Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

What3Words: The App That Can Save Your Life (bbc.com) 229

Police have urged everyone to download a smartphone app they say has already saved several lives. What is it and how does it work? From a report: Kicked. Converged. Soccer. These three randomly chosen words saved Jess Tinsley and her friends after they got lost in a forest on a dark, wet night. They had planned a five-mile circular stroll through the 4,900 acre (2,000 hectare) woodland Hamsterley Forest, in County Durham, on Sunday evening, but after three hours they were hopelessly lost. "We were in a field and had no idea where we were," the 24-year-old care worker from Newton Aycliffe said. "It was absolutely horrendous. I was joking about it and trying to laugh because I knew if I didn't laugh I would cry."

At 22:30 BST they found a spot with phone signal and dialled 999. "One of the first things the call-handler told us to do was download the what3words app," Ms Tinsley said. "I had never heard of it." Within a minute of its download, the police said they knew where the group was and the soaked and freezing walkers were swiftly found by the Teesdale and Weardale Search and Mountain Rescue Team. "I have told everyone I know to download this app," Ms Tinsley said. "You never know when you are going to get lost and need it." What3words essentially points to a very specific location. Its developers divided the world into 57 trillion squares, each measuring 3m by 3m (10ft by 10ft) and each having a unique, randomly assigned three-word address. For example, the door of 10 Downing Street is slurs.this.shark, while the area across the road where the press congregate is stage.pushy.nuns.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

What3Words: The App That Can Save Your Life

Comments Filter:
  • GPS (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fluffernutter ( 1411889 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:46PM (#59094646)
    If I have a signal, why wouldn't I just tell them the GPS coordinates?
    • Re:GPS (Score:5, Insightful)

      by laxguy ( 1179231 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:49PM (#59094654)
      because this is an ad
    • Re:GPS (Score:5, Interesting)

      by layabout ( 1576461 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:51PM (#59094658)
      My phone doesn't tell me the GPS coordinates. Also relaying accurate latitude and longitude over the phone when you're stressed is really almost impossible. Then on the other side, entering those coordinates into the emergency responders phone is also fraught with peril. Three words, easily understood across increase the likelihood of telling somebody else where you are. It's a good system for civilians.
      • Re:GPS (Score:5, Insightful)

        by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:59PM (#59094700)

        Try the map application...

        • You don't even need the map app, if I have to download an app [Slashvertising product name deleted] then I can just as easily download an app that directly tells the 911 person where I am via, you know, the cellular network I'm already calling them on.
      • Re:GPS (Score:5, Insightful)

        by holophrastic ( 221104 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:14PM (#59094748)

        You must be kidding. Or you think that all civilians can speak english words. 57 trillion into three words, let's say order matters. That's 13'000 english words.

        First, most native english speakers use only 5'000. Most fluent (non-native) use only 2'000. Most adults need only 2'000. Most scenarios/situations deal with fewer than 500. Let's say you can triple those for things like conjugations.

        Most of my country doesn't speak english natively. "converged" likely isn't known by half of the adults in my country of 33 million diverse people. And for the 75% who do, or can read it anyway, you wouldn't understand their accent in person, let alone over the phone.

        A two-year old can read digits. Most one-year olds around me can read digits.

        Contrast that to numbers -- which are:

        a) the same across most languages and cultures in this world.
        b) can be counted out with grunts, barks, hooves, or apples
        c) easily communicated by machines, be they computers or smoke signals
        d) are taught to children long before reading

        In this case, the really easy solutions would have been:
        a) a checksum to verify understanding of communicated numbers -- you know, like each and every credit card number ever.
        b) the phone just sending the data, numbers words whatever, across the voice call
        c) 911 around here can already pull that information from a cellphone. we've been paying for it for decades because we got pissed off in the '80s when someone wasn't found fast enough.
        d) education enough to understand that maybe you shouldn't walk into a dark forest without knowing how to get out
        e) education enough to find north (sun, moon, stars, nose, landmarks, birds, plants) and know which way home is
        f) knowing that your phone does show gps coordinates, it's under the is-my-gps-working section, and that means you know which way north is, and that means you can use it like a compass too. Or you can just know the gps coordinates of home, and walk that way.

        The miraculous thing here is that someone with a smart phone and an internet connection and a voice call, still needed a brand new app in order to do something that humans have been doing for millennia! Animals have been doing it even longer.

        Tell me again why they couldn't just pull up google maps, and get directions home?

        • A few corrections. (Score:3, Informative)

          by SuperKendall ( 25149 )

          Most of my country doesn't speak english natively.

          The app lets you select a language to use when you start, so it has accounted for that.

          "converged" likely isn't known by half of the adults in my country of 33 million diverse people.

          You don't have to knew what it means, just how to read it.

          I am more disturbed it includes plural forms of words which I can see being easy to mix up.

        • I thought this was an app to give you the three most important words to get help in tourist situations in foreign countries. Like:

          a) bathroom, toilet, shower
          b) food, water, alcohol
          c) medicine, hospital, doctor
          d) sleep, hotel, bed
          e) car, fuel, bus
          f) plane, boat, train
          g) danger, poison, death
          h) animal, human, plant
          i) phone, battery, broken

          So, with my lexicon of maybe 100 words, obviously in 33 groups under maybe 5 situational categories, each in a dozen languages/cultures -- that's pretty much one piece of p

        • Words in your post: 396

          Words to get your life saved by this synergistic, disruptive, market driven, rainbow-farting unicorn technology: 3

          Do the math, numbers guy.

          (Or just look at the permissions for the app, and what third parties it gives permission to.)

          • by holophrastic ( 221104 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:36PM (#59095296)

            Didn't need 3 words for the app to work. It just needed to transmit the coordinates.

            And you're wrong. The app needed internet access to be downloaded, and a working phone to be used, and a 911 operator willing and able to use it within a secure facility, and two humans able to read, pronounce, hear, understand, and type the same language.

            Stop doing math, start counting. That's a shit-tonne of dependencies.

        • So, I guess, you spell the words you don't know. Or describe the characters if it's not in a language you're familiar with. Because that's not fraught with potential for misunderstanding.

        • Or you think that all civilians can speak english words.

          The app lets you choose a language on install.

          a) the same across most languages and cultures in this world.

          Oh really? I say the word "six". Someone speaking Spanish says "seis". Someone speaking Russian says "" (according to Google Translate)

          b) can be counted out with grunts, barks, hooves, or apples

          What's the bark for "decimal point"? Or "negative" 'Cause that's really important if you're talking about relaying a latitude and longitude.

          d) are taught to children long before reading

          I'm having trouble coming up with a situation where a child too young to be literate 1) wanders off, 2) brings a smartphone, 3) knows how to start an "emergency" call, 4) knows to launch

        • "Tell me again why they couldn't just pull up google maps, and get directions home?"

          Because they likely didn't have an internet signal until they finally found a sweet spot. Tell me you knew that every phone doesn't magically know what the entire map of planet Earth looks like without having to access that data over a network, at least until one chooses to "make available locally" a particular subset.

          FTA: "At 22:30 BST they found a spot with phone signal and dialled 999" Presumably the 999 operator thought

      • by Z00L00K ( 682162 )

        Three words that can be prone to mispronunciation causing you to look like you are located in road-less land above the polar circle while you are actually in a forest in New England.

      • by leonbev ( 111395 )

        I'd like to agree with you, but I just downloaded the What Three Words app on my iPhone and it took 5 minutes to download and install on a strong LTE connection. I can only imagine how long it would take if it was stranded in the woods with poor cell reception.

        Seriously... I could have repeated my latitude and longitude about a dozen times over the phone in the amount of time it took me to download this app!

      • Since 2017, at least some Android phones display your location without even asking when you call 911. But this might be limited to the Phone app installed only on Google's own phones. I didn't want to risk a huge fine by testing it on my Xiaomi phone.
      • by smithmc ( 451373 )
        "My phone doesn't tell me the GPS coordinates." Well, it sure could if you're going to download an app anyway, couldn't it? Then you just read the numbers to the 999 operator?
    • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:52PM (#59094664)

      Lots of people may not know how to get GPS coordinates from their phones...

      However I also question how many 911 centers are yet set up to understand the three words system either.

      As far as comprehensibility over a poor connection, the three words thing may have an advantage there.

      Maybe it would be better though to just have an app that clearly gave you GPS coordinates with only two digits after the decimal point, easy to read over a phone and any rescue group can make easy use of. Since we are talking about everyone having to download an app anyway....

      • Well.. It seems to me if you're going to spend time to install and learn how to use the app, then you could spend equal time learning how to get the gps coordinate from google maps.
      • > GPS coordinates with only two digits after the decimal point

        0.01 degrees of Lat/Lon translates to about 3600 feet, so that would only get rescue crews to within half a mile of your actual location. Better than nothing, but not nearly as good as the system described.

        =Smidge=

      • Hopefully the emergency operator that is on the phone with you knows how to get GPS coords out of your phone?

        iPhone: open the Compass app
        Android: open Google Maps, long press on blue dot

        That's a problem that is solved with a post-it on the emergency operator's monitor.

    • by AvitarX ( 172628 )

      Probably because there's a higher risk of near miss.

      What 3 Words will give huge misses if heard wrong (for example missing the "s" at the end of a plural).

      https://what3words.com/wounds.... [what3words.com] vs https://what3words.com/wound.c... [what3words.com]

      But with coordinates, you can get a digit wrong and think you're right (the location will pass a sanity check) but actually be many yards (or depending the specifics, miles) away.

      The location is presumably passed multiple times via telephone game, so having an easy sanity check to get t

      • I'm under the impression that numbers are phonetically clear. I've never heard of a phonetic system for numbers.
        • by Zocalo ( 252965 )
          Specific pronunciation for numbers is included in the standard NATO phonetic alphabet, as well as many similar systems, with several digits stressed slightly differently from the standard English pronunciation to help avoid ambiguity.
        • I enter credit card numbers over the phone maybe 3 times a day.

          I get it wrong about once a week. That's 16 digits.

          Coordinates are about 14 digits. An error in the last 3 of either (so 6 out of 14?) Would not fail a sanity check.

          And with credit cards there's a pattern (0000 0000 0000 0000), people aren't used to reading GPS coordinates.

          This is obviously a slashvertisement, but this is an example of w3w being an obviously better method. Though honestly, with working GPS and internet, the emergency system shou

      • by Zocalo ( 252965 )
        What 3 Words has a kind of error checking built in. They've assigned co-ordinates such that if you get a word wrong it's supposed to result in either an invalid set of co-ordinates or one that is obviously wrong - a lost caller from a wood in County Durham clearly wouldn't be in - say - Outer Mongolia, for instance. That's far less prone to plausible transcription errors than GPS, especially if the caller is panicing and/or under duress and may not be able to speak loudly and/or clearly.

        Also, something
    • I think most people may not know how to find GPS coordinates. Words are also less likely to be miscommunicated. I do wonder, though, why you'd be lost if you have a phone.
      • by mark-t ( 151149 )

        Words are only less likely to be miscommunicated than numbers if there is sufficient redundant context around the words to resolve any ambiguity.

        Since the words are being used here in isolation of any meaningful context that relates to how the words might normally be used in conversation, the chance of miscommunication is probably just as high as it would be using numbers instead.

        But it does bear some validity that consumer map applications which might utilize GPS should have a way to quickly and easil

      • I think most people may not know how to find GPS coordinates. Words are also less likely to be miscommunicated. I do wonder, though, why you'd be lost if you have a phone.

        I recall of a case of someone lost with his phone. He was on a small plane that crashed in the woods. He had his phone and it was able to give his location by E911. He knew where he was but that wasn't necessarily helpful in that he lacked enough information on how to navigate out. There was also the matter of a lack of a vehicle, a considerable distance needed to travel to find aid, and an injured passenger that was unable to travel with much speed.

        Unfortunately people get lost all the time with their

    • by qzzpjs ( 1224510 )

      If I have a signal, why wouldn't I just tell them the GPS coordinates?

      That's what I was thinking. But then I wondered where I would find my GPS coordinates on my phone. Maybe in one of the maps apps but it's not obvious. Another nice thing about What3words is that it's easier to say 3 words than relay a bunch of numeric coordinates without messing it up.

    • Re:GPS (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TWX ( 665546 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:55PM (#59094680)

      It's been my experience that nontechnical people are notoriously awful at communicating the full extent of the necessary information.

      Back when beige-box PCs were commonplace in corporate environments, we would put stickers on the cases that described the motherboard inside so that when the user called in with a problem the helpdesk could accurately document the model, so we'd know what parts to get. The problem came about when we had a new person come up with nomenclature for the next model. That model had a motherboard from Biostar, so he simply put stickers that said, "BIOSTAR" on them onto these builds.

      The next model of computer also had a Biostar motherboard but with an entirely different architecture. Old one was IDE with SDRAM and a 20pin power supply, new ones were SATA with DDR and a 24-pin power supply. He labeled the new ones "BIOSTAR II" or "BIOSTAR 2". Problem is, the users and the helpdesk would only note "BIOSTAR", and the internally-assigned asset tag ranges were close enough that one couldn't readily identify which model a user would have. This was aggravating.

      So while in theory a user should be able to open a GPS application and read off latitude and longitude, it's extremely possible that the user is stupid and will transpose digits, omit some section, or simply get the numbers wrong, sending rescue personnel on a wild goose chase trying to find them. As much as I abhor dumbing-down to "rutabaga,mollusk,cheese" at least it'll be harder for an end user to get the words themselves entirely wrong, especially if some thought was put into the words used for the grid system, such that no similar words are anywhere near each other.

    • Or you could use an existing map application already on your device. If you were lost and lucky to find a signal, you probably wouldn't be able to download anything. I'll bet someone could make a website that asks for GPS permission and returns the same results -- all without installing anything.
      • by pruss ( 246395 )

        An existing map application might not do the job in a no-Internet situation. Of course, one can't download an app then, either, but one could pre-download the app.

        I just put my Android 8.0 phone in airplane mode (but with location on) and cleared data and cache for Google Maps, and started Google Maps to simulate what would happen if I had traveled to an area where there were no cached maps. I got a not very responsive blank screen. The usual blue dot did not show up at all on the screen. The only way I had

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Then somebody that is apparently paying the police would not make a profit off you.

    • Mostly, they'd have them already. All cellphones sold in 'merica have to be capable of providing location data somehow. It's called E911 [wikipedia.org], although in the EU there is also E112/eCall. GPS, AOA, TDOA, and/or location fingerprinting will be used to provide a typically fairly accurate location if an emergency call is made from a cellular phone.

      "In the US, the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999, also known as the 911 Act, mandated the use of E911" (see above link) but GSM carriers got a deferm

      • The problem is the resolution. E911 is an accuracy of about a city block. Which is going to be good enough for a "lost in the woods" scenario (assuming you can shout) but not good enough for an urban area.

        Yes, the phone can do better, but the low-bid contractors building the equipment and software for the E911 center didn't spend the money to handle that.

        Also, your 911 call from a cell phone is often routed to a center that doesn't actually cover your area. In most states it's routed to a state-level cen

    • by Z00L00K ( 682162 )

      Or the Maidenhead Grid Locator? Like JO57WQ21IX [k7fry.com].

    • Re:GPS (Score:5, Informative)

      by hey! ( 33014 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:22PM (#59094792) Homepage Journal

      I can't tell you how many data sets I have looked through that are chock full of badly transcribed GPS coordinates. People are lousy at accurately reading and transcribing long strings of numbers. So, yeah, if I'm relying on voice communication to get a location, three words works a hell of a lot better.

      In the US this is not an issue because by law emergency cell phone calls to 911 must relay the location of the handset to the dispatcher, either by sending GPS coordinates or by triangulating cell phone towers. Triangulation is less accurate, but in practice all recent US smartphones are going to be automatically relaying GPS coordinates if available.

      Similar technology is available in the UK's 999 system, but it may not be mandated yet.

      • E911 only requires the resolution of about a city block. And the low-bid contractors outfitting 911 centers didn't spend the money to do better.

        That's probably good enough for a lost-in-the-woods scenario (assuming you can shout), but causes problems in an urban area.

    • by ugen ( 93902 )

      Add to that that GPS coordinates convey additional information.
      For example, if my GPS latitude increased by about 0.01 degree - I am now about 1km-ish north of where I previously was.

      What information can be derived from an arbitrary set of words?

  • The map that can save your life!
  • by Kernel Kurtz ( 182424 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:53PM (#59094668)

    ...oh, wait....

  • They really dialed 0188 999 88199 9119 725 3
  • English? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ugen ( 93902 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:01PM (#59094708)

    Ok, so English-speakers are safe. How does it work for the rest of the world?

    Numbers, on the other hand, are pretty universal (in that everyone uses the same decimal system now), and all you need to learn, at most, is 10 things to pronounce/translate.

    • Re:English? (Score:5, Informative)

      by spudnic ( 32107 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:07PM (#59094726)

      The first thing it does when you install the app is which of several screens of languages you want to use for the word bank.

      • by ugen ( 93902 )

        So these words are not the same in all languages? How does that aid communication? Instead of learning 10 (common, probably well known) numeric values you need to be able to understand/pronounce an arbitrary extensive vocabulary of words that don't actually have any meaning together?

        • by Merk42 ( 1906718 )
          Wow a 911 operator might not speak the language of the person calling, surely that's never happened before!
        • Instead of learning 10 (common, probably well known) numeric values

          I say the word "six".

          Someone speaking Spanish says "seis".

          Someone speaking Chinese says "liu" (according to Google translate, and mangled by Slashdot's poor unicode).

      • Oh good, so I only need to learn to read and pronounce Thai if I get lost in Thailand. Or Chinese if lost in China. Or Japanese if lost in Japan.

        How is that helpful?

    • by HiThere ( 15173 )

      IIRC, this app started out in Africa. I presume that there it used the languages common around wherever it was being used.

      That said, it's just a map coordinate program. It was originally designed to allow mail to be delivered to placed that didn't have any official address.

  • BBC Advert (Score:4, Interesting)

    by j.a.mcguire ( 551738 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:05PM (#59094716)
    It seems a bit too much like coincidence that the author of this product launches an advertisement campaign on YouTube at the same time he's getting serious face-time on the BBC. Has anyone seen an official statement from the Police where they've endorsed the product outside of this BBC editorial? I haven't. Are the Police adequately informed to endorse the product, or will we find out later it's a Russian or Chinese owned company sifting your location data? I wonder how much it costs to buy ad space on the BBC News website? Think I'll stick to Latitude and Longitude myself.
  • by koavf ( 1099649 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:06PM (#59094720) Homepage
    Please remove the AMP link and replace it with the standard version. https://danielmiessler.com/blo... [danielmiessler.com]
  • Your life isn't in danger if you're lost for 3 hours. 3 days maybe. 3 weeks certainly. But 3 hours?

    • Re:Saved? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by apoc.famine ( 621563 ) <apoc.famine@NOSPAM.gmail.com> on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:20PM (#59094780) Journal

      Yeah, and they have enough bandwidth to download an app, but apparently not enough to open their mapping application, take a look at where they are, and start walking?

      It is appallingly pathetic to get lost on a 5 mile hike. Even more so if you have a cell phone with even occasional signal with you!

      • 5 mile CIRCULAR "hike".

        It was 4900 acres. If it were a square, it would be 2.767 miles on each side.
        PICK ONE DIRECTION AND WALK FOR 1 HOUR. YOU'RE OUT.

      • This is what offline map applications are for. I've got all of Europe in my pocket with no need for any connection.

      • Yes, calling the police in this situation, unless someone is injured, is irresponsible and a waste of public resources. They could just look at google maps and walk out. I am with the skeptics and think this might be entirely made up or greatly embellished. All you have to do in google maps is long-press on the map and the lat/long appears at the top. That is so much faster that I have real troubles thinking of a scenario where an emergency operator would not just tell them to do that. Probably you don
      • by nadaou ( 535365 )

        Don't be so smug. Anyone can break an ankle and know the way out just not know how to get there. I've also known very smart people with PhDs who couldn't navigate their way out of a supermarket parking lot. That doesn't mean they need to be culled from the human race, just that they know how to drop a current location pin in their map app and then share it.

    • Depends on the local weather conditions.

    • Your life isn't in danger if you're lost for 3 hours. 3 days maybe. 3 weeks certainly. But 3 hours?

      Hypothermia can kill you that quickly. Blood loss much more quickly than that.

      (Not to be construed as an endorsement for this product.)

    • In an urban/suburban environment, no. If a person is up in the mountains with the wrong clothing, and the weather turns wet and cold, they could be in trouble in a few hours. Maybe not incapacitated but getting there.

      Haven't checked out the story, but I'm a tad suspicious. A 911 responder calling for some random app instead of GPS coordinates? Really? Mmmmmmaaaaaaayyyybe.
    • by jwhyche ( 6192 )

      Here is something to remember if you live in the United States I once heard. I've not verified it but here is what I heard. In the US if you walk east to west or west to east you are always within 6 hours of major highway. That seems unlikely in places west of the Mississippi but east it's pretty much guaranteed

      If your on the west cost just scream at the top of your lungs "Trump 2020" or "Make America Great Again" and a pack of protesters is bound to show up. :)

      • by Merk42 ( 1906718 )

        If your on the west cost just scream at the top of your lungs "Trump 2020" or "Make America Great Again" and a pack of protesters is bound to show up. :)

        Would probably work on a large part of the East Cost as well.

        For the rest of the country, just yell "I want an abortion" or literally anything in a foreign language.

      • I suppose that depends on your definition of "major highway" - I know of at least one town in SW Colorado that is several hours of driving away from the closest interstate - this would be days of walking.

        Add in the US highway system and you're probably closer.

  • by libertarianbro ( 5430216 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:15PM (#59094754)
    Its the same thing on ars today with a major AD disguised as "news". Your "writers" aren't even trying anymore.
  • by mandark1967 ( 630856 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:16PM (#59094766) Homepage Journal
    Your. Mom's. Ass.

    Come save me!

  • by k2r ( 255754 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:19PM (#59094772)

    Can download an app that uses GPS to locate them and then generates a 3 word phrase.

    Can not use the builtin maps app to locate them and use it to figure out a way home.

    More competency may safe their life later on, but I would not bet a cent on them.

  • by Hammeh ( 2481572 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:19PM (#59094776) Homepage
    What3words is a fantastic idea, but a dangerous one. Their algorithms and databases of addresses that are mapped to true gps coordinates are all proprietary, and they have specific terms and conditions to prevent people reverse engineering or even storing the database. A dependence in an emergency situation to rely on a service run by one company, that could vanish overnight, with no back up or even the possibility to recreate in an open way is such an infringement of our freedoms. I would campaign against its use for this reason.
    • Please, Hammeh, don't hurt 'em.
    • by nadaou ( 535365 )

      Their about page states that in event that they go under the source code and datasets will be released as open source. If that is properly held in escrow or is at the whims and honor of who ever gets to sell off the assets will be seen in time.

      It also states that they have >100 employees. Doing what exactly? What is their business model that can support such a large salary base for a write in an afternoon and basically done tool? Are they selling access to first responders, guilting them into buying into

  • Seriously? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by DaveV1.0 ( 203135 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:21PM (#59094784) Journal
    If one has a smartphone that can download an app, then one has a map and GPS.The GPS will pinpoint one on the map and show one where to go. One can even put in an address and it will give directions how to the there. I have little doubt this is some sort of spyware.
  • Well, what about "share your location" from Google Maps (I presume most phones that have apps and GPS come with Google Maps since quite a while)? Never mind how you'll get lost in England, of all places; I mean really a (very) few km forest is now the jungle you need to be rescued from because you'll never find your way out by yourself... and with a working phone with a GPS that can get the location and can download apps (and presumably show you Google Maps too, even if you didn't have cached any chunk from

  • by tepples ( 727027 ) <tepples.gmail@com> on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:30PM (#59094848) Homepage Journal

    Previously on Slashdot:

    This comment [slashdot.org] points out that the November 2018 article "talks about the other issue with what3words - it is not continuous. You cannot tell by looking at two W3W addresses how rhey relate to each other geographically," unlike with street addresses and latitude and longitude.

  • by hackertourist ( 2202674 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:37PM (#59094890)

    What3Words is being pushed as an addressing system for places that don't have rigorous postal addresses. But for that purpose, it stinks: what3words has no sense of context. Postal addresses go from coarse-grained (country, city) to fine-grained (street, house number) so you can tell when you're getting closer.
    w3w addresses are random, so 'correct battery horse' might be next to 'lemon tree fancy' and 1000 km away from 'correct battery staple'.

    The emergency service operator instructed the caller to download the w3w app? Surely instructing to open Compass and read the coordinates would have been much quicker, and does not rely on a data connection.

    As an experiment, I tried getting lat/long info on my phone. I can find them in my third-party navigation app, but I had to do an internet search to find where lat/long are shown on the iPhone's default apps (they're in Compass).

  • by superdave80 ( 1226592 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @03:44PM (#59094934)

    They had enough signal to call, download an app, and then relay the words to the dispatcher... but nobody bothered to see where they were on a map? Or download the trail map of the forest?

    I actually looked up exactly where they were (although I had to figure out that what3words stupid website didn't like spaces between the periods at the end of each word. Great search system, guys!). They were on a main trail less than 1 mile from the nearest parking lot, 2 miles from a main road/home, and about 2.5 miles from another parking lot. They could have been to the nearest parking lot before the download/install of the app finished.

    • "They had enough signal to call, download an app, and then relay the words to the dispatcher... but nobody bothered to see where they were on a map? Or download the trail map of the forest?" This gets me thinking about how many casualties (or bodies) park rangers have to pull out of the woods each year are those of hipsters who decided to go out into nature because its "cool" vs those who have proper training and experience. Buying a bunch of expensive gear and gadgets does not make anybody an experienc
  • Download an app? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Malays Boweman ( 5369355 ) on Friday August 16, 2019 @04:00PM (#59094992)
    "One of the first things the call-handler told us to do was download the what3words app," Great, so what if they had a flip phone, or no data connection was available? Or maybe the phone decides to throw up a smarmy "you can't install this app on this device" for whatever reason? It is truly dangerous to rely on an "app". This should only be used as an option for when all else fails, not something to solely rely on. -- Lockdowns are for convicts
  • too.their.read

    I think this app is completely unnecessary. There are apps where you can send your gps location to someone else in your contacts with one tap. No need to mis-transcribe them or say them over the phone. Just because there is a scenario where this three words thing may have worked means nothing (and it seems like an ad to me anyway)

  • by arsenix ( 19636 )

    If I have my smartphone... how am I getting lost?

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.

Working...