Google Removes Accounts Tied To Iran-Led Misinformation Campaign (engadget.com) 87
In a blog post, Google shared an update regarding its efforts to combat state-sponsored phishing attacks and to remove accounts associated with an influence operation linked to Iran. Engadget reports: The company said that in recent months, it has detected and blocked state-sponsored groups from targeting political campaigns, journalists, activists and academics with phishing attempts. Google has also been working with the cybersecurity group FireEye, which has been providing Google with information on an Iran-based misinformation operation. FireEye identified three email accounts, three YouTube channels and three Google+ accounts linked to that operation, which Google subsequently took down.
In conjunction to the intelligence provided by FireEye, Google also investigated other suspicious groups linked to Iran. The company identified and removed 39 YouTube channels, six Blogger blogs and 13 Google+ accounts it believed to be connected to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Relevant videos on the now-terminated YouTube channels had garnered 13,466 views in the U.S. Facebook and Twitter were also made aware of the Iranian operation. Twitter announced that it suspended 284 accounts believed to have originated from Iran for "engaging in coordinated manipulation." Meanwhile, Facebook said it removed "652 pages that it says were linked to a campaign originating in Iran, as well as an unspecified number of accounts liked to Russian military intelligence services," reports Engadget.
In conjunction to the intelligence provided by FireEye, Google also investigated other suspicious groups linked to Iran. The company identified and removed 39 YouTube channels, six Blogger blogs and 13 Google+ accounts it believed to be connected to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Relevant videos on the now-terminated YouTube channels had garnered 13,466 views in the U.S. Facebook and Twitter were also made aware of the Iranian operation. Twitter announced that it suspended 284 accounts believed to have originated from Iran for "engaging in coordinated manipulation." Meanwhile, Facebook said it removed "652 pages that it says were linked to a campaign originating in Iran, as well as an unspecified number of accounts liked to Russian military intelligence services," reports Engadget.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
helping Trump collude to disenfranchise US voters
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disenfranchise
so are Republicans ready to admit the fact that Iran is attempting to influence us?
Everyone tries to "influence" everyone, Russia included. Remember when Obama flew to London to try to "influence" the brexit vote by threatening Britain? Or when Mexico "influenced" every election in living memory by shipping millions of their citizens here to produce millions of voting-legal children? Or when the CIA tried to "influence" dozens of countries since WW2 through everything from media propaganda campaigns to coups to full-blown militar
Re: (Score:2)
Apart from when Russia hacked the DNC and released the emails to stir up controversy (even though eventually nothing damning was found in them), which Trump apparently knew of before the emails were released.
And as for the CIA, two wrongs don't make a right.
Who judges fake news? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Fake news you say? You mean like this?
On Saturday, dozens of media outlets reported that federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested an illegal alien who was taking his wife to the hospital to deliver their baby - but they conveniently left out one key detail: the man was a wanted murder suspect.
The timing of the media's latest deception to demonize the Trump administration for political gain comes just two days after more than 350 newspapers wrote op-eds bemoaning President Donald
South Africa govt says it's true, also ABC News (Score:3, Informative)
"South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa announced earlier that the ruling political party, the African National Congress, had agreed to a proposal to alter the country's constitution and allow for land expropriation, or seizure by the government, without compensation", reports ABC News.
The official South Africa government Twitter account added:
"South Africa will speed up the pace of land reform"
It seems someone told you some fake news.
Re: SOMEONE HELP LYING REPUBLICAN FAGGOTS READ? (Score:2)
I like how you link to more fake news in order to prove that you're not linking to fake news.
For the record, even using their own statistics, attacks on farmers have INCREASED; it's only resultant deaths which have decreased. This shouldn't be surprising given that farmers have been working for years to improve their security measures and build groups to protect each other. Only a moron would focus on the number of deaths while ignoring an increase in attacks.
I await your next fake news link with bated br
Re: (Score:2)
The SF Chronicle report I read clearly said he was wanted for murder in Mexico.
Re: (Score:2)
Engaging in breathless whataboutism does not reflect particularly well on you or your argument.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
none of all misinformation campaigns coming out from USA are supressed, that should give you a big tip
Re: (Score:2)
We're not smart enough to make up our own minds.
Read the report yourself... (Score:2, Insightful)
https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/pdfs/rpt-FireEye-Iranian-IO.pdf
Seems like the main crime they committed was supporting Palestine, and opposing human rights violations in Saudi Arabia.
"Multiple regionally focused Liberty Front Press Twitter accounts
have retweeted content from the original affiliated Twitter
accounts (@libertyfrontpr and @libertyfrontp) that contained,
for example, anti-Saudi, anti-Israel, pro-Palestine, and antiTrump
sentiments."
Oh no, how ever shall our democracy survive a
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"Broadly speaking, the intent behind this activity appears to
be to promote Iranian political interests, including anti-Saudi,
anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as to promote
support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the
U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). In the context of the U.S.-focused
activity, this also includes significant anti-Trump messaging
and the alignment of social media personas with an American
liberal identity. However, it is important to note that the activity
does
Re: (Score:2)
Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wow the foreign troll shills are out in force in this thread.
Slashdot is z-ist to the max... (Score:4, Insightful)
Washington loves the two most depraved states on the Earth equally, Isr-el and Saudi Arabia. And the z-onists and wahhabis are blood brothers. Slashdot is just another media mouthpiece for the one, and thus the other. Every day Slashdot tries to demonise Iran.
The excuse given by the z-onist owners of Facebook for banning the 'Iran' accounts was that they dared to support the Iran nuclear treaty.
I'm reminded of when Tony Blair blew up the Serbia equivalent of the BBC HQ (civilian TV centre) because the station dared to run programs criticising Tony Blair's Kosovo War, and dared to show images of the thousands of civilians Blair murdered in Serbia. The actual BBC stated the bombing was justified (many many civilian workers were slaughtered) because the Serbs had no right to tell the truth when it ran against 'british' propaganda interests. Indeed it was a BBC foreign correspondent who phoned back to confirm all the foreign journalists had left the target building for the night, so the RAF could then murder ever civilian Serb who remained in the HQ. Jill Dando- a BBC journalist who fronted the anti-serb war propaganda- was murdered at her home in revenge shortly afetrwards.
Or perhaps you prefer the example of Loony Tunes cartoons that used nazi-style racist imagery to demonise the people of Japan during WW2.
In a time of WAR, the 'enemy' is to be denied a voice regardless of truth. The tech giants know the war on Iran has actually begun, and are acting accordingly.
Re: (Score:3)
I hardly see it as convincing anyone and all it does is put forward the question, are the corporate douche bags censoring US government propaganda in other countries to protect those countries citizens from the mountains of bullshit coming out of the US. Are the winning the censor law, nope, they are just crippling their businesses. They are simply pushing the censorship button as hard as they can until the public react.
Of course the typical complain but the mug punters will be mislead. Reality is, mug pun
Keep the content. Label it. (Score:5, Insightful)
Instead of sending all these Facebook/Twitter postings down the memory hole, they should just flag them: "These are posts which we have reason to believe originated with Iranian operatives" (or Russian military, or whatever they think it is). Give people the option to hide these posts, or to browse them, or whatever they want to do. Personally, I'd be curious to look at them, at least briefly. It could perhaps lead me to be better informed about what the various state actors are up to on social media. It would certainly do a lot to raise public awareness of that problem.
The current solution sucks, since it does nothing to raise awareness of the problem, and raises the possibility that Facebook is engaging in censorship for their own reasons. As others have observed on this thread: it smells a little gamey when Facebook says "We're going to delete all these posts because we think they originated with [x]. No, we're not going to tell you why we think that".
The solution to speech you don't like is to add more speech of your own. The solution is never to suppress the speech you don't like.
Re: (Score:2)
This is exactly why I love /.'s -1 moderation. You can still see the posts if you want to, but generally don't have to.
Re: (Score:2)
Until Google removes accounts to (Score:5, Insightful)
at least one US-lead disinformation campaign, this is censorship on behalf of the US government, and nothing else.
Remember Iraq having nukular weapons, ready to strike in under 4 hours? Remember "Alkaida operating out of Baghdad"? Remember "Syria chemical weapons facilities bombed", when the said facilities were inspected by OPCW months early and declared clean? Remember Hans Blix?
All these lies were used as excuses for massive wars, which brought an enormous amount of suffering. In combination, the propaganda and the wars are a crime against humanity.
But where's the outrage?
Re: (Score:1)
LOL really? It is the same crap, just amplified many times over. As for Trump, whatever he is to you, around him are the same neocon bunch that put "Mission Accomplished" above Mr. Dubya's round head.
Are you children learning?
Re: (Score:1)
Nope, because Bush wasn't crazy enough to use lies that obviously silly (plus there's no way America would've been willing to go to war with a country that could inflict serious damage back). WMDs was the chant, because they thought Iraq might still have the chemical weapons the USA sold them.
Re: (Score:1)
because they thought Iraq
Because they made it up, you mean.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
He'll sink the UK fleet then they'll be stuck on their little island. Good riddance.
Re: (Score:2)
while US based WMD information is allowed (Score:1)
sure..while US based WMD information is endorsed and further propagated
https://www.smoseoservices.in/blog/video-design-co (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I said, "Ya dirty dog!"
Iran and Infowars at the same rough time? (Score:2)
Information campaigns (Score:1)
The key points here are 1. differentiating information campaigns and misinformation campaigns and 2. what to do about them.
Information campaigns should not be stopped, even if they are done on behalf of a government or by government agencies.
Misinformation campaigns should be labeled so and links to definite proof of why said information is untruthful should be attached.
Anyone censoring others and claiming it was because it was misinformation is doing exactly what the Chinese government does.