you should be grateful for a possibly better but still bad situation.
Re: (Score:2)
Pathetic (Score:2)
Yes, you should be grateful, but you are an ungrateful self centered little shit. Common malady.
Grow up. You post some of the most ridiculous drivel on this site and then have the stones to start calling names when someone points it out. If you don't actually have a rebuttal more eloquent than calling someone names then shut up and move on to your next troll.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Try working construction for minimum wage and not knowing where your next job will come from. Then have your blood pressure tested.
Ahh the "staving people in Africa" argument your mother made to get you to eat your vegetables. Great example of the fallacy of relative privation [tvtropes.org]. Just because other people have it worse doesn't mean you should be grateful for a possibly better but still bad situation.
I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever. No matter what you are going through, the knowledge that someone else has it worse than you allows you to claim some sort of superiority or status over them. A child that is neglected or abused at home becomes a bully at school because he can exert power over his victims. A low wage worker in an unskilled menial job supports cutting safety nets because "I'm busting m
Dragging down others (Score:2)
I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever.
Only the more pathetic and narcissistic among us. Sadly that seems to be a rather large percent of the population. I fear people don't need that but quite a number seem to enjoy it. If we do actually need to feel better than others then that is a very sad commentary on us as a species.
Re: (Score:2)
I would posit that humans in fact need someone to be worse off than them as a coping mechanism for their own suffering/misfortune/whatever.
Only the more pathetic and narcissistic among us.
Not necessarily. The pathetic and narcissistic among us my do so consciously, but I would argue a vast majority do it subconsciously. We are always comparing ourselves to others in some way, even if we don't explicitly realize we are doing so. It's in our nature.
I fear people don't need that but quite a number seem to enjoy it. If we do actually need to feel better than others then that is a very sad commentary on us as a species.
It's not needed, but it's a coping tool, one of several that we have. Fear and hatred towards the "other" is another big one that is being prominently featured right now(think Terror Management Theory without the overly-morbid focus on death of
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You just said that. What are you getting so upset about snowflake? Go do it then.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure you know what "burn out" is then (Score:2)
I doubt they know what burnout is then. Are you dragging yourself to work AND finding yourself still getting there two hours late because fuckit AND then working at home past when you really wanted to go to bed multiple nights in a row AND hating your job AND not caring if the current deathmarch you are on actually yields a product? Then, yes, you're burned out and it's time to find a cush corporate job or maybe just a few wee
Re: (Score:3)
Telling people that aren't being abused quite as badly as you are that they aren't being abused is itself a kind of abuse.
That you are in worse straits than some others does not qualify you to define the term for those others. There are also people worse off than you are, is your life therefore perfect?
Re: (Score:2)
While the definition of burnout might not have been adequately explained to the surveyed and thus make me doubt a little of its accuracy , I suspect the percentage of Tech Workers that burnt out is higher than the 57% quoted, considering the possibility of even higher % of the severely burnout left IT for other fields, or worse, suffered ill health (physical of mental) and is now sitting at home broken. The survey seem to only question those still fit enough and produce good enough quality of work output t
Re: (Score:2)
Over their lifetime? Yes, I'd say the "burned out at least once in their lifetime" number is higher than 57%. (I've been there myself twice in a twenty-year career.) My original point is that you need to understand that there's a real differenc
Re: (Score:2)
The word you are looking for is "define". Yes, this survey did a piss-poor job of defining "job burnout" so I'm helping them with the task.
Re: (Score:2)
>> gatekeep The word you are looking for is "define". Yes, this survey did a piss-poor job of defining "job burnout" so I'm helping them with the task.
A good definition would be "your only motivation for coming in to work and doing your job is so you don't make a mistake and have all 8 of your bosses stopping by to hassle you about TPS reports."
Re: (Score:2)
Are you seriously trying to gatekeep job burnout? This is some quintessential crotchety greybeard material.
gatekeep? You going to call someone a virtue signaller next?
Re: (Score:2)
+1 funny!
Surprise, working people to death leads to burnout (Score:5, Insightful)
Surprise, poor survey sampling gives poor results (Score:3)
I'm not surprised that a significant number of users who don't feel comfortable talking to coworkers without anonymity are feeling burnout at work. This wasn't a commissioned study with careful target sampling, they just showed this question to their users. The title of this article should be "57% of Tech Workers Who Use The Blind App Are Suffering From Job Burnout, Survey Finds".
Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Surprise, working people to death leads to burn (Score:4, Informative)
I work with people who proudly complain about "working until 2 am" or willingly take on all kinds of client work at ridiculous times because it burnishes their reputation.
Some after hours work is unavoidable in IT, but I just refuse to work those kinds of hours regularly without added compensation of some kind (added vacation days without strings and/or more money).
As a more skilled/experienced/older worker, I think I can get away with it but I'm not gonna lie, the people who do it seem to have more street cred in the organization because they are willing to bend over.
I think it's highly organization dependent and sometimes individually dependent (ie, can you get done what needs doing in normal work hours). And I think there are definitely orgs where if you're not doing that, you might as well resign now because you will get shuffled to the shit work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I worked 55-60 hours a week for most of a year, mainly due to two senior people leaving with a month's difference and a third knocked his head pretty bad leaving me and a few juniors to sort it out. That was as an IT consultant though so I had a billing bonus that gave me pretty good kickback. If I recall correctly it kicked in at about 2/3rd = 67% billable time and the company average was 75-80% somewhere, so your average consultant would get bonus for like 10% while I could hit 50%+. Normally they wouldn'
Re: (Score:3)
I hear this all the time but WTH actually does this? Anyone here at slashdot? Even when I was younger I did an all nighter just once or twice. I've been working 8 hour days the last 15 years.
My understanding would be Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, etc. although I've only really heard from people that have worked at Amazon. They hire new young and eager workers who they can work and fire them when they burn out. However, just as many leave before that. It's all part of an understood system where new workers agree to be overworked while padding their resume and looking for a new job. This lastrs for an average of 18 months before they have found a new job or get laid off. They hopefully hop to
Re: (Score:2)
The no vacation thing pisses me off. My entire adult life, I've only had one "real" vacation if you define it as a whole week off.
One reason there's such a lack of vacation time here in Seattle is that in Washington state, the law only requires less than 2/3 be paid out. In CA, we have to pay out 100%. That's why in CA we require employees to take PTO to get it off of the books, but in WA we basically don't allow vacation time. No company I've ever worked for let programmers take even a fifth (as a guess)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
If you work under such conditions by choice then it is on your shoulders alone.
No, you're wrong. Those working conditions are spreading everywhere. Companies have figured out that instead of hiring more people, they can force others to work more for the same pay.
Don't like it? Get out. And then there's the bullshit of "well, others are doing it!"
And the days of walking out of one job into another are gone - unless you're in the hot skill du jour. Which these days is AI. And god forbid you're over 40: things get real hard then.
And then how does one check on that when interviewing?
Re:Manage your choices wisely (Score:5, Insightful)
If all available work is under such conditions, is that really a choice?
Options (Score:3)
It is very nice to be independently wealthy and not have to worry about getting a paycheck, but for the rest of us we have to do it for a paycheck or face homelessness and possibly starvation.
You don't have to be independently wealthy to make a living doing something that you don't enjoy. If you hate IT work then go find something else to do. It's a big world with lots of opportunity.
If all available work is under such conditions, is that really a choice?
Are you seriously claiming that someone who is bright enough to find work in the tech sector will find it impossible to do something else if they put their mind to it? Possibly even something they actually enjoy doing with reasonable hours and adequate pay. Point is very few people are forced to work in IT. Arg
Re: (Score:2)
It's a big world with lots of opportunity.
Old timer, this is no longer the case. It may have been true when you were young, but these days it is IT, gigs, or unemployment. Too many people in a globally connected world competing for the same few jobs.
Re: (Score:3)
That's hilarious. Do you have any idea how many jobs there are available in academia? Not many. The issue is that if you do what you love, what's the incentive to stop? There's a reason that the average age of professors always hovers in the 50s and 60s. It's not uncommon to find semi-retired professors still kicking around well into their 70s teaching one or two classes they love.
More than just money (Score:2)
Who ISNT working for a paycheck?
Do I really have to explain that some people don't really give a shit about what they are doing? Sure everyone works to get paid but some people actually try to enjoy what they are doing along the way so that the job is more than just a means to get money.
Re: (Score:2)
I've taken 4 weeks of vacation in 30 years. One week when my dad died. One week for a camping trip, and the remaining two weeks were for things like my children being born.
Then you've been suckered, or have different priorities. One year, I took 6 weeks off to travel around the country. Another year, I took 4 weeks off and went to Australia. Another year, I took 6 weeks off and went to Africa. I've taken multiple 2-week vacations. Without checking e-mail. And yes, I live in the U.S.
Gee, I can't imagine why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine some of the opposites here.
A company that jumps at every opportunity to create a process but never does anything with them.
A company that only promotes from within and then wonders why they can't move on to new tech as no one knows it or how to introduce it.
A company that doesn't do any get togethers with anyone since in their mind family comes first.
There are good ways to do these things and bad ways. The trick is knowing which is which.
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The office (Score:4, Interesting)
I've done a lot of Peopleware like consulting, mostly for software development teams. The IT office space is in general the enemy of these teams. They are noisy and destroy your concentration. You can only break someones concentration for a finite number per day, certainly with introverts, after that the dev is just excausted. As a rule of thumb, the correlation is more people wearing headphones -> more burnout. It's fucked up that people need to wear headphones to attempt to do their work, and a clear sign the environment is poison to their jobs. Of course they put all these people in the same space, to save money. Hardly ever do they do the math, and contemplate how much it costs them in burnout and turnover.
so... (Score:5, Informative)
1. Hire "A" players, because the competence of one's coworkers is a large contributor to employee satisfaction.
2. Don't use golden handcuffs as a means of mitigating hiring churn; you want employees to stay at the company because they want to be there. Employees choose how much stock they want vs. cash.
3. Don't use performance based bonuses; high performance is the base level expectation, not something to be singled out and rewarded.
4. "We're a team, not a family." You don't "cut" people from a family; you do "cut" people from a pro sports team.
5. "Hard work - Not Relevant". They care about productivity, not how hard you worked to be productive.
6. Low tolerance for "brilliant jerks".
7. Pay "top of market" wages. "One outstanding employee gets more done and costs less than two 'adequate' employees." "Employees should feel they are being paid well relative to other options in the market."
Re: (Score:2)
Re:so... (Score:5, Insightful)
Then refuse to work, yes you may get fired, but what's worse than getting fired? Working for free.
My boss is lucky if I even look at my phone off-business-hours, let alone pick it up and respond.
Sure, if an email is prefixed with "URGENT" or whatever, I take a look, but then I lazily come in the next day an hour or two "late".
It's all about the contract you signed with your employer. Don't sign shit you haven't read, and don't sign away your youth for pennies.
Re: ...if an email is prefixed with "URGENT" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, they continue to find people to fill those positions. I think there's just disagreement over whether "pay top wages and get top people" is the optimal strategy to pursue organization-wide. Netflix apparently believes it is. Most companies, judging by their behavior, do not. Here's why I tend to side with Netflix:
a. The difference between "top pay" and "average pay" is not that huge. Maybe 10-20%. If your interview process is at all effective, "
Re: (Score:2)
Quite likely, since this doesn't contradict anything in their manifesto. It specifically discusses compensating employees above their individual market value. A superstar is going to have a higher individual market value. Unless I just missed it, it doesn't stipulate anywhere that all employees with a given title need to be paid roughly the same.
Comparison data? (Score:2)
They're highly paid (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
IT people are highly paid. If they're not, then they're in the wrong career. Take a few months off between jobs or something. "Burnout" is only a problem if you've got no other options. Otherwise, it's a life choice.
It's good advice, but I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that IT people are that much more wealthy where they can afford to take a 6-month sabbatical with little or no income. Certified Financial Scrooge is not part of an IT certification track, and IT people aren't really any better than the average person in avoiding debt or living paycheck to paycheck, even with a six-figure salary.
Also, when I read "highly paid" with regards to IT jobs, I wonder exactly what that definition is. A low six figu
meaningless wanking (Score:5, Interesting)
A single data point is statistically meaningless "woe is us" wanking UNLESS other industries are surveyed.
If the "burnout" rate for tech workers is 57%, but for medical workers is 75%, factory line workers is 62%, and teachers is 60%, then the rate for tech workers is really not bad.
If OTOH other industries scale at 20-30%, then the tech sector really is dire.
In short: I suspect that everyone feels like they are underappreciated, underpaid, and is "fed up with all the bullshit at work"...like everyone else.
Need unions and OT pay! (Score:2)
Need unions and OT pay!
Way to go Netflix! (Score:2)
Only 38%-39% of your IT employees are burning out.
That's something to be really proud of.
Am I surprised? (Score:4, Insightful)
Yep, so many folks LOOOVVVVEEE 50, 60, 70 hour weeks, and having to respond to the boss 24x7x365.25. Who needs a life?
UNIONS are why we have benefits, weekends, holidays and vacations. No company did that out of the alleged kindness of their hearts.
But none of you here need them, they're *so* "ancient", never mind they could get you a 40 hour week and no being bothered off hours, no, enjoy your (non-) life.
Skewed towards Silicon Valley (Score:2)
Most of the companies mentioned are Silicon Valley tech firms, where the competition for jobs is fierce, and hours are brutal. In the rest of the country, my impression is that stress levels are much lower. I personally can't imagine a better job than the one I have, and I know many who agree.
Is burnout a medical term? (Score:2)
Re:Demand vaca time and use it. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Demand vaca time and use it. (Score:5, Funny)
Working in Belgium and some of the things I have had happened to me.This is in several companies:
On a Friday at the end of February: Hello, you still have not taken your 5 last days and you need to take them at the end of Febrary. "So that means I have the week of next week?" Yes. OK. Have a nice day I see you after that.
These stories are precisely why Belgium, and the rest of Europe are the king of tech development, innovation, and the global leader in envelope-pushing ideas.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
35 days a year basline seems to be the gold standard in Europe. Typically around 22-25 days you can take whenever you like, plus the rest as paid public holidays.
Unfortunately I find many companies don't like to negotiate extra time off. My current employer lets me buy one or two weeks a year, basically unpaid leave no-questions-asked and with the cost spread over the year. I'm quite happy with that.
Re:Demand vaca time and use it. (Score:4, Insightful)
I've worked for companies that offer 2 - 3 weeks and unlimited. The companies with the unlimited policies ALWAYS track your PTO more closely than the ones that give a set number of days.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Because US's annual raises rarely meet the US's annual inflation rates. So you are forced to move up the salary chain or effectively get a pay cut ever year.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What's wrong with not being promoted -- just do your job well, take your pay and vacation time. Work to live, don't live to work. A snazzy job title isn't the pinnacle of human achievement.
While I agree with the sentiment that most people shouldn't feel pressured into living to work, the pinnacle of human achievement in any discipline is nearly always achieved through an insane devotion to the task. The people responsible for this level of excellence generally live to work.
There is nothing wrong with working to live, but there often is nothing wrong with living to work as long as it is a decision made freely.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
In my field, year-long spikes are common.
I'd support having all such things (including scheduled days off, vacation, overtime/comp time, etc.) kept indefinitely, with maximum caps for each kind. If an employee leaves for any reason, including being fired, they get paid out whatever they haven't used.
I'm quite happy to help my team meet their goals and go the extra mile to deliver a quality product to our customer..... but I certainly expect that once that's done, I'll get to go spend time with my family.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Then in the off years, we'd have layoffs.
People tend to like that even less.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
40 hour work weeks, enforced. 30 days paid vacation per year, plus holidays and weekends.
Par for the course in the UK.
If you work overtime one week, you get those hours back the next week.
Not par for the course, but it's pretty common the you will get it back sometime. A busy period coming up to a deadline could cover a few weeks.
Everyone gets two days off in a row every week.
.. usually happens
If you give up those days for some special reason, you get comp vacation time to be used within the next month.
You would usually get this, but may have to wait until the peak is over before taking the time back. Alternatively you could be paid - time and a half is quite common
Everyone takes all their vacation, every year.
In the UK it's exceptional for anyone not to take all their time. A company I worked for switched the "holiday year" from a fixed January-December to a ye
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I work with several devs making nearly that much, and they most certainly are burned out. When you work constant death marches with Seattle Hundreds (16 hours a day Mon-Thu and 12 hours a day Fri-Sun) that almost always happens. I work almost that much, and I moved over a year ago and still haven't even unpacked yet. High pay helps, but you still have a breaking point. There just aren't enough programmers to meet demand.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
...end up with even more work and fewer people to do it?
The part I find fascinating about that is that the junior/recent college grads stick with jobs despite the long hours for the experience and the most experienced people stick with jobs because they know it's the same most everywhere else. I guess it's the devil you know. The guys in the middle with five to fifteen years experience are the ones that keep jumping ship to try to find somewhere better.
My company has about eighty people with less than three years experience and around twenty with more than tw
Re: (Score:2)
I work with several devs making nearly that much, and they most certainly are burned out. When you work constant death marches with Seattle Hundreds (16 hours a day Mon-Thu and 12 hours a day Fri-Sun) that almost always happens. I work almost that much, and I moved over a year ago and still haven't even unpacked yet. High pay helps, but you still have a breaking point. There just aren't enough programmers to meet demand.
I've never worked anywhere with that kind of schedule....or known anyone who has. Then again, I have never lived in shit holes like Seattle or California.
I simply wouldn't work like that. If it were that, or go on welfare, I'd say fuck it and go on welfare, or just rob houses for a living - leaving that kind of schedule to the suckers.
If my employer required me to work more than 50 hours per week on anything other than a rare occasion, I'd find a new employer. ASAP.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Too many tech jobs are just cleaning up after Indian disaster after Indian disaster. And not in any sort of permanent way, just putting out the same fires over and over.
There are two kinds of IT people. Those who create. And those who fix creations. If you're tired of doing one, then figure out how to get paid doing the other, and feel good knowing you'll be working to fix your own disasters.