Google Home Outships Amazon Echo for Second Quarter in Row 48
According to the research firm Canalys, Google shipped 5.4 million Google Home speakers in the quarter, compared to 4.1 million for Echo. It's the second quarter in a row that Echo took a backseat to Google. From a report: Things have changed dramatically from the year ago figures. Then, Amazon had an 82% market share of the connected speaker market, to Google's 17%. For the second quarter of this year, Google leads with 32% share and a 449 percent growth, to 24.5% for Amazon. What's behind the turnaround?
Voicebot.ai, a newsletter that tracks the connected speaker market, chalks it up to Google having more languages available in international markets for the Google Home speaker than Amazon does for Echo, so Google is available in more countries. And growth is coming from global. Only 16% of the new volume growth came from the U.S. in Q2 2018, says Canalys.
Voicebot.ai, a newsletter that tracks the connected speaker market, chalks it up to Google having more languages available in international markets for the Google Home speaker than Amazon does for Echo, so Google is available in more countries. And growth is coming from global. Only 16% of the new volume growth came from the U.S. in Q2 2018, says Canalys.
Great! (Score:3, Insightful)
Google surveillance for all the world!
Re: Great! (Score:1)
an the people is happy about that. Silly. Google is evil.
Re: Great! (Score:1)
We have proof, folks prefer google over amazon tracking their every word.
Re: Great! (Score:1)
So at least 9.5 million more idiots this quarter. Yays I can maths.
Re: (Score:1)
Bad judgement (Score:3, Insightful)
So it is not just Americans who lack judgement and put an internet connected spy device in their homes? For no real benefit except the novelty of being able to do simple things with voice commands.
Google is the better product (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
But Google's natural language responses are irritating. Like a middle aged person trying to speak like a millennial - and I say this as a middle aged gen X.
How do you do, fellow kids? (Score:2)
How about we listen to a music band while we operate our skate contraptions?
Re: (Score:2)
Also Google has a track record of securing their voice input. They are more transparent too - you can listen to everything it's ever listened to by logging in to your account.
Their devices have a button that can activate them so they don't have to be listening all the time either.
Re: (Score:3)
They are more transparent too - you can listen to everything it's ever listened to by logging in to your account.
Sorry, is it supposed to make me feel better that Google has permanently archived everything it's ever listened to in my house?
Re: (Score:3)
Not saying I want one, but it's better than having no access to that data.
Or turn voice history off and use the button for maximum privacy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I really want to try out an Amazon device. I have a third-party Google Home and it is pretty disappointing. Google refuses to update the firmware, so it doesn't do broadcast and several other things. I can't use it to take notes (other than useless grocery lists), schedule appointments, send texts, etc. I would hope that Amazon's third-party integration would give it more useful features. Right now my Google Home is mostly a glorified music player.
And worst of all, I can only play my songs by uploading ever
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I bought Google Mini to test and immediately ordered replacements for Echo. It is just so much better at usability and responses that it's kind of embarrassing for the Echo. I only use echo now for adding things to my Prime shopping list.
More shipped because of Walmart (Score:4)
The biggest reason for the higher shipments is because the google home is sold through Walmart. Every Walmart store I have been in has a large supply of them on display. Makes it easier to buy on impulse.
The closest place for me to get an echo is about an hour away. I guess Amazon do not want to sell their devices through their major competitor. You cannot even get the echo on Walmarts website.
Comment removed (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
Walmart is in 28 countries, not just the US.
Re: (Score:2)
So? He's still correct.
This isn't because of Walmart.
Why not just use a phone? (Score:1)
Google Home is basically just an interface for Google's search which supports voice input. And Android can even receive commands to open apps and such. The same features could be added to a TV player/Chromecast-like device, so a dedicated speaker isn't necessary. It would even be an improvement since visual apps could be controlled.
Amazon and Apple's own smart speakers are the same, but they don't have quite as robust search portal as Google. It makes slightly more sense why Amazon would need one, thoug
Re: (Score:2)
the phone does not have the microphones as the home and echo does so it is tough to use across the room. You are right, the biggest problem with Amazon Echos is their search BUT since google owns their own search it is easier for them to set things up for their device to find things easier and better.
The spy in your home. (Score:2, Insightful)
These "connected speaker" systems are like having a spy in your home, one that listens (and can record) all of the time. Sorry, no thanks, not for me. Not that I do anything or say anything to be ashamed of, I am a very private person. Basically these systems are a microphone in your home that is never off. They cannot function if they are not listening all the time. And you never really know whether what they hear is recorded or not, or who may be listening!
I once wrote a letter to the local paper tit
Re: (Score:3)
what's another spy :-) homes these days have so many different devices that can spy on you there is no way around it.
Re: The spy in your home. (Score:4, Insightful)
Why do we have these blatant untruths? Sure, these devices listen all the time - for a wake word. The idea that they're always listening to your conversation and always recording are patently false. My network usage confirms this. Unless Google and Amazon are shipping these with LTE modems and are paying for the bandwidth requirements of uploading tens of millions of simultaneous audio streams?
Re: (Score:2)
What it cannot do is send voice without using data. And voice data, even compressed, is pretty large. More than enough to be noticeable. In a home
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently not private enough.
Me ordering Alexa is the only talking done in my house.
Suckers Quantified (Score:1)
That comes to 9.5 million per quarter. A quarter of 365/4 = 91.25 days = 131400 minutes, results in 9.5e6/131400 = 72.3 per minute. This finally provides some hard evidence to conclusively disprove the old hypothesis that only one sucker is born each minute. Real world data clearly indicates that this superstition was nearly two orders of magnitude off.
So what? (Score:1)
Ogle Home vs Always-on Lecho (Score:3)
Closet exhibitionists, rejoice!
I mean, you always could arrange a dozen sheet music stands around the old four-poster, and use that to display a panoply of two dozen interrelated positions (in the Kama Sutra Unbound all leaves are perforated)—but the net effect was a bit intimidating.
Some technologies really do improve on the old state of the art.
imagine... (Score:1)
... a Beowulf cluster of those!
Oh wait, wrong century.. Sorry.