Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Japan Technology

Myopia Correcting 'Smart Glasses' From Japan To Be Sold in Asia (nikkei.com) 66

Can a pair of unique spectacles banish nearsightedness without surgical intervention? Japan's Kubota Pharmaceutical Holdings says its wearable device can do just that, and it plans to start releasing the product in Asia, where many people grapple with myopia. From a report: The device, which the company calls Kubota Glasses or smart glasses, is still being tested. It projects an image from the lens of the unit onto the wearer's retina to correct the refractive error that causes nearsightedness. Wearing the device 60 to 90 minutes a day corrects myopia according to the Japanese company.

Kubota Pharmaceutical has not disclosed additional details on how the device works. Through further clinical trials, it is trying to determine how long the effect lasts after the user wears the device, and how many days in total the user must wear the device to achieve a permanent correction for nearsightedness. Myopia is often results from the cornea and the retina in the eye being too far apart. This inhibits the proper focusing of light as it enters the eye and causes distant objects to look blurry. Asian are prone to nearsightedness. Of people aged 20 and under, 96% of South Koreans, 95% of Japanese, 87% of Hong Kongers, 85% of Taiwanese and 82% of Singaporeans are affected by the condition, according to Kubota.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Myopia Correcting 'Smart Glasses' From Japan To Be Sold in Asia

Comments Filter:
  • consider.
    do these lenses work on varying the product advertising and posted articles of the various social media sites

  • A solution for kids under 20 is great. Solutions for presbyopia would be great too.

    • Wow...those glasses look fucking stupid.

      BUT...if they worked, hell, I could wear them a bit maybe early morning or late night when no one is looking....since it says you don't have to wear them all the time.

      But, I"m skeptical how wearing special glasses can help a physical eye defect....?

      • Re:older adults (Score:4, Interesting)

        by Joce640k ( 829181 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @05:34PM (#60990892) Homepage

        But, I"m skeptical how wearing special glasses can help a physical eye defect....?

        Your eyes use muscles to focus and change the shape of the eyeball. These glasses give them a workout.

        • Your eyes use muscles to focus and change the shape of the eyeball. These glasses give them a workout.

          Which is why it is suggested you should stop looking at your monitor and focus on distant objects for several minutes (10 - 15?) each hour. It forces your eye muscles to focus back and forth.
          • The suggested mechanism for myopia is that the lens changes shape from focusing the lens to create near sight.
            If you are looking at a distant object, the eye can do the opposite.
            If this device is based on that theory, then what it will try to do is to add somewhere between +0,5 to +2 to your current prescription when you are trying to read text, which means you are forced to use far focus instead of near focus, assuming the user is taught that you are suppose to keep everything at a normal reading distance.

        • Yeah, except the idea is about 150 years old, and has never been shown to work with eyesight. It's on a par with the idea that eating Graham crackers will eliminate your interest in sex. Smells like good old-fashioned quackery, now with "quantum".

          • by NFN_NLN ( 633283 )

            > It's on a par with the idea that eating Graham crackers will eliminate your interest in sex.

            I think it's working...

        • Complete horseshit. That's the so-called 'Bates Method'. It is nothing but quackery, albeit quackery that has taken in a lot of famous people (Aldous Huxley comes to mind.)

          If that's how these glasses work, somebody has been conned.

        • No, they don't. They use *a* muscle [wikipedia.org] to change the shape of the lens.
  • by holophrastic ( 221104 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @04:35PM (#60990638)

    Tell me to wear the smart glasses an hour every morning, when I wake up and eat breakfast, and then I can take them off for the remainder of my day. That'd already be swell enough.

  • Nobody looks away, even to avoid the oncoming train.

  • Editors, EDIT FFS !
    Or, as you can't be bothered to do this one, maybe get another job ?

    • by Arethan ( 223197 )

      This is slashdot. Editors here are merely responsible for pressing the publish button for slashvertisements and articles that stroke their personal fancy.

  • by DarkRookie2 ( 5551422 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @04:38PM (#60990650)
    Whole lot of not enough info.
  • by b0bby ( 201198 )

    I don't understand why a Japanese company, which is planning to sell devices in Asia, would test on 25 people in the US.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      They probably needed to go to a 3rd world country to be allowed to test this ;-)

      In all seriousness though, Japan has very strict laws for personal injury. Maybe that was the factor.

  • Seems plausible (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Spugglefink ( 1041680 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @04:51PM (#60990710)

    Back around the time when I was in high school, my nearsighted father was completely obsessed with the idea of correcting his vision without glasses. To make a long story short, several of the techniques he tried worked. More than once, he got himself checked out by an optometrist, and was found to have perfect 20/20 vision. The effect never lasted long, however. He had to do his funky eye massage and eye exercise dance regularly to maintain the effect. So when I read about these new glasses, I'm thinking they probably do something similar.

    • when I read about these new glasses, I'm thinking they probably do something similar.

      Which is good! You can wear them an hour a day when nobody is looking.

    • by pz ( 113803 )

      Yeah, I went to a seminar that talked about those eye exercises. Whenever I did them, my eyes felt better. Although I never had my visual acuity measured very accurately, I'm pretty sure I got close to single cone resolution when comparing abilities side-by-side with my friends. But decades have passed, and my ability to accommodate is shot (something to look forward to, you young whippersnappers!). There's no down side to doing the exercises -- they take little time and don't hurt in the least -- so ma

      • I never specified when "back in high school" was. Long enough ago that my ability to accommodate is also shot. I guess presbyopia is the great equalizer. No matter what your eyes are like in your youth, you're getting presbyopia.

        If it weren't for that, I'd be a lot more interested in the Japanese glasses. They probably work, and it's a cool concept.

      • This is quite similar to an EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) exercise. I was talking with my downstairs neighbor who works with autistic kids; we got to talking about ADD (it's on the spectrum and perhaps benefits from this too), OCD, PTSD.... she said there does seem to be some link with the eyes and information processing in this regard. Apparently it can help with the information moving from one hemisphere of the brain to the other??
        Seems to me that perhaps exercises like this could

      • by Jmc23 ( 2353706 )
        age has nothing to do with it. Except a lot of old people adopt the same habits. medical science in it's infancy and myopic vision tends to think that what is 'average' in a certain population, is 'normal' for humans. It's like they've never met culture.
        • by pz ( 113803 )

          Sorry, age has a lot to do with presbyopia, and the science is well-established. With age, the lens slowly thickens and stiffens, making it mechanically less pliable. Eventually, it becomes too thick to be modulated by the ciliary muscles. (Just wait until you hit your 50s and 60s, Mr. Snark.) As with nearly everything about the body, exercise helps, here by strengthening the ciliary muscles, but you can't currently undo the lens thickening without replacement with an IOL (intraocular lens). To the bes

          • by Jmc23 ( 2353706 )
            thanks for regurgitating the popular belief. Tell me, why does the lens only thicken and become stiff in certain individuals? You conflate culture and normal too much.
    • by Jmc23 ( 2353706 )
      you have to keep correcting your vision if you insist on keeping the habits that made it deteriorate in the first place. This is the hardest thing to change because it is literally the way you look at things.
  • Link to PR release (Score:5, Informative)

    by craighansen ( 744648 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @04:56PM (#60990732) Journal

    As the OP link is behind a paywall, I looked up the PR release that the article was likely generated from:

    https://www.kubotaholdings.co.... [kubotaholdings.co.jp]

    The release claim the device corrects myopia by projecting a peripheral image that stimulates the eye to develop in a way to impede myopia development, while allowing central vision to be maintained in focus.

  • by hey! ( 33014 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @05:01PM (#60990746) Homepage Journal

    said no company about its products ever.

    Maybe this *does* work, but there's a long, long history of sight correction quackery. I'll believe it when a systemic review in a medical journal confirms it.

    Kubota began clinical trials on the device last July after confirming the therapeutic effect of the mechanism using a desktop system.

    In other words, they convinced *themselves* this thing works and now they're trying to prove it in a way that would convince other people. I wish them luck, but I'm not holding my breath.

    • by Cyberax ( 705495 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @05:10PM (#60990798)
      Well, with eyesight the effect is REALLY easy to test.
    • by nwaack ( 3482871 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @05:17PM (#60990824)
      My vision is pretty crummy and I need to wear glasses practically every second I'm awake. If this improved my vision I'd know as soon as I put my regular glasses on because the prescription would be off and my vision would be fuzzy. If it didn't work everything would look like it normally does when I'm wearing glasses. That is most definitely not the placebo effect.
    • eyesight is one of the easiest things to verify if it worked or not, the tests for eyesight are well known. This also isn't a flyby night quackery company, it has been doing vision research and producing products for 20 yearrs.
      • by hey! ( 33014 )

        Nonetheless, myths and quacks on eyesight improvement thrive. That's why the gold standard in science is a *blinded* placebo controlled study. Even those usually don't get replicated.

        Understand I'm not saying the company is dishonest. I'm saying they're not *objective*.

        • the thing with eyesight is you can either see or you can't, vision has improved or it hasn't, eyesight can be measured without the participants mental interference unlike many other drugs and devices where the users view of how they "feel" or whether they think they are better is part of the data (hence the need for placebo). Eyesight is easily independently verified, even if a fake device worked in a placebo manner it would still mean they have discovered an effective means for correcting eyesight. So eith
          • by pjt33 ( 739471 )

            I don't think it's as clear-cut as you say. It's not a question of being able to see or not see: it's a question of how finely you can resolve detail. Optometrists do this with A/B testing ("Is it better like this? Or like that? Like this? Or like that?") and while the differences are initially obvious they get to the point of being subjective. If we're talking a quarter-diopter improvement at the cutoff point where they'll prescribe glasses or not, it's probably not completely objective.

          • by Jmc23 ( 2353706 )
            actually, that's not how eyesight works. But not surprising you believe that since it's the most taught nonsense. Our culture will be better off once we actually start applying science to the myths of early medicine. Unfortunately, even with all the eye research done by real scientists, none of it ever seems to reach the people whose whole world is fit glasses, sell glasses.
    • by tflf ( 4410717 )

      said no company about its products ever.

      Maybe this *does* work, but there's a long, long history of sight correction quackery. I'll believe it when a systemic review in a medical journal confirms it.

      Kubota began clinical trials on the device last July after confirming the therapeutic effect of the mechanism using a desktop system.

      In other words, they convinced *themselves* this thing works and now they're trying to prove it in a way that would convince other people. I wish them luck, but I'm not holding my breath.

      Computer simulation before clinical trials is pretty much the norm these days, as is announcing positive results from the computer simulations before starting clinical trials. Successful simulations translate to successful trials a significant amount of the time.
      And there is a good body of past medical practice to support vision correction by muscular training. The obvious example: some of us are old enough to remember eye-patches covering the good eye to encourage the "lazy"eye to correct. Since overtaken

    • by Jmc23 ( 2353706 )
      Has there been a long history of quackery? Or a long history of those dependent on others wearing glasses suppressing anything that eliminates their livelihood? ...or both. You cant put the brakes on a billion dollar industry if you wanted to, even if it's destroying humans and the world. Welcome to capitalism!
  • by tchdab1 ( 164848 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @05:26PM (#60990854) Homepage

    My old school lenses "correct" my myopia. From the description, these apparently claim to cure it. Big difference.

  • Asian are prone to nearsightedness

    racists!!!

    • Re: Racists (Score:2, Interesting)

      by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 )

      Somebody: Asians usually live in Asia.
      You, a moron: Racists!!!

      Fun fact: You implying asians are a "race" is literally the definition of being a racist. (Definition, everywhere where education less outdated than a 100 years is available: Somebody who believes there is such a thing as races.)

      But hey, you also automatically imply hate, for whatever reason. So you're a fuckin prejudiced cunt too! Congatulations!

      • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

        Fun fact: You implying asians are a "race" is literally the definition of being a racist

        They could have said "continentist", but then nobody would know WTF they are talking about. The goals of being accurate and being understood without TLDR complaints are sometimes at odds.

  • by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Monday January 25, 2021 @05:40PM (#60990912)

    Let's send them to all our politicians.

  • but you can also see though women's clothes with these, for only $999.99.

  • In other news (Score:2, Informative)

    by XB-70 ( 812342 )
    A monkey flew out of my butt.
  • There are Trainings, Regimes and stuff to achieve this. Always have.

    Just like, for example you can't handle the weight of your bike, so you go to the gym and train for 2 hours every day 7/7 and then you can handle your bike like nothing for the 2 mile trip to and from your job. It works, but will you do it?

    This is the same thing, train your eyes for hours each day and from time to time, you'll be able to watch the next Tiger King stream from the second row.

  • There are a few places offering orthokeratology, contact lenses that reshape the cornea to correct vision. The claim is that it works but the effects are temporary: After a few days, eyes relax back into the old defect and the contacts have to be used periodically to maintain good vision. This is not what Kubota is doing.

    It looks like Kubota is trying to force the eye away from myopia, by projecting an image that is effectively too far away to focus on. Eye muscles will strain to focus the image, strengthen

  • How about we break up the oligopolies that have made correctional eyeglasses so damned expensive so that we don't need eGlasses as much.

  • The headline makes one think "How is this any different deom regular glasses??"

    [Apparently these are supposed to actually reshape the eye, and keep it fixed, even aftr usage. Which makes sense if you know how the body shapes itself. E.g. the soft shaping the hard, in the long run, and not vice versa.]

    • by ffkom ( 3519199 )
      And even then, it is not apparent why you could not achieve the same (eyeball shape changing, permanent) results by using ordinary, "non-smart" glasses - even if a few different ones had to be used over time.
  • why does this remind me of Steve Martin's movie "The Jerk." Remember the Opti-Grab

  • I say we start a GoFundMe page to buy a set for every member of Congress.

  • There is "better eyesight without glasses" book by William Bates.
    Even though his theories are arguable, even his opponents agree that exercises that he describes have positive effect.

    • by Jmc23 ( 2353706 )
      and many other books that followed by people like me who started questioning the severe cognitive dissonance needed to believe the current theory is correct, in face of all scientific evidence to the contrary, and then found Bates. It's interesting how many peoples stories include crying after being able to see the leaves on a tree. It's funny because i did it when i got my first pair of glasses in childhood, and then in adulthood when i got rid of my last pair of glasses.

BLISS is ignorance.

Working...