Microsoft Suggests Those Divisive Windows 11 System Specs Deliver a 99.8% Crash-free Experience (pcgamer.com) 187
PCGamer reports: Microsoft continues to double down on its assertion that the Windows 11 system requirements are absolutely necessary, and this whole TPM 2.0 schtick is vital for the safety of you, your PC, and maybe even the world. Okay, I made that last bit up, but the big M is sticking to its guns and has released another video backing its decision on excluding a whole lot of hardware that was fine with Windows 10. The latest claim is that you're going to see fewer blue screens of death -- or maybe black screens of death -- because of the new system requirements, citing a "99.8% crash-free experience in the [Windows 11] preview." Look, there's still a part of us that feels at some point in the future, maybe the distant future, Microsoft will turn around and say 'You know, what? We don't mind what processor you use with Windows 11,' but for right now this is where we're at. You need a modern CPU for Windows 11 for security and reliability.
And maybe a little performance. "So the requirement for Intel 8th Gen and AMD Ryzen 2000-series, and newer, chipsets does definitely contribute to performance," states Microsoft VP Steve Dispensa in the recent video. "But the main rationale here is actually the balanced security with performance. Security is at the core of these requirements." He does point to differences in how Windows 11 prioritises apps running in the foreground window. With the system running at 90% CPU load, it's still possible to get a responsive experience opening and using foreground apps thanks to these prioritisations.
And maybe a little performance. "So the requirement for Intel 8th Gen and AMD Ryzen 2000-series, and newer, chipsets does definitely contribute to performance," states Microsoft VP Steve Dispensa in the recent video. "But the main rationale here is actually the balanced security with performance. Security is at the core of these requirements." He does point to differences in how Windows 11 prioritises apps running in the foreground window. With the system running at 90% CPU load, it's still possible to get a responsive experience opening and using foreground apps thanks to these prioritisations.
Safety in numbers. (Score:5, Insightful)
Crash free? Make ECC memory [slashdot.org] mandatory.
Re: (Score:3)
Crash free? Make ECC memory [slashdot.org] mandatory.
Perhaps (hopefully) for Windows 12 they will
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Kinda, sorta it comes with DDR5.
The gist is that individual memory cells are becoming too small to be reasonably resistant to things that could flip the stored bits. Such as radiation. So DDR5 is supposed to have on-chip ECC. That will of course not cover the transmission of data over the main board and to the CPU. But even so, I hope it will improve things.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah.. Probably not until Windows 15..
Re:Safety in numbers. (Score:4, Insightful)
You want to see less BSOD's? Switch to Linux.. I can't remember the last time I got a "kernel panic", the Linux-equivalent of a "BlueScreenOfDeath" and I use Linux for daily use for the last 11 years... I suspect MS is gonna get a NICE kickback from the hardware vendors for making users run out and buy new hardware to run MS's latest abortion..
Re: (Score:3)
On that note, I can't remember the last time I saw a blue screen of death. This isn't the 19xx's any more. Windows doesn't just all over every time you sneeze. No modern mature operating system does that.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you have hardware connected that comes with crappy drivers. I had sporadic BSODs on my home Windows 10 PC for about two years. Infuriating, but not frequent enough to make me replace the whole machine with something new (about once a month or so).
Turns out it was the Logitech webcam drivers. Removed that piece of junk and I haven't seen an issue since.
Re: (Score:2)
How did THAT get through the spam filter, but paragraphs and URLs get blocked?
Re:No negative press from CCP-funded BIZX (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, how DID that shit get through??
I can't even put 4 fucking periods in a row without being stopped for "ascii art".
Re:No negative press from CCP-funded BIZX (Score:4, Insightful)
Ahhhh, it's in 'code' format which apparently doesn't check for that sort of crap.
Amusingly, 'code' format also uses a mono-spaced font, which makes sure their shitty ascii art turns out perfectly.
Good job, slashdot webmasters, you pulled disaster from the jaws of victory again!
Re: No negative press from CCP-funded BIZX (Score:2)
Good job, slashdot webmasters, you pulled disaster from the jaws of victory again!
For a so-called "Techie"-oriented site, Slashdot has the hands-down mist inept web coders on the planet!
It's honestly like a Study in how to not do a web forum, coding-wise.
And the stupid shits wear it like some sort of badge of honor!
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Just to be clear, the parent post was written by rsillvergun (with two l's) not by rsilvergun (just one l). The account appears to have first posted yesterday. This appears to be a sad attempt to indirectly troll rsilvergun by hoping that people are too distracted to notice the other l.
99.8% (Score:5, Insightful)
How stupid is it to throw out a number with no context or meaning? What the hell does 99.8% even mean? 99.8% of user interaction instances? 99.8% of clicking the start button? 99.8% of API calls? Is it random? Is it certain calls? Does it crash every 500 seconds? What the fuck? Fuck off your 99.8%.
Re:99.8% (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
How many technical white papers with all the raw details and scientific tests and raw explanations do you read? Probably not many, unless you need to do so for work.
The rest of the stuff you ask for the information to be summarized. If it is message for the general population is will be the summary of a summary. In which people then go back to it and say HOW MUCH THIS SUCKS, didn't they look at X, and Y. and Consider Z and Z' The story/summary of a 40 page technical spec in a 1 page story didn't cover all
Re: (Score:2)
This is an important detail.
The other ones might have only a 99.4% uptime, and that's a BIG difference!
After all, AMD and Intel stockholders are waiting with baited breath for their stocks to SOAR AGAIN!!!
Microsoft bought its own misery by not enforcing its own standards. The results are monthly patch/fix/update/bluescreen miseries that they just don't want to support on older hardware.
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe they mean there is 17 hours of downtime per year due to crashing.
Re: (Score:2)
So, 99.8% of the beta testers on systems meeting their current choice of system requirements have not experienced a BSOD since
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How stupid is it to throw out a number with no context or meaning? What the hell does 99.8% even mean? 99.8% of user interaction instances? 99.8% of clicking the start button? 99.8% of API calls? Is it random? Is it certain calls? Does it crash every 500 seconds? What the fuck? Fuck off your 99.8%.
I read somewhere that this was compared to the group that installed Windows 11 preview on unsupported-hardware. I can't find the reference thou, sorry.
Re: (Score:2)
It’s on a per minute basis. Going forward, you can expect just three BSODs per day. Such improvement!
Re: (Score:2)
It's a meaningless number the marketing droids came up with. It's most likely much, much lower, but microsoft won't show the real statistics...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Winzombie (Score:5, Interesting)
MS has done a fairly good job of letting stuff merely wig out instead of outright crash. However, if I don't reboot about once a week, the chance of it wigging out goes up way up. Others have similar experiences.
It just gradually turns into a zombie OS instead of die. Some argue that's worse because it may be damaging or losing files without notification.
Re: Winzombie (Score:3)
It just gradually turns into a zombie OS instead of die. Some argue that's worse because it may be damaging or losing files without notification.
Hell, my work laptop's W7 even raises a Notification if you dare to run it for more than a Week without Rebooting!
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't happen with my PC so it must be down to what software you install or maybe it's a crappy non essential service that I turned off. Or maybe CCleaner actually does something useful. Or maybe it's a driver issue.
Re: (Score:3)
I've not had any issues like that and I leave my computer on pretty much all the time
Same here, 24/7 for weeks and weeks on end, but then I'm using Linux. Basically, I never shut it down. Maybe once a month there's an update that needs to reboot but that's about it.
Back when I used Win 7 it would run about for a week or so max before it would blow up.
Re: (Score:3)
I can run win7 for months now that updates are not a thing, it continues to run fine, no perceptible issues or performance loss.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed, given Windows hasn't crashed for me in about 6 years
So Windows stopped crashing just in time to start serving up ads and telemetry? If Windows stops sucking in one way Microsoft is pretty insistent on finding a new way for it to suck.
Wait a second (Score:2)
So stuff crashes once every 500 runs?
Re: (Score:2)
No, 1 in 500 users will get to experience crashes.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm thinking once every 500 seconds. Seems like a step backwards, but writing an OS is hard.
I'm not buying it! (Score:2)
Windows 10 for me has always been incredibly stable. The only BSOD's I've seen have been because of a faulty hardware driver.
I don't believe newer processors with TPM is about "system stability".
It seems more like a gift being thrown out to AMD and Intel.
Re: (Score:2)
Ditto, and I manage a company with about 50 Windows PCs and a BSOD is a very rare sight!
Re: (Score:3)
I have a bunch of VMs that run regression jobs. Tens of thousands of small jobs per day.
The Windows 10 VMs run fewer jobs than the Windows 7 VMs with the same resources. If I try to run the same number of parallel jobs on the Windows 10 VMs as Windows 7, the Windows 10 VMs crash quickly.
Re: (Score:2)
99.8% crash free? (Score:5, Informative)
That all depends whether the 0.2% is an entire system crash - a BSOD - or just a crashed application.
I can't recall ever having had a complete system lockup on Linux, through no fault of my own.
Sure, it's easily possible to grind Linux to a halt, but you really have to create that situation.
I recently had to re-install my windows 10 gaming rig and I've never been able to figure out why - it just became unstable, frequent BSOD.
It was at that point, I switched to Linux for gaming, which is now able to launch about 85% of my games, all of which play reliably and in some cases, actually better.
I use macOS at work and pretty much my primary OS - I've had 2 crashes in a year that required a reboot - not sure how much that works out in percentage terms, but given my 2012 macBook has now had an uptime of 152 days, we're probably looking at 99.99% crash free.
Besides, I just don't buy the fact that windows 11 will be 99.8% crash free - the metrics are impossible to work out, due to the nature of windows itself.
A rogue app has a far greater chance of bringing down the entire OS with windows, than a *nix based system - but, that's anecdotal based on 20 years of experience.
The way I see it, this is Microsoft trying to boost sales of PC's, due to their OEM contracts - whipping up the FUD that to enjoy this new version of windows, you have to upgrade.
Screw that.
It's now been about 3 months since I booted up windows 10 - and for the last 5 years, I've only done that to play games.
Windows 11 will never feature in my future, except as part of my dev job of testing websites and webapps - and I'll rely on a third party service to provide that.
Re:99.8% crash free? (Score:4, Insightful)
That all depends whether the 0.2% is an entire system crash - a BSOD - or just a crashed application.
The OS can't prevent crashed applications.
But if the OS crashes without a high CPU speed, that is on Microsoft. You can run a responsive OS without crashing on a 1Mhz CPU.
Re: (Score:3)
That's been my experience as well. Win7 can be really sluggish at times, but it's been tremendously stable. For now, I refuse to upgrade my machine in any way since it works just fine.
But... remember where you are. You're legally obliged to hate Windows around these parts.
Re: (Score:2)
We're not hating on the OS today. We're hating on the stupid press release that Microsoft produced.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't recall ever having had a complete system lockup on Linux, through no fault of my own.
I have, but not due to software since... maybe 2003.
Ignoring wine apps that crash, I have about 1 web browser crash every 2 years. And shotwell, which I use almost daily, crashes about once every 3 months. Probably because I leave it running that long. But it saves changes immediately, and recovers from crashes well.
I do think it is application crashes that they're measuring, using some basket of approved software that is intended to be representative. But still, 99.8% sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
I've had Linux do complete lockups many times. Usually due to buggy drivers. Software is software, and software crashes.
Re: (Score:2)
The 2000s called and they want their FUD back.
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to Realtek and LSI, then? It does seem like most of the bugs have been worked out at this point, as I no longer get kernel panics or failures that are just as bad from those drivers, but it was painful for years, and since the hardware is quite old at this point, I'm sure if I upgraded the hardware, I'd be faced with a whole host of new bugs.
Throwback (Score:2)
Just remembered when Bill Gates was unveiling Windows 98. And the demo involved a gorgeous BSOD. Those seem to be making a comeback through my experiences with Windows 10 the past year or so. Trending?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Throwback (Score:4, Informative)
That was staged, BSOD was the joke of the day and everyone was waiting for something dramatic to happen. By staging an USB fail, everyone had their laughs, it cleared the air, and with all the jokes set aside it was finally time for doing business and a presentation.
Quit shilling.
That USB Scanner Driver BSOD was in no way "staged". Gates was temporarily speechless, before recovering with a fairly-clever "Well, as you can see, there's still some work to do!"
Indeed.
Annecdotally (Score:3)
Re:Annecdotally (Score:5, Funny)
Me, too, been running Win 11 for almost 4 wx!"xx NO CARRIER
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Same here. I installed Win11 and it hasn't crashed yet! I'll let you know more once its finished booting.
Re: (Score:2)
Me, too, been running Win 11 for almost 4 wx!"xx NO CARRIER
Won't be much longer now before that 'no carrier' joke is lost forever. We're getting older, folks.
+++
OK
ATH
OK
Re: (Score:2)
we can always do
socket error: Broken pipe
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like fun!
I've been running Windows 10 for 6 years... on my systems no bluescreens... some app crashes but that is to be expected playing games and running on older video cards and such. Seems very solid.
Prior to that: I ran Windows 7 for about 6 years... no bluescreens except F4 and ED when a HDD crashed... some app crashes but that is to be expected playing games and running on older video cards and an apparently failing hard drive. Seems very solid.
Prior to that I ran Windows 8 and Vista combined a
But of course (Score:3)
Vendor lock-in and losing control of your machine is essential to your safety. Look how well it's working with Android and iOS for years: people are so happy with that they never once tried to jailbreak any cellphone!
I rolled back (Score:2)
Microsoft stopped doing win10 upgrades, and I wanted the new kernel that had AMD nested cpu virtualizations instructions, you can run a VM in a VM.
So I see win11 has the latest kernel 19200+ versions, so I upgrade and nope, amd nested wasn't included.
Figured most things work (except vr), might as well keep using win11. But the way they crippled the taskbar was a nightmare, and open-shell won't work on win11.
They also took 2 step tasks and made them 3 steps tasks to make it look pretty, cut paste drop downs
Microsoft is just lying here (Score:2)
Windows will just have the same problems as always.
Missing context (Score:3)
This isn't about TPM. This is about MS forcing a stringent new driver model DHC. It stands to reason. There was a boost in stability when driver signing was enforced and a lot of old shit code stored working too.
Re: (Score:2)
The Microsoft Store [majorgeeks.com] seems to be the biggest issue. Signing has been around for a long time.
The real issue here (Score:2)
Re: The real issue here (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see the issue here.
I'm on an I7 3770k I bought around 2013 or so. It's OLD. It plays most of the games, does all the things but it's OLD. It's about time I drop another $2k on a new PC.
May I suggest... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Microsofts statement is probably 99.8% pure bullshit.
The remaining .2% is probably only 99.8% pure bullshit.
I haven't had a non hardware related BSOD (Score:2)
Also Valorant is already using the Win 11 TPM to tie users to their hardware for banning cheaters. I'm surprised that didn't make
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't had bluescreens, but I have had application crashes lock up Windows 10, as in, crtl-alt-del no longer works and a hard reboot is req'd, losing work in the process. That's on the OS.
I also had a Windows 10 update freeze at a certain point so I had to go into safe mode and go back to a restore point. This was consistent for a certain upgrade, so I disabled updates for a year. Nonetheless, several weeks later, it tried to upgrade again and froze again. This was a 5-year old work la
Just say you want that OEM money (Score:2)
About time (Score:2)
Improving responsiveness under load is severely overdue. Currently background apps like OneDrive and antivirus can hijack resources to the point where the system becomes unresponsive.
Whatever. (Score:2)
I know at some point I'll have to work with a Windows 11 computer but I'll leave that as long as possible and hopefully Microsoft will ease the processor restrictions to the point where I can run it on a '386SX system, where it belongs.
That TPM thing cuts both ways. (Score:5, Insightful)
Fewer BSOD (Score:3)
The latest claim is that you're going to see fewer blue screens of death -- or maybe black screens of death -- because of the new system requirements, ...
I actually cannot remember the last time I had a BSOD on any of my Windows 10, or previous Windows 7 systems, so this claim doesn't help me. Then again, I don't have unusual hardware.
My systems are a little to somewhat older, but run Windows 10 fine -- and run Linux even better. I got most of them from friends upgrading to newer hardware and I simply added more RAM or a upgraded CPU, etc... As it stands, Windows 10 will probably be my last version of Windows and this will just force me to make the full time switch to Linux. I don't really need Windows for much, mainly Office (Word/Excel) files and a lot of cards I've made in Publisher -- and my mail home budget finance tracking is in Lotus 123 (which *still* runs fine on Windows 10) and have been lazy about migrating things over to Linux alternatives. I'm sure I can run Office 2010 and Lotus in a VM on my larger Linux system until I get around to porting my files to LibreOffice...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Graphics drivers.
I have had BSOD with the WHQL'ed signed, ATI Catalyst drivers. I've swapped video cards and still have them. I may have to change to an Nvidia card to see if it goes away. Happy happy joy hoy.
Re: (Score:2)
Ditto. This isn't the era of Windows 95 or ME.
Nearly all crashes I've had in the past 10-15 years can be traced back to my video card overheating pretty much. That's it.
On the flipside, the biggest annoyance from Windows nowadays -- almost on the level of BSODs from the olden days -- is the fucking forced "restart for updates."
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft would say that... (Score:2)
Welcome to 1995 (Score:3)
FTS: "...With the system running at 90% CPU load, it's still possible to get a responsive experience opening and using foreground apps..."
BeOS was able to do this in 1995.
On a single core system.
With less than a gig of RAM.
On a spinner hard drive.
Better late than never, MS.
Re: (Score:2)
I gave Haiku, BeOS' open source clone, a try recently with their Beta 3.
It still loads to a desktop in less than half a gig of RAM and is far more responsive that Windows or Linux on the same hardware.
Donations have funded a programmer - once they import 3D accelerated graphics from Mesa and finish their Webkit 2 port it'll approach daily driver usable, i.e. if anyone has any old netbooks sitting idle.
I can't upgrade my MacBook (Score:2)
This is not unique to MS.
I can't upgrade my MacBook OS because Apple has decided it is EOL, so I am SOL.
Re: (Score:2)
Mojave 10.14 is still supported with updates, just what kind of fossil do you have?
Re: (Score:2)
Mojave 10.14 is still supported with updates, just what kind of fossil do you have?
This article is about upgrading to the latest OS version, not maintenance updates to an old one
And FYI, Mojave 10.14 will no longer be updated or supported after November 30, 2021.
Re: (Score:2)
the latest version will give you nothing more for running the useful software it's running right now, and an old mac book that absolutely can't run any newer version than 10.14 won't explode December 1 2021.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it even possible to have a more clear-cut case of planned obsolescence?
Why exactly haven't you taken that to a court yet?
Don't be so insecure. Yes, it's a crime. That's why the thing is so locked-down. It wouldn't be a crime if you had an *actual* choice. You only have that imaginary "choice" so they can say "you have a choice" while de-facto you don't.
jokes on them, when Win 8 is dead I'm fully Linux (Score:2)
What's the denominator? (Score:2)
99.8% crash-free experience
99.8% of what? Time? Logins? Starting a new app? PCs on a given day?
In a company of 10,000 employees each with a Windows laptop, does that mean there are 20 expected crashes per day? Or each employee should expect a crash every 1.5 years?
99.8% is not a vague number like some number of nines. I wonder if that number is from testing or an analytical model. Or is that just a number made up by a marketing person?
Question To Microsoft (Score:2)
Bullshit (Score:2)
I have no doubt that some of the hardware and software out there is buggy shit, particularly the more off brand and chinesium it gets. But some of it is perfectly valid and MS has chosen not to support it, or people have not paid MS obscene dollars to fix their own bugs.
And there is absolutely no way the TPM is making anything crash free. Just say no. Win7 is still perfectly fine for most home use. Win10 will last us 15 years. Just forget it.
Full of shit! (Score:2)
Why not build in full for VeraCrypt and automatically encrypted all folders and files? Are they going to force disk encryption? Will they force driver signing? Will they force system signing?
They don't care, it's all smoke show to make it seem like Windows 11 will be some impressiv
If you bought your PC to run W10, it will. (Score:2)
I don't get the desire to run W11 until 10 is EOL, and who the hell still gets excited about a new Windows version or anything else to do with operating systems unless it's code you contributed??
W11 may be a nice to have but it's hardly a necessity, and when you accepted MSFTs TOS you bent over for whatever they choose for you. If you object, game the system, run different OS, or both like most clueful users do. You know what you signed up for.
The MS Enigma (Score:2)
Historically I wasn't your typical "M$" Slashdot basher, but since Nadella took over and drove them hard towards the "you're the product" business model that's where I'm headed. Said at the outset when they rolled out the Windows Store, "If I wanted an iPad I'd already have one", and for some strange reason that sentiment got me down-voted.
The enigma is that while their product has become increasingly unappealing to me as a long-time customer and I contemplate making a non-Windows system my primary machine
Does windows BSOD anymore? (Score:2)
The latest claim is that you're going to see fewer blue screens of death -- or maybe black screens of death
This is a real, honest question: Does anybody actually see Windows crash with a blue/black screen anymore? I've used Windows for decades (all the way since 3.1), and I'm racking my brain trying to think of the last time I've actually SEEN Windows crash. Ten, fifteen years, maybe? I would occasionally see it long ago, but now? Never. I use it constantly at home/work (although I hate each iteration a little more than the last; IMHO it hasn't improved since Windows 2000).
Am I an outlier, or is the BSOD
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently windows 11 does.
Search/replace (Score:2)
Only 1 Kernel Panic Ever in OS X/macOS (Score:2)
I have used OS X/macOS daily since version 10.0.0, and the only "Crash" (Kernel Panic) of the actual OS I have ever experienced was back in version 10.2. And that was caused by some hinky shareware scanner driver.
99.8% (Score:2)
So only 2 in 1000 instructions will cause my 4.4GHz computer to crash?
Bollocks (Score:2)
Are they going to block my dodgy USB to serial adaptor? The only reason my PC has ever bsod'd was due to the poor quality drivers, installed via windows update.
Re: (Score:2)
Just to be clear, the parent post was written by rsillvergun (with two l's) not by rsilvergun (just one l). The account appears to have first posted yesterday. This appears to be a sad attempt to indirectly troll rsilvergun by hoping that people are too distracted to notice the one extra l.
Re: (Score:3)
The real rsilvergun must have really gotten to you, OMBad. The only thing your impersonation of him has done is make me think, wow, that rsilvergun must live in OMBad's head rent free.
It make you look weak, OMBad. It makes you look really weak.
But on the flip side it makes me a bit jealous. Haven't I pissed you off enough for you to try to impersonate me? What is rsilvergun doing that I'm not? I want a crazy internet stalker too!