Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Windows Technology

Windows 10 Passes 50% Market Share, Windows 7 Falls To 30% (venturebeat.com) 169

More than four years after its release, Windows 10 has passed 50% in market share. This means every other desktop computer is now running Microsoft's latest and greatest operating system, according to Net Applications. From a report: In January, Windows 10 passed Windows 7 in market share. These are nice milestones for Microsoft to finally hit, even though they took longer than the company had hoped. Windows 10 adoption started out very strong but naturally slowed as the months progressed. Microsoft was aiming for 1 billion devices running Windows 10 in two to three years but backpedaled on that goal.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Windows 10 Passes 50% Market Share, Windows 7 Falls To 30%

Comments Filter:
  • by burningcpu ( 1234256 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:11AM (#59149234)
    They've given it away for free for four years, used malware-like tactics to bolster adoption, and purposely degraded the older version through backporting of telemetry to Windows 7.

    What a compelling product.
    • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:32AM (#59149324)

      The only reason people (and more so, companies) are starting to move away from Win7 is that it's reaching EoL within 4 months.

      • by The Cynical Critic ( 1294574 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @12:12PM (#59149484)
        It's kind of depressing how they haven't gotten adoption this much closer to 100% of Windows users despite the impending EoL date and everything they've done to push people towards it.

        IMHO the scummiest thing they've done is to make it so that Windows 7 doesn't support Ryzen and newer Intel chips so people buying new hardware for the last couple of years have been forced to use it (or switch to Linux). Ran into that myself when I built a new machine just as the first Ryzen chips came and had previously been happily using Windows 7 on the machine I'd previously had (was was still going to continue using some components of). Thankfully my main use OS is Linux anyway so it's only really come up whenever I need to boot up Windows to play games (which isn't often anymore thanks to Proton/Wine).
        • "Windows 7 doesn't support Ryzen and newer Intel chips"

          That is correct. Microsoft does not use Windows 7 to "make money from" Ryzen and newer Intel processors. Or did you have some other, non-standard, meaning of support other than "make money from" in mind?

        • by oopsilon ( 958290 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @02:20PM (#59149886)

          Probably too late for you, but wufuc has been pretty handy to keep several Windows 7 installs updated on Ryzen systems.

          https://github.com/zeffy/wufuc [github.com]

          Definitely not looking forward to EoL day when I'm forced to jump over for security updates.

        • I think it's exactly the opposite. Too many people with old PCs which "still run" combined with little incentive to update the hardware. Most users don't know half of the things the people here know about Windows 10 (which are mostly tin-foil hat exaggerations anyway). Also, most people don't upgrade their Windows installation. Like, ever. Aka they don't upgrade to a newer version of Windows because the don't upgrade the hardware it comes with. With the exception of niche markets like gaming laptops, PCs a
        • by Livius ( 318358 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @04:08PM (#59150160)

          It's kind of depressing how they haven't gotten adoption this much closer to 100% of Windows users

          I'm depressed that they got as far as they did, rather than accepting it was a terrible product and fixing it.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          "It's kind of depressing how they haven't gotten adoption this much closer to 100% of Windows users despite the impending EoL date and everything they've done to push people towards it. "

          Another way of looking at it is that it's kind of good computers last long enough to reach the standard Windows EoL without ending up in landfill.

          What's depressing is that Microsoft isn't offering a decent way for those machines to remain productive and useful. The Windows 10 upgrade process will brick half of them and isn'

      • When you have only one choice other than "don't own a computer anymore", what are they going to do? Only us techie types consider Linux to be a real alternative (posting this from Ubuntu), for everyone else it may as well not exist. You can tell the average person "it's just as easy to use as Windows", but if everything they want to do, every game they want to play won't run on it, it's all over. Therefore this 'tech news story' is as irrelevant as the election results from some authoritarian dictatorship-r
        • I've convinced three non-techies to use Linux.

      • "The only reason people (and more so, companies) are starting to move away from Win7 is that it's reaching EoL within 4 months."

        Well, that is untrue. Within 4 months it will be reaching the end of Microsoft fiddle-faddle and entering the stage of Stability.

        The young-uns prefer things that are in a continuous state of change since it keeps them employed dealing with the continuous breakage. Once Windows 7 exits the stage of fiddle-faddle end enters the stage of stability, they will have nought to do. Beca

      • This. Due to the way Windows works (with fonts being handled in kernel space and other things like that) the moment a Windows version cannot receive security patches it becomes "zombified OS used to run old apps in a VM not connected to the internet". When I downgraded from Windows 10 i went to 8.1. With Classic Shell Start Menu it's the last great Windows. And it boots faster than 7.
      • The only reason people (and more so, companies) are starting to move away from Win7 is that it's reaching EoL within 4 months.

        Not the only reason. There's also the small detail that you can't buy a new PC running Windows 7 any more.

    • by Dutch Gun ( 899105 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @01:13PM (#59149660)

      Many Slashdot denizens seems to have this bizarre notion that Windows 10 is free. First, it was only a limited time free upgrade from Windows 7 & 8, which has long since expired. Second, Windows licenses are tied to hardware, not to the user, so when you get a new computer, you need to pay for Windows 10 again if you want it on that new machine. The only thing Microsoft has done with Windows 10 is to eliminate the concept of paid version upgrades going forward.

      The rest of the comment stands though. The aggressive malware-like tactics for upgrade were disgraceful, and Microsoft really tainted the concept of telemetry by making it appear more like spyware that you can't opt out of.

      • by Retired ICS ( 6159680 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @02:26PM (#59149908)

        "The only thing Microsoft has done with Windows 10 is to eliminate the concept of paid version upgrades going forward."

        For now. Microsoft did the same thing by distributing Windows 1.0 "for free" in boxes of Corn Flakes. See where we ended up?

        Windows 10 will be renamed to Windows 365 and you will be paying a monthly rent. And like the other Microsoft 365 products, it will stop working whenever there is a Microsoft or other network issue, and Windows 365 will *only* work with a continuous Internet connection so "all your data belong to us".

    • They've given it away for free for four years, used malware-like tactics to bolster adoption, and purposely degraded the older version through backporting of telemetry to Windows 7.

      What a compelling product.

      But the security of Windows 10 is much better!

      If you believe that, then I have a lovely bridge to sell you. Only used by a little old lady to drive to her church on Sundays!

      Actually, I think the biggest problem with this story is the monoculture thing. Every flaw and security vulnerability in Windows 10 now represents a possible attack on half of the computers in the world. That is bad.

      Solution time again? As if the typical Slashdot user has time for or interest in solutions?

      Imagine that you cut Microsoft i

  • by DaMattster ( 977781 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:13AM (#59149242)
    I have no idea why Microsoft so drastically changed the user interface between Windows 7 and Windows 10. I really don't like Windows 10 at all. They should have kept the Windows 7 UI and just added the excellent search features and cortana into it. The UI that attempts to marry mobile device computing and desktop computing just does both poorly.
    • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:29AM (#59149316)

      Excellent search features like cortana... ok.

      Let's put it that way: Type "cortana" into google and watch what the first suggestion is that you get. It gives you a hint how much people like it. Seriously, it's the least liked Windows feature since the demise of clippy.

      • Type "cortana" into google and watch what the first suggestion is that you get. It gives you a hint how much people like it.

        A bit curious as to what you're seeing? I'm getting as search suggestions and links just the ordinary wiki and microsoft links followed by links to the game halo (which I've never played but apparently features a character named cortana). Never used cortana either btw.

        • by rastos1 ( 601318 )

          A bit curious as to what you're seeing?

          Me too. I see:
          cortana
          cortana download
          cortana android
          cortana windows 10
          cortana halo
          cortana apk

          Disclaimer: I'm 99% of the time on Linux and I never attempted using Cortana.

      • In my previous job (Intel) where I had Win10 forced on me (literally: they purposefully disabled Win7, broke it on purpose, to make me switch) I went out of my way, breaking things (things I didn't need anyway) in the process, to make sure Cortana was completely and totally disabled.
    • by ArchieBunker ( 132337 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @12:09PM (#59149474)

      It takes more clicks to do common things like changing an IP address. You think you're in the right place at first and all you get is a giant ON/OFF switch.

      • Right! And while some parts a lot worse than others, the entire design concept is just so lazy and basic, with the options just thrown into a long list, disguised to look like a UI through the use of copious white space, flat textures, and flat toggles.

        Hope you like scrolling! And don't get me started on the critical privacy options hidden throughout, like some freaking easter-egg hunt. It'd take a masters degree in Windows 10 just to mitigate the myriad of fucks Microsoft shoves up our collective ass wit
      • Sure, that's because Windows has always been the PlaySkool OS all along, it's only gotten worse and worse over time. It practically slaps your hand away.
    • I have no idea why Microsoft so drastically changed the user interface between Windows 7 and Windows 10.

      Because, yet again, they were trying to ape what Apple was doing. But instead of making Windows Phone look like Windows 7 on a mobile device, they outsmarted themselves and made what they thought was an ideal mobile interface than then ported it to the PC, with disastrous results. Do you know ANYONE that uses Windows 8/8.1? No? Thought so.

      Ever since Windows 95, Windows lives and dies with the start menu. Microsoft leadership should have known better than to do a Redmond version of New Coke. ESPECIALLY Stev

  • ... are running BSOD.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    Jobs that deal with constant updates. Jobs that deal with Intel driver updates that suck. Jobs that deal with viruses and security. Jobs that deal with print spooler never restarting a job, ultimately always requiring .....a........reboot. Jobs that deal wIth windows disabling attached monitors randomly. Jobs that deal with licensing. Jobs that deal with Intel CPU updates slowing down devices. Or get a Mac.
    • If only mac's were a choice for a lot of business comps. I handle a bunch of dentist and doctors offices and their software sure won't work on macs unless they're running windows, lol

      • by TechyImmigrant ( 175943 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:59AM (#59149438) Homepage Journal

        Dentists offices are where IT goes to die.

        • lol. Yeah. I stayed after a procedure once to help the staff fix an IT issue. Their work was made a lot harder because the voice recorder wasn't integrating with the dictating software they use during procedures, and their workaround was nearly as painful to watch as the surgery felt.
      • It is. I've seen a lot of macs at companies lately. More than I would have ever thought I would.

      • I would have thought that the software for a dentist would in 2019 work from a browser and you could just use a cheap chromebox or similar thin client to access it. If you can run an entire university turning over hundres of millions a year on a web based erp then you sure as hell should be able to manage a dentist.

        • by Voyager529 ( 1363959 ) <voyager529@yahoo. c o m> on Monday September 02, 2019 @01:26PM (#59149712)

          For the ERP-based side of a dentist's office, sure, you can make that mostly browser-based.

          Now, add in oral X-ray sensors, intra-oral cameras, and the imaging formats (protip: most systems use proprietary formats rather than something sensible like jpeg or png). Most of the hardware I've come across has interfaced either with USB or been another thing on the network. To get these interacting with a browser you can't have a sandbox anymore, or you're ending up with some horrendous shim like Java or ActiveX or Silverlight...but, let's pretend you've solved that problem.

          You've got your perfect dental management system in The Cloud (tm), and you've got a whole lot of hardware built that can interface with it. You've also managed to get all of that hardware certified by all the people that one needs to get their hardware certified from, which will cost you millions. Oh, and all your back end servers are 100% HIPAA compliant.

          X-Ray scanners are *expensive*. A quick Google search showed me entry-level *used* machines going for $12,000 a pop, and those were the film-based ones. I am confident that it's not too hard to find $100,000 models; dentists aren't just going to just buy new ones if the one they have is 1.) working, and 2.) less than ten years old.

          All of that to...get off a system that, in all likelihood, is working just fine for them at the moment? In practice, it will be miraculous if your system manages to beat out current Windows-based systems on price. Even if a dentist moved away from Windows purely on principle, you'd be their only option, while Windows has a handful of existing vendors, enabling dentists to at least keep their computers (and possibly some hardware) if they change software vendors.

          So, yes, there are certain things that work in a browser. However, there are things that don't work in a browser, and they very much exist and are critical to the services dentists provide.

    • Jobs that deal wIth windows disabling attached monitors randomly.

      To be fair, I’ve been seeing this with Macs as well. I think it could be the fault of the display manufacturers doing things half-assedly, or the extra crap HDCP forces into the process.

    • by lgw ( 121541 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @12:56PM (#59149608) Journal

      Jobs that deal with constant updates.

      Windows updates once a month on a predictable schedule. Ubuntu updates all the damn time, at least once a week, and always seems to ask to reboot after (most people ignore that, but it does ask).

      Jobs that deal with Intel driver updates that suck.

      Wait, is this a rant about MS or Intel?

      Jobs that deal with viruses and security.

      Plenty of viruses everywhere these days.

      Jobs that deal with print spooler never restarting a job, ultimately always requiring .....a........reboot.

      OK, I guess I get your point: every damn OS sucks at being a print spooler (other than mainframes, which are great at it).

      Doesn't matter who's driving, the ride sucks, and there's job security for all ...

      Jobs that deal wIth windows disabling attached monitors randomly.

      ... but Ubuntu has the absolute worst multi-monitor support of any consumer OS I've ever used. I cannot imagine how it manages to do exactly the wrong thing every damn time I switch to a different application.

      • by mea2214 ( 935585 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @05:02PM (#59150302)

        Windows updates once a month on a predictable schedule. Ubuntu updates all the damn time, at least once a week, and always seems to ask to reboot after (most people ignore that, but it does ask).

        Is this a joke? I have an Ubuntu box with an uptime today of 696 days. Try going more than 2 weeks with a Windows 10 box before it decided for you to reboot killing all the VMs it supports.

  • XP VS Linux (Score:2, Offtopic)

    by CastrTroy ( 595695 )

    Linux is at 1.72%, while Windows XP is at 1.57%. So, Linux only has a few more users than an operating system that they ended general support on a decade ago, and ended extended support on 5 years ago.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Opportunist ( 166417 )

      If you sell every other PC with Windows preinstalled and keep people thinking that it's the only OS they can get without having to get a degree in CS, what do you expect?

      What can I say, marketing works. It can have a strong influence on the weak-minded.

      • Re:XP VS Linux (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:58AM (#59149424)

        With Linux being free, how the fuck does anyone count the number of actual Linux installations anyway? I've got Linux installed on all my machines, but the only cash register records out there are for me buying a copy of Windows 7 back in the day for playing video games, Windows 7 pre-installs on my laptop and desktop purchases from the manufacturers, etc. Now a days I only run Linux because there is just too much malware/ransomware going on in the Windows world...

        Going by sales numbers, Windows gets counted maybe 3 or 4 times over from my purchases, while completely missing that I don't use Windows and doesn't count any of my Linux machines that I do use because there is no paper trail of those.

      • I've sometimes seen computers with Linux preinstalled, and the first thing their buyers did was format and install Windows. The problem with Linux is not being preinstalled or not, the problem with Linux is still not providing a desktop environment that works consistently.
        • I've sometimes seen computers with Linux preinstalled, and the first thing their buyers did was format and install Windows. The problem with Linux is not being preinstalled or not, the problem with Linux is still not providing a desktop environment that works consistently.

          Do you believe that people with linux preinstalled even try it? Afaik you can run windows with activators not needing an official licence. Unless you purchase a dodgy licence and buy it directly from a reputable store or microsoft it seems like it would be cost prohibitive compared to buying it preinstalled.

          • This is Brazil my friend, most ones just install a pirated version and they don't care. I myself was not for lack of attempts that I stopped trying to use Linux as desktop (I've used Slackware, Mandrake, Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, etc), it just isn't good enough yet to that.


            P.S: That doesn't mean I agree with everything they are doing with Windows 10. His interface is so mediocre, so half done by chimpanzees that I believe the time they decide to remove all old control interfaces (like the original control p
      • Most people demand Windows to be pre-installed on their computers. They want to game, run some Windows exclusive software, or operate hardware with Windows-only drivers.

        I love the concept of Linux. I've used versions to run my file server for over a decade and previously, operated my own email and web server. I've also tried using it as my primary desktop off and on since 2005 but I always become discouraged. Wifi driver woes. Graphic driver woes. Stuttering sound or stuttering video, or both. Days spent
      • by tsa ( 15680 )

        Weak-minded? You mean the people who don't give a damn because they're not tinkerers like we here are. Which is about 90% of the population according to the pie graph in the article.

    • I'm migrating from Windows to Linux due to not liking anything from Microsoft since Windows 7, and I've wondered how many others are doing the same thing. Seeking confirmation bias, I went to the article read:

      Windows overall slipped 0.56 percentage points to 87.89% in August. macOS gained 0.70 points to 9.68% while Linux slipped 0.38 points to 1.72%.

      Meaning that Linux saw a net gain in market share change over Windows. Yes, they both lost overall to Mac, but still....

    • by lgw ( 121541 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @12:58PM (#59149612) Journal

      Linux is at 1.72%, while Windows XP is at 1.57%.

      When Slashdot was young and optimistic, everyone told me that Linux would overtake Windows XP on the desktop and they were right!

    • Linux is at 1.72%, while Windows XP is at 1.57%

      Citation please?

      • by clovis ( 4684 )

        Linux is at 1.72%, while Windows XP is at 1.57%

        Citation please?

        Are you joking? That would be a good one.
        But I honestly can't tell. I'll provide the citation if you still need it.

  • by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:35AM (#59149338)
    Another tab I've got open is one in which I'm buying a bunch of refurbished Windows 7 machines. We're not switching off of Windows 7 any time soon.
    • What do you plan to do in January?

      • by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @11:58AM (#59149430)
        Windows 7 machines. Our mission critical software doesn't run on Windows 10.
        • Your mission critical software doesn't work on 10? Windows 10 was released in 2015. With developers previews at least a year or two before that. So basically since 2014 there was no testing to prepare your company for the future? That's some really bad IT practice.
      • Why? Are Windows 7 systems going to shut down and self-destruct in january?

        • by lgw ( 121541 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @01:00PM (#59149616) Journal

          Well, yes, but not any more than any other month.

        • Why? Are Windows 7 systems going to shut down and self-destruct in january?

          With no security upgrades and the trend of ransomware, pretty much yes if you intend to have it connected to the internet.

          • How many Windows 7 PCs really connect directly to the Internet, though? If you have a laptop and you connect to any old WiFi you can find, that's one thing. However, for professional work, we have several layers of security between any machine running Windows 7 at the office and the outside world.

            • How many Windows 7 PCs really connect directly to the Internet, though? If you have a laptop and you connect to any old WiFi you can find, that's one thing. However, for professional work, we have several layers of security between any machine running Windows 7 at the office and the outside world.

              We're talking about 30% of _all_ computers here, don't be silly.

              • Right, so anyone connecting via a WAN router on their home or office network is immediately outside the group I mentioned. We're primarily talking about people who take their laptops out and then go online using untrusted WiFi networks being at heightened risk here.

  • It is both Microsoft and Developer's fault Windows 7 is still on a large amount of users right before support ends. Microsoft hasn't given businesses with data security oriented computers a version without telemetry and forced reboots and developers still write applications for old versions of Internet Explorer and and Windows. You have had 6 years since Internet Explorer 11 came out to update to a newer browser and 5 and a half years since Windows XP was end of lifed. If you use Windows XP online in a comm
  • I never would have guessed that usage of Windows 7 was still 30% of the install base, not this many years later...

    I wonder if that affects people much who are writing Windows applications?

    • I believe that most of corporate users are still with Windows 7. Probably the most important metric regarding the success of Win10 is how well it has penetrated the corporate marketspace. I can't find what it is with a quick search - maybe somebody could provide these numbers.

      I suspect most business apps are going web based so the choice of the OS is less important, allowing companies to stick with Windows 7.

      • IME, big corporate users are some of the least likely to be holding back. They're all running Enterprise editions, which for Windows 10 is almost a different product without the worst downsides of the Home and Pro editions, and they all have volume licensing and support deals so the cost is typically a moot point. It takes time to manage an organisation-wide change at that scale, but after four years, I suspect most have done so.

        Now, small businesses and power users -- the kind of people who might tradition

    • Windows 10 should be near 100 percent compatible with Windows 7 apps.

      • I'm also confused by these claims; for all of its faults, I have yet to find anything that won't run on it that I could run unmodified on 7 (and assuming the same 32/64-bit edition). Old, strangely persistent stuff like VB6 can still be beaten into shape.
        • Re:Wow still 30%?? (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Retired ICS ( 6159680 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @02:40PM (#59149950)

          I have Windows Applications from before the turn of the century that work just fine on every version of Windows that was ever released, including those not yet released. There is no application compatibility problem. Just application developers' and vendors' practicing *lock in*.

      • The Bluetooth Drivers were rewritten in Windows 10 (I believe the last previous upgrade was XP).

        They seemed to be fixed as of 2018 but it took a lot of complaints from a lot of people and companies.

    • Re:Wow still 30%?? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by lgw ( 121541 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @01:02PM (#59149624) Journal

      I never would have guessed that usage of Windows 7 was still 30% of the install base, not this many years later...

      I wonder if that affects people much who are writing Windows applications?

      Nothing important has changed since Windows 7, aside from MS shitting all over the UI and telling everyone it's chocolate ice cream.

  • How often is hardware replaced; and when it is, how likely will someone bother changing the OS that comes with it? The free update may have altered the equation somewhat but even then many users not savvy or motivated enough to avoid it had probably already bought new hardware (or felt forced to when the update broke their original platform :)
    • It's hard to say. Up to some time like the end of 2017 or even later, corporate users kept installing Windows 7 on new PCs or ordered them from vendors already preinstalled with 7. If you wandered into Dell's business PC store, they'd still offer you machines with Windows 7 Pro, etc. On the other hand, home users don't upgrade or buy new PCs that often any more unless they play demanding PC games. In my home I have three PCs strictly used for office tasks, and two of them are from 2012 and one from 2010. Th

  • After only four years since the release of OS, one year of near forced free updates, forcing Windows 10 on all new retail PCs, and a conspiracy to prevent Windows 7 and 8 from running on the latest AMD and Intel CPUs they finally got to 50 percent of Windows installs.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. Impressive in its level of complete fail.

    • Just curious since I've been running 8.1 with classic shell as my go to Windows OS. Do the new AMD and intel chips really have issues with Windows 8 or 8.1?
    • by clovis ( 4684 )

      After only four years since the release of OS, one year of near forced free updates, forcing Windows 10 on all new retail PCs, and a conspiracy to prevent Windows 7 and 8 from running on the latest AMD and Intel CPUs they finally got to 50 percent of Windows installs.

      Why do you say Windows 7 won't run on the latest AMD and Intel CPU's?

      Are you talking about the fact that Windows 7 doesn't have USB 3.0 out of box drivers for new motherboards so you can't do the Win 7 install?. For those that don't know, the new motherboards don't have USB 2.0, so the Windows 7 installer doesn't see a keyboard/mouse.
      There's a simple workaround. Otherwise, AFAIK Windows 7, once installed and updated, runs just fine on the latest hardware.

      • It depends how many problems there are with your CPU, motherboard, etc. and whether any of the software you want to use tends to encounter them.

        A lot of people don't realise this, but the major operating systems work around a huge number of problem cases where hardware simply doesn't work properly in some specific situation.

  • I mean, could these numbers be any worse, considering that Win7 is not even being sold anymore?

  • Every elderly cousin I have switched to Win10 has called me far less for maintenance than was the case for XP, 7, 8.1. It does seem to 'look after itself', although the regular updates add so much bloat each time they now claim it's all getting slower on otherwise adequate machines. For younger cousins, I've fixed dual boot to Linux but not one has even given it a try. Tells you something.
  • i bet they are grouping all of windows 10's releases under a same category. wake me when the _latest_ windows 10 release (as of right now 1903) has over 50% market share

  • by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Monday September 02, 2019 @02:44PM (#59149964)
    Whoo Hoo! I've hit 30%
  • >"This means every other desktop computer is now running Microsoft's latest and greatest operating system"

    Only in some alternate reality where EVERY desktop computer runs MS-Windows, perhaps. This ignores at least MacOS and Linux.

The 11 is for people with the pride of a 10 and the pocketbook of an 8. -- R.B. Greenberg [referring to PDPs?]

Working...