CBS, Viacom Strike Deal To Recombine (hollywoodreporter.com) 24
Viacom and CBS have struck a deal for a merger on Tuesday with an agreement to recombine in the latest entertainment industry mega-deal. From a report: As expected, Viacom CEO Bob Bakish will lead the combined company as CEO, while CBS acting CEO Joe Ianniello will also remain in a top executive position that will have him oversee CBS-branded assets. CBS CFO Christina Spade will serve as CFO of the merged firm. Shari Redstone, vice chair of both companies, will serve as chair of the combined company. The companies had previously agreed on the management setup and the composition of the board of the merged company, with the stock exchange ratio for the deal being the final haggling point that was finally resolved early in the week. The boards of both companies have approved the deal.
Consolidation to gain more scale amid competition from streaming video and technology giants has been a key focus for the entertainment sector in recent years. The CBS-Viacom deal agreement comes after Walt Disney's $71.3 billion acquisition of large parts of 21st Century Fox and AT&T's $85 billion takeover of Time Warner. CBS is also understood to have offered Lionsgate $5 billion to buy its premium TV unit Starz.
Consolidation to gain more scale amid competition from streaming video and technology giants has been a key focus for the entertainment sector in recent years. The CBS-Viacom deal agreement comes after Walt Disney's $71.3 billion acquisition of large parts of 21st Century Fox and AT&T's $85 billion takeover of Time Warner. CBS is also understood to have offered Lionsgate $5 billion to buy its premium TV unit Starz.
what does this mean for us? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Network TV is ded (Score:1)
Will CBS kill South Park? (Score:2)
Will CBS kill South Park?
Re: (Score:1)
Star Trek Unified (Score:3)
This mean Star Trek is now back into a single corporate roof, which hopefully will end the "25% difference" rule that has caused so much of the newer series to look and feel odd compared to the older ones.
Star Trek Rights Problem Explained (Score:5, Interesting)
This mean Star Trek is now back into a single corporate roof, which hopefully will end the "25% difference" rule that has caused so much of the newer series to look and feel odd compared to the older ones.
For whoever needs this explained in detail:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
or in greater detail (including how STD has hidden and lied about it in marketing):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Midnight's Edge is frequently accurate and insightful, but on this subject, they've always been wrong. As is mentioned further down this thread, CBS officially confirmed that DSC's look was a creative decision instead of a legal one.
People need to stop pushing this debunked crap. It takes focus away from the actual problem, which is that the current staff working on Star Trek doesn't care about any of the previous shows, about canon, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
I get what you're saying, and I respect it. Canon has more to do with just self-consistent storytelling though. Aesthetic is indeed a part of it, which is part of what makes Discovery so jarring. While I understand that the bridge of a mid-23rd century fictional starship can't look like cardboard and plywood if the show is made in 2019, at least Enterprise tried to show something akin to a design lineage. Discovery completely swept that under the rug, at least until the revamped Enterprise showed up. Frankl
Re: (Score:2)
And as an addition to my previous comment; all those things that are likeable about season 2 of Discovery, (The Enterprise herself, Captain Pike, Mr. Spock, DSC: "Light & Shadows," Jeffrey Hunter, Pike facing his ultimate fate, etc.)?
Cynical fan service, and utterly unnecessary, (especially showing Pike's future.) I think those things are the production staff literally admitting that they diverged too far from what Star Trek is, and trying to bring fans back.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh thank Q! All the weirdness this caused was completely unnecessary, and while I don't expect it will change the general direction of writing modern Star Trek, hopefully it means they at least don't have to keep dancing around certain aspects of the series.
Re: (Score:2)
The "25% rule" has been debunked. CBS has officially stated that DSC looks the way it does for creative reasons and not legal ones. That's not good because it means their staff are every bit as incompetent as we feared.
Re: (Score:1)
Star Trek may (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I hope you're right, but I am 75% convinced it's too late at this point.
Re: (Score:2)
Stop pushing Midnight's Edge. They're usually quite insightful, but in this, they're dead wrong [trekmovie.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Star Trek: Discovery on TV? (Score:3)
Doubt it Helps (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It was broadcast on the Space channel in Canada.
Combine to form.... (Score:2)
MEGA MAID!
Suck! Suck! Suck!
Reminds me of... (Score:2)