Google's Annual Spectacle at CES is No More, With Tech Show Going Virtual

One of the biggest disappointments from CES 2021 going virtual will be the lack of a splashy booth by Google. Whether you cared about the company's bevy of Google Assistant-related announcements, it was hard to deny the stagecraft employed by the tech giant. From a report: For the last few years, Google boasted some of the most eye-catching CES booths, from a theme park ride in 2019 to an escape room back in January's show. Unlike other CES heavy hitters, like Samsung or LG, Google opted to place its typically massive "activations" in the parking lot in front of the Las Vegas Convention Center, suddenly making that a trendy spot to place a booth. Google's booths largely pushed the benefits of Google Assistant, underscoring the importance of the digital assistant as it scrambled to claw back market share from Amazon's Alexa, which had a head start in the area thanks to Amazon's array of Echo speakers. Indeed, Google and its Assistant were part of a battle waged over digital assistants at past CES shows, with extravagant booths and with partners announcing that their respective assistants would come embedded in a new television, car or some other gadget. But with CES going virtual, a move dictated by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, many of the show's biggest names are opting to skip the show. Google will hold partner meetings, but it won't have a large presence at the show, according to a spokesman. It's not alone -- the Consumer Technology Association said it expects about 1,000 exhibitors at the virtual show, less than a quarter of the total from the January confab.

Google assistant

[timeOday]

If they are announcing updates to google assistant, I am still waiting for the simplest thing in the world, which is to tell my phone to play a certain album that is stored on my phone, with no cell service required.

Thanks ahead of time google.

Re:Google assistant

[PolygamousRanchKid]

I am still waiting for the simplest thing in the world, which is to tell my phone to play a certain album that is stored on my phone

How would Google make money on that . . . ?

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

I am still waiting for the simplest thing in the world, which is to tell my phone to play a certain album that is stored on my phone

How would Google make money on that . . . ?

For the overwhelming majority of people, the phone would be connected at some point. Google would at that point gather data on what you'd been listening to which would help them to target advertising to you of products that correlate well with those musical choices. I don't know whether that sort of thing is enough to support Google Assistant but it's a large part of how Google makes their money on other services.

Re:

[thegarbz]

hahahaha. Hey everyone, look over here! This guy stores music on his phone! hahahaha.

Re:

[Nkwe]

On the topic or other "simple" things that should just work is the voice interface for navigation with Google Maps. When I am driving down the freeway and would like a drive through drink or snack and say "Ok Google, add Wendy's (or McDonald's, whatever) to route", I would like Google to do something intelligent when there is more than one option. Currently it just displays the options on the screen (in tiny text on the map) and I have to look at the screen and touch select one. It's dangerous because I hav

Re:

[Actually, I do RTFA]

updates to google assistant, I am still waiting for the simplest thing in the world...with no cell service required.

Isn't the voice recognition cloud based? Not the "listen for the awake word", but the actual processing?