Google Lens Can Now Copy and Paste Handwritten Notes To Your Computer (theverge.com) 25
Google has added a very useful feature to Google Lens, its multipurpose object recognition tool. From a report: You can now copy and paste handwritten notes from your phone to your computer with Lens, though it only works if your handwriting is neat enough. In order to use the new feature, you need to have the latest version of Google Chrome as well as the standalone Google Lens app on Android or the Google app on iOS (where Lens can be accessed through a button next to the search bar). You'll also need to be logged in to the same Google account on both devices. That done, simply point your camera at any handwritten text, highlight it on-screen, and select copy. You can then go to any document in Google Docs, hit Edit, and then Paste to paste the text. And voila -- or, viola, depending on your handwriting.
OCR and categorize photo album (Score:2)
What's everyone using nowadays to categorize and OCR stuff that is in their pictures collection? The default ones in most of my devices (iOS or Android) are terrible. For example, the iOS photo album is terrible at image recognition and doesn't even seem to attempt OCR from what I can gather.
Re: OCR and categorize photo album (Score:1)
OCR? No solution that I know of. Without neural nets you only get the precision of FineReader from around the year 2005. And phones don't have those.
Categorize? No need for anything. All tagging and categorizing solutions are just standard file system features, recreated. Badly.
Dump your pictures in one large pool directory. Then create a directory structure where each directory is considered a tag. Now put a softlink or hardlink of a picture, depending on your needs, into a tag directory to tag it with tha
Re: (Score:2)
I see. Well then, it looks like there is no user friendly solution .. it seems this is an app creation opportunity for someone then.
Re: (Score:2)
OneDrive's OCR is very good. Its image categorization though is garbage.
Google translate is quite impressive too (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Google translate is quite impressive too (Score:1)
Not that impressive, if you see the hardware being involved.
Call me when my phone has a *realistic* neural net simulation chip built-in. And I will install a much better open source solution, with a few of my patches.
Re: (Score:2)
Modern phones do have neural accelerators. And they can run various AI toolkits. Qualcomm processors especially around the 835/845/855 and 865 models can run TensorFlow Lite with the accelerator, or you can make better use of it using Qualcomm's SNPE library.
All available for download now for apps. Nothing's really stopping use. SNPE is nice in that it
Finally (Score:2)
I can add jotting down notes electronically back into my workflow. Something that I had to drop when pen computers faded away and thus Palm Graffiti as well. Now the only remaining hurdle is remove the requirement for physical paper and we'll be as advanced as we were 20 years ago.
For what it's worth, I've worked on product development of more recent tables with pen support. I even wrote multitouch+pen drivers for one of them (because it was not android based). Pen support is not something the consumer mark
Re: Finally (Score:1)
Not by long shot. Unless you like literally being a PP (privacy prostitute).
And paper will never go away completely. As it is a cheap convenient screen with a very low refresh rate. Perfect for static long term displays.
R.I.P. dead trees (Score:1)
Being cheap is great. I'm not convinced that paper is convenient, at least not in ways that people may value. Paper will go away as the primary means of recording ephemeral information within our lifetime. Just as using paper for long term archives have ended in some industries. Duplicating, retrieving, sharing, searching, versioning, collaborative editing, ... I think we could construct a pretty large list of conveniences that physical paper lacks. Either consumers will demand some of these features, or re
Who sees your handwriting? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Indeed. I specifically opt in to this. It's amazing what engineers have achieved thanks to people sharing their handwriting.
Re: (Score:2)
It's amazing how much marketing and executives profit thanks to people doing unpaid labour for them.
It's amazing how their profits are tied to increased usability for me, and receiving a better product. Also I'm not sure them providing a service that benefits me and me using it constitutes "unpaid labour".
Dear AC, get your head out of your arse. The smell in there can't be pleasant.
Re: (Score:2)
Google already sees everything you search for, and even if you don't use Google, just about every Web site in the world sends your browsing history to Google on the back end, in order to get Google Analytics capabilities. I'm pretty sure that my handwriting won't give Google anything useful, that it doesn't already have about me.
I'd rather have my data in the hands of a big company that everybody is watching, than in the hands of some no-name outfit in the shadows.
Not without copying it to advertisers first. (Score:1)
Where "advertisers" stands for: Organizatioms that try to manipulate you into wasting money and votes and arguments for things that are not the best choice you would have made with a reasonable mind, and hence actively harmful to you, like a neural assault, by using ALL the creepy psychological and NLP tactics and precisely zero qualms or morals.
Which, fun fact, was literally born out of snake oil salesmen.
So yeah. Fuck off, and take your somehow still legal organized crime with you.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah nah. Google is an advertising platform and thus never actually hands your data to advertisers. That would be like Coke giving away their recipe to people so they can make their own at home.
But I expected nothing less from Slashdot's dumbest poster. Seriously man you put the AC's to shame, even their racist rants are more on point than you are.
Re: (Score:3)
There's lots of competition for that coveted title these days. Check out Way Smarter Than You, and of course AHuxley.
Oldie and not so goody (Score:2)
Privacy (Score:2)