Trump Will Remain Off Facebook For At Least Two Years (politico.com) 244
Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump's account will remain suspended for at least two years, setting a timetable for his potential return after its oversight board criticized the company's indefinite ban. From a report: "Given the gravity of the circumstances that led to Mr. Trump's suspension, we believe his actions constituted a severe violation of our rules which merit the highest penalty available under the new enforcement protocols," Facebook's vice president of global affairs Nick Clegg said in a blog post. "We are suspending his accounts for two years, effective from the date of the initial suspension on January 7 this year." The social media giant said after that period it would evaluate whether "the risk to public safety has receded," and make a call on his possible reinstatement.
Now get everyone else (Score:5, Insightful)
They should kick EVERYONE off Facebook for 2 years. Would be a great improvement to society.
Re:Now get everyone else (Score:4, Interesting)
Define society. I believe underground music and comedy scenes are part of society and they would be completely demolished by this with whole generations not entire sure of how to find local gigs without it.
Then there's a whole lot of us who moved to other countries who find a social network quite convenient for keeping up with friends (actual friends) back home, and Facebook can go on a baby murdering spree but I'd still consider it better than writing shitty postcards. Remember postcards, and mail? There's little alternative to keeping up with large groups of people.
Facebook isn't all about arguing with anti-vaxxers and Trump apologists, and if you find the content on the site not to your liking, maybe that's the company you keep rather than a problem with Facebook itself.
Re: Now get everyone else (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I know what he said. You seem to have a strange view of the way people use "the Internet". Quite specifically the things I mentioned are not on "the Internet". They are relegated to small corners of highly popular social media. Tearing one down without first building another ends up being devastating to those who have built literally a way of doing business around those platforms. Just because there's still an Internet after Facebook doesn't make this less painful.
Re: (Score:2)
Define society. I believe underground music and comedy scenes are part of society and they would be completely demolished by this with whole generations not entire sure of how to find local gigs without it.
Then there's a whole lot of us who moved to other countries who find a social network quite convenient for keeping up with friends (actual friends) back home, and Facebook can go on a baby murdering spree but I'd still consider it better than writing shitty postcards. Remember postcards, and mail? There's little alternative to keeping up with large groups of people.
Facebook isn't all about arguing with anti-vaxxers and Trump apologists, and if you find the content on the site not to your liking, maybe that's the company you keep rather than a problem with Facebook itself.
This.
Facebook is the ultimate echo chamber, those people arguing with anti-vaxxers are doing it entirely out of their own violation.
I simply block the crap I don't like an unfriend the people that keep posting it. I'd rather have 40 good people who make me laugh and think than 400 scum that just end up annoying the living shit out of me. Facebook is meant to be about friends right, not connecting with anyone you have the tiniest interaction with.
My facebook is mostly full of jokes, memes and gener
Re: (Score:2)
You mean forever.
Some context... (Score:5, Informative)
Some important context: Trump has been pressing forward with a rumor that he'd be 'reinstated' in August. If my Facebook feed is any indication, people are starting to fall for it. After what happened in January there are definitely some valid concerns.
Re: (Score:2)
I loathe that fucker, but you have to wonder how much of what we read is true and how much not true. Does he really believe that, or is it made up shit the media is running with because it conforms to our preconceptions? At this stage I'd probably have to hear him say it himself to 100% believe it. Not that he's not a delusional, narcissistic lunatic - it's just that this recent bit of news about him thinking he'll be back in office soon is a *bit* too much on the nose.
Re: (Score:2)
The story I heard (take with a grain of salt...) is that the My Pillow guy said to Trump that he'd be 'reinstated' in August and Trump has been running with it ever since.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, if you're taking constitutional legal advice and predictions from a guy who runs a company that makes pillows from shredded foam, you're probably not getting the best advice.
Just saying.
Re:Some context... (Score:4, Informative)
Don’t forget he was a former crackhead, not even joking.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody's ever a "former" crackhead. He's a crackhead in remission. And that status is increasingly questionable.
Re: (Score:2)
The former alleged president does not believe in experts, they know more than he. So he goes with whatever moron at his level tells him something that he likes. That strategy works until the adults call him on it. Then he blusters and blows and declares whomever the adults are, that they have a vendetta against him. You can always predict his behavior if you consider he has the emotional age of a 13 year old who constantly is amazed at himself.
Re:Some context... (Score:5, Informative)
“In an interview with The Daily Beast, the controversial pillow mogul explained that recent comments from the former president at his Mar-a-Lago resort suggesting that he could be “reinstated”may actually stem from Lindell himself.
“If Trump is saying August, that is probably because he heard me say it publicly,” Mr Lindell said.
https://www.independent.co.uk/... [independent.co.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
Is Trump in the pocket of Big Pillow?
Re: (Score:2)
This rumor about Trump being reinstated started in the QAnon circles and elsewhere, and I think Trump is just picking it up from there and repeating it. Sidney "clown school dropout" Powell was definitely stating this earlier, except her time line sounded like June and not August. Mike Pillow was muttering something about it too. We're definitely hitting peak self-delusion levels.
Re: (Score:3)
The old game of the former alleged president's White House team was to seed conservative mouthpieces with whatever ideas they wanted reflected back to them so they could then announce that "people are talking about X". It's an even older game. A great example is in the movie Soapdish when Sally Field needs a pickme and has Woopie Goldberg loudly wonder if that is "she" on the escalator.
Nothing about the former alleged president is real, he's an entire Potemkin village on two legs.
Re: (Score:2)
You might get your chance to hear the full-on delusion live - he's going to be doing stupid rallies again this summer, and you already know he's going to sit there and pump out salty purple piss over the 2020 election. After all, he can't be seen as a loser, so he needs to try to frame it in any way he can as being stolen from him.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm here for it. I can't wait, at this point it's just a show, a joke. My life didn't get especially better or especially worse due to anything Trump or Obama did, and I doubt it will under Biden either. Fuck it, we're all femtosecond blips of sentient, meaningless matter in the span of an infinite universe in both time and space, at least keep me entertained.
Watching the absolute idiocy of Trump and his circus on one side and the only slightly less lunacy of the far left on the other side battle each other
Re: (Score:2)
I'm here for it. I can't wait, at this point it's just a show, a joke. My life didn't get especially better or especially worse due to anything Trump or Obama did, and I doubt it will under Biden either. Fuck it, we're all femtosecond blips of sentient, meaningless matter in the span of an infinite universe in both time and space, at least keep me entertained.
Following Trump's insanity is pretty entertaining, but do keep in mind that there are actual people (LGBTQ, minorities, immigrants) whose lives are significantly impacted by that shit.
Re: (Score:2)
He's only saying that because his blog was a complete flop and closed after a couple of months, and now he has realized that he needs Facebook more than Facebook needs him.
He always does this. Make something up about a thing he wants to happen, and then let his loyalists get outraged when it doesn't happen, even though it was never going to happen. Then Facebook has an angry mob coming at them. Unfortunately for him I doubt Facebook cares either way, it's all more engagement to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Remember who you are talking about, the former alleged president "believing" anything is a non-sequitur given his past behavior. He operates on the basic principle of throwing his food against the wall to see what sticks. Then he points to the bits that stick and declares himself a genius for throwing that particular bit.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump is a right wing racist and conspiracy theorist,
He's a power hungry opportunist. He was in the Democrat party for decades. He would join that party again in an instant if he thought it would get him back the presidency.
Re: Some context... (Score:2)
Re:Some context... (Score:5, Informative)
He said it's a hoax
Then he said it's only one case it'll go away in no time
Then he said it's only a few cases it'll go away quickly
Then he said it it's just a flu
Then he said inject disinfectant and shine light in your body
Then there was a the hydrochloroquine fiasco
Oh and remember he drew a Sharpie on the hurricane map claiming it was headed for Alabama???
Oh and Helsinki. Putin is right America is wrong. Remember that?
I could go on and on.
Re:Some context... (Score:5, Insightful)
He tried saying the virus originated in China
Uh...there was almost no debate from anyone about whether it originated in China. There was some speculation that it might have come from some place like Italy before reaching china, but that was never a very popular theory, and I dont believe any of the genetic evidence ever pointed that way. So you seem to be confused on what the actual debate was about.
Then he tries to suspend flights from a "suspected pandemic hotspot" when we all know Wuhan has a large population of Chinese - coincidence or targeted racism, you decide.
Bzzt!!! Sorry, that's wrong. Flights were not suspended. Plenty of people flew in from there after the "ban". The only people banned were the Chinese. I guess an American wasn't capable of catching covid in Wuhan, huh? And they couldn't possibly bring it back with them, right?
Then he doubled down and suggested it could have been from a lab leak, when Fauci - who has nothing it gain from all of this - was able to dismiss this ridiculous theory. How ridiculous you ask? It was so ridiculous he was able to dismiss it without having to do any investigation or collection of data - you just know the answer.
No, he didn't dismiss it without investigation. He indicated that all genetic data pointed towards away from that explanation. Sort of an occum's razor situation. All evidence points 1 way, and it consistent with historical cases that pointed the same way. On the other hand, no actual evidence (just speculation) pointing the other way.
This man's ideas are dangerous to the very core of left wing science, reasoning and basic principles of a just and reasonable system of law. As such I suggest we abstain from any trial and block him immediately. How long? I say indefinitely.
Trial? WTF are you talking about? Are you confused? Forget to take your dementia meds? He's being banned by a private corporation from using their private resources. There's no fucking "trial" involved in any of this. Of course, he's welcome to request one himself if his feelings are hurt that he was uninvited from the party, but I think his lawyers are already too busy losing other trials due to lack of evidence.
So white it was a nice attempt at sarcasm, you'll find sarcasm works a bit better when there's at least an element of truth behind it.
Re: (Score:3)
The only people banned were the Chinese.
No. All non-US citizens. Specifically "foreign nationals who have been in any of the following countries during the past 14 days" and later "noncitizens who were physically present within" the list of countries[1]. Your lie makes it sound more racist -- was that intentional or do you just repeat talking points?
Sorry I wasn't 100% accurate in my wording (90%+ of those affected were Chinese, so effectively Chinese by proxy). However, that wasn't even the point of the discussion. The point was that the claim that he suspend flights from a "suspected pandemic hotspot is false. We were letting plenty of people in from those areas (27,000 Americans in the first month after the "ban"). And yes, as you pointed out, we didn't handle quarantine well at all. I know someone that returned home in the first week of April after
Re: (Score:2)
About half of the Always-Trumpers on my friends list left Facebook for good. The other half left and gave a "I'm leaving you should come with me" but came back again (possibly it was a desert out there, or the spouse stepped in and said "no!").
But in general the Trumpist rhetoric on my Facebook feed died almost to zero after Jan 6th. I think the really hardcore stolen-election types are the ones who didn't slink back to Facebook and are off on Parler wondering where everyone is. Now it's back to normal w
Re: (Score:2)
But in general the Trumpist rhetoric on my Facebook feed died almost to zero after Jan 6th. I think the really hardcore stolen-election types are the ones who didn't slink back to Facebook and are off on Parler wondering where everyone is.
Maybe they shut up about it because their coup failed, but over 60% of self-identified republicans still think Biden stole the election. https://www.theguardian.com/us... [theguardian.com]
That's frankly insanely high
Re:Some context... (Score:5, Informative)
What's even more hilarious about that, is that there is absolutely zero mechanism in Federal law to make that happen unless a Constitutional amendment happens, and you can guess what the probability of that is, with a Democrat holding the gavel in the House, and a Democrat in the Majority Leader office in the Senate.
The States ratified their election outcomes.
The Congress ratified the States' outcomes, and ratified the electoral tallies.
Biden is President until January 2025, with an option on 4 more years. And that's the end of the god damn story.
Re: (Score:2)
He's just trying to milk the cow a bit more, get more donations from the suckers that think it's going to anything political and not just into his wallet.
But yeah, people in positions of power or authority should be upheld to a higher standard than the average person anyway. 2 years is an awful light sentence IMO. I'd like to see it 5, keep him gagged past the next election. Although I suspect that is the actual reason the ban is set for only 2 years, they want to give him a chance to use FB for the 2024
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Christ why do you believe that BS from the same people who have been lying to you for years?
Some more important context: Zero evidence to the contrary has been produced despite multiple claims that it exists.
Re: (Score:2)
oh you are funny, what a cute little quisling you would make... Maybe you would be cuter if you smile more!
Re: (Score:2)
Trump made himself look bad. If he had just kept the hell off Twitter and didn't take every opportunity available to piss off people who weren't onboard the "Trump train", he would've won a 2nd term even with Covid-19.
Trump's loud obnoxious mouth was his own worst political enemy.
Re: (Score:2)
Pandemic strikes, emergency meetings are held in the White House:
Flunkie: I don't know what we're going to do with this virus.
Former Alleged President: It's just the flu.
Flunkie: No, it's worse than that. We should get some companies to make vaccines just like with the flu.
Former Alleged President: Wow!! I've got a great idea, let's get some companies to make vaccines just like with the flu.
Flunkie: (in awe) Brilliant!!
Former Alleged President: There, there, I am a genius you know.
Re: (Score:2)
You have always loved the orange leader. You would do anything for the orange leader. Please praise the orange leader harder. All hail the orange leader.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL! No, I can't count how many times I've posted that Trump is a circus clown. I'm not a fan, I just know for certain that you and anyone you would want in power over me is far worse.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Let that be a lesson to you all (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
For me the worst part was seeing him watching the rioters on TV, waiting to see if they were successful in murdering his opponents and delaying Biden's confirmation before making a statement.
He learned how to play them. Set them off but disavow when it all goes horribly wrong. Use the mildest condemnation possible so that they think he's still playing the long game and not really turning on them. Happened at Charlottesville too, the far right took his extremely half hearted criticism and attempt at a "both
Re: (Score:2)
My making him wait two years, isn't Facebook basically forcing Trump and his followers to set up shop at a competing platform like Parler?
Politics aside, this probably isn't a popular business decision for them. They're already struggling to further grow the business as it is, and this will just drive hardcore conservatives away from the platform. Everyone else who wants a Facebook or Instagram account already has one at this point, and their new business ventures like VR haven't been very popular so far.
Re:Let that be a lesson to you all (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh come on. There have been leftist protest-riots in Portland going back much further than the first known usage of the term "ANTIFA". Staffers in George H. W. Bush's administration referred to Portland as "Little Beiruit" in the 1990s. [wweek.com]
Sure, it's stepped up lately, but so has the fucking bullshit they're "protesting" against (until it turns into a riot due to shitheads).
Signed, someone who grew up and lived in the Willamette Valley for 30 years, including living in inner SE Portland for 10, and is moving back in another year.
Re: (Score:2)
One group wants to be treated equally, and shatters some glass and maybe sets a few fires to make that known--and the other group wants to murder democratically elected officials because of conspiracy theories about "adrenochrome", "eating babi
Re: Let that be a lesson to you all (Score:2)
"March peacefully and fight like hell," the Russian troll advised.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that does it, you've convinced me. I'm no longer planning to vote for Maxine Waters for President.
Re: (Score:2)
Too Little, Too Late (Score:2)
Really Facebook - you think you're so great because you banned him after he lost the legal capability of retaliation?
It's closing the door after the horse has bolted and all that. All that sweet advertising cash decided to go away if he stayed, probably - rather than risk being associated with Trumpist rhetoric.
I think, you want to position yourself like a toll-road operator. If that truck's carrying bread, beer, sex dolls or trafficked children - it's not your gig. After watching the last four years or mor
Trump Trump Trump (Score:5, Insightful)
Do we really have to keep him on the front page every day? I was kinda hoping he was voted out so we could forget about him.. No such luck, eh? Maybe it's all part of his '24 campaign, and all the coverage is absolutely free.. Gotta admit, that's something..
Re: (Score:2)
Overall, Trump coverage is way way down from a year ago, which we should all be thankful for.
Re: (Score:3)
Sadly, no.
While I personally think there are far better GOP candidates for the 2024 election, a recent drive through rural PA showed no shortage of "Trump 2024" flags already on lawns. At least some on the right are looking forward to him running again.
However, they're not the reason why Trump continues to end up in the news.
CNN lost over half its viewership once Biden took office, MSNBC similarly had a drop. Media outlets catering to a left-leaning viewership had a near infinite source of outrage porn they
Re: (Score:2)
Not cherry picking, AC.
https://www.businessinsider.co... [businessinsider.com]
Re: (Score:2)
It's a shame they didn't ban him for 5 years, long enough to make sure he doesn't use Facebook in his 2024 campaign.
You know he's going to try it. Campaigning is a big money-maker for him, even if he doesn't win.
Re:Trump Trump Trump (Score:4, Insightful)
Sure, let a bunch of people in tactical gear with bear spray charge into your living room during thanksgiving and I'll start to believe you really think this way
Re: (Score:2)
They actually did delay Mike Pence from certifying the results. That is the definition of insurrection.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>>then we've had several over the last year or two.
Please identify them, and no, intentionally having protestors gassed because you want to get a photo op with a bible in your hands is not official business
Re: (Score:2)
Why not permanently? (Score:5, Insightful)
As far as I know, there are plenty of people who have done far less and been permanently banned. Nobody should get special treatment.
Re: (Score:2)
Andrew Clyde claimed the people were tourists. Looks like he shit himself in this picture.
https://i.redd.it/9ow5xznjetz6... [i.redd.it]
There’s also photos of him barricading the door. These people are delusional to the point of being dangerous.
Re: (Score:2)
Try googling 'why did trump get banned from facebook?'
Oh, here it is:
After Facebook banned Trump for his posts following the Jan. 6 Capitol riot...
So there you go, easy peasy... are you "simple"?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
that is called moving the goalposts, which I know will be followed by simply refusing to acknowledge anything that I do come up with
simple tactics for simple minds
Re: (Score:2)
I don't follow Trump or his antics, but I was curious as to the actual offensive content. So I followed garyisabusyguy's advice and the first link was this article [independent.co.uk]. It doesn't have a lot of concrete information, but does contain this:
Re:Why not permanently? (Score:4, Insightful)
you would have done well... working for Goebbels
We all need a time out from Facebook (Score:2)
Probation period (Score:2)
In fact, it might make FB more usable and less hostile if everyone's posts were delayed for 24 hours before being published.
When will other politicians be banned? (Score:3, Insightful)
You have tons of politicians who've called for radicalism and flirted with violence just as much as Trump has. Maxine Waters is a great example. She's repeatedly told supporters to seek out, confront and get aggressive and confrontational with Trump supporters. The riots last year were a gold mine of "I'm not saying I support the violence, but I'm not saying the violence is actually bad either" tweets from prominent politicians.
Of course, none of them are going to get banned which is precisely why there is a growing hatred of S230. Sites like Facebook and Twitter should not have the freedom from legal liability when their moderation policies are so obviously broken. You can find tons of examples of them showing favoritism and allowing violation of their rules from "the right people." That behavior from a set of use case monopolies is more societally dangerous than having the federal courts be the final arbiter of whether or not they properly enforced their rules on appeal. It's THAT behavior which causes people on the losing side to say "playing by the rules makes you a sucker."
Re: (Score:2)
She's repeatedly told supporters to seek out, confront and get aggressive and confrontational with Trump supporters.
Did she repeatedly post that on her Facebook page? Being a raging thunderc**t is all good and fine, but unless you actually act that way on your Facebook feed directly you're not violating ToS.
I think a lot of politicians should be booted off Twitter, but really the overwhelming majority of them only use Facebook to run ads, and instead spread their hatred and bullshit on Twitter.
Re: When will other politicians be banned? (Score:5, Informative)
You seem to watch too much right wing media, please read an informative article from overseas:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world... [bbc.com]
TLDR: US right wing media made up a bunch of lies about BLM
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have a list of cops assassinated by BLM?
From the Desk of... (Score:2)
Time for "From the Desk of Donald J. Trump," v2.0
Re: (Score:2)
lol, maybe it will send messages to pagers once a day
Risk to public safety (Score:2)
The social media giant said after that period it would evaluate whether "the risk to public safety has receded,"
Will they also evaluate whether the Sun will continue rising in the east and setting in the west?
Trump is less dangerous than other Republicans (Score:2)
Others, well coached and saying sound bites, well mediated through Fox News are every bit as dangerous and anti democratic, anti American like Trump. But not overtly and obviously so.
Take Trump away, Republicans will be back with their shell game and play rope the dope with America and the Democrats.
Perfect timing for Trump (Score:2)
Re: Dump Facebook (Score:2)
Dude...
Quitting Facebook was cool like half a decade ago. You're just now deciding FB is a cesspool?
Re:Dump Facebook (Score:5, Insightful)
Zuckerberg is a radical leftist? Zuckerberg isn't a radical anything. He's a reactionary troll with a penchant for turning morally questionable positions into massive payouts. Which, according to the general outlook of the average person, is one of the best things a person in our society can possibly be. More money = more better, and there's nothing worse than poors and underlings complaining about a person that's so much better than them based on net value.
Zuckerberg a radical leftist. Jesus. Zuckerberg would enslave his mother if it'd make him some extra cash. That's not leftist. Hell, it's barely even human.
The only reason Trump or any other "conservative" got booted was because it was costing sponsors which ultimately costs dollars. Now, we could have a similar conversation about how Trump isn't really a conservative, but that ship has long sailed. Being "conservative" in America is now a flag that you're willing to worship at the altar of Trump. It's a cult of personality rather than a political outlook.
Re: (Score:2)
The only reason Trump or any other "conservative" got booted was because it was costing sponsors which ultimately costs dollars.
Note that Zuckerberg now has political aspirations, so now when politicians talk to him, he is also hoping to get on their good side. It's not just advertising dollars anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
What would his platform be? "I'm me. What other choice do you have?"
Re: (Score:2)
Now that one should be modded funny. Really captures the essence of Trumpism.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting comment though hyperbolic in spots. Memorable new identity? But I can't decipher the handle, making it hard to remember (notwithstanding this reply). But I think the moderators were right to settle on "Insightful".
The search "night flame auto" returns weird results, also not memorable. Perhaps the most interesting are automatic (motion detecting) night lights that look like flames...
Substantive reply? Difficult because of the hyperbolic tone. But I definitely agree the label "conservative" has b
Re: (Score:2)
I've had other names here and elsewhere over the years. You probably knew one of my other internet lifetimes.
Re: (Score:2)
Zuckerberg is a radical leftist? Zuckerberg isn't a radical anything. He's a reactionary troll with a penchant for turning morally questionable positions into massive payouts. Which, according to the general outlook of the average person, is one of the best things a person in our society can possibly be. More money = more better, and there's nothing worse than poors and underlings complaining about a person that's so much better than them based on net value.
Zuckerberg a radical leftist. Jesus. Zuckerberg would enslave his mother if it'd make him some extra cash. That's not leftist. Hell, it's barely even human.
The only reason Trump or any other "conservative" got booted was because it was costing sponsors which ultimately costs dollars. Now, we could have a similar conversation about how Trump isn't really a conservative, but that ship has long sailed. Being "conservative" in America is now a flag that you're willing to worship at the altar of Trump. It's a cult of personality rather than a political outlook.
This, a thousand times this.
Trump's cack-handed shit-pottery was fine when it was bringing in the eyeballs to those sweet, sweet advertising dollars. Then Trump went full retard and their customers (the advertisers, users are the product) flat out said we don't want to have our names anywhere near the lunacy of that orange shitgibbon... And FB dutifully kow-towed as any money grubbing toady would.
There's nothing political about it, it was all about money.
Twitter did the same thing for the same reas
Re: (Score:2)
Aw, aren't you cute. You look better when you smile, you should smile more
Re:Dump Facebook (Score:4, Insightful)
> Their leader is Mark Zuckerberg, a radical leftist.
Sure, and you're a prolific paedophile if we're going down the route of assigning random titles to people.
Re:Dump Facebook (Score:4, Insightful)
I look forward to Facebook being marginalized or falling into bankruptcy as newer technology takes over, perhaps by social media sites based on blockchains
Thanks for blatently tagging your post with "I am clueless", just in case we had any doubt before that.
Re:Dump Facebook (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Dump Facebook (Score:5, Informative)
Unless I'm mistaken, the Fox tabloid never mentioned it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, Manish (Score:4, Funny)
Drumpf is going to be off Facebook for a lot longer than 2 years. Reason why? He's gonna be in PRISON for creating the pandemic and crashing the economy. President Harris is going to send him straight to Florence IDX and will let the courts sort out the mess. The lawsuits will be so YUGE only traceable money from Russian Oligarchs will be able to save him. Which it won't though because we KNOW the when's and what's of the Drumpf Crime Family.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously pathetic.
You don't even have an argument. All you can do is essentially say "I hate Trump".
Why? Because that's what you've been TOLD to do.
And you still buy the whole Trump-Russia thing.
Four fuckin' years, ZERO evidence of collusion, and LOTS of evidence of Democrat malfeasance in MANUFACTURING a false crisis.
How do people as gullible as you still exist in this day and age?
Replace the con artist's name with Hillary Clinton and it sounds really familiar. Funny how that works.
Re: (Score:2)
Except we HAVE the evidence for Clinton.
More bullshit. 7 Republican-led investigations into BENGHZAII!! and nothing. Zero. Zilch. There is no evidence because you have nothing. It's just another lie deplorables like you keep trotting out. Like the "stolen" election. Like the insurrection on January 6th was just a cub scout outing. Like "massive" vote fraud.
Lie after lie after lie. That's all you have.
Re: Thanks, Manish (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
OP - Yeah, name-calling. What has he actually done
You - Race-baiting, woman-loathing, worker-hating
OP - Lalalalalala I can't hear you
Trump summarized at a glance? (Score:2)
Imagine a little radar graph showing "dimensions of personality" for a person (or other 'identity') on Facebook (or Slashdot). I imagine seeing it right next to the identity's self-selected avatar. My 12 o'clock most-important dimension would surely be "true-false". If the score is highly positive, with a dot near the outer rim, it would indicate that the person speaks the truth, but if it is negative and the dot is close to the center, then it would mean the person has a record of lying.
Not really relevant
Re: (Score:2)
lol, I am surprised you didn't post a link to 4chan, or is that your secret planning platform?