Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Social Networks

Dropping WhatsApp? Despite Privacy Concerns, Nostalgia Drives Users to ICQ (wsj.com) 59

Here's an interesting tidbit from The Wall Street Journal: ICQ was a pioneering, mid-1990s internet messaging service then used on bulky PCs on dial-up. It was a precursor to AOL Instant Messenger, and was last in vogue when the TV show "Friends" was in its prime and PalmPilots were cutting edge.

It's been modernized over the years, and now is an app for smartphones. Lately it has skyrocketed up Hong Kong's app charts, with downloads jumping 35-fold in the week ending Jan. 12.

"It recalls my childhood memories," said 30-year-old risk consultant Anthony Wong, who used ICQ when he was in grade school. He has since connected with more than two dozen friends on the platform after some bristled this month at a privacy policy update by WhatsApp that would allow some data to be stored on parent Facebook Inc.'s servers.

Back in 1998 Slashdot's CmdrTaco wrote a story about ICQ being ported to Palm Pilot, and linked to a Wired story about ICQ security flaws. In fact, you can almost tell the history of ICQ just with Slashdot headlines.

- AIM and ICQ to be Integrated (2002)

- Russian Company Buys ICQ (2010)

What's happened since? ICQ's entry on Wikipedia cites a 2018 article in a Russia newspaper.
According to a Novaya Gazeta article published in May 2018, Russian intelligence agencies have access to online reading of ICQ users' correspondence. The article examined 34 sentences of Russian courts, during the investigation of which the evidence of the defendants' guilt was obtained by reading correspondence on a PC or mobile devices. Of the fourteen cases in which ICQ was involved, in six cases the capturing of information occurred before the seizure of the device.

The reason for the article was the blocking of the Telegram service and the recommendation of the Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation Herman Klimenko to use ICQ instead.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Dropping WhatsApp? Despite Privacy Concerns, Nostalgia Drives Users to ICQ

Comments Filter:
  • Tried it a couple of years ago. It looked like the last msn messenger with a nice clean UI. None of my friends used it and I could not get them to try it. I would not be worried about some russian guy reading my messages, since I am not from there.

  • Why? (Score:5, Funny)

    by GuB-42 ( 2483988 ) on Sunday January 24, 2021 @10:01PM (#60987550)

    ICQ never was considered secure or private. I was even a bit shady. It was one of the first and benefited from network effects but what does it have now?

    If your reason for switching is security, stay on WhatsApp, it is not that bad. It is still among the best actually. If you want to switch to Signal (good) or Telegram (not as good), I can understand, but why ICQ?

    • by Amouth ( 879122 )

      for the fog horn of course

    • It is absolutely not among the best!

      Tell me: What use is a super-secure tunnel between the base of you and your friend, if both bases are staffed entirely with enemy soldiers with constant radio communication home, that refuse to tell you what they are even doing?!

    • Re:Why? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by BlackBilly ( 7624958 ) on Sunday January 24, 2021 @10:52PM (#60987634)

      If your reason for switching is security, stay on WhatsApp,

      What if I think that Mark Zuckerberg is a threat to our security, and that supporting his business supports that threat?

      • Then I have to ask... Why are you thinking this just NOW?
      • What if I think that Mark Zuckerberg is a threat to our security, and that supporting his business supports that threat?

        Then switch to Signal, the OP already said that.

    • Here is why (Score:5, Informative)

      by Laxator2 ( 973549 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @04:52AM (#60988310)

      I installed WhatsApp on my phone under pressure from my employers. Suddenly, my phone went from 5 days on a charge (mostly on stand-by) to half a day on a charge.
      I therefore decided to unistall WhatsApp, and guess what ? During the uninstall process it popped up a message informing me that WhatsApp took ownership of my contact list and therefore will wipe it out, which it did. No "Cancel" button to be able to back up the contact list.
      I guess these two reasons are enough to never look at WhatsApp ever again.

      • by mattr ( 78516 )

        Was this on Android?

      • I mean good for you for not using any data apps I guess. That's not a WhatsApp problem, that's a use problem. Apps which rely on push notification need to use data, so you can't expect 5 days on a modern smartphone while still getting push notifications.

        For the majority of us WhatsApp doesn't even feature in the top 10 battery drainers even when we do actively use it.

        Mind you you said "half a day" so I either call bullshit, or you legitimately had a bug. My 5 year old phone with a degraded battery happily g

      • Definitely a common problem with Facebook related apps. I recently installed the Facebook Messenger app on my phone because I was trying to sell something on their marketplace, and immediately remembered why I got rid of it so many years ago. My phone easily eats up an extra 30% battery a day, and I only sent/received about 10 messages. I'm uninstalling as soon as I'm done selling the item.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Is that an iPhone? Or very long ago?

        In any case if you need to use WhatsApp for some reason there is a great open source app called Shelter that lets you isolate apps using an Android feature designed to separate personal and work stuff. Then it can't access things like your contacts at all, and you can control how it is allowed to run etc.

      • Remember the first facebook app? I never installed it but it was in the news big time. It also took over your contacts list, send it to facebook, and then wiped it. Very classy.

        One is left with the takeaway that one should never install an app from facebook on their phone. But you knew that before, right?

        BYOD is an abomination which should never, ever happen. EVER. If your employer wants you to have an app on a phone, they should give you the phone. Any employer which is unwilling to do that is a shitheel.

      • WhatsApp took ownership of my contact list and therefore will wipe it out, which it did.

        I would rather blame the OS than the app

  • So I had not thought about ICQ in years, probably 10-15 or so. Story prompted me to download the app. Somehow I remembered my UIN and guessed my password - boom logged in! Unfortunately they did not preserve the contact lists from ages ago. A quick search revealed other users on Reddit encountered the same problem. So close but so far. Would have been amazing to contact people from ages ago... I'm talking AGES ago, like this was the main form of communication for BattleTech Solaris, if any of you are old
    • The contact list was not srored on the server, afaik!
      I think that wasn't a thing until later.
      You need to find an old backup and restore it!

      (I've got, like, five UINs... and the pasword for none of them. :/ I keep them until I manage to look up the file format and hope the password is stored in there so I can use a a rainbow table. Thougg technically, one could graft the backup to work for a newly created UIN. But I guess that will take even more work.)

      • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

        Why'd you have to tell me that, now I'm going to have to spend a perfectly good afternoon going through the stack of old drives in the cabinet behind me, trying to find one from the late 90's with ICQ installed on it to recover my UIN list lol...
      • I've still got my UIN and password, but I'm not going to download and run random binary from dodgy company with a horribly bad security record. So I tried the web app. Stopped when it wanted my phone number for no good reason. Bye forever ICQ. Was fun back in the day.

  • by khchung ( 462899 ) on Sunday January 24, 2021 @10:07PM (#60987566) Journal

    Putting politics and ideology aside, unless you are planning to subvert your own country, it make sense to use a service that is hosted locally. (If you planned to go against a nation state, your own or otherwise, you better consult experts rather than relying on what you read on the web.)

    Not only would a foreign company unlikely to respect your privacy or your country's data privacy laws (if any), they could be forced to terminate your service if things get ugly between your country and theirs. The latter used to be quite farfetched and unlikely, until the last two years.

    For people in countries without any local companies offering these services, I can only offer my consolation.

    • They tried that. They tried to kill Telegram (run from Germany now) which is also of Russian origin and push people to ICQ and VK Messenger.

      However, their own public ended up being MUCH MORE PRIVACY CONSCIOUS than ours. They refused to budge.

      As a result of the conflict, Telegram bomproofed itself to a point where it is virtually impossible to exterminate. One year later, on the QT, they made it an essential communication service. We will never know if there was an agreement of some sorts behind the ceas

      • Eventually the only people in Russia using Twitter will be disinformation bots and the IRA agents that run them...
        • Eventually the only people in Russia using Twitter will be disinformation bots and the IRA agents that run them...

          To be precise - the 77th brigade contractors that run them. I have yet to run into a Russian speaking IRA agent on Russian speaking media. Plenty of 77th Brigade staff working for an English speaking handler though. They are very easy to discern - the backend software was probably written by Capita in the same sweatshop as the UK army HR system.

          A quick howto on how to spot the Troll

          1. Use of an account by multiple people in shifts and cross-post of identical content on multiple channels without marking

    • In the US, apparently it's the "in" thing to publish your seditious attack's on the Nation's capital directly on the most public social media forums one can find. Don't bother even bothering to do anything securely, make sure any nearby camera can clearly see your face. Also, the big thing is to make sure you have MANY far-right posts on your social media all in public to make it easy for law enforcement to come find you after matching your face with pictures from inside the Capital Building. Another fun
  • It's real nice for things like Linux distribution support or programming language chats. Because you know that a certain kind of people will never get there. The kind that are the reason why we otherwise can't have nice things.

    Of course, real cool people use write/wall. ;)

  • The thought that Russians might read your inane messages is very worrying, as opposed to NSA doing the same. That one should fill you with warm thoughts of safety like a good citizen!
  • Something that's become more and more obvious lately is that human beings follow the path of least resistance. They join whatever network is most convenient to them, regardless of any consequences outside of convenience.

    • All those fools trying to save a few cents on mailing a post card when a proper envelope gives you more privacy.

  • by Jason Straight ( 58248 ) on Sunday January 24, 2021 @10:59PM (#60987652) Homepage

    I don't use whatsapp anyway, but I really just got sick of the fact that chat wasn't all end to end, and that they required identifying information, and that they lacked configuration that I remembered having on ICQ clients.

    Then I found element.io on the matrix.org network. No identification, end to end encryption, distributed network, ability to set different notifications per chat (a big plus for me to know if I need to look at my phone/application right away), etc.

    • by skerit ( 1182237 )
      I really love the idea behind Matrix! How it's a federated system, so you can run your own server but still seamlessly talk to people on other networks. Kind of like e-mail. The only downside is the client support. Element.io is trying to do *a lot* and doesn't really succeed at anything.
  • If somebody is going to bring up that dinosaur I guess I should show my head, being a dinosaur myself.

  • That is all.

    • by Shaitan ( 22585 )

      Mod up. Nuff said.

    • I got this sound clip and put it on my phone as my text message notification sound.

      Its fun when you are out in public and it goes off and you see someone's head snap up and look around. Its like "they know".

  • by EkriirkE ( 1075937 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @02:57AM (#60988148) Homepage
    It's run by Russia's mail.ru, the interface is incredibly bloated and it has a shit ton of OS tie-ins/monitors and permission requests. It's spyware.
  • by pele ( 151312 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @03:51AM (#60988226) Homepage

    I had icq on palm dialling out to freeserve over IR on my nokia 8210.
    It was hard work.

  • I use Whatsapp with European friends and also to chat with relatives overseas. Though for my own family, since we all got iPhones we use iMessage a lot, that and WhatsApp. Actually being on the family iMessage and iPhotos were the two main reasons to switch from Galaxy to iPhone. That, and Samsung's refusal to support repair on an old model. My main issue now is I do not want Facebook to social graph me based on my WhatsApp and exploit what I consider private messaging. I haven't been using Signal or Telegr

  • Those who don't understand IRC are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
    • by fazig ( 2909523 )
      So do you no longer need a BNC to receive messages in your absence?
      If you still need one, then it's like YOU who doesn't understand the appeal that most people see in instant messengers.
      • I agree that IRC is rather clunky, and I haven't used it in recent years. However, the point is that instant messaging should be something really simple. It doesn't make sense that every year or so, a new fashionable closed-source app comes about and people need to switch to it just to type some text.
        • by fazig ( 2909523 )
          Peer pressure I assume.

          There was a time where I used multi-protocol instant messengers like Miranda IM. There I had IRC, ICQ, XMPP, and others.
          Some people I knew would only use XMPP because of its encryption features. Some people could be reached via ICQ, and others had their BNCs on various IRC networks (QuakeNet mostly). Around the time where facebook came up and everyone had to go there, I told myself to screw it and stood away from anything new. And as the contacts on those old platforms went inactiv
          • Around the time where facebook came up and everyone had to go there, I told myself to screw it and stood away from anything new. And as the contacts on those old platforms went inactive as well I stopped using those as well.

            However as a result I'm left out of a couple of things that are exclusively organized on platforms like facebook.

            I got a Facebook account when my amateur theatre groups moved their communications from mailing lists to FB. It works fine for such limited "work" uses, I don't have to live my whole life there.

            • by fazig ( 2909523 )
              Facebook became popular nearing the end of my University time in Germany.
              It became popular enough to be used as an example in a data protection & data privacy class that I took. Being from Romania and having seen what mass surveillance can do if it is combined with a state that does not respect human rights (see Securitate in Socialist Romania [wikipedia.org]) I have a certain bias against anyone who collects a lot of data about people. As I went to school in Germany, I've also learned extensively about Germany's hist

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...