Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses The Internet Technology

How To Escape the 'Hyperactive Hivemind' of Modern Work (bbc.com) 78

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: Our workplaces are set up for convenience, not to get the best out of our brains, says Cal Newport, bestselling author of books including Deep Work and Digital Minimalism, and a Georgetown University professor. In knowledge sector jobs, where products are created using human intelligence rather than machines, we must be switched on at all times and prepared to multitask. These are two things that are not compatible with deep, creative, insightful thinking. "In knowledge work, the main resource is the human brain and its ability to produce new information with value," says Newport. "But we are not good at getting a good return." Being switched on at all times and expected to pick things up immediately makes us miserable, says Newport. "It mismatches with the social circuits in our brain. It makes us feel bad that someone is waiting for us to reply to them. It makes us anxious."

Because it is so easy to dash off a quick reply on email, Slack or other messaging apps, we feel guilty for not doing so, and there is an expectation that we will do it. This, says Newport, has greatly increased the number of things on people's plates. "The average knowledge worker is responsible for more things than they were before email. This makes us frenetic. We should be thinking about how to remove the things on their plate, not giving people more to do." What might being wired for work at all times lead to? Inevitably, burnout. Newport describes this way of working as a "hyperactive hivemind." Unstructured conversations on messaging apps and meetings dropped into diaries on the fly congest our day. His objective, to give people the space to do their best work without distraction, is the subject of his next book: The World Without Email. Newport's idea is to allow workers to do less work, but better. Cutting out unnecessary chatter is important but only if the organization's culture allows for slower communication.
Newport advocates for a more linear approach to workflows. "People need to completely stop one task in order to fully transition their thought processes to the next one," reports the BBC. "However, this is hard when we are constantly seeing emails or being reminded about previous tasks. Some of our thoughts are still on the previous work -- an effect called attention residue."

While it is very convenient to have everyone in an ongoing conversation, such as in a Slack thread, Newport says convenience is never the goal in business, it is value. "The assembly line revolutionized car production but it is not a convenient system -- it is the system that produces the most cars quickly."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How To Escape the 'Hyperactive Hivemind' of Modern Work

Comments Filter:
  • Linear workflow (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 ) on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @08:23AM (#58933448)
    is for linear people.

    If a person is stressed by having multiple things to do, and multiple problems to solve at the same time, they are in the wrong job.

    The Good Doctor Newport appears to be assigning everyone to that status. I could be in a minority, but I enjoy troubleshooting multiple problems, assigning rankings and making it all work.

    It is simply not possible to make all work linear. And if we did, it would be much more of a hivemind that what he decries.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • " I could be in a minority, but I enjoy troubleshooting multiple problems, assigning rankings and making it all work"

      Very few people are good at genuinely multitasking, they just think they are.Any time you spend on 1 problem is time not spent on the others so instead of solving 1 thing properly you're probably coming up with some half arsed solution to 3 or 4 things.

      And thats before we get onto the point that to be good in IT you need to have a mind that can think sequentially/linearly and properly join th

      • " I could be in a minority, but I enjoy troubleshooting multiple problems, assigning rankings and making it all work"

        Very few people are good at genuinely multitasking, they just think they are.Any time you spend on 1 problem is time not spent on the others so instead of solving 1 thing properly you're probably coming up with some half arsed solution to 3 or 4 things.

        And thats before we get onto the point that to be good in IT you need to have a mind that can think sequentially/linearly and properly join the dots.

        I have no issue with thinking in a linear fashion. But I can also handle multiple tasks at once, and do a good job on all. My employer always called that "fast on your feet." Some can do it, some can't. I happen to enjoy it, and the people I am working for now are quite happy as well.

        In fact, this linear workplace that he espouses, and the apparent wish of so many Slashdotters for a "I do one thing, and I do not do another thing until I am finished with the first thing, is my version of workplace hell. A

        • by Viol8 ( 599362 )

          "But I can also handle multiple tasks at once, and do a good job on all"

          Sure, you keep telling yourself that. Perhaps even you'll believe it one day.

    • Task saturation (Score:5, Insightful)

      by sjbe ( 173966 ) on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:08AM (#58933608)

      is for linear people.

      Literally every human is a terrible multi-tasker and there is endless research backing this up. Myself included. Some of us handle multiple tasks better than others but our brains literally cannot do more than one thing at a time effectively. Just not how we are wired.

      I could be in a minority, but I enjoy troubleshooting multiple problems, assigning rankings and making it all work.

      I prefer to wear multiple hats in my job too but I don't perform well when I try to wear them all at once. I'm sure you aren't actually doing multiple problems simultaneously. You are simply task switching more rapidly than average. My job is like that that. I would go nuts doing the same thing all day every day.

      If a person is stressed by having multiple things to do, and multiple problems to solve at the same time, they are in the wrong job.

      Being stressed about having a full schedule doesn't mean someone is bad at it. And everyone has their task saturation limits. EVERYONE. Some can deal with a more chaotic work flow more gracefully than others but even the best of us aren't great at doing multiple things at once.

      • is for linear people.

        Literally every human is a terrible multi-tasker and there is endless research backing this up. Myself included. Some of us handle multiple tasks better than others but our brains literally cannot do more than one thing at a time effectively. Just not how we are wired.

        While it is nice to assume that all human brains are a homogenous structure of sameness, really, they are not. I'm not going to do 100 simultaneous spherical geometry problems in my head at one time. work on several problems at the same time. Hell man, I dream solutions to problems.

        I could be in a minority, but I enjoy troubleshooting multiple problems, assigning rankings and making it all work.

        I prefer to wear multiple hats in my job too but I don't perform well when I try to wear them all at once. I'm sure you aren't actually doing multiple problems simultaneously. You are simply task switching more rapidly than average. My job is like that that. I would go nuts doing the same thing all day every day.

        Task switching is certainly the portion that is what is going on when dealing with people. And I don't have two computers typing different papers on at the same time. But my mind does allow me to have one task working in the back

    • is for linear people.

      Of course, we're *all* linear people. This has been proven by multiple studies. You're not nearly as good at multitasking as you think you are.

    • Linearity is also a feature of the work itself. For creative work, I like having 2 or 3 different (sub)?projects going on. Different as in one of programming and one of music, for example, so they use different areas of the brain. Creative work needs periods of rest for subconscious development, but it doesn't have to be actual rest as long as I'm doing something different enough. The projects also feed on each other in unexpected ways.

      Not all work is creative in this way, and sometimes you have to focus

      • Linearity is also a feature of the work itself. For creative work, I like having 2 or 3 different (sub)?projects going on. Different as in one of programming and one of music, for example, so they use different areas of the brain. Creative work needs periods of rest for subconscious development, but it doesn't have to be actual rest as long as I'm doing something different enough. The projects also feed on each other in unexpected ways.

        Not all work is creative in this way, and sometimes you have to focus on things like data entry. Of course, creative projects also have their areas of deep linear focus.

        Exactly. Excellent and insightful post. Data entry is a good example of a mode that needs in the moment focus. But that doesn't mean I can't have those other portions of my brain thinking.

        I liken it to when I am doing 3-D rendering. I start a render then work on something else. while the render takes place in the background. Does it take longer to render? Maybe. It might take 5 minutes longer out of an hour and a half, while I write a paper. But if I devote all my efforts on the render and just sit ther

  • Tell management (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @08:28AM (#58933468)

    The workers didn't make assembling cars faster by creating the assembly line, it was management that organized work into an assembly line. It's not up to the worker to make work more efficient, it's to do the work they are presented with. It is up to management to organize the work for other workers.

    • by sinij ( 911942 )

      It is up to management to organize the work for other workers.

      The easiest and most obvious way to temporarily increase productivity is to slave-drive crazy overtime. This is go-to solution for mediocre management faced with difficult deadlines, so suggesting reasonable process improvement to management is often necessary step to forestall said "solution".

    • Sure, but on some level, people have to still decide how they're going to work. Management can, for example, make a decision to pay for Slack or not, to allow Slack or not. Management can even encourage workers to use Slack in certain ways, and limit their use of Slack in certain ways. However, in the end, each user has to make decisions about how and when to use Slack.

      The technology has changed rapidly over the past few decades. We need to develop a culture of healthy habits, and we haven't done that

  • People need to completely stop one task in order to fully transition their thought processes to the next one.

    I'm not sure this is wholly true - this is useful to some degree, but I've found it's useful to have at least some small part of your mind considering another issue or two. By letting your mind mull over some issues in the background great ideas can come to you, that really help when you are ready to switch back to them - or make it easier to transition to some other task if you become stuck or bloc

    • by sjames ( 1099 )

      Human multi-tasking is QUITE limited. You can often get away with doing two entirely different types of things at once (sweeping the floor while solving a logic problem), but if you try to work on two problems requiring logical thought at the same time, you'll just burn resources switching back and forth.

      If one of the tasks is lower priority or has very loose deadlines, you may gain insights by switching from your primary task when you get stuck and going back after a few minutes but that's about the extent

  • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Because it is so easy to dash off a quick reply on email, Slack or other messaging apps, we feel guilty for not doing so, and there is an expectation that we will do it.

    When I'm not at work I don't look at work emails and I certainly don't feel guilty about it. (Don't use Slack or similar nor does anyone I work with) I keep my work and life separate. When I'm at work I respond to emails that need responding to and ignore the rest. If someone wastes my time and expects me to cater to an unreasonable expectation of responding to them then that is their problem, not mine. It's been my experience that email is a giant time sink if you let it become one. It's no differen

    • If someone wastes my time and expects me to cater to an unreasonable expectation of responding to them then that is their problem, not mine. It's been my experience that email is a giant time sink if you let it become one. It's no different than sitting in endless (useless) meetings.

      Other than management above me, my general philosophy is that if you want me at a meeting, I need the agenda ahead of time, along with the planned outcomes of the meeting. And the agenda needs to be chunked at least into 20 minute segments.

      Making that well known means I don't get invited to a lot of meetings anymore, and it seems that less are happening as well. If you're going to waste $300/hr of collective employee time, you'd better be sure that you've got a plan to get $300 out of that meeting.

      Now there

  • Because it is so easy to dash off a quick reply on email, Slack or other messaging apps, we feel guilty for not doing so, and there is an expectation that we will do it.

    Ah, that's why I don't feel stressed by the "Hyperactive Hivemind". I feel absolutely no compulsion to check my messages off-hours, and even when I'm working I feel no guilt for not responding to messages quickly. In fact, messaging tools allow me to defer questions to when I have a moment to answer them, unlike phone calls and in-person vis

    • by dasunt ( 249686 )

      Ah, that's why I don't feel stressed by the "Hyperactive Hivemind". I feel absolutely no compulsion to check my messages off-hours, and even when I'm working I feel no guilt for not responding to messages quickly. In fact, messaging tools allow me to defer questions to when I have a moment to answer them, unlike phone calls and in-person visits. They allow me to schedule my context switches instead of responding to interrupts in real-time.

      This is asynchronous I/O. If you feel obligated to respond immedia

  • by turp182 ( 1020263 ) on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:16AM (#58933650) Journal

    That's all, just an observation that I have switched from working to reading Slashdot for a bit.

    Context switching is a massive waste of time. Probably over 20% these days (IMs, Teams, Email, even phone calls, text messages).

  • by eepok ( 545733 ) on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:33AM (#58933780) Homepage

    "In knowledge work, the main resource is the human brain and its ability to produce new information with value," says Newport.

    No, not really. In knowledge work, the main resource is using the human brain as a systems processor that can make discretionary judgements based on the information provided, the individual's experience, and the individual's colleagues (as necessary). If everyone in knowledge work were creative artists, nothing would get done. They'd all be writing self-help books.

    When it comes to being overwhelmed with the amount of simultaneous tasks and deadlines, the worker needs to have a talk with colleagues and management to discuss burn-out, its cascading effects on colleagues due to absenteeism, and the need to hire more workers. If that seems like an impossible task, then so should submitting "deep, creative, insightful thinking" as one's work product and accepting the resulting criticism.

    • I found this counter-argument very intellectually interesting. Is the real value of the human brain in knowledge work:

      a) synthesis, the combining of information and creating new information of increased gestalt value

      or

      b) experience-based situational overlays, and using that to feed decision making

      The second one is almost exactly what AI aims to solve, in terms of training AIs to make decisions.

      They both also rely heavily on pattern recognition. a) because you are seeking patterns and relationships to create

  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @09:45AM (#58933852)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • this reminds me NGT discussing "productivity" of people saying they are really productive because they handle hundred emails this morning, made all these phone calls, completed various data spreadsheets. But the real question did they create anything new. When creating something new, need to not be busy with busy work.
  • from 5:30pm to 6:30am during the week. On Friday, it shuts down at 5:30 and does NOT come back on until 6:30 Monday morning. If my boss expects me to answer, respond to email after hours, PAY ME!

Some people manage by the book, even though they don't know who wrote the book or even what book.

Working...