Ruling Party Figures Say Poland Has Pegasus Spyware (reuters.com) 27
Senior figures in the Polish government indicated on Friday that the country had bought sophisticated spyware developed by the Israel-based NSO Group, but denied that it had been used against political opponents. Reuters reports: Reports from the Associated Press that NSO Group's Pegasus software was used to hack the phones of government critics, including a senator who ran the election campaign for the largest opposition party in 2019, have led to accusations that special services are undermining democratic norms. Government figures had previously declined to comment on whether or not Poland has access to Pegasus, citing laws on official secrets. In December, a deputy defense minister said Poland did not use Pegasus. However, in extracts from an interview with conservative weekly Sieci published on Friday, the leader of Poland's ruling nationalists Law and Justice (PiS) indicated that Polish services had the software.
"Pegasus is a program that is used by services combating crime and corruption in many countries...It would be bad if the Polish services did not have this type of tool," Jaroslaw Kaczynski [leader of the Law and Justice party] was quoted as saying. He rejected opposition claims that Pegasus had been used against political opponents as "utter nonsense." Asked about Pegasus during a news conference, Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro said it would be a "disgrace" if Polish services did not have access to such surveillance technology.
"Pegasus is a program that is used by services combating crime and corruption in many countries...It would be bad if the Polish services did not have this type of tool," Jaroslaw Kaczynski [leader of the Law and Justice party] was quoted as saying. He rejected opposition claims that Pegasus had been used against political opponents as "utter nonsense." Asked about Pegasus during a news conference, Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro said it would be a "disgrace" if Polish services did not have access to such surveillance technology.
djen dobry (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:djen dobry (Score:4, Informative)
I think the far-right leanings of Poland and its strong religious beliefs are not completely causative. Other countries are traditionally very catholic like Spain, Portugal have nearly zero far-right, and both are currently governed by leftist parties. Italy is obviously catholic but has been governed by both left, right and populists.
Here some considerations on very recent oppositions between the Catholic Church (the Pope in Vatican, and the Polish Catholic hierarchy) and the far-right government of Poland.
Re: (Score:2)
Polish ruling party is extreme left, at least when it comes to economy and one-party rule. It's far right only socially and for rhetoric. In other words, it's national-communist. They keep raising taxes and borrow with abandon, give handouts to the idle poor, spew propaganda about banks and companies being all evil, and so on.
As for oppositions between Polish church and the govt, there's none. The Polish church hierarchy is deeply in bed with the ruling party, taking massive amounts of money, land, buil
Re: (Score:2)
The PiS classifies itself as right in Poland "United Right" coalition and is member of the "European Conservatives & Reformists Party" (in which the US Republican party is associate member).
When you say they are left, what you might be seeing the effect that "extreme meets", meaning aspects of far-left and far-right end up the same, and the modern politics is much more center/extreme rather than left/right.
I agree with you the national Catholic Church chapters do not care much what the Pope says, region
Re: (Score:2)
is much more center/extreme rather than left/right
PiS is about as far from centrism as possible. The left/right spectrum is a circle not a line, and PiS, being a mix of Gomulka-style communism and far right, is on the very opposite side.
Re: djen dobry (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
But Poland does not have totalitarianism... You yourself just admitted, that the regime enjoys the voters' support!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, you can. And always could, hence the 1st Amendment.
Bullshit! No, they don't.
Exactly! Fear — not sincere support.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
This does not follow from anything discussed...
So? What's the relevance?
It just seems like you only like Democracy, when your school of thought wins. When voters — sincerely and freely — reject your ideas, you denounce them. Make up your mind — do you want free elections?
Re: (Score:3)
It's AUTHORITARIAN.
Re: (Score:1)
Indeed. Probably keeping tabs on what two adults are doing with their genitals.
Re:djen dobry (Score:4, Interesting)
Indeed. Probably keeping tabs on what two adults are doing with their genitals.
That should not surprise anybody. Observing and regulating what other adults are doing with there genitals is a very old and time honoured conservative christian tradition and an important tactic in their ongoing 2000 year old war on sex and generally anything else that's fun.
Christianity vs. sex (Score:1)
And now that there are fewer Christians in the US [pewforum.org], we're having less sex [slashdot.org]. Congratulations!
Re: djen dobry (Score:1)
Re: djen dobry (Score:4, Informative)
Sure: There's this [reuters.com]. Or this [politico.eu]. Also Catholic leaders whipped up a mob [medium.com]. You know what another word for "mob" is? You might also want to google Polish knife crimes, football violence and anti-semitism. All of which involves Catholics.
Pegasus Watergate (Score:3)
"Would be disgrace" - and now it is. (Score:1)
"Countries identified by Israel as authoritarian regimes have disappeared from the list. So Poland was placed next to countries such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Mexico and Hungary. Apparently, it was considered too dangerous to hand over such a powerful surveillance tool to representatives of countries where it would be difficult to effectively c
And Mossad has backdoored Pegasus :] (Score:2)
Right wing authoritarian? (Score:2)
If liberal policies favor a larger more powerful central government while (US) conservative policies would allocate more power to the state and individual level, then by definition authoritarian dictatorships cannot be conservative. Or, said another way, forget the labels liberal and conservative because they tend to just elicit unhelpful defensive, reflexive responses and consider that - Authoritarian regimes and dictatorships necessarily must always originate from political environments that favor large