The Boring Company's Las Vegas Tunnel Is Nearly 50 Percent Complete (teslarati.com) 140
According to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, Elon Musk's Boring Company is now about 50% complete with its underground tunnel. It's about six football fields in length. Teslarati reports: The Boring Company officially started tunneling for the people mover after a ceremonial groundbreaking event on November 15. In just two months, the project is nearly halfway completed. The company's Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) has been 40 feet underground for months and is working to drill two, one-mile-long tunnels. Boring Company began shipping portions of the TBM to the site in Las Vegas in September. Since then, the project has really started to take shape.
The project cost the Boring Company $52.5 million and is expected to connect the Las Vegas Convention Center to popular Las Vegas hot spots. Downtown Las Vegas, the Strip, and McCarran International Airport will all be destination options for riders. The mover is expected to transport an estimated 4,400 people per hour. The Las Vegas project is just one of five projects the Boring Company has listed on its website. A Livestream of the Boring Company's Las Vegas Tunnel Project is available for viewing here.
The project cost the Boring Company $52.5 million and is expected to connect the Las Vegas Convention Center to popular Las Vegas hot spots. Downtown Las Vegas, the Strip, and McCarran International Airport will all be destination options for riders. The mover is expected to transport an estimated 4,400 people per hour. The Las Vegas project is just one of five projects the Boring Company has listed on its website. A Livestream of the Boring Company's Las Vegas Tunnel Project is available for viewing here.
GAY NIGGERS GNAA BUTT FUCK SNOODLE FELCH AND RIM (Score:5, Funny)
gathers GAY N1GGERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being GAY N1GGERS!
Are you GAY [ytmnd.com] ?
Are you a N1GGER [encyclopediadramatica.rs] ?
Are you a GAY N1GGER [gaydemon.com] ?
If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is exactly what you've been looking for!
Join GNAA (GAY N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time GNAA member.
GNAA (GAY N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing GAY N1GGER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America.
You, too, can be a part of GNAA if you join today!
Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!
First - you have to obtain a copy of GAY N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE [imdb.com] and watch it.
You can watch GAY N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube. FOR A GAY UNIVERSE! [youtube.com]
You can also get GAY N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE with this magnet link "magnet:?xt=urn:btih:5fbb4224d15e46bdc6dd41ac6635f91b6a7d5ac0"
Second - you need to succeed in posting a GNAA "first post" on slashdot.org [slashdot.org] , a formerly popular "news for trolls" website
Third - you need to join the official GNAA irc channel #GNAA on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!
If you are having trouble locating #GNAA, the official GAY N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network.
The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.Prison.NET or irc.mzima.net as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy you are free to use the GNAA Java IRC client by clicking here [efnet.org].
If you have mod points and would like to support GNAA, please moderate this post up.
This post brought to you by Penisbird [encyclopediadramatica.rs] who is a proud member of the GNAA
G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aaN_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#GNAA________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
Gary Niger gary_niger@GNAA.us GNAA Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@GNAA.us GNAA World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld.2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Copyright (c) 2003-2019 GAY N1GGER Association of America
Ich Bindawalross (London) - GNAA (NYSE: GNAA) Pres
What about the monorail?? (Score:2)
What about the monorail
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:5, Funny)
Monorails are so 20th century , i.e. yesterday. Your grandpa rode a monorail, YOU will travel a tunnel like a chic new world GOD!
Know it, own it, love it.
Re: (Score:2)
metros are 1800's though.
dunno about the 52 mil cost. that does sound cheap? like cheaper than any metro project ever cheap? does that include the stations and auxiliary stuff like that?
monorails are kinda cool though, they just don't have any real advantages.. there's a few places with monorails though. kuala lumpur being one, but having been in it I don't see how it's any better than a light two rail raised railway would be.
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:5, Informative)
The main historical advantage of monorails was decreased visual bulk... instead of a wide, hulking track leaving the street below in permanent shadows & darkness, you had two slender beams that didn't block sunlight. The problem is, newly-constructed transit systems in the US are required to have (among other things) a 3 foot wide pedestrian walkway along the guideway to provide an emergency Means of Egress. So, monorails like the one in Las Vegas NOW have steel walkways hanging between the guideway tracks, almost completely neutralizing any point of building them as a monorail to begin with (as opposed to some other form of elevated fixed-guideway transit).
Example:
Las Vegas, showing walkway -- https://www.gettyimages.com/de... [gettyimages.com]
WDW, no walkway -- https://cdn1.parksmedia.wdprap... [disney.com]
Re: (Score:2)
"The main historical advantage of monorails was decreased visual bulk."
If your apartment window is only a couple of yards away, 'visual' is the least of your problems.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What? You want to survive the egress? Picky picky picky.
Re: What about the monorail?? (Score:2)
A vacuum-tube maglev doesn't need TOTAL vacuum, it just needs enough of one to reduce the impact of going hypersonic.
Partial vacuums aren't GOOD for human health, but brief exposure to it almost certainly won't kill you, or even cause permanent injury. We aren't THAT fragile, especially if you're only talking about a minute or two at most while the section is re-pressurizing to atmospheric levels.
If you're involved in a wreck that's so bad, you can't grab an emergency oxygen-supplementation mask, 30-60 seco
Re: (Score:2)
The main historical advantage of monorails was decreased visual bulk... instead of a wide, hulking track leaving the street below in permanent shadows & darkness, you had two slender beams that didn't block sunlight.
You're confusing sloppy, cheesy, technologically simpleton and cheap modern el trollies with something from an early 20th century world's fair.
Re: (Score:2)
> The problem is, newly-constructed transit systems in the US are required to have
Do we know how many deaths have occurred at WDW due to the lack of a walkway?
How about their bus system?
Sounds like unelected government making the perfect the enemy of the good.
Re: (Score:2)
Another cool design that present US standards make effectively impossible to build here is "Aerobus". It's a "hanging monorail" system that could be built like an upside-down suspension bridge... you'd put a big column every few blocks, string thick cables between them, then use smaller cables hanging from them to suspend the guideway itself. It wasn't fast enough (around 25-35mph max, from what I recall) to be a PRIMARY mass transit system, and had comfort (but not safety) issues with swaying in high winds
Re: (Score:2)
"monorails are kinda cool though, they just don't have any real advantages.. there's a few places with monorails though. kuala lumpur being one, but having been in it I don't see how it's any better than a light two rail raised railway would be."
In Germany, they have an old one where even an elephant fell out of it.
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/ge... [faz.net]
Re: What about the monorail?? (Score:2)
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:4, Funny)
I hear those things are awfully loud...
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Is there a chance the track could bend?
Re: (Score:2)
Not on your life, my Hindu friend
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You'll be given cushy jobs!
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:4, Funny)
The one in Seattle isn't, and it's definitely quieter than the light rail or the S.L.U.T. (South Lake Union Trolley). It was built in 1961 for the World's Fair and cost taxpayers $0. Alwig, which built it, put it up for free in exchange for the first three years of revenue. Once the Fair was done and everyone seemed happy they offered to extend it to the University District (several times further) in exchange for another seven years of revenue.
The City Council, being made up of lawyers with no real-world experience in how anything actually works, decided, "If they can do it for seven years revenue then we can do it for even cheaper" and turned them down. They then spent the next 35 years debating routes, funding, right of way, etc. and probably spent enough on consultants to install a Star Trek transporter in its place. Of course the monorail still ends at the Seattle Center.
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:5, Funny)
I am with you man, that is absolutely insane. The idea that a person would need to walk 5 minutes is a global atrocity someone should hang for this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like somebody who has never actually tried to use the monorail in Vegas to get around.
It runs more or less *behind* the strip and it is at least perceptually kind of far from Las Vegas Boulevard and seems like it adds a lot of walking distance, especially if you're headed somewhere on the west side of the strip. It doesn't help that you go through casinos to get to it, which adds another serpentine amount of distance.
And part of the problem really is that most of the Vegas casino properties are mass
Re: (Score:2)
The fatal problem with the LV monorail was temerity and design by competing interests. It does not go to the airport, or otherwise be too convenient, to prevent it from interfering with the taxi and bus services - so designed to fail. Lack of imagination also failed to realize that the monorail needed to be a center of attention - an attraction like an amusement park ride that brought it into the heart of the casino environment. Instead of hiding it behind the casinos, it should run through them, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Like actual walking with your legs across the ground for 5 full minutes?
More like actual walking with your legs across a casino floor for 5 full minutes. And that's the point of putting the monorail stations in the back of hotels, same as candy at a grocery checkout aisle. The real problem is that the monorail doesn't go to the airport, and probably won't because of the layout of the airport, but mostly because it would make the taxi drivers unhappy. If these tunnels ever reach the airport, that would be more important than just being out of the sun.
Re: (Score:2)
"If you'd ever been to Vegas in the summer you'd know that a five minute walk can be eternity. How's about leaving the commentary to those with experience?"
Perhaps it was a bad idea to live in the desert?
Re: (Score:2)
...
Perhaps it was a bad idea to live in the desert?
And I thought it was all green meadows.
Re: (Score:2)
Live there? Yes, that's a bad idea. I was there for training on a gaming system.
Re: (Score:2)
Then they should lose weight or carry a sun umbrella ... ...
No idea why people in america think their heat is an exception versus the heat i other countries
Re: (Score:2)
Says the German who's country has not a single place with either as much sun or as much concrete as Las Vegas.
Of course it's not just the heat, but also the reflected sun from the glass buildings baking the concrete. Remember that building in London that got so much news coverage for burning the dash boards of a few luxery cars? There are several death-ray casinos in Vegas, and dozens more buildings that aren't quite so concentrated that they would melt your car, but they still reflect a ton of heat onto the concrete sidewalks.
At least it's a dry heat. I grew up in the South.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, you are right. ...
After WWII we only live in mudd huts.
A few of us can afford a wooden hut, though!
I'm happy to sleep under a concrete bridge, though.
No idea who built it. The elders who had such
technology are long gone
Re: (Score:2)
Try losing a layer of fat.
And I am writing this sitting in weather that is 105 with 60% humidity, cry me a river.
How's about leaving the commentary to those with more experience?
And less fat.
Re: (Score:2)
Not *exactly* a boondoggle. It is set up so that you need to walk the entire length of the casino to get to it.
I do agree that its pretty useless. though.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't mind the walk to the monorail. What I did mind is the wait. The last time I rode it was to CES a few years ago. I got to the closest loading point and had to wait for the "train" to come by at least 3 times before I was able to get on. We initially tried the monorail because it was suggested. After the first day we just decided to walk. It was kind of nice to take a walk on uncrowded sidewalks (not many folk out in the morning and the weather was nice and cool). This was especially true cons
Re: (Score:2)
The monorail in Vegas has been a flop. I think there were political fights involved in it, but the monorail is on the very back side of all the hotels it connects, meaning it is often literally a 10 minute walk from the front door of a casino to the monorail station. And I recall ticket prices being high enough that it was cheaper for 2 people to take a cab or an Uber down the strip.
It seemed like a good idea when it was being built, but the cost and placement of the stations made it unattractive.
Re: (Score:2)
Con man musk has stolen tax payer money to make a Tesla show room [curbed.com].
Way better than them spending my confiscated money on a football stadium though.
Re:What about the monorail?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Quality "journalism" from Curbed (which says nothing about "showrooms") - whatever the heck "Curbed" is. Exactly what does it matter what the shape of the passenger vehicles is, or whether they run on tires or rails? Public transit runs on tires all the bloody time. And why is it only public transit if people are crammed in and forced to stand? No, seriously, why?
There was an open bidding process for specific goals in Las Vegas. Boring Company's bid was $48,6M. The competing bid was $215M. To achieve the exact same capabilities. But welcome in the Musk bashers to bash the project for... saving Las Vegas money? Making transport more comfortable in the process? Wait, what are we complaining about again?
Re: (Score:3)
There is no "bait and switch". The requirements of the system were spelled out in advance. The shape of the capsules was not among them. The net throughput was a requirement. Why does it matter what shape the vehicles are that meet the net throughput requirements?
If Boring Company does not meet the specified requirements, they don't get a dime. That's what a contract is.
And all of this nonsense is over a photo. I guess the intrepid "reporters" over at Curbed are rightfully outraged about this "change",
Re: (Score:3)
You seem to be under the impression that Boring Company got its money upfront. Nope [theguardian.com]
6 football fields (Score:5, Funny)
Presumably American football, or 600 yards, which is approximately 548.6 meters... which is about the height, Olympic pool-wise, of the CN tower or the Ostankino Tower.
Six Canadian National Towers has yet to gain mainstream acceptance as a universal measuring stick for those opposed to more traditional forms of measurement.
Re: (Score:3)
If it isn't in furlongs per fortnight or hogsheads to the stone, it's no real unit of measurement anymore.
With apologies to the true Scotsman.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: 6 football fields (Score:2)
This is where you're getting confused: a "meter" merely measures things. Meters are rarely a metre long.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
meter /mdr/
noun
the fundamental unit of length in the metric system, equal to 100 centimeters or approximately 39.37 inches.
"sit two meters away from the TV screen"
"The metre (Commonwealth spelling and BIPM spelling) or meter (American spelling) (from the French unit mètre, from the Greek noun , "measure") is the base unit of length in the International System of Units (SI). "
Re: (Score:2)
See definition 3 [merriam-webster.com]. Merriam Webster for the win.
Oh, and it's 'numbskull [merriam-webster.com]' you numbskull. Pick up a dictionary, will ya? And not one of them English jobbers. Next thing you know, you'll be calling someone a "git" and saying they wore the wrong "colour" "pyjamas" while getting on the "aeroplane".
Re:6 football fields (Score:4, Funny)
Re: 6 football fields (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
it really ought to be called "meterball" since they don't measure the field in feet anymore.
Perhaps you somehow never noticed this, but I'm fairly certain that in the game in question, you generally kick the ball with your foot.
Foot-ball.
Re: (Score:3)
In Soccer, yes, but American Football? The ball is mostly thrown or carried. Also, in Rugby Football the ball is mostly carried and thrown.
For American football, we should use the name: "Hand-egg" .
Re: 6 football fields (Score:2)
The term football refers to the fact that the players are not riding a horse while playing and thus afoot.
Re: (Score:2)
In Soccer, yes, but American Football? The ball is mostly thrown or carried. Also, in Rugby Football the ball is mostly carried and thrown.
For American football, we should use the name: "Hand-egg" .
For American football you should go back to it's orginal name. Gridiron.
Re: 6 football fields (Score:2)
The playable length of an American football field is 100 yards. People dont generally consider the end zones when describing the length of the field.
Re: (Score:2)
A football field (American) is 120 yards, a football field (Rugby) is 120 meters, and a football field (Soccer) is 120 meters.
I like how you call three different games football and two of them are played primarily with hands. Also Rugby is just Rugby, not some kind of football.
Re: (Score:2)
How many Library of Congress is that?
Re: (Score:2)
Presumably American football, or 600 yards, which is approximately 548.6 meters... which is about the height, Olympic pool-wise, of the CN tower or the Ostankino Tower.
Six Canadian National Towers has yet to gain mainstream acceptance as a universal measuring stick for those opposed to more traditional forms of measurement.
Those are far more meaningless to me, but once they start telling us how many Rhode Islands it is, then I'll know they are making progress.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, ... how many meters was that again? ... Ah, forget it ...
we could abbreviate it to SCNT
So does this mean one tunnel is done? (Score:2)
The project consists of two tunnels.
It's "about 50% complete".
Does that mean one of the tunnels just broke through, or is about to?
TFA doesn't say...
Re: (Score:2)
That would seem to be the natural conclusion - especially since I think TBC only owns one "production" boring machine, and moving it back and forth between two tunnels would seem to be a major headache for no good reason.
Re: (Score:2)
"The project consists of two tunnels.
It's "about 50% complete".
Does that mean one of the tunnels just broke through, or is about to?
TFA doesn't say..."
I'd say 'you must be new here' but your uid says otherwise, so I won't.
Re: (Score:2)
The project consists of two tunnels. It's "about 50% complete". Does that mean one of the tunnels just broke through, or is about to? TFA doesn't say...
They've managed to dig half a hole?
Re: (Score:2)
I think they'd just say they were digging one tunnel then... and I don't know that I've heard of many tunnels that were dug from both ends.
Plus, since TBC's tunnels are so narrow they only allow for one-way traffic, so unless you intend to never have more than a single car or train going back and forth you always need to have at least two different tunnels serving each station - one coming and one going.
Re: (Score:3)
The Chunnel was dug from both ends, but that was more for political reasons (both sides paid for the project).
Although at $50M/mile just to dig the tunnel (they don't even have a fully working prototype vacuum tube yet at that distance) it doesn't seem very cost effective. You could run a small train on the surface or on an elevated concrete slab (think Disney's people mover) for about a tenth of that.
Re: So does this mean one tunnel is done? (Score:2)
The Chunnel is also three tunnels. Dug from both ends, and laser guided. They started at different heights and followed the ups and downs of the strata in the bed rock, as well as curving the direction around. Total route length more than 30 miles/50 km, and they managed to meet almost-on
Re: (Score:2)
Tunnels have the advantage that you don't need to buy the property for it to pass through. In a conservative state like Nevada where big money interests own almost everything just the lawyers for processing the Eminent Domain condemnations for the right of way would probably cost that much before you built anything.
Re: So does this mean one tunnel is done? (Score:2)
Unless they have passing spots, such as at stations with two platforms. Long distances would make the station stops quite long though.
Re:So does this mean one tunnel is done? (Score:4, Informative)
... and I don't know that I've heard of many tunnels that were dug from both ends.
All large tunnels are dug from both ends unless there is a special reason not to do so. It is faster, there is less distance to carry out the spoil, and the final spoil removal is spread over two roures. Spoil removal is a major part of tunnelling activity. In the case of recent railway tunnels under London there are multiple points at which they are dug from, these intermediate shafts usually being at intended intermediate stations.
Plus, since TBC's tunnels are so narrow they only allow for one-way traffic, so unless you intend to never have more than a single car or train going back and forth you always need to have at least two different tunnels serving each station - one coming and one going.
Wow - the 2020 prize for most insightful comment is in the bag already. This being primarily a US forum, whenever a railway - sorry railroad - topic comes up it makes me realise how little many Americans know about them.
Re: (Score:2)
That is not such an issue with surveying methods these days, but even from the early 1800's there is a legend that when the tunnellers of Box Tunnel (nearly 2 miles long, on the Great Western Railway near Bath, UK) met in the middle they were only 6 inches out of l
Just 600 yards? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: Just 600 yards? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Check your math: 2 tunnels * 1 mile * 50% * (1760 yards/mile) / 52 days = 34yards / day
Re: (Score:2)
Also, your quora link says 17-20 yards/day is the typical average, with speeds reaching 67 yards/day on a good day.
Re:Just 600 yards? (Score:4, Insightful)
Basically the Boring Company made a normal tunnel in average time and everyone is going batshit over it because it's Elon Musk.
Note how they have quietly dropped plans for their high speed car transporter tunnels after it was pointed out how completely unfeasible they are. If anything the story here is that they failed and had to go back to digging a normal tunnel using normal methods because their pie-in-the-sky 1960s future city ideas were half baked from the start.
Re: (Score:2)
In almost half the average time, (18.5/34 = 54.4%) using early prototype modifications of mostly-stock hardware.
Loop, etc. are unlikely to be relevant unless and until at least their first-generation boring machine is completed, which is supposed to reduce that to under 7% of average times (I'll bliee it when I see it) If they can pull it off for a similar per-hour cost, *especially* if they can deliver a rough-finished tunnel while importing minimal additional material, then Loop may start actually being
Re:Just 600 yards? (Score:4, Informative)
Digging anything in Las Vegas takes a long time. The soil is similar to concrete. Called caliche. https://www.lasvegasadvisor.co... [lasvegasadvisor.com]
Waste of money (Score:4, Insightful)
That's not even a fraction of what a subway can handle.
So for all the money spent on that, what we get is something that does not even lighten congestion; all those cars still have to get to entry points, and when leaving those entrypoints will continue to clog up the roads, and is horribly inefficient.
Re: (Score:2)
Math much? (Score:2)
is now about 50% complete with its underground tunnel. It's about six football fields in length.
Seriously, 'football fields' as a unit of measure? Ok, so I guess they HAVE dug 600 yards? Or is the finished tunnel GOING to be 600 yards?
and is working to drill two, one-mile-long tunnels.
Uh, a mile is 1760 yards. So 600x2=1200, which is a far cry from 1760. Who wrote this?
Business plan (Score:2)
1. 50% complete
2. 90% complete
3. ???
4. Profit!
Monorail (Score:2)
50% complete (Score:2)
50% complete is another way of saying they aren't finished.
Let me know when it's finished.
More big works! (Score:2)
I love big works. The work has to be done locally, increasing local demand for labor and local technical expertise.
In addition, big projects like this can decrease ground level congestion.
Yes, I expect all of them to under deliver and go way over budget. But decades after they're completed they'll still be of use, helping the local society.
600 yards is 50% complete? (Score:2)
The tunnel is 50% complete and stands at 6 football fields, or 600 yards. That means the full tunnel will be 1200 yards, or about 2/3 of a mile. In NYC, the short blocks are 264 feet (according to Wikipedia), so the tunnel will be about fourteen blocks long. Going by the NYC standard again of local subway lines stopping every 5 blocks, that means three stops. Now, I understand the drive for convenience, especially in places where it gets blisteringly hot in the summer, but it takes 10-15 minutes to walk
Re: (Score:3)
Personally, and this is a little out there, I don't think The Boring Company exists to make car tunnels on Earth. It's a nice little warm-up to making tunnels for underground civilizations on Mars though.
Finally, a clear exit! (Score:2)
I hope he drills up into the casinos.
There may finally be a an obvious way to exit!
Repurposing 737-max fuselages (Score:2)
Just shove the fuselages into the ground and mount the engines on the traincars.
Now that would have been a Musk-level aproach instead of this boring stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
According to your link:
"As of December 2015, the final cost is projected as CHF 9.560 billion.[17] Nine people died during construction.[18]"
CHF are "swiss francs" and the current exchange rate is about 100 CHF = 103 USD. Therefore that's roughly $9.85 billion USD for the 150 km, or $65.7 million USD per km.
In contrast, Boring have spent $52.5 million USD for two 1-mile tunnels (total of 3.22km), translating to $16.3 million USD per km.
So, it seems that the cost per km is cheaper by a factor of four, and s
Re: That's not a tunnel, *this* is a tunnel (Score:2)
But it's not 4km under a mountain and up to 70C heat due to the depth.
Re: That's not a tunnel, *this* is a tunnel (Score:2)
Wikipedia says 46 C, which is hot but so what.
46 C (Score:2)
Re: That's not a tunnel, *this* is a tunnel (Score:2)
Add to that ... at the current speed, the Boring CO could complete 179km in 16 years, so his 150km in 16 isn't much to brag about. Especially given that the Swiss tunnels were apparently dug from 4 different locations at the same time, while Boring is just digging with one machine.
Re: That's not a tunnel, *this* is a tunnel (Score:3, Informative)
Except that the tunnel itself was built in 7 years. And it's diameter is considerably bigger. The rest was about everything else needed: the roads, tracks, ventilation, safety equipment, etc.
Also note that the 9 billion CHF cost is for the whole project, but simply the tunnel.
A few details that TBC has a bad habit of wilfully lying about.
TBC's boring costs, based upon their first tunnel, are actually in the average.
Re: (Score:2)
Which considering this **IS** their first tunnel, is more than a little surprising.
Re: (Score:2)
SpaceX didn't develop a rocket by themselves, they reengineered Soviet rocket engines and mated them to US-style rocket bodies using modern materials and manufacturing techniques. Not an inconsiderable feat, granted. I'll be interested to see what they do with their next generation of TBM.
Re: (Score:2)
So, it seems that the cost per km is cheaper by a factor of four, and so far, no deaths have occurred.
The Swiss tunnel is also more than 4 times the cross-section (9.5m vs 4.3m diameter). And tunneling costs scale roughly with cross section.
Apples and oranges comparison, but it turns out that apples and oranges cost about the same "per pound".