Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine

People Think CPR is More Effective Than It Really Is, Study Finds (usnews.com) 59

Long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 shared this article from HealthDay: In earlier studies, patients have pegged CPR survival rates at between 19% and 75%. But the real rate of survival is about 12% for cardiac arrests that occur outside hospitals and between 24% and 40% for those that happen in the hospital, according to the report published online July 13 in the Emergency Medicine Journal.

For the new study, Bandolin's team surveyed 500 emergency department patients and their companions. Fifty-three percent said they had done or witnessed CPR, and 64% had taken a CPR course. Ninety-five percent said their main source of CPR information was television. About half said the success rate of CPR topped 75%. And nine out of 10 said they wanted to receive CPR if it was needed.

But only 28% had discussed CPR with a doctor, the investigators noted in a journal news release.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

People Think CPR is More Effective Than It Really Is, Study Finds

Comments Filter:
  • by EzInKy ( 115248 ) on Saturday July 25, 2020 @02:38PM (#60331119)

    I was ACLS certified before I retired, and I much preferred trying to revive a patient with a beating heart than one without one. Staying alive, staying alive!

    • Plus at least you're still pushing oxygenated blood to the brain, so by the time the ambulance arrives the patient doesn't have brain damage,
      • by EzInKy ( 115248 )

        Hypothermia protocol was very popular just before I retired. Got a lot of push back from patient families though. They wanted blankets piled on because their loved one was cold.

        • That's when you take your hands off and say "Ok, here's the deal. You let me save him or you get to save him. Make a choice quickly, every second matters. Now can I treat him right or the way you want it?"

        • And it's effective, if you've got a well-equipped emergency room in your pocket. If you've got a phone and your training in CPR ... "Stayin' Alive."

          If you don't do even the 12% chance-of-success action, then you have a corpse cluttering up the sidewalk. And, as I remember, a very-recently widowed woman and an 8 year-old kid screaming at you. Memorable, that.

    • CPR is the foundation of ACLS. But good ACLS is rapid defibrillation.

  • Even those that survive CPR often have poor outcomes. They may be confined to a wheelchair, or suffer brain damage. Only a small percentage return to a normal life.

    The belief that CPR is a magic solution comes from TV. Someone receives CPR, then gets up, defeats the bad guys, and a week later wins an Olympic gymnastics competition. In real life, that happens infrequently.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I was not a direct witness to it, but a guy fell of a cliff on the beach near me. The first person on the scene was a young lady who valiantly administered CPR. When paramedics arrived, they were able to get him going again but I had a bad feeling about it. I remember walking up the path back to the parking lot thinking, "he's going up too". Sure enough, a small two-paragraph story in the paper the next day said he died at the hospital. Drinking and cliffs don't mix. He was in his early 20s.

    • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *
      Restarting a heart that has stopped due to trauma (motor vehicle accident, fall, etc) is next to impossible. The reason it stopped in the first place is due to damage to the heart muscle itself, and/or major blood vessels. Asystole is the worst "rhythm" to treat, and you can't shock it either.
      • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

        That actually depends on the trauma. Sometimes people's hearts stop suddenly with only a fairly modest chest impact, typically involving getting hit by a ball or similar. This phenomenon, called "commotio cordis", occurs when the chest gets hit at exactly the wrong point during the heart's cycle. In those cases, survival is about 25% if resuscitation is started within 3 minutes. That's not a great number, but it's a long way from "next to impossible". After three minutes, though, the survival rate dro

        • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *

          which is why having AEDs everywhere sports are played is so crucial.

          It's called a "defibrillator" for a reason. You cannot shock asystole. Your AED will not even go off. It works on ventricular fibrillation and some cases of tachycardia/torsades de pointes - ie where there is some degree of fibrillation...

          • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

            I didn't say you could shock asystole. That sentence was the only sentence in your post that I was not disagreeing with.

  • The one time I had to do CPR for real, the patient didn't survive, so I don't have much faith in it anymore. And in having to be certified for my job, I've also heard repeatedly how the survival rate isn't that great. I have to wonder what the rate would be for CPR combined with immediate AED use. I didn't see that in the original article.
    • Re:With AED? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by MrL0G1C ( 867445 ) on Saturday July 25, 2020 @04:13PM (#60331361) Journal

      I had to do CPR a few years back, I just did the chest compression bit and took turns with a couple of work colleagues, I thought the guy had no chance but he did made a good recovery. The emergency services did turn up quick.

      So, it might seem futile but it's worth a try.

      And if you're the boss of someone who does CPR on someone that day, give them the rest of the day off.

    • by burne ( 686114 )

      The one time I had to do CPR for real, the patient didn't survive,/quote>

      That sucks, sorry for that. But if you hadn't done anything at all, the patient would have died for sure. You tried, and it could have made a difference. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.

      My trainer told me one in ten will survive short term, and one in twenty long term. But if I'm dead already I'd rather have a one in twenty chance of surviving than no chance at all.

      So please try again, next time. They are already dead and you could make all the difference.

      • That "patient" was my mom. So I was a little screwed up for a while and have been replaying that day ever since '06, wondering if I did it wrong.
        • Sorry to hear that. I can see how that would shock your world view. But you more than likely didn't cause the situation, and it sounds like you did the best you could with the training and tools available. That is *never* wrong. My uncle had a heart attack in the middle of a field with nobody there to help him. At least you were there to *try*.
    • Re:With AED? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 25, 2020 @04:57PM (#60331457)

      This thread actually surprises me and has made me die inside a little.

      I've done first aid training a number of times in a number of circumstances, I did it in the military, I did it as part of my rescue diver training, and I did it as part of recertification to be a first aider in a typical office scenario.

      In each case the training was very different by people with very different backgrounds and with a very different focus - the military had a heavier focus on bullet wounds, tourniquets, heavy bleeding, and that sort of thing. Rescue diving had a heavy focus on drowning incidents, CO2 and Oxygen toxicity, and so forth. The office training was more concerned about burn, electric shocks, and heart attacks. But also, in every single one of those training sessions it was made clear to us that CPR doesn't have a high success rate, but AEDs are significantly more effective with many studies showing a survival rate as high as 50% when an AED is added into the equation.

      I'm not having a pop at you for not knowing this - reading the summary and this thread it seems very few people that have done first aid training are aware of this, this is a revelation to me, I thought it was standard in first aid training across the globe. I'm amazed therefore at how many people are posting here with the implication that first aid courses aren't covering this rather important fact. We were always told to send someone immediately for an AED even if you end up not needing it for precisely this reason - it could be the difference between a 1 in 10 chance of saving someone and a 1 in 2 chance of saving someone.

      CPR is nothing more than a last ditch effort, and any trainer teaching otherwise should be fired on the spot. You do it when the situation is bad enough to warrant it, when no other options are available, and you do it until professional medical support arrives or until the patient responds - it's hard, it's physically painful to do for real especially for any extended time, and the success rate is low, but most people would prefer you give them that chance no matter how small, and that's why we do it when no other option is available.

      Don't feel bad that it failed for you - the odds were always stacked heavily against you - if anyone told you different they were being incredibly unfair and setting you up for that disappointment. You did the right thing and tried anyway and I hope if you need to you'd still try your best to do it again regardless of the previous outcome, because the hope is that sometime, maybe, just maybe, the odds are in your favour and you hit that 10% success rate and save a life.

      In fact, the basis of pretty much all first aid is that it's best efforts, you're really just there to do what little you can to increase chances, you're not a medic, or a doctor and no one should expect you to be because you do not have those years of training and the equipment nor knowledge of how to use it that they have. The fact you tried something is really what matters, because that's something more than the vast majority of people would do and that makes you a good person even if your efforts ultimately failed. As the saying goes, "Imperfect care administered is better than perfect care withheld" - you tried to do something, and that's better than doing nothing because you were worried you wouldn't do it perfectly or get a perfect outcome - it's hard to make the situation worse when someone is literally minutes from death so it's better to do something than nothing, because giving them a +10% chance of survival is better than giving them a 0% chance of survival.

      • Don't feel bad that it failed for you - the odds were always stacked heavily against you - if anyone told you different they were being incredibly unfair and setting you up for that disappointment. You did the right thing and tried anyway and I hope if you need to you'd still try your best to do it again regardless of the previous outcome, because the hope is that sometime, maybe, just maybe, the odds are in your favour and you hit that 10% success rate and save a life.

        Thanks for the kind words. I realize

      • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

        CPR is nothing more than a last ditch effort, and any trainer teaching otherwise should be fired on the spot. You do it when the situation is bad enough to warrant it, when no other options are available, and you do it until professional medical support arrives or until the patient responds

        To be slightly pedantic, sometimes you have do CPR even when other options are available. In particular, if the patient doesn't have a shockable rhythm, you have to start with CPR first. But otherwise, yes.

    • Re:With AED? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Dunbal ( 464142 ) * on Saturday July 25, 2020 @06:24PM (#60331653)
      I do it for real as part of my job (I'm a doctor). I usually end up bringing back 1-2 people a month. It's a great feeling when it works and sometimes you can actually feel the heart shudder and start up again as you do compressions (that's when you stop lol). But yeah, 50% sounds about right. It depends on the initial state of health and the age of the patient and how long they've been "on the other side". I remember reading one can expect a 70% reanimation rate if CPR is started immediately, but it drops downhill very quickly for every minute that passes. We've never brought anyone back after 30+ minutes, although some of my colleagues try hard (especially with kids). And that's in a hospital with oxygen, respiratory therapist, intubation, all the drugs in the crash cart, the defibrillator and a team of 6 or more trained and experienced professionals. taking turns. I can imagine on the street it's far less likely to recover, or recover anything salvageable. Which doesn't mean it shouldn't be tried - the cost of trying is negligible compared to the possible benefit to the person you bring back. Moral to my story - I was brought back after ventricular fibrillation in my 30's. I've had an extra and productive 20 years. But mine happened in the ER, in front of the treating doctor :)
      • It is very hard to know whether a faint heart is beating or not. Thumbing on an unconcious person's chest when there heart is actually OK is not going to do them any good.

        I had this experience a couple of years ago at a classical concert. Man in front of me went unconscious. I made space, got him to the ground. First question -- is he breathing? Again not easy to tell, it was at best shallow.

        Fortunately a nurse was in the audience and took over after I called out. She put him on his side, and he soon

        • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *
          That's why you have electrodes put on the patient and you also have someone taking their femoral pulse (to rule out pulseless electrical activity).
          • YOU might do that, but I would not.

            I had someone pass out on me in a concert. Got him to the ground, but hard to tell whether they were breathing let alone pulse. Fortunately I was saved by a nurse at the concert.

            So for non-experts in non-medical situations, is the CPR likely to do more harm than good?

            • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *
              If CPR is required, the patient is clinically dead. Can you harm a person who is already dead?
              • Do how do you know they are "dead"? By asking them?

                • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *
                  No pulse, no blood pressure and not breathing. That means dead. Death is either reversible or not. Clincal death is described by the above. Legal death is after I signed the death certificate.
  • ... to that of doing nothing. Wouldn't you still try to save a life even if it only marginally improved the outcome?

  • I knew the numbers for CPR but one question was lingering: You'd hope that maybe with better training people would be able to increase the chance of survival so it becomes closer to hospital numbers.

    Now,slightly on a tangent but if anyone wants to watch fascinating and educational stories about rapid response teams saving people against the odds, I really recommend the presentation(s) of the late John Hinds, a flying doctor at the Manx Tourist Trophy for motorbikes.

  • And nine out of 10 said they wanted to receive CPR if it was needed.

    12% chance or 0%? I'd so hate to put someone out...

  • by thunderdolt ( 1221406 ) on Saturday July 25, 2020 @03:42PM (#60331301)
    As pointed out, the save ratio is bad, however, it can work. As a former firefighter/EMT as one of my careers, I have had about 20 real CPR encounters with only 2 saves. One was an 18 month old little girl who drowned across the street from me and she made a full recovery. The other save was a 40 year old female with miscellaneous health problems with none of them being heart issues up until that time, and she made a full recovery. All the others were failures due prolonged heart issues for years. If done quickly, it can work, but don't bet the farm.
    • I'm trained in CPR, the survival rates are made very clear: It works well in some medical situations. It only works if administered quickly. The odds of success increase a shitton if you have access to an AED.

      There's a lot of misconceptions around it and what it does. I blame Baywatch and action movies where people don't come back from CPR but then do come back when the actor cries and punches the corpse in the chest.

      • How many unconscious people get seriously injured or killed because someone though their heart had stopped and pumped on it?

        It is not at all easy to tell.

        • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Sunday July 26, 2020 @05:01AM (#60332549)

          Firstly it's quite hard to counteract a beating heart with CPR to the point where you kill someone. Secondly no one trained in CPR cares about the heart. The only thing you're asked to check is for breathing.
          If conscious > talk to victim put in recovery position and wait for ambulance.
          If breathing > put in recovery position and wait for ambulance.
          If not breathing > start CPR while waiting for ambulance. If the persons heart is beating, it won't beat much longer anyway unless you can get breathing back.

          One of the key parts of survival is early administration. Survivability goes up when people don't fumble around trying to take a pulse.

  • Sssshhhhh... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by GameboyRMH ( 1153867 ) <gameboyrmh.gmail@com> on Saturday July 25, 2020 @03:47PM (#60331311) Journal

    This is by design, if people knew the odds of CPR saving someone they wouldn't get training or attempt CPR, which would drop the survival rate of people who might benefit from CPR from 12% to a big fat zero.

    Just a few weeks ago a friend saved his friend's life when he collapsed out on a mountain bike trail. He came out of it with a bunch of broken ribs (a sign of doing it right) but was fine otherwise.

    • Please don't spread misinformation. Breaking rips is not a sign of doing it right. It is a sign of doing something though and a broken rip is far easier to mend than any kind of brain damage from lack of oxygen.
    • Sorry, but no. A broken rib is not a sign that it was done right. It can happen as a side effect of CPR but it's far from required. It's only something you accept as a possibility because healing ribs is easier than fixing a damaged brain.

  • by Joe2020 ( 6760092 ) on Saturday July 25, 2020 @04:14PM (#60331373)

    Of course does it make people believe it works well when all they know about it comes from movies and TV shows. Almost every movie, which features CPR, shows a 100% survival rate. There people simply bounce back to 120% - all thanks to the movie ratings!

    The list of traumatic injuries that gets downplayed on TV and movie is endless. Only people unfortunate enough to make the real experience, and fortunate enough to survive it, can tell the truth ...

  • A family member is a retired firefighter.

    I asked him about CPR.
    Throughout his entire career, he only saw CPR work once to revive someone.
    It mostly just buys you a few minutes of staying alive before the paramedics to arrive.

  • by Solandri ( 704621 ) on Saturday July 25, 2020 @04:28PM (#60331401)
    The American Heart Association [heart.org] reports that if you suffer a heart attack outside the hospital:

    So if you do the math (going with 43% chance of CPR, 11% overall survival rate, and 2.5 increase in odds of survival), then (1-0.43)x + 0.43*2.5x = 0.11. 1.645x = 0.11. x = 0.067

    • Chance of surviving a heart attack without CPR = 6.7%
    • Chance of surviving a heart attack with CPR = 16.7%

    So yeah it's lower than most people think. But your chances of surviving are still a lot better with CPR.

  • You have to be really careful what you mean by "survival rates". At least when I took CPR for first responders years ago they gave rates that meant "Got to the hospital alive." which were based on how long after they went down before they got CPR. It's been awhile but the number for "Got out of the hospital alive" was something on the order of 2% and most of those were not "fine".
  • by NotSoHeavyD3 ( 1400425 ) on Saturday July 25, 2020 @05:15PM (#60331503) Journal
    Is why you need it. If you need it because of electric shock, choking, or drowning you've got a better chance. If you need it because you had a heart attack your chances go way down. Oh in the case of heart attack AED's help but for those that don't know that thing doesn't start your heart, it reboots it.
    • More like resets. An AED will typically stop your heart. That's still far better than the arrhythmic pulsing it did before, since those actually damage the heart muscle without pumping any blood. But you still need the CPR to actually keep the patient alive.
  • Unless you almost or do crack a rib, you ain't pressing hard enough.
  • I volunteered for an ambulance service and learned that you just do not ask EMTs about their CPR experiences.

    It's depressing how few people, if any, they have been able to save.

  • If given a 12% chance or certain death, what're most people going to pick?

    • by ledow ( 319597 )

      That's not the point.

      You see someone doing CPR on your father and you think "This is just like the movies, he stands a good chance of popping back to life."

      No, he doesn't. Better than nothing, but chances are he's going to be dead, or even brain-damaged if it's not being done by a professional or goes on for too long.

      "Too long", incidentally, is the few minutes for a defib to be found and used. They aren't going to be able to do it all the way back to the hospital and then save him.

      Chances are, when you s

  • When attending a first aid training I was told that CPR aim is to prevent the heart from completely stopping while the defibrillator is on the way.
    Sometimes miracles happen and the heart can restart beating normally but most of the time performing CPR simply keeps it fibrillating and circulates the blood.
    For that reason no matter how long, You have to continue either till You can confirm the heartbeat and breathing is back (miracle) or the professional rescuers take over, even if You do it wrong it's bette

  • An EMT friend of mine told me the reason resusitation is
    so low it that in the vast majority of heart attack cases he is called on,
    the patient is already dead. But he has to keep
    trying until a doctor tells him it is OK to quit.

"Life sucks, but it's better than the alternative." -- Peter da Silva

Working...