Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Communications Government Network

Mobile Internet Goes Free, National For a Day In Cuba (reuters.com) 87

More than 5 million cellphone users in Cuba received free internet on Tuesday, in an eight-hour test before the government launches sales of the service. The test marks the first time internet services were available nationwide. Reuters reports: Cuba is one of the Western Hemisphere's least connected countries. There are hundreds of Wi-Fi hotspots in Cuba but virtually no home penetration. Dissident blogger Yoani Sanchez, considered the country's social media pioneer, raved that she had directly sent a tweet from her mobile. In another tweet, she called the test a "citizen's victory." On the streets of Havana, mobile users said they were happy about the day of free internet, even as some complained that connectivity was notably slower than usual.

Hotspots currently charge about $1 an hour although monthly wages in Cuba average just $30. The government has not yet said how much most Cubans would pay for mobile internet, or when exactly sales of the service will begin. But [the state-run telecommunications monopoly ETECSA] is already charging companies and embassies $45 a month for four gigabytes. Analysts have said broader Web access will ultimately weaken government control over what information reaches people in a country where the state has a monopoly on the media.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mobile Internet Goes Free, National For a Day In Cuba

Comments Filter:
  • by Vinegar Joe ( 998110 ) on Wednesday August 15, 2018 @06:08AM (#57129240)

    According to Michael Moore they've got free and "incredible healthcare"......

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Because now they can hear how great communism is from a bunch of dumb American hipsters

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      According to Michael Moore they've got free and "incredible healthcare"......

      You do realize, I hope, that a place can be good in some areas, such as basic health care, but weak in others such as internet availability. Different governments and communities may be better at different things.

      Does it say we in America are morally superior because it is easier to get good internet than basic healthcare, particularly if you don't have any money?

      Learn. If a country is good at something find out why. Can we use that knowledge to improve our own country? Can we improve on it? Too many i

      • by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Wednesday August 15, 2018 @07:44AM (#57129496)
        U.S. health care is pretty good all things considered, but a big part of the problem is that the U.S. is just terribly unhealthy. One-third of the country is obese (we consume more sugar per capita than anyone else, and we're almost 25% higher than the next country) and we're near the top of the lists for almost all types of hard drug use.

        The other problem is that our healthcare system is some terrible amalgamation that's the worst of a free market and worst of a national system cobbled together. When people get unhealthy, they don't want to get checkups early because they don't know what it will cost them. We don't have the free clinic visits of some countries that can nip a lot of expensive problems in the bud if dealt with early, but you can't possibly get a hospital or clinic to give you a price for any of their services before you buy. In some cases they don't even have that information.

        There's a public healthcare system in Medicare and Medicaid but it has its own problems and is too frequently abused [fbi.gov] by medical providers who make false charges. [fbi.gov] The private healthcare system isn't terribly great either since you can't go across state lines to buy insurance, so in some cases you're stuck with too few providers for reasonable competition to take place.
        • by Anonymous Coward

          U.S. health care is absolutely fucked. And it refuses to look at anything else because government is intentionally broken by rich people who don't want to pay it forward. Point out how much the wealthy in this country have benefited from government spending, infrastructure, security, R&D, etc., and they get very uncomfortable - because deep down, most of them know they were born on third base. 'Libertarians' always seem to be people who chose their parents well, but have achieved very little themselves.

        • U.S. health care is pretty good all things considered, but a big part of the problem is that the U.S. is just terribly unhealthy. One-third of the country is obese (we consume more sugar per capita than anyone else, and we're almost 25% higher than the next country) and we're near the top of the lists for almost all types of hard drug use.

          Yes, I suppose not having enough food or enough money to buy drugs is one way to reduce those things. Onward to Venezuela/Cuba style government!

          • "Venezuela and Cuba have socialized medicine and also have bad economies so socialized medicine = bad economies.

            What? The entirety of the first world also has socialized medicine except America and they pay less than half per person than America does for its healthcare?

            No, that's wrong because Cuba and Venezuela!"

        • U.S. health care is pretty good all things considered

          U.S. healthcare is amazing when you can afford it and when you don't need it.

          I hear endless stories from friends and colleagues over there.
          Most of them are alive because of how great U.S. healthcare is
          Most of them are in financial or legal trouble because of how great U.S. healthcare is.

          • You don't need to afford health care in the U.S. to take advantage of it. By law, hospitals are required to treat anyone who walks into the emergency room with a genuine medical emergency, regardless of their ability to pay. That's part of the reason hospital bills are so high for patients who can pay - the hospitals have to pass their uncompensated losses onto their paying clients. Also, the vast majority of the country (around 90%) has health insurance, either self-bought or provided by their employer.
            • You don't need to afford health care in the U.S. to take advantage of it.

              I didn't say people weren't treated because they couldn't afford it. I said they are in financial or legal trouble as a result of it.

              Also the health insurance of the 90% is useless. Many of the policies can't even cover basic things let alone serious accidents. Oh and don't you dare get something that requires ongoing treatment. Health insurances only like customers who don't claim.

              Anecdote: A colleage of mine got t-boned by someone who ran a red light. After the pathetically small insurance of the person a

        • (we consume more sugar per capita than anyone else, and we're almost 25% higher than the next country)

          This is actually kind of funny because, per capita, Cuban sugar consumption is through the roof. It's actually more than the average American, but Cuba is usually not included in those "top 10" list type things. See https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/b... [umn.edu]

          Anyway, there's actually a reason for this. Before the fall of the USSR, Cuba had a deal with the Soviets where they would produce sugar in exchange for just about everything that Cuba wanted / needed -- meat, cars, televisions, you name it. They ramped up th

      • by cascadingstylesheet ( 140919 ) on Wednesday August 15, 2018 @08:43AM (#57129680) Journal

        According to Michael Moore they've got free and "incredible healthcare"......

        You do realize, I hope, that a place can be good in some areas, such as basic health care, but weak in others such as internet availability.

        Except, of course, that isn't the case with Cuba. Nobody travels to Cuba to use the great healthcare. Because it isn't great.

        • by skam240 ( 789197 )

          "Except, of course, that isn't the case with Cuba. Nobody travels to Cuba to use the great healthcare. Because it isn't great."

          You're correct, for a third world nation it's fucking amazing.

          Context matters my friend.

          • by Anonymous Coward

            "Except, of course, that isn't the case with Cuba. Nobody travels to Cuba to use the great healthcare. Because it isn't great."

            You're correct, for a third world nation it's fucking amazing.

            Context matters my friend.

            Cuba wasn't always a third world nation:

            Before the Revolution [wikipedia.org]

            Prior to the Cuban Revolution, Cuba ranked fifth in the hemisphere in per capita income, third in life expectancy, second in per capita ownership of automobiles and telephones, first in the number of television sets per inhabitant. Its income per capita in 1929 was reportedly 41% of the US, thus higher than in Mississippi and South Carolina.

            Yep. Context matters.

            • by Anonymous Coward

              Cuba wasn't always a third world nation:

              Before the Revolution [wikipedia.org]

              The World never had a 'Third World' country until Pandit Nehru coined the term. Being a Third World nation [i.e. a non-align one] used to be a compliment.

              The world is far more complicated now, and educated people shouldn't be using this expression. Even the US is a tad third-world-ish nowadays.

              • Even the US is a tad third-world-ish nowadays.

                Parts of it are; especially the parts we insist on importing from the third world. Which amazes nobody except the enthusiastic importers.

      • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

        No one is suggesting we adopt Cuba's form of government.

        I hate to be the one to break this to you, but a lot of people, especially in our universities, are suggesting exactly that. Distributing society's resources equally among all people is a highly attractive idea.

        • by Junta ( 36770 )

          Yes, but Cuba doesn't really do that. That's the challenge with communism in practice, those in power to distribute it, distribute it unfairly to themselves.

    • They do. They also don't need to read politically obsessed nu tjobs from the US airing their dirty underwear on every news article they read.
    • I went there a few years back and the only fat people I saw were tourists. While this is not indicative of overall health, there are a lot of medical conditions revolving around obesity. Their medical facilities, equipment, and even medication are not up to par when compared to other countries, but they do a phenomenal job of working with what they do have, to the point where their average life expectancy is competitive with what we would consider "first world" countries.

      Also, their rum is amazing.

  • Hotspots currently charge about $1 an hour although monthly wages in Cuba average just $30.

    WELCOME TO SOCIALISM, MOTHERFUCKER!

  • Welcome to the mobile widespread censorship and monitoring.
    If you'll be able to effectively use TOR, VPNs and full cryptography, then maybe you won.
    Otherwise, you lost.

    • Yeah, I'm quite skeptical of how open the internet will be or how much they'll crack down on citizens who access information that they don't like.

      Reporters Without Borders has Cuba ranked 172 out of 180 for press freedom in 2018. [rsf.org]However, the U.S. is a pathetic 45th, so I don't think I can give them too much shit.
      • I have to give it to you for the whataboutism in your last sentence. Not many people use whataboutism in its original sense, to deflect from the crimes of Communism, any more. But here's an example spotted in the wild. Pretty cool, actually.
  • what will they change tourists for roaming?

    $15-$20 a meg (your cost not ATT's cost)

    • Just got back a few weeks ago. There have been foreign networks in Cuba offering roaming for quite some time. And you're right, they're exceptionally expensive, around $2/meg.

      For what it's worth, the local Internet access is the same for tourists and locals (though the impact of that pricing is felt quite differently) at $1/hr. If anything this will certainly bring prices down across the board. Mobile phones have become incredibly popular, and $2/M is ludicrously prohibitive. If I had to guess, there'll

  • See how communism provides prosperity for everybody? Free Internet in Cuba! No need to work for it! Just compare that to the evil, capitalist, fascist West, where workers are forced to be exploited by their capitalist overlords like slaves for several hours each month just in order to be able to afford basic gigabit Internet service!

    .
    .
    .

    (Yes, that was sarcasm.)

    • Yeah but I see far less shit posts coming from Cuba, so they have that going over democracy.

      • "Why should freedom of speech and freedom of the press be allowed? Why should a government] allow itself to be criticized? It would not allow opposition by lethal weapons. Ideas are much more fatal things than guns. Why should any man be allowed to buy a printing press and disseminate pernicious opinion calculated to embarrass the government?"

        Spoken like one of your heroes!

  • More than 5 million cellphone users in Cuba received free internet on Tuesday

    Now it is North Korea's turn.So much to live for and to hope for — unlike in the decadent lands of the West. The Communism is more and and more attractive every day!

  • Free as in no cost, or free as in you can see/go/access anything you like? I'm pretty sure it's the former, and the latter will never happen with the current regime.
  • FidelCastro.com & CNN.com?
  • broader Web access will ultimately weaken government control over what information reaches people in a country where the state has a monopoly on the media.

    Anyone willing to get news from the Free World could do it using a cheap radio. It seems that has not impressed Cubans so far

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...