Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation Operating Systems Software Technology

Volkswagen Has 'massive' Software Problems With New ID3 Electric Vehicles (electrek.co) 107

Socguy shares a report from Electrek: Germany's Manager Magazine reports today that Volkswagen is struggling with software problems for its ID3 all-electric car. According to the report, the ID3 will be built for months with an incomplete software architecture that could affect up to 20,000 electric cars. These units, intended for sales in Europe and not the U.S., will require a manual software update.

The nature of the software problem -- how it affects vehicles or the sales timeline -- was not disclosed. The magazine reported the issue as "massive." And unfortunately, the fix is cumbersome. Thousands of ID3 cars will be parked in dedicated rented spaces until the spring when service teams will be deployed with mobile computer stations. New software will be manually installed in this manner for the first 10,000 or so ID3s. A total of 20,000 ID3 vehicles will need to be reworked until the second wave of production begins in May. At that time, further software updates can be deployed over-the-air.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Volkswagen Has 'massive' Software Problems With New ID3 Electric Vehicles

Comments Filter:
  • by williamyf ( 227051 ) on Friday December 20, 2019 @06:56PM (#59543182)

    A new low for an editor.

    And yes, i make orthographic mistakes too, but English is not my mother tongue (is spanish, I also speak french), and my job title is not editor.

    Is not about being a grammar nazi (I kinda sorta hate those), but an editor in a headline is kinda low....

    • But then you replaced the *correct* "V" with a "W".

      Credibility == gone.

    • And yes, i make orthographic mistakes too

      ... In your own very post. Please take right plam, apply it to face, and let out a deep sigh while you question the life you live, pointing out the mistakes of others while you yourself aren't able to get the very word you complain about correct.

  • by jfdavis668 ( 1414919 ) on Friday December 20, 2019 @07:22PM (#59543236)
    Probably left in the software designed to cheat diesel emissions tests.
    • Or their near senior engineers recently completed a coding bootcamp in Whatthefuckistan. They saved thousands of dollars in engineering costs.

      • Or hired a new crop or "engineers", that reinvented the "wheel" and up, in the latest technology, that is version 1.0 or lower
        • I've done a lot of "great you got this working, Zach. This file can he replaced with the word 'join'. Dan, awesome work covering all of the corner cases. That's a useful functionality you added. SQL calls that a 'view' - it's built-in."

          Newer peope often do a good job re-inventing the wheel. It worked well that the company kept me around to point out where the wheels were BEFORE they re-invented them most cases.

  • Software is Hard (Score:5, Interesting)

    by lazarus ( 2879 ) on Friday December 20, 2019 @07:28PM (#59543258) Journal

    We know that a software company can build an electric car. What we are learning is if a car company can build software.

    The guy in charge of VW effort in this regard is Christian Senger who talked about VWs effort in an interview [yourstory.com] in 2017. From the article:

    "The other thing is that the car is now an operating system. The Volkswagen operating system will be available with a whole range of services from startups and partners. By 2020, we will have all this in place and we will be one of the largest producers of electric vehicles in the world. By then, I must also prove to the board of Volkswagen that this can be a sustainable business model."

    I suspect he is under a great deal of stress at the moment, but it is a massive undertaking.

    • by mspohr ( 589790 )

      Well, VW did have software experience programming their emission controls to maximum pollution except when they were being tested. Maybe their current software problems are due to them adding in code to cheat the emission tests.

      • Silly. They maximized torque/horsepower, but not pollution. Maximizing pollution would have meant running a lot richer than that. Unburned fuel is a horrific pollutant.

        The "cheat" software will not affect their all-electric vehicles (there are no emissions standards to cheat). It was funny once. Sort of. Now it's just repetitive and stupid.

        • Deluded. Granted you could produce as much pollutants as you like with bad combustion settings. However even with optimal combustion settings maximizing torque/horsepower means maximizing pollution. Pollutants are a residue of the combustion process. So VW knew they were maximizing pollution.

          VW are no more able to innovate in the ICE area. They are stuck so they cheat. IMHO they should do less marketing, less advertising, less product placement and invest more in R&D.

          • Again with the word "maximizing". Are you the one who is deluded?

            Yes, running lean improved fuel economy and increase NOx production. It didn't "maximize" it. It's not like VW is some Captain Planet villain that pollutes just for the sake of pollution. And you're still daft for trying to make stupid jokes about the "cheat" software ruining their electric cars. Like I said . . . sort of funny once, but it's done and dead.

            VW is done with ICE engines. They won't be making any as much for PR reasons as an

    • Well, I'll go way out on a limb and speculate that if they had spent less time thinking about adding "a whole range of services from startups and partners", and had instead just focused on implementing the embedded logic required to control the electric drivetrain, then they wouldn't be in this pickle.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Sounds like they haven't got all the advertising, "value added" bloatwear and of course spyware in yet.

      That's presumably what he means about "business model". Monetising the data and selling you shit in your own car for additional revenue.

    • I have a basic Seat Ibiza which is made by a company owned by VW.

      The car is really basic, like 1980's basic, but it has a port on the dash where you can attach the optional extra flat screen/tablet thing. Suddenly you get access to all the stats of the car, maintenance cycles, temps, fuel consumption, etc.

      The whole car is run by an OS, it has been like that for years, because it is much cheaper, more reliable and more accurate to run everything like that.

      So no software is not hard for engineers who know how

    • The current Linux kernel CAN bus stack was written by Volkswagen, so I suppose they can build software.

  • BMW X3 music sub system. Mp3 playback. Every damned mp3 player, from dinky little sandisks to ipods, to mp3 disk players to winamp to media players can play back my files. But not BMW music software.

    MP3 format has redundant data, both frame count and end of frame markers. Both must be legal and both must be consistent. Else it crashes. It takes forever to reboot the entertainment system. It skips tracks, gets confused, ...

    BMW service blames my tracks. Your file is not correct. Not our problem.

    • Both must be legal and both must be consistent. Else it crashes. It takes forever to reboot the entertainment system. It skips tracks, gets confused, ...

      Odd. I never have that problem with the CD player in my car. It just works. I must be doing something wrong.

    • MP3 really needs to die. It was revolutionary when it was new, but it's seriously dated now - there are many newer, most advanced codecs now, all of which provide a more accurate reconstruction at any bitrate. That means smaller files.

    • Ironic since a German Fraunhofer institute invented mp3
  • Non-car-using Europan city dweller here. I never owned a car and it is usually months before I even sit in one. And my question is this:

    How do modern cars get updates over the air?

    Do you need to buy a SIM card for them, and stick it into the dashboard somewhere? Costing you money too? Or does the manufacturer have his own systems and just does it behind your back? What if I want to skip an update that is known to break my car? What about privacy and tracking? Do I need to cut the antenna or can I just insta

    • by Teun ( 17872 )
      Many modern cars have a build in G3 or G4 receiver and transmitter.
      Good for monitoring the engine but also a recognised privacy problem, I am sure DuckDuckGo can tell you more.
    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Several of them will pair with your phone, and download updates via your cellphone over a secure VPN. In the case of Tesla you can choose to install or not, and apparently you can even choose to be in an "early adopter" group of firmware testers if you want. In the case of my wife's older Audi they plugged a unit into the CAN bus to install updates over the dealership's wireless LAN when it was in for scheduled maintenance (and again we could choose to update or not.)

    • by tippen ( 704534 )
      Most do it via your home wifi network.
    • In the case of Tesla, all of their cars (other than the original Roadster) have 3G (in older cars) or 4G LTE connectivity built in. (The old ones can be upgraded to 4G LTE; it requires a hardware installation and is not free.) An account comes with the car; you do not need to install your own SIM. Since July 2018, they have divided their 4G features into two tiers: Standard Connectivity and Premium Connectivity. Standard is free, and includes navigation and OTA updates. Premium costs $10/month, and adds liv

  • This is undoubtedly another effect from trying to do software (which is about the most complex engineering discipline known to man) on the cheap.

    • This is undoubtedly another effect from trying to do software (which is about the most complex engineering discipline known to man) on the cheap.

      I don't think software is anywhere near the most complex engineering discipline known to man. I suspect much more discipline is needed to build a rocket booster which can return to its launch site and land on its tail. Yes, that requires a lot of software that is hard to test, but it requires many other engineering skills too.

      • by gweihir ( 88907 )

        I don't think software is anywhere near the most complex engineering discipline known to man.

        You do not seem to know a lot about it then. Sure, writing simple business logic is not that hard. But do some real computing, add reliability, performance and security and things look a bit different. Of course, not that many coders ever go into these depths, because most will completely fail to get anything working there.

        • I don't think software is anywhere near the most complex engineering discipline known to man.

          You do not seem to know a lot about it then. Sure, writing simple business logic is not that hard. But do some real computing, add reliability, performance and security and things look a bit different. Of course, not that many coders ever go into these depths, because most will completely fail to get anything working there.

          Actually, I do know something about it. I was a Principal Software Engineer at Digital Equipment Corporation, and my son used to work at the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, AL.

  • Imagine, if you will, what this list of comments would look like if this were a story about Tesla instead of a story about VW.

    Once again would be be ruled by derp galore and confronted with proof yet again how delusional Elon Musk is.

  • I'm a music nerd, I know little about cars. Glancing at this headline briefly, my first thought was: ID3 tags? What do metadata containers have to do with cars? Heh.

  • OMFGIH (Score:2, Insightful)

    by TigerPlish ( 174064 )

    Fuckwit, it's volks-wag-EN!!!!

    When you say it like vollks-wag-ON you come across as a che-guevara-t-shirt-wearing jouno hack wannabe!

    Fuck!

    Oi, can we trade this lot of eds for live, real humans? I'm convinced they're all bots with names like Che, Fidel, Joe.

    Stalin, not Biden.

    Fucking wake up, eds!

  • Emissions evasion sub-routine confused. No emissions to fake.
  • Their engineers concentrated on emission fraud the last 10 years.

  • This is the kind of thing you would fire 100 the entire middle management team over. There is no excuse for this... at... all...

    This was some middle management VPs trying to meet a schedule to get their bonuses... but let's face it, they've probably already left the company to rinse and repeat somewhere else.

  • I've seen this sort of problem before, but with satellite receivers. And unfortunately, they were stationed all around the world. The company had to send techies to every location to re-flash the receivers. Why? Because someone accidentally sent out an over-the-air update that broke the receiver's ability to do over-the-air updates, or receive anything at all, for that matter. There was no local ability to do a rollback (this was the 90's, and the equipment was from the 70's).

    And in true Dilbert fashio

  • I'm guessing this means that one of the functions that doesn't work yet is over-the-air updates. That's why the cars will have to be updated manually at a later date. Let's hope that all the basic functions of the car, including all safety related things, work properly.
    • Or one of the things in the update was the OTA software and they didn't initially build in a way to do that without physical access (noobs). But as someone pointed out, they are a company that makes cars, now they are a company that is making software as well. There are bound to be some hiccups.

A committee takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom. -- Parkinson

Working...