A Horrifying New AI App Swaps Women Into Porn Videos With a Click (technologyreview.com) 258
Karen Hao, reporting for MIT Technology Review: The website is eye-catching for its simplicity. Against a white backdrop, a giant blue button invites visitors to upload a picture of a face. Below the button, four AI-generated faces allow you to test the service. Above it, the tag line boldly proclaims the purpose: turn anyone into a porn star by using deepfake technology to swap the person's face into an adult video. All it requires is the picture and the push of a button. MIT Technology Review has chosen not to name the service, which we will call Y, or use any direct quotes and screenshots of its contents, to avoid driving traffic to the site. It was discovered and brought to our attention by deepfake researcher Henry Ajder, who has been tracking the evolution and rise of synthetic media online.
For now, Y exists in relative obscurity, with a small user base actively giving the creator development feedback in online forums. But researchers have feared that an app like this would emerge, breaching an ethical line no other service has crossed before. From the beginning, deepfakes, or AI-generated synthetic media, have primarily been used to create pornographic representations of women, who often find this psychologically devastating. The original Reddit creator who popularized the technology face-swapped female celebrities' faces into porn videos. To this day, the research company Sensity AI estimates, between 90% and 95% of all online deepfake videos are nonconsensual porn, and around 90% of those feature women.
For now, Y exists in relative obscurity, with a small user base actively giving the creator development feedback in online forums. But researchers have feared that an app like this would emerge, breaching an ethical line no other service has crossed before. From the beginning, deepfakes, or AI-generated synthetic media, have primarily been used to create pornographic representations of women, who often find this psychologically devastating. The original Reddit creator who popularized the technology face-swapped female celebrities' faces into porn videos. To this day, the research company Sensity AI estimates, between 90% and 95% of all online deepfake videos are nonconsensual porn, and around 90% of those feature women.
Well..... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Why is it horrifying? (Score:5, Insightful)
Pervy, sure. Weird, ok. Sad, absolutely.
But horrifying? Why?
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. I've done it in Photoshop/Gimp on static images and I am sure many others have*. So why is video any different? It's for my personal amusement only.
Yes, we dudes are horny pervs; "God" made us that way, and we'll stay that way in private. We'll be politically correct in public, but our bedroom toys are ours alone.
* In fact the first time I ever saw a color PC (Wintel) was when somebody in the dorm was editing different faces onto porn. Everyone was thinking, "gee, I gotta get a color card & moni
Re: Why is it horrifying? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This even though I had already violated the "no porn" rule the very first time I knew the parents were far enough away I'd have time to clear the screen if they were coming. I'd like to say I've changed, but nah. Although I don't like deepfakes; they're just
Re:Why is it horrifying? (Score:5, Insightful)
Pissed of student does this of the teacher. She loses her job, her kids go through financial stress as she has to change careers away from anything to do with children/her degree/background. It's impossible to prove a negative, so you can never prove it isn't you beyond a shadow of a doubt, and many communities don't want adult actresses teaching their kids regardless of their scholarly training and smarts. It's the purity culture thing.
Is that pervy? Nope. Weird? Nope. Horrifying? Yup.
Many people don't want to be involved in others sex lives, they don't want to be the subject of someone's sexual gratification, they want to be able to chose who they share themselves with, they don't want to be devalued. Women already have a hard enough time with people abusing their pictures, their likenesses, their presence in public, adding a hidden aspect they might be ignorant of is an issue. If you actually were able to chose to do porn and then have responses if challenged, that's different than someone not making that choice and having their agency stripped from them.
In other cultures (some parts of the Middle East) they wouldn't just lose their jobs, the ramifications might be death.
Like anything, a tool can be wielded for good (pleasure) or bad (harm). It can't be banned, as it's thoughts. So how do you defend yourself?
My answer is you don't, culture has to embrace the fact that no photo, video, or audio recordings are evidence or proof of anything anymore, which renders much of a courtroom moot. You can sure bet if there's video of me doing something, I'll bring copies of that video with the judge doing it, the opposing counsel doing it, etc.
So yeah, the ramifications of it is horrifying, especially since so far the people victimized have been predominantly women, a marginalized group in society to begin with.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems a tad far fetched, wouldn't you say? Do we have any evidence this might actually happen?
Re:Why is it horrifying? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why is it horrifying? (Score:4, Informative)
The Revenge Porn Helpline funded by the UK government recently received a case from a teacher who lost her job after deepfake pornographic images of her were circulated on social media and brought to her school’s attention, says Sophie Mortimer, who manages the service.
Re: (Score:2)
Teenage boys have been rubbing one out to hot teachers since forever. They've made accusations about inappropriate behaviors as well. Generally speaking no one believes them.
If the video quality is high enough that it's indistinguishable from the real thing, then no one will be fired for it ( even if they DO do a porno ).
Re: (Score:3)
I was taught by nuns through junior high. To this day, whenever I see a nun, I get a strange mixture of abject fear and arousal.
Here's a video of a group of nuns at a rave (this is real). This counts as porn in my book. No need for deepfakes, and all these nuns are of legal age, so don't be judging me.
https://youtu.be/mNwGjyay954 [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Pissed of student does this of the teacher. She loses her job, her kids go through financial stress as she has to change careers away from anything to do with children/her degree/background. It's impossible to prove a negative, so you can never prove it isn't you beyond a shadow of a doubt ...
Depends on whether the video is already out in the wild or not. If it is, you can probably do a reverse image search of one of the frames and find similar images, then find the original video, and then you have pretty solid proof that it isn't real. The nice thing is, the same basic technologies that make deepfakes possible also make it easier to find the original video, assuming that a copy of it exists anywhere on the Internet.
Similarly, if a couple of college kids have sex on camera and then substitute
Re: (Score:2)
How do you prove which is the original and which is the fake?
Re: (Score:2)
Very easily, usually. The version with billions of copies on the Internet dating back a decade is real. Historical Internet archives are your friend.
Alternatively, if the creator of the original video is known, you can contact that creator, because odds are good that the creator still has a copy of the original employment contracts, both to prove that the performers were adults and to prove that they agreed to appear in the videos.
Re: (Score:2)
That's assuming that the source pornography in question was professionally produced, widely distributed and that the producer or participants are still around. None of these are a given - there is plenty of amateur porn and non consensual porn etc floating around the internet or in peoples personal collections which could be used as source material for a deepfake.
presumption of innocence ftw (Score:2)
How do you prove which is the original and which is the fake?
No need to.
Reasonable doubt.
Case closed.
Re: (Score:2)
For now your comment about courtroom implications is probably wrong. Most deepfakes are reasonably easy for an expert to detect. How much that would help outside of a courtroom, however, is a different story. So the rest of your argument looks good. And who knows what next year will bring.
Re: (Score:2)
Pissed of student does this of the teacher. She loses her job
Nope. Does not happen. Pretty much everybody should know by now this is possible.
Re: (Score:3)
And yet... from TFA:
The Revenge Porn Helpline funded by the UK government recently received a case from a teacher who lost her job after deepfake pornographic images of her were circulated on social media and brought to her school’s attention, says Sophie Mortimer, who manages the service.
Re: (Score:3)
My answer is you don't, culture has to embrace the fact that no photo, video, or audio recordings are evidence or proof of anything anymore, which renders much of a courtroom moot.
This is a very important point, and it's been happening for years already.
For example a few years back there was a civil case where a car park management company tried to get money from someone using one of their spaces without paying. They submitted a photoshopped image of the space with the parking signs made more visible than they actually were. They were only caught out because they earlier submitted the same image without the modifications and the defence was able to compare the two.
Decades before the
Re: (Score:2)
Pervy, sure. Weird, ok. Sad, absolutely.
But horrifying? Why?
That is just the usual hysterics pushing their deranged fantasy of how the world works. Anybody sane pretty much expected this but does not care too much.
Re: (Score:2)
Pervy, sure. Weird, ok. Sad, absolutely.
But horrifying? Why?
Really.
A Horrifying New AI App Swaps Women Into Porn Videos With a Click
Omg pick beautiful women, you idiots!
Men could make brag videos! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Put uploaded photos on well-equipped dudes having sex with a lot of women
You don't think the LGBTQ community will run with this and paste their crushes on anything else?
Copyright violation but not horrifying (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
This feels like something that is covered under existing laws.
I suspect that this might be covered under some of the new 'revenge porn' laws. If not, it wouldn't be a stretch to amend such laws to include it.
Paste someone's face on a nude and wank to it all you want in private. Post it in an online forum and expect trouble.
Re:Copyright violation but not horrifying (Score:4, Insightful)
this really isn't any different than some kid decades ago cutting out a picture form one magazine and pasting in onto their copy of playboy.
It's very different in two key ways:
1. The fake is much better quality than an obviously cut-out head pasted on, and will continue to improve over time.
2. One kid stashing a magazine under his bed is different to it being posted on the internet where others can view it.
Good luck (Score:2)
Sure you can ban the app. How do you ban people's imagination? How do you criminalize what's in someone's thoughts? Also, how do you prevent people from writing their own code to do this, now that the idea is public?
Re: (Score:2)
It is not illegal to imagine a crime.
And you'd be wrong about that
Criminal conspiracy [wikipedia.org]
in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect
And here's a fun one What Legally Makes It Child Pornography? [hg.org] (my emphasis)
There are officially two types of material considered child pornography, simulated, or digitally generated ....
Visual illustrations containing child pornography are deemed illegal under federal law. These may include photographs, videos, digital downloads, images produced to depict an actual minor, undeveloped film and video and electronically stored data.
Re: (Score:2)
It is not illegal to imagine a crime.
And you'd be wrong about that
Criminal conspiracy [wikipedia.org]
in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect
Nice of you to miss the first and most important sentence in that article:
a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime
Imagining it yourself is not an agreement between two or more people. Every detective novel author imagined dozens of crimes for every book they wrote. They are not in jail for that. OJ Simpson wrote a book about killing his wife while under suspicion of having actually done the deed. He did not go to jail for that.
Re: (Score:2)
Does this work with Rush Limbaugh's face? (Score:3)
Asking for a friend.
Re: Does this work with Rush Limbaugh's face? (Score:3)
Man, I *just* got over the stomach flu, tooâ¦
Is this the site? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Ron Jeremy (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't want Ron Jeremy to feel bad.
He's in jail, I doubt he cares. Is somebody going to feel enough pity on him to give him an extra serving of dessert, or not?
Re: (Score:2)
give him an extra serving of dessert
Is that prison slang?
Re: (Score:2)
"When Rolling Stone charged Ron with being in the ME TOO movement, he showed us proof against the allegations," Rusciolelli said in the statement.
The new Rick Roll (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If it's WW2 era Betty White (yes she's that old) then that would probably be just fine. She was pretty damn hot in her day.
Might eventually end up as more good than bad (Score:2)
If deepfakes get good enough, so that anyone can make porn of anyone ... then people will be aware of that, and not attribute "porn of someone I know" to that person - it is implicitly assumed that it is a fake. Yes, it is a bad thing to portray someone that way and still will be - but the impact in a couple decades of someone seeing someone's head on someone else's body, will probably be "meh" for most people. Shocking now that it is new and novel, not so when it is mainstream.
Re:porn will make videos not evidence (Score:5, Insightful)
Faked yes. Unable to be detected? I wouldn't bet on that.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You don't understand what it means to attempt to destroy a persons reputation?
Re: (Score:3)
In a world of normalized fake images and videos, it's far easier to dismiss anything as deepfaked. If anything, it would be easier to convict someone of extortion.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:5, Informative)
The problem is really political messages. Videos of [politician] saying things that are not true, which [politician's opponents] will just believe because there's a video of them saying it.
It's bad enough as it is right now. It's going to get a lot worse when you basically can't trust any video footage that isn't being streamed live by a trusted media organisation. And how many people trust media orgs any more...
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:4, Interesting)
Imagine if you can not in any way trust the video.
I suppose one future outcome of that (far future maybe) will be a return to a federate, hyper-local, multi-layered representative system of democracy. Basically:
a) People will vote for a representative they personally known close enough to have a correct general notion of their ideas, let's say, a 1:5,000 ratio. These elected representatives form layer 2, and have jurisdiction over their area.
b) These elected representatives, in turn, become a group of electors who, by knowing each other also closely enough to have a correct general notion of each other's ideas, as well as serving those who elected themselves and their interests, will in turn elect one among themselves, let's says, a 1:100 ratio. These form layer 3, and their task is to deal with issues involving two or more of the groups under them.
c) Repeat at the same ratio for further layers, until at the very top there's a global parliament deciding things involving the entire world.
For a world with 8.5 billion people that'd result in 5 layers, with things looking roughly like this:
Layer 1: 8,500,000,000 individuals.
Layer 2: 1,700,000 independent "villages" of 5,000 people each.
Layer 3: 17,000 independent "city states" of 500,000 people each.
Layer 4: 170 independent "countries" of 50,000,000 people each.
Layer 5: 2 independent "continental unions" of 4,250,000,000 people each, which by this point might alternate presidency and vice-presidency.
Since in this hypothetical scenario people only vote for the layer immediately above them, and always for people they have some direct connection with, AI fakes would have a much harder time working, at the cost of limiting democratic representativeness from being as broad and far reaching as we're used to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I based this on a vague memory I have of reading about "confederations of clans" existing somewhere in Northern Europe during the Middle Age or before. A clan was formed by several families. Each family had its head, and one of these family heads, typically the oldest of them all, was the head of the clan as a whole. Those heads of clans in turn formed an assembly do deliberate on things pertaining to all clans. So I generalized the idea and introduced voting in it.
By the way, if global politics were to rea
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:2)
Sounds like the Bahaâ(TM)i system.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:4, Insightful)
Agreed - this seems FAR more dangerous that faked porn videos. We have already had politicians try to deny having said things that were caught on video. Imagine if you can not in any way trust the video.
Who’s to say it wouldn’t be both?
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand it could cause people to be more cynical of the things they see and read.
Doing deepfakes is nothing new, it's just that the resources required to do it have decreased to the point that the technology is available to anyone. Well funded political parties, film studios and governments have had the ability to create fake videos for years.
Re: (Score:3)
We've sort of seen already a low-rent version of this with QAnon where nutcases where sending around photoshopped images of hillary clinton doing vampire stuff, and despite it being an obvious photoshop, it was still freaking out gullible fools.
Now imagine how impactful that would be with a deepfake capable of fooling even expert eyes.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a simple solution to this problem. You get three news organizations (Fox, CNN and the BBC, say) and they validate each others claims to the authenticity of a particular video clip. The number of orgs in the group needs to be small so it is easier to validate what they say. Any clip that they validate must have had one of their reporters at the scene. Those people will sign off on the clip and be held accountable if theyâ(TM)ve lied.
Why would they do this? For a chance to have "official" news clips that people can trust. Then they can have opinion pieces on verified media. So Fox can continue to make its right-wing commentary but also have a legitimate claim that what they broadcast is truthful.
News orgs should be talking this as an opportunity to be a trusted source of information again.
Re: (Score:2)
Videos of [politician] saying things that are not true (...)
We really don't need AI to obtain videos of politicians saying things that are not true.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:5, Insightful)
Not as upsetting as I'm sure deep-faking you into a crime or scandal you were nowhere near would be. So far the reaction is "so what, it's not affecting me"? Till things start maturing, and becomes more widespread and acceptable then "so what" becomes "too late", and there will be no sympathy because no one cares. Now and then.
Re: (Score:2)
Once it's widespread and common. "It's just a deepfake" will be everyone's excuse, even if they were there and it was real.
You may have heard the term "fake news". Expect to hear it even more.
The really upsetting part will be a certain political party descending even further into their alternate reality due to this.
Ask your female friends (Score:5, Interesting)
Sure in the Victorian era. What does this have to do with someone's reputation today?
Simple test: Ask 10 women in your life what they'd think if you swapped their face into a porn and masturbated to it. Report back on your findings! :) Women find it threatening and hostile. Should they? I don't know, they just do. Even cool women get really touchy about being sexualized against their will. My wife is here with me. I asked her what she thought of the idea of such a site and she nearly smacked me and this is the woman I had sex with a few hours ago.
:)
Me? I don't care. Swap my face into a porn and masturbate to your heart's content! I won't feel bad...other than seeing my face swapped on the body of someone presumably in better shape than me.
Even if I'd never want to have sex with you, if fantasizing about me gave you some joy, I don't care one bit. I'd be happy to effortlessly provide someone joy.
However, that has been described to me as "male privilege" (yeah, I hate that term as well, but I get where they're coming from) because I am confident you won't want to rape me and even if you did, I could fight you off. I have never felt threatened by anyone who wanted to have sex with me. For women, that's a constant fear. They've been told all their life to watch out for strange men who smile at them, to never let their drink leave their site, to be careful and paranoid every time they enter a parking garage at night or walk the streets alone. It was news to me, personally, to learn the depth of paranoia the average woman has regarding safety that I just take for granted.
So yeah, women find unwanted sexualization uncomfortable as it is. Now it's expanding into swapping them into your porn library. I'm not telling you not to do it. It's not my place to do so, IMO. However, if you swap some woman's face into a porn and jerk off to it, I'd suggest not telling her.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
However, that has been described to me as "male privilege" (yeah, I hate that term as well, but I get where they're coming from) because I am confident you won't want to rape me and even if you did, I could fight you off. I have never felt threatened by anyone who wanted to have sex with me. For women, that's a constant fear. They've been told all their life to watch out for strange men who smile at them, to never let their drink leave their site, to be careful and paranoid every time they enter a parking garage at night or walk the streets alone. It was news to me, personally, to learn the depth of paranoia the average woman has regarding safety that I just take for granted.
I wonder how much of that is caused by actual risk and how much of it comes from TV and movies and news constantly making everyone think that anyone different should be feared, whether it's constantly telling women that they should fear men because otherwise they're going to be raped at parties, or portraying people who are obviously on the autism spectrum as creepy stalkers that prey on young people, or constantly trying to make people afraid that the wrong political party will win, or constantly reinforci
Re: Ask your female friends (Score:2)
Itâ(TM)s very common for women to have at least one physically aggressive sexual male lay actual hands on them during high school or college. Pretty much every woman has a story of âoethat guy.â It is *extremely* common. Few of them deal with full on rape, but the real risk of it is felt by most.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Ask your female friends (Score:5, Informative)
"What people don't know is that in a domestic abuse situation resulting in death it is almost always the woman who murdered the man."
Or not.... "One in four women in the U.S. will be targeted by an abusive partner in their lifetime. ... Almost one out of five or 16.3% of murder victims in the U.S. were killed by an intimate partner; [AND] women account for two out of three murder victims killed by an intimate partner."'
And if you follow the first link below, you'll see tons of stats like, "1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men have been victims of severe physical violence (e.g. beating, burning, strangling) by an intimate partner in their lifetime."
Since almost all of these events happen more to women than men, I'd say the level of caution is justified.
Stats come from NCADV and DOJ. If you have a reputable source for your original assertion, feel free to post it.
https://ncadv.org/learn/statis... [ncadv.org]
https://www.domesticshelters.o... [domesticshelters.org]
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pu... [ojp.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
Lets be honest. Nobody has to think this is their only sexual outlet to sit around laughing with friends and see what that chick a couple apartments over would look like for fun. We are horney animals an
Re: (Score:2)
I won't feel bad...other than seeing my [her] face swapped on the body of someone presumably in better shape than me [her].
Maybe *that* was why she almost slapped you. I mean, unless she gave you a different reason.
Re: (Score:2)
Simply ask 10 women if it would be alright you imagined them naked and masturbated it, report back on your findings, I think the results would be similar.
I can see that they wouldn't like it, I don't see how once deep fakes become common you could control it.
Also I am not confident people wouldn't want to rape me, plenty of men have been raped, although the mechanics of it means only by men. I am not confident I could fight you off, what I am doing is not worrying about things I cannot control. Also I a su
Much more than climate of fear (Score:3)
Also I a sure that men have been sexually assaulted by women, but men have not been raised in a climate of fear, taught that every woman wants to rape them, so just shrug it off.
Sure, I've been groped by a female coworker against my will. That is technically sexual assault in the same way it was assault when my 8yo kicked me in the balls last week. :) This was long ago when we were both young and single. The woman who groped me was literally 100lbs lighter than me and almost a foot shorter.
I think what you're missing is imagining what comes next. I told the woman, "hey, not cool, we're at work." She made a lame joke insulting my sexuality and walked away (apologized the ne
Re: (Score:2)
It seems almost your entire comment is based on this. But not all women are smaller or weaker than men and most all men have to worry about other men who are larger and stronger than them.
"I can injure her or kill her if pushed to the point of violence...she could give me a bruise?...some scratches? That's why it's a false equivalence."
I think you seriously underestimate women. A woman can serious injure or kill you as
Re: (Score:2)
Also I am not confident people wouldn't want to rape me, plenty of men have been raped, although the mechanics of it means only by men.
This is a false and absurd claim. Of course women are able to coerce and sometimes even force men to penetrate without consent, or use an object to penetrate them without consent, and those are rape.
The DOJ defines rape as "The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." and specifically clarifies it applies to all sex/gender combinations.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Nah, she knows what I look like naked (Score:2)
You probably would care if someone swaps your face on some gay porn and sends it to your wife.
I'd only be slightly miffed because you're showing her very clearly how much better looking I'd be if I had the body of a male porn star. :) You'd never match up the height, dick shape/size, and scars and my birthmark.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure but it doesn't matter how they feel about it. They aren't harmed by it. God forbid someone wanting to avoid this might have to show social restraint and stop publishing all their pictures publicly on social media.
"Me? I don't care. Swap my face into a porn and masturbate to
Re: Ask your female friends (Score:5, Insightful)
And no one should assume a deep-fake video of Donald Trump doing a speech about overthrowing the united states government, because magically we just know that would never happen, just like "we know" a porn video isn't actually them.
Re: (Score:3)
Or to take it another way, how many have done things they regretted in the past - young and stupid, desperate for money, trusted someone they shouldn't have etc.
Deepfakes give them plausible deniability even if the video is actually real.
Re: (Score:2)
OK, imagine your boss being fucked (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure, but deepfakes aren't the problem here; it's masturbating to them or otherwise imagining the woman in sexual situations. In this situation, you're making her uncomfortable by telling her about it, not by making the deepfake.
And the question posited was how does this affect her reputation? I'd argue it doesn't, simply because deepfakes are a thing, so no one should assume a porn of someone means they did porn.
Fair point. Do you report to a woman, directly or indirectly? Our director is a woman and has 200 people reporting to her directly or indirectly, including me. Now imagine if we circulated a video of her swallowing the cum of workers we deepfaked in. Rationally, what you said makes sense. However, this woman is Indian as are many of my coworkers. Already a ton have regressively stupid issues reporting to women. Now they are openly bonding over fantasies of sex with her? I think in the mind of regressive shitheads it would lower her reputation and make it harder for some to respect her. Should it? Absolutely not, but there are assholes on this planet.
However, a point to consider is you and I can debate this detached from the situation, like how I can debate the Gaza strip with detachment. I live in the US, not Israel or Palestine. I have no dog in the fight. For her, she has to wonder if such a video diminished her standing or the respect of her subordinates or even her bosses. You and I can say "nahhh..only an asshole would think that." However, if we're wrong...oh well, no problem for us. She has to worry if this could harm her or lead to someone else getting the next promotion, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Doubtful. First the idea that sexually objectifying a woman and respecting her being in some way exclusive is nonsense. Nobody magically becomes incapable of respecting mad skill just because they also want to bend you over the desk. Second, nobody over 20 actually respects their boss.
"She has to worry if this could harm her or lea
Re:Ask your female friends (Score:4, Funny)
Whoa wait...you just had sex?!? What's it like?
Not bad, although I had to buy my hand dinner first.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Also the "reputation destruction" will, at best, last a few weeks and then everybody is clued in and this is meaningless to anybodies reputation. The whole thing is pretty limited before that as porn may not be shown publicly. There are benefits as well: While this example gets screamed at by the usual hysterics that nicely makes it clear to everybody that the age of "video evidence" is pretty much over.
Nothing "horrifying" to see here (except the mind-set of the story author), move along.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing "horrifying" to see here (except the mind-set of the story author), move along."
THAT is kind of horrifying. Honestly, it was over a long time ago so maybe people recognizing it is for the best.
"The whole thing is pretty limited before that as porn may not be shown publicly."
That is actually true of real porn as well. Unless the person posting it knows you and points others you know directly at it... nobody will ever see it or know it is you even if th
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:3)
So you'll just paste his face over Hunter Biden's in the video? Cool.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> If you really feel this way, surely you won't mind linking to a jpg of your face.
One has nothing to do with the other.
Since you have no problem trying to destroy any random person's "reputation" on the internet, here ya go:
https://images.pexels.com/phot... [pexels.com]
I'll await whatever you think you can do.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:4, Insightful)
In some countries, some women have been stoned to death for less.
Re: (Score:2)
In some countries, some women and some men have been stoned to death for less.
Re: porn will make videos not evidence (Score:4, Insightful)
On the one hand women assert they are no different than men and have just as much desire for sex as men to counter the old idea that women aren't interested in sex anyway. On the other they claim a massive disparity in unwanted sexual interest from men even pushing to make much of it criminal.
Or maybe some of them just want to fuck and others don't and these positions don't exactly match with what other people want for them. People overcomplicate and overanalyse. Learn to be laid back and let others get on with being how they want to be.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you missed the point. The issue I'm raising is people not being able to get on with how they want to be. I can't even imagine living through the mindfuck being saddled on women. They are being programmed to think sexual interest is negative attention, attracting sexual interest is negative, it is okay to do everything that overtly attracts sexual interest but negative if someone expresses it overtly in response, and that t
Re: (Score:2)
Religious repression of sexuality ...
Religion has been used to justify a lot of things but the demonizing of pre-marital sex wasn't a major point until the 1700s and the rise of a middle-class.
Where are the women saying they need sex. We've seen it on Seinfeld, Friends, Sex and the City but in reality, after 60 years of liberation, women still hide their sexual needs and their use of contraception.
Sigmund Freud didn't have an answer but I'll risk it: Women want a relationship and then, somewhere to 'nest'. In patriarchal society, women have
Re: (Score:3)
This isn't just human. This isn't just mammalian. This is whenever and wherever one sex (usually the female) has to make a larger initial investment in reproduction than the other. But it's true of ALL mammals. Some address it one way, some another. Look up lek (e.g. https://psychology.wikia.org/w... [wikia.org] ).
Re: (Score:2)
It can still be evidence but additional testimony will be required to establish chain of custody and that the video was not altered. Random video found on the internet with unknown provenance will not be very persuasive.
Re: (Score:2)
If they're talking about https://www.yapty.com/ [yapty.com]
It ain't all that believable, you could tell it was fake
Re: (Score:2)
You're right, there are no websites that have porn created specifically by women for women. They do not exist at all, anywhere, because there is precisely 0 demand from women for such things.
Re: (Score:2)
You're right that calling the program an AI is silly. It's not really wrong, though, but it sure isn't a general AI.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, now I know what you're going to beating off to. Thanks for sharing, I hate it.
Re: (Score:2)
But of course, the narrative is about VICTIMIZATION. It always must be. Because all women are delicate flowers who will immediately wilt if their "honor" is "besmirched" by being associated with something as "naughty" as a pr0n shot.
Yes, the usual hysterics are really salivating over this idea. They probably have not been this aroused in years. The sane part of the population does not care too much.