Facebook Deceived Users About the Way It Used Phone Numbers, Facial Recognition, FTC To Allege in Complaint (washingtonpost.com) 36
The Federal Trade Commission plans to allege that Facebook misled users' about its handling of their phone numbers as part of a wide-ranging complaint that accompanies a settlement ending the government's privacy probe, Washington Post reported Tuesday, citing two people familiar with the matter. From the report: In the complaint, which has not yet been released, federal regulators take issue with Facebook's earlier implementation of a security feature called two-factor authentication. It allows users to request one-time password, sent by text message, each time they log onto the social-networking site. But some advertisers managed to target Facebook users who uploaded those contact details, perhaps without the full knowledge of those who provided them, the two sources said. The misuse of the phone numbers was first identified in media reports and by academics last year [PDF]. The FTC also plans to allege that Facebook had provided insufficient information to users -- roughly 30 million -- about their ability to turn off a tool that would identify and offer tag suggestions for photos, the sources added. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity. The facial recognition issue appears to have first been publicized earlier this year by Consumer Reports.
Facebook Deceived Users?!?! (Score:5, Funny)
I'm shocked I tell you! Shocked! ... well.. no... not shocked....
Re: Facebook Deceived Users?!?! (Score:1)
Say it isn't so (Score:4, Interesting)
"Facebook Deceived Users About the Way It Used Phone Numbers, Facial Recognition, FTC To Allege in Complaint"
No way, I can't believe that Facebook would do anything underhanded or deceptive.
Do it again, I mean.
No they did not! (Score:1)
Facebook has always been 100% honest about how much they were going to spy on you.
Their lies were as thin as a doctor about to give you a shot and saying... "This will not hurt one bit".
Whenever I read Facebook's TOS and Privacy notices, they made it clear they sell your data and use it however they please.
Re: (Score:2)
---No doctor ever says, "This will not hurt one bit."---
Yep been told this to my face.
---What they actually say is, "You might feel a little pinch."---
Heard that one too. along with a few other variations, but that is not the point here. The point here is that people say shit that is knowingly false for a little expedience.
---Oh, and, in the USA at least, it's usually the doctor's PA (Physician's Assistant - which is to say, "nurse") who administers injections.---
Usually is no contradiction to what I said.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not the real problem. Their TOS may have been "clear" about using their system, if a legal document can be described as clear. That's one thing the EU was trying to address. They have a generic quick misleading request then a challenging legal document that says contrary to what you just read. "Well, that's just legaleese. Facebook already summed up what the info/permission was for." And the problem is that it is the legaleese that is truthful and the easy to understand part that is completely decept
Re: "Plans to allege" "Settlement" (Score:1)
Re:Glad I never gave my number to FB (Score:5, Insightful)
This app has access to:
Device & app history: retrieve running apps
Calendar:read calendar events plus confidential information, add or modify calendar events and send email to guests without owners' knowledge
Microphone: record audio
Contacts modify your contacts, read your contacts, find accounts on the device
SMS: read your text messages (SMS or MMS)
Camera: take pictures and videos
Phone: write call log, read phone status and identity, directly call phone numbers, read call log
Identity: add or remove accounts, read your own contact card, find accounts on the device,
Wi-Fi connection information: view Wi-Fi connections
Photos / Media / Files:read the contents of your USB storage, modify or delete the contents of your USB storage
Device ID & call information: read phone status and identity
Storage: read the contents of your USB storage, modify or delete the contents of your USB storage
Location: approximate location (network-based), precise location (GPS and network-based)
Other: download files without notification, receive data from Internet, adjust your wallpaper size, read Google service configuration, change network connectivity, pair with Bluetooth devices, create accounts and set passwords, connect and disconnect from Wi-Fi, control Near Field Communication, control vibration, expand/collapse status bar, send sticky broadcast, read sync settings, modify system settings, draw over other apps, install shortcuts, run at startup, prevent device from sleeping, access Bluetooth settings, toggle sync on and off, view network connections, read battery statistics, full network access, reorder running apps, change your audio settings, set wallpaper
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with those permissions is that you can't disable them individually for specific apps (or doing so is needlessly tedious).
I blame The GooG(le).
Re: (Score:2)
I imagine the list of permissions it DOESN'T ask for is shorter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Do not install the Facebook app.
If you need to use Facebook on your phone, do it in a browser.
I hate being right. (Score:4, Informative)
That's why I don't have phone-based 2FA on Facebook. I expected them to misuse my phone number.
You cannot trust Facebook. Ever. They are an entirely rotten, untrustworthy organisation and that tone comes from the top.
Re: (Score:1)
They already have your phone number; someone who has you in their contact list gave it to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed, but unlike the OP, I quite enjoy being right.
It reminds me of all the morons that say you can avoid using Google. They are stupid in the same vein. They never consider the fact that Google trades information with everyone for money. Like the Credit Bureaus, you don't have to directly do business with Them, you only need to do business with a business that does business with them and they get your information that way. And there are a lot of businesses that do business with google and Facebook!
Re: (Score:2)
They never consider the fact that Google trades information with everyone for money.
Cite? Do you have something beyond cynicism to back this claim?
FWIW, in 8 years of working for Google, I've never seen a case of Google buying information. I was once peripherally involved in a conversation with credit card issuers who offered to sell information about credit card transactions to Google, but Google declined (and the Googlers involved were shocked -- Google would never sell such information and the ease of the offer and the low price were very surprising). I moved to Android five years a
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong direction. Google isn't a data buyer, it's a data seller.
Re: (Score:3)
Wrong direction. Google isn't a data buyer, it's a data seller.
Nope, not that either. Google's data is far too valuable to sell. Google can get much more value out of it than potential buyers could, because Google has better tools and better access to users. Google also has a philosophical/moral position against selling data, but one would have to be very naive to believe that would survive if the business case for selling it were significantly better than the business case for keeping it close and using it internally to target ads. As it is, the targeted ad busine
Time to hit the couch (Score:3)
Looks like Zuck needs to start digging between the couch cushions again, so he can pay the fine.
Malicious intents (Score:2, Informative)
Fixed title: (Score:2)
"Facebook Deceived Users About Everything "
There, FTFY.