Facebook Will Stop Recommending Health Groups (theverge.com) 38
The Verge reports on the new rules Facebook is adding to slow the spread of misinformation and other harmful content on its Groups feature. From the report: Some of the new policies encourage more active administration of groups. If administrators step down, they can invite members to take their place; if nobody does, Facebook will apparently "suggest" admin roles to members, then archive the group if that fails. Also, if group members accrue a community standards violation, moderators will have to approve all their posts for 30 days. If the moderators repeatedly approve posts that violate Facebook's guidelines, the group could be removed.
The health guidelines take a broader approach by focusing on an entire category of content, not specific rule-breaking behavior. Facebook says that although groups can "be a positive space for giving and receiving support during difficult life circumstances ... it's crucial that people get their health information from authoritative sources." Facebook also says it's continuing to limit content from militia groups and other organizations linked to violence. Groups that discuss potential violence will be removed, and it will soon down-rank even non-violating content in the News Feed.
The health guidelines take a broader approach by focusing on an entire category of content, not specific rule-breaking behavior. Facebook says that although groups can "be a positive space for giving and receiving support during difficult life circumstances ... it's crucial that people get their health information from authoritative sources." Facebook also says it's continuing to limit content from militia groups and other organizations linked to violence. Groups that discuss potential violence will be removed, and it will soon down-rank even non-violating content in the News Feed.
it's crucial! (Score:1, Troll)
that people get their health information from authoritarian sources.
Oh damn! Did I say that?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I feel your pain, brother! I wanted to give you a 'Funny' for that one.
And by the way, we are Federal Security Service now
Re:it's crucial! (Score:4, Insightful)
I dunno, Trump's health advice hasn't been particularly good.
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry all you guys (moderators especially)! I really did try to be as obvious as possible...
Who Is Paying Them (Score:1, Insightful)
Hmm, let me guess, ohh yeah, BUY PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS AT INFLATED PRICES, you cheap fuckers, right up until they fucking kill you, filthy dirty nobody workers. That is all it is, no more diet recommendation, no more healthy eating, no healthy mental practices, nor more nothing that does not start with doctors and end with prescriptions until they day they bankrupt and kill you. Ohh Facebook you suck a steaming pile of shite holes.
Oh for Pete's sake (Score:2)
With COVID you can bet your ass those scams are exploding. Facebook had traditionally profited off them thanks to engagement and ad sales, but they're probably getting so big they're worried the FDA is going to come down on them for it. So they're pulling the plug. That's literally all this is.
You can still do all your health themed Facebook groups, but you'
Re: Who Is Paying Them (Score:2)
The so called alternative medicine typically isn't cheap, and what's worse, it doesn't actually help you in any meaningful way beyond possibly a placebo effect. The whole alternative medicine industry is basically built on fraud, and Facebook promotes fraud.
Facebook & Harmful Content (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
One man's misinformation (Score:3)
Re:One man's misinformation (Score:4, Insightful)
You do know that reality dictates that some things are just plan wrong. Antivaxxers and other diseminators of fake medical information should be given the heave ho
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Beware people defending anti-vaxx, 5G conspiracy theories and other pop-bullshit. It's a gateway into even worse stuff and while it's possible they are just morons who believe that stuff it's also possible they want to keep the pewdie-pipeline operating.
In this case you know nothing (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
People can still be wrong about matters of life and death, they just can be as wrong, as publicly, without making more of an effort.
Given the stakes and availability of objective criteria, medicine should be one of the least controversial areas of content moderation. Simultaneously, the stakes and specialized knowledge required mean that a lot of otherwise intelligent people will latch on to theories like morgellions or Steve Jobs' juice cleanse cancer cure.
Dodge the bad (Score:2)
Post health advice as a political messages. For instance:
- Lose weight FAST: register to vote. The candidates are so nauseating you'll eat less.
- Support the GOP to cure coronavirus: if they have their way, 5G will never happen. No 5G, no coronavirus!
- Symptoms to watch out for: your skin looks yellow? You might have cirrhosis. You skin look orange? You might be running for president.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
In the final week or two French electoral officials basically shut down political tweets, so it can be done.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
as long as the suppression actions are independent of political view?
All justifications for censorship are political, even the ones everyone agrees with.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They were suppressing Russian attempts at tampering with the French presidential election.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You also have political campaigning laws.
Anyway these are private companies so freedom of speech doesn't apply. People have tried suing them in court for constitutional violations and have been laughed out.
Re: (Score:2)
I do get that Facebook could be used to coordinate or incite riots or other mass violence, but I think we're in a position where it's almost guaranteed that either on election night or shortly thereafter, we're going to have mass violence regardless. No matter who wins or looks to be winning, large groups of people are angry and scared that if "their guy" doesn't get to sit in the oval office, the entire world will burn down. So much so that they'll be more than happy to light the match.
Re: (Score:2)
Happily on the downside of life (Score:2)
Overhyped Newz (Score:2)
Authoritative sources? (Score:2)
Isn't that just newspeak for 'approved sources that follow the party line'?
There is never a single truth about anything, especially not when it comes to medical stuff. Let's take covid-19...
Where did it come from? - Some claims it came from bats, some that it came from pangolins and some that was bioengineered in a lab. What is true here? What is the single unifying truth?
What works to help ease the disease? - Malaria medication? The 100 year old Calmette vaccination? Both?
Bottom line is that there is no tr
Re: Authoritative sources? (Score:2)
Nobody with any credibility believes it was engineered, if anything that has been conclusively ruled out.