Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Social Networks Politics

WhatsApp Faces Misinformation Problem in Nigeria, Reports Say (cnet.com) 72

Fake news is being spread on WhatsApp in some of Africa's most populous countries, according to two new reports, raising concerns over coming elections in Nigeria. From a report: Photoshopped images and false claims about politicians have been circulating on the Facebook-owned messaging service in Nigeria, which holds election in February next year, according to a report from The Poynter Institute on Friday. Many of the false claims are in local languages and exploit ethnic friction. One set of false claims focuses on how politicians will address clashes between a group of semi-nomadic herdsmen and farmers, Poynter said. Another rumor claimed a presidential candidate couldn't enter the US because of a corruption charge, Poynter reported.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

WhatsApp Faces Misinformation Problem in Nigeria, Reports Say

Comments Filter:
  • by 0xdeaddead ( 797696 ) on Sunday December 02, 2018 @11:26PM (#57738872) Homepage Journal

    Obviously only state approved media should be the only source of any and all messages.

    • You know, the same sort of thing used to happen by e-mail. Anyone remember the ridiculous urban legends and scams propagated by e-mail? It occurs for at least two reasons, IMO: people love to gossip and spread rumors, and people were (are?) more naturally predicated to believing anything in print, as it seems more authoritative than someone saying "Hey, I heard from my cousin Frank that..."

      And of course, it's not like it started there either. I've been reading WW2 history recently, and noticed many accou

      • People will stop believing wild rumours on one medium when they start believing them on another.

        Stupidity is like a balloon full of water. Squeeze it in one place and it bulges out in another.

      • People almost always do this to themselves. This is one of the reasons man came up with laws to regulate itself.

        It seems the larger question at this point, is how do you properly moderate that? If the message board in the local town square was precipitating killings, it would be roped off until further notice.

        I think the bigger question in all of this is "who is going to do something to help get this under control before society collapses under the weight of being afraid that regulating misinformation is

        • Yay censorship! Only state approved messages are GOOD messages! People are too stupid to think for ourselves! Down with freedom of speech! Big brother loves us all!

          • by Kiuas ( 1084567 )

            Freedom of speech has never meant freedom to libel or incite violence towards others for example, nor does it cover things like false advertising.

            Freedom of speech also does not mean that governments should be able to freely spread false information to their citizens. In Myanmar, it's gotten to the point that Facebook has been used to facilitate outright genocide by spreading altogether false claims about the local muslim minority, and this has been coming from the highest levels of authorities. Facebook re

            • Imagine if your own government started to do something similar, demonizing one group of individuals and pushing false information through the platforms to support their narrative: 'Look at what the jews/the muslims/the blacks have done, they must be interned to prevent further crime!"

              Look what the white people have done! We must check their privilege, raise their taxes, use affirmative action to deny jobs to the more qualified candidates, lower their birthrate through conspiring economic disincentives of student debt and rising housing prices overlaid on a feminist/environmentalist disdain for reproduction!

        • Do Whatsapp and Facebook really need to be selling political advertising space?

          Do they even employ people who can read Hausa, Yoruba or Ibo? or any of the other 25 or so languages used in Nigeria?

          America may be ok with "The Right to lie your head off" but it is hard to argue they have the right to force this on others who do not have a similar culture.

          I personally had a Nigerian woman say to me "Did you know Michelle Obama is a man? It says so here on Youtube!" - which it did, with Photoshopped pic

    • by Anonymous Coward

      You joke, but this is exactly what is being pushed. The media is putting a propagandist's touch on the whole situation, but this is where the ship is sailing.

  • I'm sure fake news never happened before the Internet was widely available. I can't find my sarcastic face. Maybe (/s|s\)
  • by fredrated ( 639554 ) on Sunday December 02, 2018 @11:42PM (#57738902) Journal

    The problem is people. There is no technology that can keep us honest.

    • The problem is people. There is no technology that can keep us honest.

      I am an old man, and even though I'm inclined to cynicism, I still believe most people are honest. And gullible, unfortunately.

    • There certainly seems to be technology which can make fooling us easier and more effective, however. Maybe we could address that somehow.
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The problem here is lack of education. People don't learn to spot fake news or properly evaluate information they receive.

      A few simple tools could really help fix this issue. Social media and chat apps could have a little button next to widely posted images that links to a reverse image search or fact checking site. They could use image analysis or AI to add warnings to photoshopped images (wouldn't that be great for airbrushed fashion models too).

      Web browsers could add known fake images and fake news to a

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Several years ago, The New York Times ran a story on the Obama administration that was perceived as negative. The paper lost a lot of democrat subscribers as a result of this story. Because of this incident, The New York Times swore off real news and they only produce Fake News since then. But people like msmash insist on consuming these Fake News because they reinforce their belief system and their hate-filled rage!

    Same thing in Nigeria. If someone has negative feelings for a group of people, they seek

  • by bradley13 ( 1118935 ) on Monday December 03, 2018 @02:44AM (#57739166) Homepage

    Dunno what you can do about "low information voters". Allow me to digress...

    Just recently I somehow came across an article from the US, where a biologist had discovered retroviruses in vaccines, and these viruses were responsible for everything from autism to dementia. Having angered the powerful pharma cartels, the researcher was in jail, and all of her data had been confiscated.

    Curious, I did a bit of research. As always, there was a kernel of truth. The researcher had, indeed written a paper about retroviruses. She had been fired from her job, and had taken company data (apparently paper files) with her. The company charged her with theft. She handed the data back, and the charges were dropped.

    So you get conspiracy theorists who read more into this, in support of their pet paranoia - in this case, clearly anti-vaxxers. They make use of technology - like WhatsApp - to spread their nonsense. In the US, this isn't a huge problem, because enough of the population has enough of an education, and the "low information voters" ultimately don't dominate the voting population.

    So...Nigeria... A country where most of the population has little education, and hence few critical thinking skills. The West has given them high technology, but they lack the general level of education to go with it. So the fruits and nuts can spread their nonsense far and wide - and it has a massive influence.

    Democratic institutions can only work, when the population has a minimal level of education. The purists pushing democracy as some sort of panacaea? They are indirectly responsible for a lot of death and misery. It's not PC to notice, but the continuous warfare in much of Africa has not been an improvement over colonialism.

    • This is the most nicely dressed up racist comment I've ever seen on Slashdot. The alt-right is getting better. Time to come down on them.
      • A lot of what he says is actually reasonable. Nigeria probably has a similar proportion of illiterates to America, however, they are not evenly distributed among ethic groups - in some groups it is over 90% literate, while in others, probably less than 20%, and Boko Haram, are by definition, terrorist illiterates fighting for everyone else to be as illiterate as they are.

        Illiterates may not lack critical thinking, but they certainly lack the tools to check on facts - in many cases, they probably do not un

      • I was talking about the poorly educated population [nationmaster.com] in Nigeria. You're the one who brought race into it.

        I've been in Africa, I've been involved in a couple of projects there. There are some really great people, but also a pile of problems. Yet, anytime someone tries to discuss those problems, people like you shut down the discussion with cries of "racism".

        Who is the real racist, here?

        • Black people can't think for themselves and things were better when they were ruled by whites. For someone who's not alt-right, you sure have a lot of alt-right opinions.
  • in Brazil, India, and other countries...
  • How can I put this? If someone just believes just any old message that comes at them, then the problem is not with the message ...

Time is the most valuable thing a man can spend. -- Theophrastus

Working...