A Successful Experiment Gets Us One Step Closer To a Quantum Internet (engadget.com) 42
Earlier this week, a team of researchers announced that they successfully teleported qubits of photons across approximately 27 miles of fiber-optic cable. Engadget reports: While other scientists have worked on similar projects, this group is the first to beam quantum information across such a great distance. What's more, they did so across two separate networks and with a fidelity greater than 90 percent. One of the researchers on the team told Motherboard they built the networks using "off-the-shelf" components, and that their tech is compatible with existing telecommunications equipment.
In PRX Quantum, where the team published its findings, they say their work provides "a realistic foundation for a high-fidelity quantum Internet with practical devices." They added, "this is a key achievement on the way to building a technology that will redefine how we conduct global communication." Experts believe a quantum internet could revolutionize a variety of computing fields, including cryptography and search. [...] With two 13-mile networks under their belts, the Caltech and Fermilab teams plan to build a city-scale network called the Illinois Express Quantum Network in Chicago next.
In PRX Quantum, where the team published its findings, they say their work provides "a realistic foundation for a high-fidelity quantum Internet with practical devices." They added, "this is a key achievement on the way to building a technology that will redefine how we conduct global communication." Experts believe a quantum internet could revolutionize a variety of computing fields, including cryptography and search. [...] With two 13-mile networks under their belts, the Caltech and Fermilab teams plan to build a city-scale network called the Illinois Express Quantum Network in Chicago next.
Fuck Charter (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
i'm guessing the early adopters would be financial institutions and the military
in both cases speed trumps all else, and cost is a very distance concern.
Re: Fuck Charter (Score:1)
just in time (Score:3)
Hello (Score:1)
World
I builda tha new-internet! (Score:2)
Jian Yang!!!
Boy, do I miss that TV serie.
So What? (Score:2)
If my packet goes via a "quantum" link, does that improve the quality of my life any? I don't think so.
If the link is secured by one of the quantum privacy schemes, how is that better than the rather effective cryptographic algorithms we use today?
The world is already running according to the rules of quantum physics. Isolating particles so they behave more quantumly is not magic, it's just difficult however the doers of quantum doings still needs to find an application that is in some way better than what
Re: (Score:1)
The implication is that they can also eliminate the part of the transmission latency that is a function of the distance of the end points. That's gonna improve your Quake score a lot.
Re: (Score:2)
No latency improvement (Score:2)
The implication is that they can also eliminate the part of the transmission latency that is a function of the distance of the end points.
No they can't because to read the teleported quantum states they need additional information that is sent through classic channels, not faster than light.
Why is this forgotten every time?
Re: (Score:2)
Why is this forgotten every time?
Most posters know nothing about modern physics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: So What? (Score:2)
Correct me if I am wrong, but its still limited to the speed of light, correct?
Re: (Score:2)
You're "partially wrong". The quantum state transportation is instantaneous. In fact it's probably faster than that, being backdated to when the correlation was created. But you can't interpret it until you receive some information which comes at regular network speeds.
Re: (Score:2)
True. I tend to believe the Wheeler MultiWorld hypothesis, which implies it however. But you're right, there's no way to test.
Re: (Score:2)
You're "partially wrong". The quantum state transportation is instantaneous. In fact it's probably faster than that, being backdated to when the correlation was created. But you can't interpret it until you receive some information which comes at regular network speeds.
It's like a one time pad you can bring into being in two places instantaneously, but the message protected by the pad needs to travel at under the speed of light.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: So What? (Score:2)
If we could overcome it, then us from the future probably would have told us how by now.
Re: (Score:1)
You're assuming that it would have told everyone, instead of just me.
How does a quantum state "keep" ..? (Score:1)
Physics question --
My understanding is that (1) quantum states are stored in photons, or other similarly small particles.
Further, that (2) a quantum state becomes actual, rather than potential, once it has some kind of interaction with -- just about anything. That quantum states are in some sense, "fragile."
Further, my understanding is that, (3) if a photon travels through the air, or bounces off a wall in a fiber optic cable, -- pretty much anything other than the vacuum of space, that it's likely that th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The question is "how can you transmit quantum
entagled photons through a fibre optic cable, when
that cable is made of atoms that should cause the
transmitted photon to decohere"?
Re: (Score:1)
Teleportation? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Teleportation? (it is not) (Score:2)
Now where's my several million dollars?
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much. The only difference is that the color of the marble is fixed all along, but you can't prove that the value of the quantum state was fixed until you look at it. I happen to believe that it was fixed, but then I also believe in the Wheeler multiverse...which implies that. Many other interpretations of quantum physics imply that it's uncertain until you look.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
1. Deconstruct the object
2. Send the deconstructed bits elsewhere
3. Reconstruct those bits at the destination
Without step 2, all you have done is cloned the object. So how do you propose we accomplish step 2 without a cable?
Re: (Score:2)
A simple question for Physicists (Score:3)
Okay, maybe not so simple. I have a few questions.
Quantum encryption is most emphasized in popular media but the below popular summary on PRX Quantum is intriguing.
1. Is there a maximum speed at which useful information can be transmitted? I am guessing it is c, except for within an entangled computation in which basically two points are in the same place informationwise. Correct?
2. Once a quantum connection is transmitted as in the experiment, does this connection provide a layer over which a file can be sent for a limited time, in which your data does not travel over the fiber as photons but rather is communicated by reading states of one side of the pair? Or is it limited to basically "sharing a password"?
3. The term "quantum resources" is intriguing and not so clear to a layman.. Is it implied that two quantum computers of 50 qubits in different cities could be connected such that a single 100 qubit entangled computation could be performed? or is there a physical impossibility due to noise, etc.?
Re: A simple question for Physicists (Score:2)
I have a quantum bridge for sale if you're interested, buy now and I'll throw in some free AI.
Re: (Score:2)
1. The maximum transmission speed is still c. The wikipedia article on quantum teleportation is fairly straightforward on this. In order to do quantum teleportation, Alice and Bob each need one of a pair of entangled photons. In order to teleport a photon, Alice entangles it with her shared entangled one, applies some quantum gates, and makes some measurements that result in 2 classical bits. She sends those bits to Bob using a standard classical channel, who applies a different set of quantum gates to h
They are way behind (Score:2)
What's going to happen to Internet Protocol? (Score:2)
IPv6.1? IPv6.q?
IPv8?
IPvQ?
90% huh (Score:1)
Well, I would say that level of accuraci is pretty good.