Elon Musk Offered Chinese Green Card (politico.com) 181
hackingbear writes: During Elon Musk's trip to China for the ground-breaking of Tesla's first overseas factory, which will allow it to sell vehicles directly in the world's largest market for electric vehicles, he was offered a Chinese green card when he met with Premier Li Keqiang on Wednesday in Beijing, where they discussed Tesla's China ambitions. "I love China and want to come here more often," Musk was quoted as saying in the report. "If you do, we can issue you a Chinese green card," the premier replied. Getting a Chinese "green card" has been described as "one of the most difficult tasks in the world." By 2017, only about 10,000 foreigners had been granted permanent residency since the program was introduced in 2004, out of an estimated 1 million foreigners living in China; recipients include Dutch scientist Bernard Feringa, who won the 2016 Nobel Prize in chemistry.
It's a Trap! (Score:5, Interesting)
Any business leader, especially one the caliber of Elon Musk, willingly visiting China is taking a massive risk given the geopolitical machinations going on.
He'd have to be stupid to not think the Chicoms wouldn't in a heartbeat lock up the star of America's green tech.
I'd sooner visit Afghanistan, Yemen, or Somalia over China. At least the risks are obvious. In China, your freedom is on the whim of some self serving bureaucrats looking to boost their social credit scores.
No thank you!
Re:It's a Trap! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:It's a Trap! (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, because the US drives tanks over its protestors. And the US locks up political dissidents. Don't be fucking stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to Lynndie England.
Re: (Score:1)
She tortured people under color of duty. Torture is illegal even for GI's. She was "scapegoated" only because so few others were sought for prosecution, which in turn was because she TOOK PHOTOS. Pure idiocy.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This is a false dichotomy.
Running people down in a tank is hardly the only way to perform rights violations against people. Neither is it the most egregious. In most cases a rights violation is usually depending on several factors. Example... missile striking a building to kill a terrorist while also killing innocents is going to be a rights violation to many people. But missile striking a building to destroy and enemy leader while war is declared that collaterally damages innocents will usually not be
Re: (Score:2)
You fail in both logic and in rhetoric.
Re: (Score:2)
I may have failed to help you understand, but you were successful in revealing why you can be easily fooled and manipulated.
If emotions are required for an appeal to your sensibilities then, at best, you are likely only going to be a product of your environment instead of being an agent of beneficial change or reason within the environment. Anyone can make an appeal to emotion... including evil & illogical people. But those that can remain level headed and explain why an argument is baseless without g
Re: (Score:2)
Emotions are a fundamental requirement in order to have self-defined objectives. Even a drive as fundamental as hunger is an emotion.
"Running people down in a tank is hardly the only way to perform rights violations against people."
They also used machine guns when they used that tank. They used them in the slaughter and burning of the people in the brutal occupation of their neighbor Tibet as well. Since China argues Tibet is part of China or that there simply is no Tibet we would have to count those as act
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't exactly call that comparable. Those were armed forces who were part of a nationwide network preparing for a rebellion. Granted, only an idiot believes the government on that one but those weren't peaceful protesters or monks who insist on digging a handful at a time to avoid killing an insect.
Still not cool, since that rebellion was about protecting the people from a corrupt system but at least it was part of a hostile armed force. The Chinese don't have that going for them. Better examples are p
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody is entirely unemotional including those labeled as sociopaths. An emotion is nothing more than a form hormonal signaling and even the most primitive drives such as hunger are examples. Without emotion there is no self-drive.
Re: (Score:1)
Nothing like hippy honey, I bagged six at Kent State!
Re: (Score:2)
What is the difference to shooting people with war weapons?
From the point of view of the Chinese, the people "run over by tanks" could have walked away ...
Re: (Score:2)
Like Manning?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: It's a Trap! (Score:1)
millions of Uyghurs would like to have a chat with you.. but can't.
Re:It's a Trap! (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: It's a Trap! (Score:1)
When talking about human right we are referring to how a government treats their own citizens (or subjects or property depending on the country).
But! Oh! The US bombs people! Waaaaah! is not a human rights issue. It is politics.
Re: (Score:2)
we are referring to how a government treats their own citizens
America assassinates its own citizens [nytimes.com], even though America's constitution is supposed to prohibit that. When America indulges in extrajudicial killings it becomes difficult to claim the moral high ground over Russia or Saudi Arabia.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
People in the USA are free to talk about a personality cult in China.
When a Communist party leader gets to be emperor.
Books like Animal Farm and Brave New World can be talked about in the USA.
The USA allows an animated bear to be talked about in reference to politics.
In the USA people have freedom after making such comments about China.
People in the USA also enjoy freedom of religion and can publish their own comments on politics a
Re: (Score:2)
In theory ... in practice I'm not so sure about your freedoms. ... ...
Considering e.g. legal age for sex or alcohol
The home land security flight bans
The retarded punishments for "computer crimes".
The social credit system in the US is FB ... in case you have not noticed. Employers forcing you to hand access to the account over before accepting you e.g.
Weekly drug tests etc.
Re: (Score:2)
In China the talking is banned too
The talking and comments about politics in the USA are not crimes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To protest at an injustice is the highest form of patriotism. To sit/stand idly by and let injustice occur is the exact opposite of patriotism.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, the Left believes that patriotism is for morons. Seriously? You're arguing in bad faith.
Giving the finger to the American people is really bad form. But I suppose it felt really good for all those millionaires to pretend to be oppressed. They treat Americans as The Other. [archive.is]
Re: (Score:2)
The Trumpet suffers from free speech, too!! In other words: he is free to utter any stupidity he wants ...
Re: (Score:2)
I think Musk can be fucking awesome, but let's face it, he's a loose cannon. He really needs a tough, competent assistant to keep him out of trouble.
Re: (Score:3)
"Loose cannon" is probably a fair label. That said, anyone who ever actually watched the Joe Rogan interview could clearly see that Musk has almost no experience with smoking pot. ;) That interview was great for cracking jokes, of course.
That said, when it comes to China, it's clearly not about Musk; it's about much bigger issues. 4,5% of China's new car sales last year were electric - far higher than the US. China has now issued rules to make it almost impossible to build a new factory for making ICE veh
Re: (Score:1)
"Loose cannon" is probably a fair label. That said, anyone who ever actually watched the Joe Rogan interview could clearly see that Musk has almost no experience with smoking pot. ;) That interview was great for cracking jokes, of course.
The interview was even better for distracting the tech news world on the day Tesla's new head of auditing resigned after less than a month. I'll give it to Musk, it worked.
Re: (Score:3)
LOL. Tesla has several dozen people at the VP level or higher. The average executive changes jobs every 3-5 years. At a high-stress company like Tesla with frequent changes in needs, you should expect significantly shorter.
If you're going to freak out every time a person at the VP level or higher leaves Tesla, you're going to be freaking out a lot. But all means, please don't let that stop you. I love the ever-so predictable lows and highs in this stock. Good buy points wouldn't be so easy to come by if
Re: (Score:3)
China has now issued rules to make it almost impossible to build a new factory for making ICE vehicles in the country.
False. If you can read Mandarin, you can read for yourself [ndrc.gov.cn]. SMALL companies will be stopped, but those big Government entities - Geely, BAIC, SAIC, BYD, and others are exempt. They can expand all they want. Why? They are Government owned, and the Government gets to do what it wants.
And do you realize that Musk was really there to celebrate the opening of a Chinese factory that carries the Tesla name? It's not a Tesla factory - car factories/companies in China must be at least a joint venture, and must
Re: (Score:2)
China has already figured out two important things. Build a large military to keep aggressors out, but conquer others through economy & control of it. They have learned the American way... military is only used against the weak nations in a post WW2 world, otherwise regulate/control everything they can under the guise of protecting you.
Nothing is mightier than money/power. It is the beast that drives war/conflict, and no other. If someones tells you that a war/conflict was fought for a reason other
Re: (Score:3)
Cough. [financialpost.com]
Seriously, google it [google.com].
As for your PDF:
Re: (Score:2)
Those WFOE rule changes for automotive don't kick in until 2022 [industryweek.com] - if ever (China is famous for slow-walking regulatory changes). Current rules [gettingthe...hrough.com] ban WFOE status for automotive factories. Since this factory is breaking ground, the controlling entity already exists - and that means it is majority owned by Chinese entities. By law.
As far as the ICE rules - read it yourself. There is an exemption for investment projects. Guess what - nearly every large Chinese company is considered an investment project, and
Re: (Score:3)
Tesla was granted an exception to WFOE rules. I'm not sure why you're having trouble following links or using Teh Google. 2022 is when the rule change goes through and applies to everyone.
And foreign automakers operating in China disagree with you about whether this rule change effectively prohibits them from starting new factories in the country.
Re: (Score:2)
Or to put it another way: if you don't believe that GF3 is fully foreign owned (by Tesla), by all means, go ahead and name their (fictional) Chinese partner.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Literally every article on the subject says the exact same thing: Tesla's GF3 is the first fully foreign owned auto factory in China and they were granted an exception for this. Tesla has no Chinese partner in the project. Period. Google it. If you want to keep asserting something against all very accessible facts, then by all means, cite Tesla's fictional Chinese partner.
I'm waiting.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I literally gave you a Google search result in which every single article talked about the topic. And (for the third time!), I'll repeat: "If you want to keep asserting something against all very accessible facts, then by all means, cite Tesla's fictional Chinese partner. ... I'm waiting."
How many times are you going to dodge that? Let me take a wild guess: you're going to respond yet again, without a name for the fictional "Chinese partner".
Re: (Score:2)
Eventually one must admit that one has been arguing with a brick wall, and leave the wall in peace to do its job of holding down the floor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The proper term would be "Lao Wai"; only a slovenly Cantonese speaker would use the "Gwai Lo" term. Real Chinese - the Han - use Mandarin and that would be Lao Wai (literally means old foreign). If you're going to troll, at least educate yourself first so you don't look so ignorant.
You're welcome.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have anything better to do than racist trolling?
Re: (Score:3)
Examples:
* Crystal meth
* Fixing up your trailer
* Sleeping with your cousin
* Adding another confederate flag sticker to your pickup
* Not graduating from high school
Come on, there's loads of other things you could be doing apart from racist trolling on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:2)
They are only doing it in retaliation for what the US and Canada did.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It's a Trap! (Score:5, Informative)
Musk is from South Africa. He lives in the USA because it's expedient. He's not some American agent pushing America's agenda, and China knows that.
The risk of landing in prison is far, far higher in the USA than in China for anyone who isn't a political activist. The USA has 4% of the world's population and 22% of the world's prisoners.
"I love China and want to come here more often," (Score:1)
"Lots of pedos, plenty of places to dig a hole in the ground."
Don't want one (Score:1)
Trump has a green card ... (Score:2)
... and it's a beautiful thing. Much better than Musk's failing green card. Sad. Melania got an expedited green card.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget her parents. Chain migrants.
Re: (Score:2)
Importing high-dollar whores to spy for foreign adversaries...
Slovenia is a member of NATO, and a solid American ally.
Re: (Score:2)
Hillary didn't expedite Trump's green card. Melania's husband did that.
Its So Much Quicker To Steal EV Tech... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to be an idiot.
Against popular believe: they have elections and voting in China, too.
And: Vietnam is a "communist" country, just like China.
There are dozens of underdeveloped but reasonably FREE countries where people need jobs just as badly as China ... so why do you want to produce anything in a country that can't produce it?
Underdeveloped as in: not developed enough to run such factories
Re:Its So Much Quicker To Steal EV Tech... (Score:4, Informative)
LOL! Voting in China? You've ever lived there, or have Chinese family? Not a chance! The party controls all [wikipedia.org], down to the local level. IF your family is chosen as one that gets a vote (not all families get the right to vote), the Party chooses which member of your family gets to vote. It is 100% fascist/dictatorship based Government. There is a vote as much as there were votes for Saddam Hussein.
Here are the results of the latest 2018 election [wikipedia.org]; the closest race was Zhang Jun who ran for the Minister of Justice, he sqeaked by with just 99.49% of the vote - that is a nail-biter in China!
There are NO elections in China, it's window-dressing only for outsiders to feel better about the Country. All positions are pre-selected, pre-arranged, and done only with the blessing of the Central Communist Party leadership only.
Re: (Score:2)
Point is: there are votes. Which our parent claimed there weren't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
East Germany actually had more than one party ... and you were obliged to vote, so nothing about "approval".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The other parties were about a dozen.
And obviously parties need to be approved, or they would not be able to run in elections. Or how do you actually do it?
Re: (Score:3)
Couldn't you make stuff just as cheaply in Ghandi's India
No. Absolutely not. India is far more corrupt, bureaucratic, and inefficient than China. Chinese workers are four times as productive as Indians. All the supply chains are in China, and it is easy to find people with manufacturing expertise.
Plus is China, the corruption WORKS: You bribe one guy, and you get the permit to build your factory. In India, you bribe one guy, and he steps aside so you can deal with the next bureaucrat with his hand out. It can take years to get a license to operate a fruit
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
an actual attempt at necessarily diverse Democracy in India...
The BJP, the ruling party in India, is about as "pro-diversity" as America's KKK.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
IF you're ethnic Han there's prosperity, any other race is shaken down, imprisoned, disappeared, robbed, cheated.
Not true. Most minorities in China are doing about as well as their Han neighbors. The big exceptions are Uyghurs and Tibetans.
In Xinjiang, much of the conflict is not Uyghur vs Han, but Uyghur vs Hui [wikipedia.org] despite both being Muslim.
I have never been to Tibet, but I have been to the Tibetan region of Yunnan, including the city of Xianggelila. I traveled there from Lijiang [wikipedia.org], and the difference between the two cities is startling despite being only 60 miles apart.
Xianggelila is ethnically Tibetan, and was sullen.
Re: (Score:2)
Couldn't you manufacture cheaply in Vietnam, Bangladesh or Africa, or Latin America as well?
1. all these countries also violate intellectual properties left [googleusercontent.com] and [googleusercontent.com] right [qz.com]. All developing countries, including the USA itself [google.com], violate intellectual propertiesen mass during the early days of its industrialization. (And they will all become patent trolls once they become developed.)
2. like the US, China has entered an era post low-end manufacturing and therefore boost its intellectual property [xinhuanet.com] protection [forbes.com] as a way to move up the economic food chain. This is the real reason the US is so afraid of China now: o
Re: (Score:2)
Because you can build large things in China without having hordes of hippie moms or Westwood real estate snobs sue you into oblivion. Musk drilled a short section of urban transit tunnel near Dodger Stadium because it's a good place to show off concept demos to investors, but if he wants to install a prototype transit line under the streets of a real city, it's going to have to be in China.
Re: (Score:2)
...in Ghandi's India
Ghandi is currently polling 23%, against Modi at 41%. The era of the Ghandi family dynasty is not about to be revived.
So what will it be this time? (Score:2)
Now an Elon Musk thread. I suppose we were due.
I have been repeatedly assured with great Reason and Authority on this very web site that Elon Musk is a fake. Delusional. His engineering is crap. His books are cooked. There is no way he will ever make a profit. His quality control is just shit. The cards burn and the wheels fall off. He will never be able to scale his manufacturing. He lied to investors. The employees are all in open revolt. Every other car manufacturer in the world is going to eat
Re: (Score:2)
Out of cash in 6 months you watch. He smoked pot. ...
Pot is cheap. Even in countries where it is "illegal".
I doubt he runs out of cash because he spends some money on pot
Re: (Score:2)
If he had money he could have gotten something better than pot.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess some people would argue: there is nothing better. Only the origin and quality varies ... and the price.
Re: (Score:2)
I am not sure what you are talking about, Slashdot is the home of the flaming Musk fanbois.
If I were Elon I'd take their card... (Score:1)
From my 10,000' view... (well actually 10,000km, I'm in New Zealand)...
China does seem to be moving forwards and advancing technologically much faster that America and has the resources to do what Elon wants. China on the moon... China and their Tesla equiv... China and solar...
America, especially at the moment with their current leader, seems to be going backwards with Elon the only real light shining out of that country... America does have big clubs to beat every one else about the head with though.
Good (Score:2)
Personal experience (Score:5, Insightful)
Personal experience:
Chinese green card is a thing about which people have very mixed feelings. Application chances are totally random, privileges are a mixed blessing. Chinese state does not give a consistent message about what people should to expect from it.
In other words, it is a very hard to get, yet near meaningless document in comparison to 5 and 10 year work visas, aside you becoming fully subject to the glorious Chinese legal and tax system...
I knew one brilliant expat entrepreneur, undoubtedly a woman of exceptional achievement.
She lived in China since she was 14. She got her PhD in nanotechnology at 26, and by 27 she had an own chemical business that she made with money she won from "1000 talent plan" â" a national level scientific grant.
She owned a number of patents, and spoke 5 languages freely (including 2 Chinese dialects,) and she was a stunning tall beauty on top of that...
I would've said that is somebody was an ideal applicant, it would be her. She went to apply for that green card, and got a refusal notice _the next day_ with reason stated along the lines "we considered your high achievements, but you are too young and lack class..."
The attitudes of Chinese elites towards things like talent, merit, entitlement and personal achievement had not changed much in past decades. China was and is an extremely elitist and snobby country.
This attitude is pretty much telling "talented youngsters have no value besides being patronees,
and pages to the elite"
All they want is his "technology" (Score:2)
I’m missing something (Score:2)
I’ve read the summary; I’ve read the comments... but I’m still unclear on why I should care in the least whether or not Elon Musk gets a green card from China.
Re: (Score:2)
I’ve read the summary; I’ve read the comments... but I’m still unclear on why I should care in the least whether or not Elon Musk gets a green card from China.
China - lots of hate
Musk - lots of hate and lots of stans.
China and Musk in the same article? Click gold mine!
They want him to pay 45% Chinese tax (Score:2)
...and give up his rights, just like all other Chinese people, so they can force him to transfer technology for EV cars and SpaceX tech, on his next visit.
evil (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Chinese will now steal all Tesla tech! (Score:1)
Read the news. They made an exception for Tesla's Shanghai Gigafactory. Tesla owns it outright.
Re: (Score:2)
Monaco, their neighbors got them to agree to 'conditions' a couple of decades ago. To get the zero income tax of Monaco citizenship, you have to jump through lots of hoops and suck up paying your taxes for decade or more.
Otherwise the EU was threatening to start taxing Europe's 0.01%. Pretend country, long running tax dodge etc.
Re: (Score:2)