Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses

Could Unions At Tech Companies Gain Traction in 2020? (geekwire.com) 133

"2020 may be the year where tech unionizing efforts gain some actual traction for the first time," argues GeekWire: The chances of this happening in 2020 reflect several factors in the industry and political landscape coming together in the right way for the first time ever. The "Streisand Effect" is basically where the actions you take to prevent what you most want not to happen actually makes it happen. Google has been in the news recently around unionizing activity and its response to that.... [T]he perceived heavy-handed response by Google and the response to it seem more likely to foster more pro-union activity at Google in the near future than to quell it. As Google is a huge presence in Silicon Valley and other cities such as Seattle, these actions can have ripple effects throughout the industry. Certainly, it seems more rather than less likely that there will be continued actions like this at Google in 2020. Since Google is such a leader in the industry, that could spread to other companies in Seattle, Silicon Valley, and beyond.

Here we turn from Google to two other tech powerhouses: Amazon and Uber. Both of these companies now have a huge presence in areas that have historically strong bastions of union activity: trucking and transportation... [T]he war around unionization and ride-sharing is happening on multiple fronts and at the state level it will be harder for Uber and Lyft to combat this.

Two other factors come into play here in the broader business and political landscape and they both mean that right now, tech companies have few friends outside of the tech industry that would be willing to come to their aid in these fights against unionization... Take all these factors and put them together and you have the makings of a true perfect storm for union activity in tech in 2020.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Could Unions At Tech Companies Gain Traction in 2020?

Comments Filter:
  • The reason that high-skill, highly-paid workers tend not to be in unions is that it's far more effective to vote with your feet. A tech company which can't attract and keep talent is soon to be a bundled of assets liquidated in bankruptcy.

    We don't need unions, we just need to suppress those non-competes.

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by bloodhawk ( 813939 )
      exactly, most of us don't need a union dragging us down. I think if you work in the tech sector and your company is unionizing it is time to run the fuck away as quickly as possible as it is going to sink.
      • So Amazon and Google are going to "sink" if their workers unionize? Sounds reasonable.

    • by mobby_6kl ( 668092 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:44AM (#59588592)

      We don't need unions, we just need to suppress those non-competes.

      Guess what could get rid of those non-competes? :)

      I actually have some experience starting a union in a branch of one of the biggest tech companies (you've heard of it but it's not mentioned in TFA). If I have some time later today I'll share some of the findings, feedback and what was possible to achieve.

      • Oh goody, I can't wait. Guys, can we put this thread on pause so this narcissistic rando has time to update us?
        • by mobby_6kl ( 668092 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @10:38AM (#59588878)

          Even though you're being a dick for no reason, I'm still going to committ the horrible crime of sharing directly relevant experience instead of spouting the usual uninformed nonsense that typically happens in these threads.

          As mentioned in the original post, this is a branch of a major tech company and one of the highest rated employers here. If you're working here, you're not poor. However there are many departments and teams such as support, finance/acounting, HR and other functions. Maybe some hotshot programmer superstars can instantly get a better job offer but it's not universal, and not everyone can move anytime the management does something stupid.

          Still, most people are generally pretty satisfied so there weren't crowds just running to the union once it was established, so growth is pretty slow. We talked to some lawyers who have experience with this in other companies and of course compared to retail or manufacturing, the conditions are such that the demand for unions isn't that heigh. Although I'd imagine for something like Uber, their "contractors" would be much more motivated.

          We recently did an open Q&A session and a the attendees almost filled the arranged meeting room. It wasn't a huge room admittedly, but as much as we could've hoped at the point. A few decided to join, and most seemed pretty receptive to the idea. There were some revealing questions though. Some seemed concered that a union would prevent them from getting a raise or promotion. Or that every decision would have to go through the union. There also seemed to be a feeling that a union is somehow communist, even though it's like the most free market solution possible.

          Speaking with the members, some people certainly came up with ridiculous demands. Some wanted free daycare, or that they were promised career opportuities but nobody just gave them a better job. The company is under no obligation to provide daycare or babysit your career of course, so instead we tried to channel this as productively as possible into discussion of possible future benefits or as HR advice support. Most people though had some legitimate issues, such as unpaid overtime or lunch breaks not being respected, etc.

          A union can also be beneficial for the company. I've been in corporate long enough to see that the decisions some managers make aren't necessarily in the interest of the company, but in their own. A new guy comes in as VP of whatever and starts shuffling stuff around to demonstrate how proactive he is. Or another one keeps almost entire department as temporary staff to save headcount but wastes money on ridiculous turnover and agency fees. A union provides a mechanism to raise this concern in a much more visible way than if you told your manager that something happening two levels above them doesn't make sense. (Even if they fully agree, nothing's going to happen). It can obviously also help with employee satisfaction, which is something most companies do strive for.

          Most of the time when you hear about unions, it's usually the very rare and highly visible strikes e.g. in France stopping all the trains and what not. Some branches in other countries have been unionized or have other means of employee representation, and there's never been a strike and I don't think there'll ever be. Because that's not the goal and a decent company wouldn't get even close to that point.

          • by Cederic ( 9623 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @12:12PM (#59589112) Journal

            A union provides a mechanism to raise this concern in a much more visible way than if you told your manager that something happening two levels above them doesn't make sense. (Even if they fully agree, nothing's going to happen).

            So talk to the manager above the one causing the problem. That's possible, you know, without a union.

            The moment a union starts demanding a voice and the ability to engage with senior managers the rest of the staff lose some of their own voice and influence. The union isn't exactly going to be telling senior management, "Staff are unhappy that we have too much influence and keep telling you things they disagree with."

            No, if you felt the need to unionise in a technology company then you had no fucking clue how to communicate properly and/or you wanted to kick off that corrupt gravy train for your own benefit.

            Want daycare? Ask for daycare. Want pay for overtime? Don't accept a salaried job. Not getting your lunchbreak? Stop working and eat fucking lunch.

            What are they going to do, sack you? Oh no, you'll just have to get a better job at a company that gives a shit about its employees, instead of being caught at one that not only clearly doesn't care, but is also being encouraged to care even less by the corrupt cunts that are demanding a tithe from the employees.

            Trust me, while all managers aren't acting in the best interests of the company no unions are.

            • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

              So talk to the manager above the one causing the problem. That's possible, you know, without a union.

              Sure it's possible however anyone who follows your advice is going to eventually be shown the door. Employees that go around their line managers about company decisions are showing complete disrespect and disdain for them and may not even end up speaking to the right person.

              The moment a union starts demanding a voice and the ability to engage with senior managers the rest of the staff lose some of their o

          • by kqs ( 1038910 )

            Thank you for taking the time to describe your experiences. I know that you'll get lots of "duh, I hate unions" crap responses, but I appreciate your post.

            I'm not convinced that my job would benefit from unionization, but I suspect that many companies (with worse management and worse working conditions) might benefit. And I always like hearing things which challenge my assumptions, as long as they are well thought out or based on actual experience.

          • Is not child care a top ask for professionals? It's not obvious to me what I'd be getting for my union dues that isn't already provided by the company's appointed ombudsman.

            • Is not child care a top ask for professionals? It's not obvious to me what I'd be getting for my union dues that isn't already provided by the company's appointed ombudsman.

              Subsidized daycare is already provided by the state here so it's more of a "I fucked up and my kid didn't get in" or "I want a nicer/more convenient daycare" thing. It's a great benefit for employees with small children of course so it was brought up with the company, but in the local context it didn't make sense to make this as a life-or-death fight.

          • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

            I'm still going to committ the horrible crime of sharing directly relevant experience

            Thank you, and thank you for your efforts.

      • Maybe you hadn't had your coffee yet, and forgot what uniins do. What unions do is set is put together huge non-compete arrangements, where everybody gets to same mediocre salary, rather than competing on skill, abilities, etc.

        I sure as heck don't want a union - I'm in demand, with a bidding war to hire me whenever I'm available. I hage no interest an an arrangement where I get the same pay as the stoned guy who doesn't have any idea what he's doing, thanks.

      • by Sigma 7 ( 266129 )

        Guess what could get rid of those non-competes? :)

        Requiring the company to pay severance equal to its duration, regardless of whether or not it's enforceable, because asking someone not to work is not different than engaging them to wait. I believe some more sane legal systems already do something similar, especially of the non-compete is over 90 days or so.

      • Why would a union want to get rid of non-competes? A union doesn't want you leaving the company because it likely means you are leaving the union - ie they are incentivised to keeping you where you are.

      • Unions are about power. If you don't have much, you can improve your lot by giving what little you have to the union. Since your power wasn't worth much, anything you get back will be worthwhile.

        As a high-skill worker, you still have to give your power to the union. But you actually had a lot of power on your own. The union has to return an awful lot before sacrificing your power to it proves worthwhile. I'm dubious about that prospect. Very dubious.

    • by PhrostyMcByte ( 589271 ) <phrosty@gmail.com> on Sunday January 05, 2020 @08:01AM (#59588606) Homepage

      I can see this helping the gaming industry, which is well known for having a grueling pace.

      And a bit more forward-thinking -- there's been a massive push by tech companies (Hour of Code etc.) to increase the number of developers. If they are successful, there will be significantly less balance of power for the next generation of devs.

    • The reason that high-skill, highly-paid workers tend not to be in unions is that it's far more effective to vote with your feet. A tech company which can't attract and keep talent is soon to be a bundled of assets liquidated in bankruptcy.

      We don't need unions, we just need to suppress those non-competes.

      You're confusing a union with a local. High-level workers might organize to push industry-wide policy changes, rather than short-term demands at one company. No one-company union can eliminate those non-competes for just one example, but an industry-wide organization can.

      • They can lobby for changes in state law. Getting union support for aggressive state laws has helped them pass.

      • California is a non-compete state. Several of the big techs have already been slapped down for collusion in hiring. None of this was because of tech unions.
        • by kqs ( 1038910 )

          If I understand you, we don't need unions as long as we have a strong government which enforces regulations on companies when the companies misbehave? I agree, but that doesn't help people in states which don't have regulations on companies. Those people must find their own solutions.

        • by geekoid ( 135745 )

          And the issue where most techies are forced to be salary, yet don't qualify as such under IRS and Supreme court guidelines?
          The fact they are being forced to work 50,60,.80 hour weeks without extra pay?

    • It depends on the rules adopted. Just because the assembly line adopts seniority rules doesn't mean the engineers have to. I would have hated to be in a union with rules about time in grade and senior people being promoted first. It would have held me back significantly during my career. Especially the first 10 years. On the other hand having a union (or perhaps calling it a guild or professional association would make it more appealing) owning the pension and healthcare coverage would make it easier to jum
    • That works, until companies start talking through back channels to limit wages on certain positions, to not poach each other's employees and to otherwise game the system to keep salaries stagnant. We know it's happened, and they paid their fine because it's cheap and they'll just figure out better ways of doing it that they won't get caught at.
      • That works, until companies start talking through back channels to limit wages on certain positions

        Such actions are illegal and are easily solved without some magical union.

        • by kqs ( 1038910 )

          I think you are saying that we need better regulations which limit what companies will do, enforced by a strong government? I agree, but what should people do when they are in an area without a strong government?

          • It'll never happen, typically the same people who hate unions hate the government and regulations too.
            • by kqs ( 1038910 )

              Oh, I agree. I just find that the same people who want to get rid of strong government want to get rid of unions, with explanations that come down to "we don't need unions because we have strong government, also we should get rid of strong government because I don't understand irony."

    • we just need to suppress those non-competes

      It's almost like you're self aware here but miss the point. The industry puts itself together in a way to ensure that voting with your feet becomes a non-option or as painful an option as possible at the very least.

      • I've been in the industry for a quarter of a century and have yet to have an enforceable non-compete get in my way. If your experience has been different, I'd love to hear your story. YOUR story, not the story of some guy you heard about third hand.

        • have yet to have an enforceable non-compete get in my way

          Oh, my time before last position was one of those too. The problem being, I didn't want to include a protracted lawyer review of the terms and legal challenge to my employer as part of my changing jobs. That's the thing, it's not that it totally is enforceable, it's that no one is really going to take the time to legally challenge it. Some may, I'm not excluding that as an option. I worked for a company that produces a line of components for a kind of consumer product, and they are facing some litigatio

          • First, thank you for sharing. That takes guts.

            Second... that sounds sorta self-imposed to me. Like someone said, "You can't do that," and you said, "Oh, okay" without ever wondering if it was true.

            You could have gone to any other company and said, "Hey, I have a confidentiality and non-compete agreement with Company X. I don't think there's a problem with the work I'd do for you but if you put me on something similar to proprietary work I did there, we'll have to check it with the lawyers first."

            Two things

    • by ranton ( 36917 )

      We don't need unions, we just need to suppress those non-competes.

      You just mentioned one thing unions could help with. Unions are not only created to bargain wages. There are plenty of professional organizations such as the American Bar Association and American Medical Association which act as trade unions for their profession but rarely if ever take part in salary negotiations. I would guess an IT trade union would work more like these trade unions than the UAW.

      Regulating non-competes and negotiating outsourcing / cloud migration decisions would be very useful activities

    • And besides, are there really unions in India?

  • Let's hope not (Score:4, Insightful)

    by quall ( 1441799 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:26AM (#59588576)

    Unions work for blue collar jobs. It won't work for jobs where your salary and benefits are based on skill and performance. What benefit is there for a tech company to agree to a union? They are looking for the best performing candidates and need the flexibility to negotiate for them. Traditionally, that's the opposite as to whom a union helps.

    And no, unionizing is not gaining traction. This article is wishful thinking at best. I'm willing to bet that most people with skill, who earned their position, are now even further against unions in general.

    • Re:Let's hope not (Score:4, Interesting)

      by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @09:26AM (#59588714)
      I think a tech union is beneficial in that it allows for collective bargaining on the part of employees. However, I wouldn’t ever want one that’s mandatory to belong to, spends my dues on politicians or campaigns, or really does anything outside of serving as a vehicle for collective bargaining when I think that’s in my best interest.
      • Why would top skilled hard working well paid tech worked -want- collective bargaining? You meant to say, "take a much lower total comp so some incompetent slacker can make more while being even harder to fire for killing projects with their stupidity".
        • by j-beda ( 85386 )

          Why would top skilled hard working well paid tech worked -want- collective bargaining? You meant to say, "take a much lower total comp so some incompetent slacker can make more while being even harder to fire for killing projects with their stupidity".

          There are many counter examples. Professional sports and entertainers unions don't seem to have this type of issue. And there are many, many, many more examples of skilled hard working well paid workers being taken advantage of due to their low power situation within the business structure.

          Surely you are aware that being part of a collective bargaining system can bring the power structure into a more balanced situation?

          Of course there are costs and downsides to working within any given collective bargaining

      • by j-beda ( 85386 )

        I think a tech union is beneficial in that it allows for collective bargaining on the part of employees. However, I wouldn’t ever want one that’s mandatory to belong to, spends my dues on politicians or campaigns, or really does anything outside of serving as a vehicle for collective bargaining when I think that’s in my best interest.

        That seems reasonable at first glance, but of course one of the benefits of forming a collective is that it increases a group's political power. The 40 hour work week, sick pay, worker safety legislation and a huge amount of other political stuff only came about due to pressure from groups outside of just collective employment bargaining.

        I don't have any good, simple way of preventing union bureaucracy from abusing its power other than the same things that work towards any political bureaucracy from getting

    • Re: Let's hope not (Score:2, Interesting)

      by BytePusher ( 209961 )
      Unions work for the people in the union. They aren't one size fits all, since members vote on what the want the rules to be. It does have an impact on that guy who likes to be first in and last out of the office, who's behavior negatively impacts everyone else as he burns himself out trying to become management.
    • by ttfkam ( 37064 )

      You know very little about blue collar jobs. I would wager that you have never worked a blue collar job for any appreciable amount of time.

    • The tech company doesn't have to agree to a union. If the employees decide to form a union, there's nothing short of closing down that can stop them.

    • by geekoid ( 135745 )

      Software Engineer here: I'm in a union, and it works just fine.
      I work 40 a week, get good health benefits.

      " jobs where your salary"
      I'll take a moment to point at the the VAST majority of software jobs don't actually qualify for salary. There are rules to exempt and non-exempt.
      Do you even know what those rules are?
      So right there is most software developers being abused.

      "are based on skill and performance"
      That's almost never true. Most corporation give a flat increase, regardless.
      Ironically, My union only all

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Most of the people working in tech are not writing code. Most are IT. Hired on a scale with specific certifications or skills.

      Anyway none of that is an issue for unions. Wage scale negotiations is not all they do.

  • by chthon ( 580889 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:26AM (#59588578) Journal

    The Department of Redundancy Department

  • by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:44AM (#59588590) Homepage
    Unions are on Trump's side. I'd imagine the people at Google and Amazon will have second thoughts after finding this out. They are in favor of reducing immigration to protect their well-paying jobs. America run for the benefit of the American people.

    "What the commission is concerned about are the unskilled workers in our society in an age in which unskilled workers have far too few opportunities open to them. When immigrants are less well-educated and less-skilled, they may pose economic hardships to the most vulnerable of Americans, particularly those who are unemployed or under-employed."

    -- Barbara Jordan, civil rights icon and first black woman elected to Congress from the South. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMywOal05s0 [youtube.com]

    In his 1995 State of the Union address, President Bill Clinton said: "Illegal immigrants take jobs from citizens or legal immigrants, they impose burdens on our taxpayers...That is why we are doubling the number of border guards, deporting more illegal immigrants than ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, barring benefits to illegal aliens, and we will do more to speed the deportation of illegal immigrants arrested for crimes..."

    He received a standing ovation in Congress for saying this. That's what a pro-Union president sounds like. Not what the people at Google and Amazon want any part of.

    • The illegal immigrants that Clinton is talking about are not the people that would be working at tech companies, and therefore the unions wouldnâ(TM)t care about them. The immigrants that they would care about are the ones coming in legally via H1B visas.
    • [citation needed]

      By all means, list some unions that have endorsed Trump either in 2020 or 2016. Outside of law enforcement, I don't remember a single one. Feel free to provide the names of ones I've missed.

  • by CrimsonAvenger ( 580665 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:50AM (#59588596)

    Do we have editors, or not? It's bad enough when we get dupes in the same day, but dupes in the same TITLE?

    • by 2TecTom ( 311314 )

      Do we have editors, or not? It's bad enough when we get dupes in the same day, but dupes in the same TITLE?

      Yet another example of the typical outcome resulting from corporate ownership. Corporations always need to maximize profits so they cut costs, eventually, and inevitably, the cost cutting becomes pathological and dysfunctional. This is isn't help by the fact that the management is largely incompetent as a result of the Peter Principle. See ~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

  • help Communist China.
    Does not want its workers to enter a union...
    The charm of working for an ad company.
  • No. They will not. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by technomom ( 444378 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @08:31AM (#59588636)

    Why would I want to have another boss?

    In the tech industry, if I don't like my job or my pay, I move on to one of the zillions of jobs that recruiters or one of my friends have told me about. Problem solved.

    • Unions are not "another boss" Workers are the boss of the union via democracy.
    • You can elect your union membership. So have you always hated democracy and wanted to return to a monarchy (since you are too dumb to have any say in how things are run) or just since reading Atlas Wanked?

  • Hahahahaha. Finding support for unions in America, really? The one country in the world where they are unconsidered the work of Satan? Not likely. It doesn't help of course that many of the existing unions are in a pitiful state compared to the rest of the world.
  • Join the Software Workers Union. When we stop working the Internet stops working.

  • Should help weaken the big tech companies and break them up.
  • by 2TecTom ( 311314 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @10:17AM (#59588824) Homepage Journal

    and were democratic, we wouldn't need unions. If democracy is so great, why aren't our companies democracies? Instead we have what is basically a despotic tyranny with the elite upper class at the top and the rest of us at the bottom. It's unethical and amounts to nothing less than modern economic slavery.

  • They're fighting a continuing avalanche of assault from government, the press, sites like slashdot (as well as sites that are actually visited by more than dozens of people per week) and many other sources as well. The unions have slightly better approval ratings in this country than US congress, which as an institution has about as good of approval ratings nationwide as influenza. Even when Trump loses the presidential election this November the unions will still have an uphill fight for anything like t
  • Unions had a place in the workforce decades ago. Now, unions appear rightly or not, to work "hand in glove" with companies. The lines are so blurred that it's difficult to differentiate between taskmaster companies and taskmaster unions. All for greed and power. There are companies that would rather lay veryone off and permanently shut their doors than unionize. There are companies that still operate today because of the union. Each situation differs. But it all boils down to greed and power.
  • Tech is not like a factory town where neither workers nor owners have much choice except being stuck with each other and negotiating a deal. If you have some demands for a potential strike, you can likely get these demands met by switching to one of dozens of available positions for your skillset.

    • by geekoid ( 135745 )

      They concept you think all Coronation are abusive is adorable.Couple that with the in fact you think it's ok for corporation to abuse people becasue they can just shift careers willy nilly.

  • by Livius ( 318358 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @01:04PM (#59589240)

    Unions in theory make up for the imbalance in bargaining power between an employer - typically a large enterprise with a very large number of job candidates with varying degress of desperation - and the worker - an individual with limited financial assets and comparatively fewer employers to choose from. When employers are too exploitative, they can't complain if workers start to find unions appealing.

    But they don't work that way in real life. Unions in general are anti-meritocratic and wilfully blind to any perspective other than that of their members.

    Ask a union member why unions are great, and see how many generations into the past they have to reach to find something constructive that unions have achieved besides inflating wages beyond market rates.

    • by kqs ( 1038910 )

      I like working only 40 hours a week, and I do that now, not "many generations into the past". I can work more than 40 (and I'm salaried, so I won't get any real benefits), and I do sometimes, since I like my company. But I don't have to, and I usually choose not to. And since the 40 hour a week, 8 hour a day system came from labor movements, I really like unions.

      It really sounds like you are saying "I am not in a union and my life has not benefited from unions". Which is of course wrong, as I just point

      • by Livius ( 318358 )

        the 40 hour a week, 8 hour a day system came from labor movements

        That's going three generations into the past. Unions are not the reason labour rights exist in 2020.

        • by Uberbah ( 647458 )

          But of course they are. Amazon would be happy to make you work 80 hours a week with no overtime except for the actions of unions.

    • Unions in general are anti-meritocratic

      The highest paid workers in the world are members of unions. The average professional baseball player makes a few hundred thousand a year - so go tell the highest paid one of all time, Alex Rodriguez, that he didn't actually make $450 million of the course of his career because there is no meritocracy and it was all his imagination.

      and wilfully blind to any perspective other than that of their members

      You are willfully blind to the fact that the well-being of any unio

  • No, becasue most techie are educated just enough to be able to have hubris, but not so educated they realize it or can reflect on it.

  • I've turned down opportunities to be in a unionized workforce. To me being a union coder means my compensation is based on group negotiation rather than my productivity. I work hard, I'm good at what I do, and I get compensated accordingly. I don't want to be compensated at some fixed "coder grade X level" the same as everyone else.

    • I'm pretty sure that your company, if it's big enough, also has classifications like "coder grade X level" - they may dress them up with names like "Software Engineer 4" or "Systems Analyst II", but rest assured, they have them and which level you are on constrains your compensation as tightly as any union contract - no matter how productive you are. You're also very mistaken in your belief that compensation is strongly correlated with productivity in any organization - it don't work that way, unless you're

      • You're also very mistaken in your belief that compensation is strongly correlated with productivity in any organization - it don't work that way, unless you're paid piece rates.

        Have you spent much time working in investment banks? Personal productivity and commercial effectiveness are huge factors in your annual total comp. And if you are on the low side in either of those you (1) wont get paid and (2) will probably get fired in the annual "bottom 20% elimination round".

  • by LynnwoodRooster ( 966895 ) on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:10PM (#59590318) Journal
    After all, we're about to be inundated by newbies since anyone can program. Seriously, it's a dirt-easy skill! After all, Joe Biden [newsweek.com] even said anyone who can go 3000 feet down in a mine can learn to program. So we better unionize to protect the wages, or we're going to get overrun with new coal-miner programmers!

news: gotcha

Working...