Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Japan

Dust From Japan's Asteroid-Blasting Probe Returns to Earth (ibtimes.com) 29

Long-time Slashdot reader reminds us that in 1999 scientists discovered the asteroid Ryugu flying 300 million kilometres (or 186,411,357 miles) from earth. In 2014, Japan launched a probe to collect samples from it.

Today those samples returned to earth.

The International Business Times shares pictures and report: In a streak of light across the night sky, samples collected from a distant asteroid arrived on Earth after being dropped off by Japanese space probe Hayabusa-2. Scientists hope the precious samples, which are expected to amount to no more than 1 gram of material, could help shed light on the origin of life and the formation of the universe. [That's 0.00220462262185 pounds.]

The capsule carrying samples entered the atmosphere just before 2:30 am Japan time (1730 GMT Saturday), creating a shooting-star-like fireball as it entered Earth's atmosphere. "Six years and it has finally come back to Earth," an official narrating a live broadcast of the arrival said, as images showed officials from Japan's space agency JAXA cheering and pumping their fists in excitement... The capsule was recovered in the southern Australian desert, and will now be processed before being sent to Japan...

The probe collected both surface dust and pristine material from below the surface that was stirred up by firing an "impactor" into the asteroid. The material collected from the asteroid is believed to be unchanged since the time the universe was formed...

Scientists are especially keen to discover whether the samples contain organic matter, which could have helped seed life on Earth.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Dust From Japan's Asteroid-Blasting Probe Returns to Earth

Comments Filter:
  • And to how many decimal places?

    WTF.

  • by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Sunday December 06, 2020 @01:12AM (#60799468)

    1 gram of material ... [That's 0.00220462262185 pounds.]

    Editor: People don't know what grams are!
    Writer: Wait but we do use grams someti-
    Editor: CONVERT IT TO SOMETHING PEOPLE KNOW!
    Writer: So... to the nearest trillionth of a pound?
    Editor: Exactly!

    • A gram of water is one cubic centimeter. Steel would be approximately one-eighth of that. To put it in other terms, if you dropped the sample onto shag carpet you'd never find it.
      • Well, first, I doubt the density of mostly loose dust is equal to the density of steel; but even supposing it is, one eight of a cubic centimeter is still a cube of 0.5 cm on a side, so it's not quite so small. It would be the same size as a small six faced die [dicegamedepot.com]

    • CONVERT IT TO SOMETHING PEOPLE KNOW

      People here should have an idea of what a gram represents.

    • by dsvilko ( 217134 )

      Even worse, it's up to 0.00220462262185 pounds. That's a truly weirdly specific (approximate) upper limit.

    • But how many football fields would it cover, assumed you make all the molecules to distance in the way of social distancing? These are the questions people need to know these day.

    • by Falos ( 2905315 )

      I rather doubt the sample measures at 1.00000000000 grams either.

    • Writer: So... to the nearest trillionth of a pound?

      That would be stupidly imprecise. Which is why the writer actually gave the value to the nearest hundred trillionth. 14 decimal places.

      Sigh. Science writers should be required to take at least one basic chemistry or laboratory physics class. You know, where they cover significant digits. Also, it would have been better to present it as a fraction of an ounce, rather than a pound... "0.04 ounces", or "1/25th of an ounce" or if you want to stick to the power-of-2 fractions common with Imperial units, "1/32n

    • by dwywit ( 1109409 )

      Just don't put any epileptic folk on the research team, please.

      And make sure ALL the safety cut-off nodes are operational.

  • Well done (Score:4, Insightful)

    by hcs_$reboot ( 1536101 ) on Sunday December 06, 2020 @03:43AM (#60799640)
    Well done, Japan! That's was not an easy job.
  • ...a meteor rain?

    Like a "non-happy" ending Armageddon movie?

  • So: speaking of movies, anyone watched Andromeda Strain lately? No, the GOOD one in 1971, not the 2008 made-to-show-commercials MiniSeries.

    So it's really cool how in 1969 we faked the moon landing becuase it was "much too hard" (a la Crapricorn One 1976) but a mere 40 years later Japan and China can call out for moon-dust and such and get it successfully delivered by drone.

    Maybe Bezos is right -- drone delivery, not human drivers, *IS* the future.
  • one of these [dreamstime.com] to stop it going all over the place and making a mess.

  • by dsvilko ( 217134 ) on Sunday December 06, 2020 @05:15AM (#60799750)

    Not since the Solar system formed?
    Small white particles called CAI-s (calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions), found in meteorites, are the oldest condensed matter in our solar system. Even though you can have nano-diamonds that are thought to be even older (formed by a nearby supernova shortly before out Solar system was formed), as far as I know, the bulk of meteoritic material is younger than CAI-s (4.567 billion years old).

    As for the possibility of organic chemistry, I would be extremely surprised if none was found. The material that is spectroscopical match to the asteroid Ryugu has been studied through multiple meteorites and all meteorites of that type have been found to contain organic compounds.

  • ...shoot a bullet into an asteroid

  • Oops - Bye (Score:4, Funny)

    by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Sunday December 06, 2020 @06:37AM (#60799852)
    Ahh... Choo! Sorry.
  • by dwywit ( 1109409 ) on Sunday December 06, 2020 @07:29AM (#60799894)

    The sample is going to be assessed briefly at an Australian lab before being returned to Japan.

    There might be one or two Aussie scientists tempted to include an image of Godzilla in the package.

    Or a tentacle.

    But they'd never tamper with the evidence to include some octopus or squid DNA. Never.

This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough hunchbacks.

Working...