Bitcoin at $100,000 in 2021? Outrageous To Some, a No-Brainer for Backers (reuters.com) 123
Bitcoin investors, which include top hedge funds and money managers, are betting the virtual currency could more than quintuple to as high as $100,000 in a year. From a report: It's a wager that has drawn eye-rolls from skeptics who believe the volatile cryptocurrency is a speculative asset rather than a store of value like gold. Since January, bitcoin has gained 160%, bolstered by strong institutional demand as well as scarcity as payment companies such as Square and Paypal buy it on behalf of customers. Bitcoin is within sight of its all-time peak of just under $20,000 hit in December 2017. It debuted in 2011 at zero and was last trading at $18,415. Going from $18,000 to $100,000 in one year is not a stretch, Brian Estes, chief investment officer at hedge fund Off the Chain Capital, said. "I have seen bitcoin go up 10X, 20X, 30X in a year. So going up 5X is not a big deal."
In related news (Score:2)
John McAfee still hasn't eaten his own dick yet as per his claims.https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7qawy/john-mcafee-no-longer-willing-to-eat-his-dick-on-tv
Re: In related news (Score:2)
He should contact Armin Meiwes for assistance. ;)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Unless you're slashdot then its something something tulips.
Re: (Score:2)
Digital libertarian play-money collectibles.
Re: Whatever your opinion, it is interesting. (Score:2)
It's completely predictable and ancient, to anyone with any wisdom on this.
I wasn't one of them. You aren't yet. Not to worry, have fun with your first ride. But this game has been played ever since cavemen bartered meat and berries.
Re: Whatever your opinion, it is interesting. (Score:4, Insightful)
Bitcoin transactions currently take an average of 10 minutes, while only processing an average of 5 per second.
It's already incredibly, unusably slow, and there's every reason to believe it will scale very poorly.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Welp, as expected I got the normal variety of responses here - all of them smug/dismissive and all of them different.
Lightning solves everything. It's all the fault of the other side in some schism. Bitcoin isn't about bulk transactions, it's a store of value and you'd use something else or some other service for that kind of thing. And your reaction, which is that there just isn't a problem to begin with.
Yep, that's a bingo. Cool. Have fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin has advantages over conventional currencies only when financial institutions let it, or haven't caught up. They have advantages of scale.
Suppose I want to send money to someone in Germany. I buy a certain amount of Bitcoin with dollars, transfer it to my contact, and my contact sells it for marks. There are two currency conversions and three transfers of ownership taking place. The transfer of ownership is deliberately computationally expensive. It is possible to have services that streamlin
Re: (Score:3)
Suppose I want to send money to someone in Germany. I buy a certain amount of Bitcoin with dollars, transfer it to my contact, and my contact sells it for marks.
Where have you been?
Re: (Score:2)
No scarcity of stupid suckers (Score:2, Insightful)
Please define "interesting". In particular, I feel like asking you to carefully distinguish "interesting" discussions of cryptocurrency from "interesting" discussions of stock prices. Or why not go all the way to explaining the differences from theories of how Hugo Chavez helped steal the election for his great buddy Joe Biden. And how Chavez actually died while experimenting with a prototype of Covid-19, too!
At this point America is #1 for suckers and fools with no actual understanding of "currency, techno
Re: (Score:2)
Whatever your opinion about the various aspects of bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general. It's existence has led to a lot of interesting discussions about the nature of currency, technology, security, responsibility, usability, investing and more.
Or Bubbles. Becaus this is going to be a hella big one.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You think it is going to inflate again?
Just like the stock market or subprime loans and whacky derivatives, the concept is to get people's money. After that, it can disappear. The original people made their money. At some point, the bitcoin market is going to fall apart when the biggies cash in their coins.
It's no dissimilar to gold. I don't have the figures on me - there is a good reason to not publish them, but suspect a lot more money has been lost on gold than made on it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> suspect a lot more money has been lost on gold than made on it
Maybe I'm gay tired, but that sounds impossible, care to explain how that could be?
It's the concept that many people buy high, and sell low.
Prudent people who invest in Precious metals should hold on to them, and buy during the low spots. But altogether too many buy on the way up price wise. Then when the market is near i's peak, the buying tails off. Then it crashes. But the selfsame people sho bought it as the price is skyrocketing think "It'll recover!" but it doesn't, and they sell it after they've lost money.
I have some investments in PM. But the stuff is locked in a safe, and I
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But for every dollar lost, someone else makes a dollar, right?
But it's who and what. There are a lot less sellers, and likely a corporation, that gets all the largess. And they tend to do it right. Perhaps it would be better is I said a lot more people lose than make?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with Bitcoin and all other cryptocurrencies is that new ones can be created practically out of thin air. You could create Bitcoin 2.0 based on Bitcoin technology, and after that Bitcoin 3.0, etc. Now suppose there's a meta-cryptocurrency you can buy and sell, that behind the scenes is buying and selling all cryptocurrencies in the market (usually spreading risk is a good thing). However due to the nature of creating cryptocurrencies out of thin air, your investment would thin out over the course
Re: (Score:2)
is that new ones can be created practically out of thin air. You could create Bitcoin 2.0 based on Bitcoin technology, and after that Bitcoin 3.0, etc.
Its not really an issue that new ones can be created. Same deal with the stock market... just because thousands of new companies and stocks can be created out of thin air does not mean Microsoft stock will be diluted by the new stocks coming into existence.
When new cryptocurrencies are created - Not enough people to matter will even bother using or acqui
Re: (Score:2)
its not really an issue that new ones can be created. Same deal with the stock market... just because thousands of new companies and stocks can be created out of thin air does not mean Microsoft stock will be diluted by the new stocks coming into existence.
That's not a correct analogy. The service provided by Bitcoin is anonymous trade over the Internet. Each of the dozens of cryptocurrencies out there provides the same service, with new ones popping up all the time.
If serious competitors to Microsoft, providing the equal service - cloud computing, office suite, etc. were popping up in the dozens, you can bet the value of Microsoft would drop as competition increases and customers switch to cheaper offerings.
Are these backer willing to make the same bet ... (Score:2)
... as certain John Mcaffe who said he would eat from a fresh "one coup" he made himself if bitcoint did not reach $100K at the end of 2020?
No?
Not even a bet like Mr. Bob Metcalfe (of Ethernet fame) when in 1996 he bet he would eat his words if the internet did not suffer a massive collapse ? (when he lost the bet he took a piece of paper with the word printed, put it in a blender with some water and ate/drank the pulpy goo)
Not that one either?
Oh, then this is just market pumping...
Re: Are these backer willing to make the same bet (Score:2)
Vanilla paste "one cup" or "cuttlefish and asparagus" one cup?
The best part of 2019 and 2020... (Score:3)
Was that these bullshit stories of people saying Bitcoin will reach 100x profit increases weren't a thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Somebody’s working hard lately (Score:5, Insightful)
The past few weeks, someone is really working to get Bitcoin in the news. I’m expecting this will turn out to be a pump and dump.
Re:Somebody’s working hard lately (Score:5, Informative)
I’m expecting this will turn out to be a pump and dump.
It definitely is and I can prove it.
Go here: http://bitcoinity.org/markets [bitcoinity.org] and set the horizontal timeline to "all"
The purple bars behind the graph are trading volume.
Look at the big peak in 2017/2018, massive trading volume. Supply is following demand, it's all good (idiotic, but good).
Look at the big peak now - zero trading volume. Nobody's buying. The "surge" is coming from from a few sock puppet accounts trading small amounts between themselves at stupidly elevated prices, ie. somebody is pumping like crazy.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin is designed as deflationary over time so it makes sense that the value would keep increasing against national currencies even as volume of trading declines.
I'm not saying that is a good thing. Most modern nations aim for inflation to keep markets moving. Deflationary markets tend to cause hording.
Which is pretty much what we are seeing here, right?
There's probably some hedge funds out there that have been collecting Bitcoin in little bits over time and are tossing them around between themselves to k
Re: (Score:2)
Deflationary markets tend to cause hoarding.
... and the hoarding causes even more deflation.
With a national currency, this deflationary cycle can cause real problems, as it did in America in the 1930s and Japan in the 1990s.
But for Bitcoin, the built-in deflation makes owning it a no-brainer.
Re: (Score:2)
That's weird, because on other websites the trade volume is fairly normal:
https://coinmarketcap.com/curr... [coinmarketcap.com]
https://www.blockchain.com/cha... [blockchain.com]
Seems Bitcoinity is providing some weird numbers.
Re: (Score:2)
That's weird, because on other websites the trade volume is fairly normal:
I feel a conspiracy theory coming on...
Seems Bitcoinity is providing some weird numbers.
Or ... maybe it's the only one telling the truth.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Somebody’s working hard lately (Score:4, Interesting)
If you really believe what you say, then you can short Bitcoin and make a fortune.
Five ways to short Bitcoin [investopedia.com]
When you liquidate your positions, be sure to come back here and post a photo of your yacht. Good luck.
Re:Somebody’s working hard lately (Score:4, Insightful)
Predicting that bitcoin is eventually going to crash and burn, is not the same as predicting when it will crash and burn, nor what prices it may reach in the meantime.
“the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
Re: (Score:2)
“the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
True, but do be careful, there are people here who consider quoting Keynes equivalent to heresy.
Re: (Score:2)
I can see crashes coming without being able to time them. I think Bitcoin is going to crash at some point. I have no idea when. If I did, I would short it then.
Re: (Score:2)
I think BitcoMaking vacuous predictions is veryin is going to crash at some point.
Many people said that back in 2010 when Bitcoin first reached the ridiculous value of an entire cent.
Since then, it has gone up by 180000000%.
They haven't been proved wrong yet. It could still fall back below a penny.
I have no idea when.
So you don't know when, or the peak, or how far it will fall.
Making vacuous predictions is very safe: If bitcoin goes up to $100k and then falls back to "only" $90k, you can still say "I told you so."
If I did, I would short it then.
So would everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if you can short bitcoin in any meaningful way. The real issue is counterparty risk. If bitcoin fails spectacularly, and your counterparty depends on bitcoin being a profitable businessmodel, then there is a great risk they will go bankrupt before they can pay you any money.
If you can find a short issued by someone who primarily makes money from other business (like a big traditional bank), then it might be worth considering. Otherwise it is just like buying a short on Lehman Brothers from Lehm
Re: (Score:1)
Bold prediction (Score:2)
Didnt bitcoin just drop like 3k in value overnight?
Rangom number generator. (Score:2)
Didnt bitcoin just drop like 3k in value overnight?
Probably yes. It's Bitcoin, what would you expect? It's rate is so unstable you could probably use it as a source of entropy to some cryptographic random number generator.
So...
Yes, very likely It'll happen.
Somewhere between the day is rises from a previous value of $0.05, and right before it falls again to a value of $2,000.00
Re: (Score:2)
I'm more wondering what $100,000 will buy in 2021 if the QE-induced dollar inflation carries on any further.
Re:Random number generator. (Score:2)
Partly replying to correct DrYak's spelling mistake in the Subject, but I'd also give you [lobiusmoop] a mod point if I ever had one to give. I wish Slashdot would stop disabling the spelling checker for the Subject field. (However that flaw is pretty low on the list of bugs that I would consider paying to help fix.)
On the QE (Quantitative Easing) front of scamming, I just got some fascinating data. I'm not sure about America, but Japan's version of QE includes the central bank buying equities in a veiled w
Re: (Score:2)
but it's even less imaginable that they can continue buying shares without limit.
What limits a central bank from continuing to buy shares in the denomination of its own currency?
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting question and I can't pretend to be an economist who might deeply understand the answer. However, putting on my mathematician's hat, I think it is linked to the main story here, where I focused on the problem of scarcity. The thing about gold is that its value is based on a truly limited supply. There is true scarcity there. Fiat currencies, including Bitcoin, aren't scarce. There's always bigger numbers to print on them. We've seen many episodes of hyperinflation when currencies were debased to
Re: (Score:1)
I wish Slashdot would stop disabling the spelling checker for the Subject field.
Not Slashdot's fault. You're barking up a tree without a paddle.
about:config: layout.spellcheckDefault=2
That will fix your problem
Public masturbation of 1673220 (Score:2)
Z^-1
Well, that's gratitude for ya (Score:1)
Try to help a guy out and this is what you get..
Ingrate!
Let this be a reminder of what is behind the mask
Public masturbation of 1673220 (Score:2)
Z^-2
Thank you ladies and gentlemen (Score:1)
Enjoy the fish, tip your waitress, and keep your tires properly inflated.
By the way, spell chek works fine for me up in the subject header, but some people would rather complain.
Public masturbation of 1673220 (Score:2)
Z^-3
Today's Slashdot fortune at the bottom of page (Score:1)
Work smarter, not harder, and be careful of your speling.
They did it just for you. Show a little respect
Public masturbation of 167322 (Score:2)
Z^-4
You like it, don't you? (Score:1)
Ya little fruitcake
Public masturbation of 167322 (Score:2)
Z^-5
Re: (Score:2)
I'm more wondering what $100,000 will buy in 2021 if the QE-induced dollar inflation carries on any further.
It didn't create that much in 2008-10.
Re: (Score:2)
Dropped 16%, someone probably tried to convert one to USD
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. Somebody dumping and all the suckers losing money.
"Backers" (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's 'Bagholders'
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Funny, I always preferred the word "Shill" instead.
The "Boosters" (your term, not mine) have been oddly silent until November this year. I guess that a lot of them are still stinging from the big selloff in early 2018, which looks like it might be due to repeat itself in early 2021.
It still sucks as a currency (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Satoshi invented Bitcoin to be a payment system, and not a store of value. His invention has failed its purpose.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin has some properties that are definitely undesirable in money. Money also needs to be a somewhat stable store of value most of the time, and Bitcoin fails at that. It's far too volatile. The volatility also affects currency exchanges, who need to hold enough Bitcoin for their operations. It also can't be spent most places. Money is worth what you can buy with it, and there's a vast array of things I can't buy with Bitcoin but can easily buy with dollars. Bitcoin is deflationary, which doesn't
Well duh. It's literally legalized crime by now. (Score:2)
It's what you get when you have imaginary value.
Bitcoin isn't even to blame for this. It's the victim here. As are we, if this results in some of those gamblers deciding to actually use the money they tricked some victims into paying for their $imaginaryWorth tokens.
It would work exactly the same with glas beads if they'd become increasingly wasteful to make.
This should be prosecuted as a Ponzi scheme, plain amd simple.
What's the point? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It was never untraceable. The blockchain is public, you can see the transactions made by every wallet. That's much less privacy than your bank account.
Mostly the Chinese (Score:1)
For good reason (Score:2)
"t's a wager that has drawn eye-rolls from skeptics who believe the volatile cryptocurrency is a speculative asset rather than a store of value like gold."
Since bitcoin doesn't have a finite amount in existence like gold, nor any practicable use like gold, it can't be anything other than speculative.
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't know anything about the topic being discussed, don't comment on it.
Re: (Score:1)
Gold isn't that useful. The most useful thing we can find for most of the world's supply is keeping it in vaults as a store of value.
Bitcoin does have a limited supply. Supply will get to 21 million.
Re: (Score:2)
Gold is extremely useful. If it was obtainable at its industrial value we'd have all kinds of things made of gold. Instead, because it's shiny and easy to work so you can make baubles out of it, we keep it locked up in vaults.
Diamonds are sort of analogous. The big shiny ones are hard to buy so they're stored in vaults and not used very often. But unlike gold, which you can melt and reform, there are lots of little diamonds people don't like to look at, and they show up all over the place: drill bits, saws,
Everyone's got a theory (Score:2)
Bottom line is that it's all just talk and no one knows what's going to happen. That's kind of the beauty of it: it's an essentially worthless asset that only has value due to market forces. It's pure capitalism. Some people will guess right and make a profit, plenty others will guess wrong. All we can really do is watch it unfold. It probably makes for a great economics study.
Paypal effect (Score:2)
It's caused by Paypal and speculation. Remember, Paypal started allowing cryptocurrency trades a couple of weeks ago so everyone is hoping the mass influx of whales and fools will boost it.
Problem is, it's also Christmas, so people will be dumping soon in January to pay the bills.
And if you think people don't understand Paypal, thing about cryptocurrencies in general. After all, a lot of "I hate paypal" comes from people not understanding credit cards and how you can get your account locked as a regular mar
Not possible to have lower intrinsic value. (Score:1)
And..... (Score:2)
Bitcoin at $100,000 in 2021? Outrageous To Some, a No-Brainer for Backers
....and still utterly stupid to the rest of us.
Bitcoin: for the other 1% - that 1% being just the geeks this time around
Re: (Score:3)
LOLs a rich white guy throwing around a bunch of buzzwords on TV ("capable of storing and channelling energy over time without power loss") L! O! L!
This is a classic pump & dump scheme:
- Rich white guy gets a spot on some news segment
- Calls xxx "the next big thing - I invested, SO SHOULD YOU!!! BUY! BUY! BUY! "
- xxx temporarily goes up from above hype
- Rich white guy cashes out before xxx crashes, laughs at everybody else that loses their homes
Re: (Score:2)
Some people have a real life.
Yeah, like people with an actual nick.
Re: (Score:2)
Ooooh! I'm bookmarking this one - it'll be a perfect post for when bitcoin falls flat on its face!
Agreed!
It's been a decade now, time to wake up (Score:2)
People said Bitcoin at 1$ was not happening. Then they said similar things when Bitcoin's value reached 10$. And then 100$, 1000$ and 10K$.
Big money is just starting to enter the picture (banks, financial institutions, etc). If you think 100K$ Bitcoin is outrageous, you better start searching for more words to describe your astonishment when it reaches 1M$ in 2030~2035.
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't the first exchange sell bitcoin at $1 and didn't it go to $10 within a week of the exchange being opened? I think you're talking crap.
could quintuple! (Score:2)
Yes, it could quintuple. It could go to 5X as easily as 1/5X. There is no way to determine it's future value, because it has no present value.
If it's value was based on sunspot activity, there are a small number of people who might wager a good guess on it's future value.
If it's value was based on the suborbital spin of the Hydrogen atom electron, there are a small number of people who might wager a good guess on it's future value.
But because it's value has no basis on anything in this universe, it's impo
BTC != Bitcoin (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin Price Drops Almost $3,000 (Score:1)
Investment vehicle for WallSt. (Score:2)
!money.
Money is a store of value, currency and medium of exchange.
In other news.... (Score:2)
Bear shits in woods.
It comes as no shock that people who have invested in Bitcoin want to talk up the possibility of it going to $100,000. How else are they going to convince idiots to buy it from them at more than they paid for it? Every idiot they convince to buy is another dollar in their pocket. It won't be long before it's reaching the point of being like Russian Roulette.
No big deal (Score:2)
My income more than doubled in a week once. When I was a kid my allowance went from $2 to $5. Based on this, I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect my income to once again double, any day now.
Before We Read this Article (Score:2)
Prior to reading this, I want to see MSMASH and Slashdot come out and tell us all how much they own in Bitcoins. Just so we know how much they're pumping this up.
Clearly Slashdot is not well-educated on Crypto (Score:1)
Reading through these comments is incredibly stupid. And some of the comments in the article were incredibly stupid too.
One word: Scarcity. There will only ever be 21 Million BTC. That's a very rare commodity on a planet with 7+ Billion humans.
The volume arguments would make sense if we were experiencing the consumer fomo from 2017. But we're not.
Pretty much ALL investment analysts have lost faith in governments and the stock market. We know how ludicrously inflated a lot of these numbers are, and we