Last Of Us Voice Actor Pisses Everyone Off With NFT Push (kotaku.com) 28
Troy Baker, best known as the voice behind The Last Of Us Parts 2's Joel Miller, made trouble for himself overnight when he announced his support for a new NFT venture around monetizing artists' voice work. From a report: "You can hate. Or you can create. What'll it be?" he standoffish-ly tweeted. It didn't take fans long to decide. "I'm partnering with VoiceverseNFT to explore ways where together we might bring new tools to new creators to make new things, and allow everyone a chance to own and invest in the IP's they create," Baker -- who's voiced dozens of video game characters from Final Fantasy XIII's Snow to Fortnite's Agent Jones -- wrote overnight. "We all have a story to tell."
Last dying breath (Score:3)
This is a voice actor's last dying breath before being replaced with deep fake AI tech. One last "monetize all you can" push before their projected career death.
Re: (Score:2)
Translation (Score:5, Insightful)
Very minor celebrity tries to jump on one of the many blockchain Ponzi bandwagon to make a buck.
It's fake (Score:2)
How is everyone pissed off? (Score:2)
Seems like one of the few valid use cases (Score:2)
Re:Seems like one of the few valid use cases (Score:5, Insightful)
But they don't. NFT adds nothing here. It guarantees nothing here. Only by assigning shared ownership (via copyright law) and contractually agreeing on payout terms do you get that. And then, you don't need NFT to do it.
Just like every other use of "the blockchain" and related "technology;" the only actual use is convincing someone else to give you money. So ask yourself: are you convinced, or are you the one making the money?
Also, why has no one made PtbarneumCoin?
Re: Seems like one of the few valid use cases (Score:2)
Not quite P.T. Barnum, but close enough - griftcoin.biz ;)
Re: (Score:2)
NFTs could be a patronage token. You like an artist so you give them money and get a cosmetic token, an NFT, in return. This is about the only legitimate use of NFTs, and is precisely what they were used for prior to the blockchain-based variety becoming popular.
Re: Seems like one of the few valid use cases (Score:2)
Patronage typically leads to at least a public "thanks to...", unless you want to remain anonymous. NFT does nothing here in either case.
But if it convinces some more people to give you a patronage... well, again, it's useful for that.
Re: (Score:2)
An NFT is a pretty public thank you. One that's supposedly part of the public record until the servers shut down.
I imagine there will be people who appreciate being anonymous, ones for the classic wine, cheese and polite applause, and some who want to be Internet famous. So long as the speculation doesn't turn the whole thing into the high end art market: a cluster fuck of corruption.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't that. NFT just says you can use this particular one-off recording in your Twitch streams, or you TikTok videos, or whatever. There are literally no royalties. You can play that "Bazinga!" sound all you want but your competing Twitch streamers can't. Ho hum. The voice actor is the only one making money, this is just another way of doing Patreon...
Now what if 10 People have what appears to be ten nearly identical "Bazinga!" sounds, with 10 different unique signatures? It's no longer a clear "o
News that matters? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The nerds didn't leave, their interests just shifted.
Re: (Score:2)
There are a handful of us left but yeah the constant shilling of cryptocurrency is making me rethink if I should even bother with /. for 2022.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I have a different, related, perspective. I think there simply isn't anything "new" in tech. Tech is now either:
A. Blocking and tackling issues.
B. Specialized science 10 people in the world can comment on.
C. Derivative of a project we've seen a million times.
D. A cool/scary new robot/AI thing.
E. A project that changes the perception of reality.
"A" is now covered by stackoverflow. "B" gets no comments. "C" is boring. "D" is interesting, but not enough of it to fill up the page each day. So Slashdot now
"We all have a story to tell." (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Title is wrong (Score:2)
"Last Of Us Voice Actor Pisses Everyone Off With NFT Push"
I'm not pissed. I'm pretty indifferent to this..
Ha! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean Isaac Hayes [imdb.com] is in on this, too?
You can hate? More like manipulate. (Score:2)
Troy Baker: You can hate? Or you can create.
Internet: When you can't innovate, you can manipulate.
You aren't fooling anyone with this imaginary wealth.
This is beneath /. (Score:1)