Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Transportation Technology

Waymo Can Now Shuttle Passengers In Its Self-Driving Cars In California (cnet.com) 23

Waymo has received a new permit from the California Public Utilities Commission to shuttle passengers in its self-driving cars. Before this, Waymo was not allowed to transport passengers. CNET reports: In order to be eligible for this permit, the company in question must already have an AV testing permit from the California Department of Motor Vehicles, which Waymo has had since 2014. It operates a fleet of Chrysler Pacifica and Jaguar I-Pace vehicles, both of which are outfitted with the hardware and software capable of autonomy. This doesn't mean Waymo One has begun operation in California. That may change in the future, though. There's a second tier of the CPUC pilot program that allows members of the public to be shuttled around in driverless vehicles, but that tier requires a DMV permit for driverless testing, and what do you know, Waymo has one of those already. All the company needs to do is start testing its driverless vehicles in California to be eligible for this next stage of the CPUC's pilot.

According to the CPUC website, only four companies have been granted access to the first tier of the pilot program: AutoX, Pony.ai, Waymo and Zoox. Waymo is the only company of the four to receive an exemption to use a third party for contracting the safety operators required in every vehicle. In its letter to the CPUC requesting the exemption (PDF), the company said that "operating and scaling a meaningful pilot requires a large group of drivers who are more efficiently engaged through Waymo's experienced and specialized third-party staffing providers." All of its test drivers go through the same training program, the letter says.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Waymo Can Now Shuttle Passengers In Its Self-Driving Cars In California

Comments Filter:
  • third-party staffing = victim left holding the bag when sometime bad happens.

  • So Tesla isn't in the lead on this after all?

    • So Tesla isn't in the lead on this after all?

      In the lead of what? In terms of practical technologies that can mass market to consumers they are leaps and bounds above the competition. In terms of fully self driving shuttle services that have all the advantages of incredibly expensive LIDAR and other technologies they are quite far behind on account of the fact they have stated from the very beginning they aren't even going to try self-driving using this tech.

      • Yet here we are and the people using the best tech have only got to a short shuttle ride. Kind of makes Tesla look like an idiot, since "his" tech will never amount to anything safe.
  • that we're 20 years out from Self Driving Cars. Top. Men.
    • Fenced in an area without much adverse weather with perfectly mapped roads still leaves a lot of unsolved problems before general purpose self driving, problems at least an order of magnitude more difficult and not getting solved any time soon.
    • Just because you're allowed to do something doesn't mean it will work. The politicians making the rules certainly are probably less effective than those non-existent "Top Men".

  • Just a tiny little problem: there aren't any self-driving cars. A car where a dude has to sit in the driver's seat is not "self-driving". It's "assisted-driving" at best.

  • "Before this, Waymo was not allowed to transport passengers."

    What? Did they drive only pizzas around?

    But seriously, check the highways leading into the city. Apparently, over 90% of them are also not allowed to transport passengers, because they just have the driver in it.

    • What? Did they drive only pizzas around?

      No they drove researchers around. Do you not know what Waymo has been doing for the past 5 years? They're not a taxi service.

One good suit is worth a thousand resumes.

Working...