Twitter Warns of Suspicious Traffic Coming From China and Russia (reuters.com) 72
Suspicious traffic to a Twitter user forum appears to be part of a government-backed activity coming from China and Russia, a Twitter spokesman told Reuters Monday. The company said it is yet to determine the reason for the activity, but is choosing to notify users out of an abundance of caution.
Additionally: Twitter bug leaks phone number country codes.
Additionally: Twitter bug leaks phone number country codes.
Re:Twitter is lies (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't get the Soros complaint angle. So plutocrats with deep pockets to spend on political causes are bad? Wouldn't that make Koch's bad? Or are you cherry-picking your plutocrats?
Re: (Score:3)
I cherry pick based on how much they make my life suck
Hey Anonymous Coward, can you provide some concrete fact-based examples of exactly how Soros has "made your life suck?"
Half-dozen or so examples should be fine.
Re: (Score:3)
Want me to continue?
No. But I do want you to answer the question. How exactly did those things you listed make your life "suck?" How has Black Lives Matter or Ferguson specifically made your life "suck?"
Please go through the list and explain how each of these items have explicitly impacted you negatively.
Re: Twitter is lies (Score:1)
Well I lived in St. Louis during the Ferguson thing, and not only did it fuck up my work commute and a planned trip via airplane, but I ended up pulling triple duty at work for a week because several of my black co workers had to stay home (yes, in Ferguson) sitting around with loaded guns to keep their homes from being looted.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, someone lost their life and we should definitely all be upset that yout commute got interrupted. Not to mention the absurdity on blaming it on George Soros. You, Sir, appear to be a vile human being.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that you don't know that Ferguson and BLM are very much connected to Soros tells me you're an imbecile.
Sigh. Typical Soros-blaming Anonymous Coward - Completely incapable of answering the simple question asked, so simply deflects to irrelevancy and lobs an insult.
Who's the imbecile again?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you feel better?
Yep.
I don't overdo it (that'll kill you) but a troll a week (or thereabouts) is cathartic.
Re: (Score:1)
And all of these have literally made your life more miserable?
Do you hear voices in your head? Do you wear a tinfoil hat? Does it help?
Re: (Score:2)
Open Society Foundations
Yeah, Buba! you tell'em!! Fighting for human rights - like the LGBTQFAGS - and health issues like AIDs (more fags), education (who needs that!), women's rights around the world, and other things for the better of society and everyone. Doesn't he know that the World is just for us white heterosexual men!
- Ferguson
With you on that. Craig Ferguson ain't that funny.
- BLM
Yeah, what's his problem with Bowel Lower Management.
- Ready For Hillary Super PAC
Damn straight there! We are lucky that we have Trump who is waging these trade wars that are bankrupti
Re: (Score:1)
Your life? To be frank, we don't care much about your personal preferences any more than you care about ours.
Re: (Score:1)
If they were that powerful, that email server would mysteriously disappear.
But they're not so cautious (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
What should they do with that revenue? Remember, there is no way to connect ad revenue to any specific tweets.
Should they a) try to come up with an arbitrary number and refund that percentage of their revenue to advertisers? or b) donate that arbitrary amount of revenue to charity? or c) endeavor to block that suspicious traffic even though it might cost you future revenue?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No. On YouTube, ads are run on specific videos and channels, so you can see which videos are driving the ad revenue.
On Twitter, ads are run on your timeline, and are not attached to any specific tweet. If you follow a bunch of accounts of guitar players, you might get ads from Guitar Center (or if your bio says you play guitar, etc). It's a completely different model from YouTube.
Ever notice they never bothered with Google+ (Score:5, Funny)
correction in linked reuters story (Score:5, Informative)
"(This story corrects to show Twitter saying suspicious traffic appears to be coming from China and Saudi Arabia, not China and Russia) "
seems reuters (and /.) has too much russia on its mind and sees russia everywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Russiafags/Chinafags need to STFU and quit defending shitty countries doing shitty things and also INB4 saying the U.S. is shitty therefore somehow that justifies anyone else being shitty too.
?! /. and reuters any of that? /. is yet to correct this, even though reuters corrected this before /. posted this here with wrong info.
how is pointing out factual error on the part of
typical that
Why bombs when information is more effective. (Score:2)
The key objective in a war, is to get what you want by any means possible. Wither that is land, material, workers, or just follow your ideas or not being a threat to your security.
Today, why bother with all the killing, when you can obtain your objectives via hacking the media. I
They are here as well (Score:1)
Re: Take Down the UN (Score:1)
Well, China and Saudi Arabia actually, but why not toss Russia in the mix, those filthy communists make good scapegoats.
Not Russia (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"Pyotr, they've found you out! Your twitter spammers have been spotted! Duraki!"
"I'll tell them to switch to the Saudi Arabian fronts. That'll work for a while."
When will this idiocy end? (Score:2)
There has _always_ been adversarial traffic from foreign countries, including from foreign government-sponsored entities. There will _always_ be such traffic. All these reports are is CYA: if, god forbid, someone in Russia were to spend $6k promoting Black Lives Matter they can say âoesee, we told you it was happeningâ. This is not new, this happens all the time, and is done by all countries. Furthermore, thereâ(TM)s no way to reliably tell if adversary is a government or not, and any asserti
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I can hear the rest of you "But but, you break the internet"
But why would anybody say that if you're only protecting your private LAN? I mean, you're not asking the ISPs to white-list specific IP ranges, are you? That would break the internet, and the ISPs don't need any more help in that department.
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah someone really needs to tell these elite, highly funded, government Chinese and Russian hackers that there are ways of making their traffic look like it's coming from somewhere else. The least technical solution would be to set up your cell in the actual country you want your traffic to look like it's coming from.
But we don't have to tell them because THEY AND EVERYBODY ELSE ALREADY KNOW THIS, SO ALL THIS BULLSHIT NEWS ABOUT MALICIOUS NETWORK TRAFFIC COMING FROM CERTAIN COUNTRIES IS ABSOLUTE PROPAGANDA
Re: (Score:1)
Wow I totally agree.
All countries that don't give their citizens any power in governance, but especially those ones that give the appearance of democracy but are actually plutocratic.
The ones that only have two parties, neither of which acts in the interests of the citizens. You know, the ones that don't have preferential voting which effectively kills off the chance of a competing third party.
We need to build a wall around these shitty countries!
Re: (Score:2)
"Wall them off -- online and offline. No internet. No visas. No trade. No food. No energy. No nothing."
But American politics don't seem anywhere near walling off Saudi Arabia.
Contradicting opinions are suspicious (Score:1)
that's what I'm reading. The U.S. wants to lie, lie, and lie some more, and if someone corrects or contradicts the lies, then it's suspicous propaganda.
Correct (Score:2)
Next time, when we tell you there are hundreds of thousands of fake twitter bots, and turn them in to you, believe us.
Note it's probably a lot worse than that.
Twats (Score:2)
Twitter is full of twats. :)
For a happy life, avoid Twitter.
(At least, don’t read the comments to the people you follow. )