Electric Vehicle Sales Doubled In 2021, With More Now Sold Each Week Than Entire Year In 2012 (independent.co.uk) 156
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Independent: The electric vehicle (EV) market is soaring, with 130,000 cars sold globally each week, roughly equivalent to sales for the entire year in 2012. Sales of EVs more than doubled in 2021, even with supply chain snarls and pandemic-related shrinking of demand for gas-powered cars. New data, from the influential intergovernmental International Energy Agency (IEA), revealed that 6.6 million electric cars were sold last year -- twice the number of 2020 -- making up 9 per cent of the global car market. IEA says the growth is "particularly impressive" over the last three years. The number has about tripled from 201 when 2.2 million electric cars were sold. "We estimate there are now around 16 million electric cars on the road worldwide, consuming roughly 30 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, the equivalent of all the electricity generated in Ireland," the IEA reported last week.
More than half of all electric cars are being sold in China (3.4 million), but the market is steadily growing in Europe and the United States. In the US, electric car sales more than doubled in 2021. More than 500,000 new EVs hit the highways, accounting for 4.5 per cent of the market. Tesla is still the strongest player, accounting for more than half of all electric car sales. A "generous" tax-credit system for EVs in the US may be influencing new car buyers (although it doesn't apply to Tesla and General Motor vehicles, IEA notes). In Europe, 2.3 million electric cars were sold in 2021, about half of which were plug-in hybrids, against a backdrop of tightened carbon emissions standards and more subsidies being rolled out by countries in the bloc. Germany made up the largest share of the European market last year where more than one in three cars sold was an electric model.
More than half of all electric cars are being sold in China (3.4 million), but the market is steadily growing in Europe and the United States. In the US, electric car sales more than doubled in 2021. More than 500,000 new EVs hit the highways, accounting for 4.5 per cent of the market. Tesla is still the strongest player, accounting for more than half of all electric car sales. A "generous" tax-credit system for EVs in the US may be influencing new car buyers (although it doesn't apply to Tesla and General Motor vehicles, IEA notes). In Europe, 2.3 million electric cars were sold in 2021, about half of which were plug-in hybrids, against a backdrop of tightened carbon emissions standards and more subsidies being rolled out by countries in the bloc. Germany made up the largest share of the European market last year where more than one in three cars sold was an electric model.
I'm optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I'm optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: I'm optimistic (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the great grandparent or so poster was saying that
1. people say that luxury battery replacement on a high end tesla is 20K
2. an EQ gasoline car (a 7 speed mercedes) has similar or worse lifecycle costs to get a high performance luxury car (engine = $15k?, Tranny $4K, plus expensive and frequent brake and oil service jobs)
This isn't comparing a 100K electric car with every option checked to a Ford Escort, this is a fair comparison for a high end, high performance german gas car to a high end, high
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's probably somewhere between a regional and a Benz thing; I had one about fifteen years ago, and back then, it would run about 150 for an oil change at the dealership, and the quickie oil places wouldn't touch it out of liability issues. (And battery changes were even worse...)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this a big issue? I can understand the problem of "lack of charging stations" as being far more pressing than fast charging stations.
I mean, if you had a slow charging station - say a 1.5kW station everywhere you go, wouldn't that be better than having a 150kW station? If you go between the office and home, 1.5kW charges around 5-8 miles per hour, so 8 hours of charging at the office will get you between 40-64 miles, covering all but the longest commutes.
Its better than havi
Re: (Score:2)
You're hilarious. 8 hours of charging at the office? there are going to be outlets in parking lots of office buildings for cars? no, there won't. no employer is going to put out for that. Just as apartment building owners aren't going to pay for an outlet for every parking spot.
Fast charging stations are necessary, REALLY fast, less than 15 minutes or this electric vehicle thing will not fly in these united states. Not to be negative though, a switch out and go battery swap could be done faster than fi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The usual 240 mile range of modern EV's is enough to cover most people's daily driving for a 5-7 days. You can charge them up to 80% in 15-30 minutes at a fast charger. 2-3 miles range per hour on a 120v wall socket, that could top it off overnight for most daily driving. Nobody will need to keep their car plugged in to a charger at work every day.
Re: (Score:2)
It blows your mind that an employer would shell out a few thousand bucks (one-time) per employee to provide a useful amenity? That's peanuts in the grand scheme of the cost of employment.
Re: (Score:2)
Different budget.
For maybe $2,000 per private office you can give each one individual temperature control. But most corporate people in charge of design and construction won't go for the costs, and will have one thermostat shared among 4 or 5 separate rooms, even if each person working in those spaces is getting paid a good 6-figure salary.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not unrealistic to imagine more buildings will provide charging infrastructure, both included in the parking space cost and charged separately. Same with city streets having posts that cars could connect to for charging.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They are already doing that in a lot of cases. And if they're building new parking, the city I work in requires 2% of the spaces to have chargers put in, plus infrastructure for another 18% of the spaces.
Re: (Score:2)
The building has put in EV charging, because it is a source of revenue for them. So, charging at work will absolutely be a thing.
I recently saw a rental listing for a new building near me, that was listing EV charging stations as a feature of the building. (Admittedly a higher end building, but give it time.) Building owners will happily invest in ongoing sources of revenue.
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen pricing of around $6,000 per charger in a large parking garage, including all the added electrical capacity and wiring, compared to maybe as little as $1,000 per space for a small cheap asphalt surface lot (not counting land acquisition or grading), and as much as $20,000 to $40,000 per space for a 6-story concrete parking garage.
Re: (Score:2)
BEVs and robotaxis by 2026? (Score:2)
I believe it will be a while before ICE autos go out of fashion.
Tony Seba and his think tank have predicted the future, and according to them, ICE autos will be out of fashion within the next decade at latest.
They drew a curve that predicted battery prices would come way down, and reality followed the curve. Projecting that curve out just a couple more years predicts that BEVs will cost less than ICEVs. BEVs are already cheaper to operate and cheaper to maintain; if they are cheaper to buy, that will disr
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If I still lived in the city, I mostly wouldn't need a car. But I would much rather get into a taxi or Uber that has a person in charge compared to getting into a driverless car that the previous passengers threw up in, had messy sex in, or god knows what else.
Re: (Score:3)
We need an electric car with the basics.
There *is* the Chevy Bolt and the Nissan LEAF. Both of these are great, car-like cars. It's just unfortunate that Chevy has handled the Bolt battery recall so shabbily. It's almost over, though, and as a result every Bolt in the world (including used ones) is going to have a brand new battery. Good time to get a used EV.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'm optimistic (Score:5, Informative)
There are quite a few reports of EV's (mainly Tesla at present) that have gone well over 200k miles on a battery, and age should not be not an issue. Yes you can keep rebuilding everything on your ICE vehicles and make them last indefinitely if you are willing to spend the money, but for many EV's that won't be necessary.
"With what we are learning from companies like Gruber Motor Company and owners worldwide, it would not be unheard of to have your Tesla last you for over a decade or over 400,000 miles, well over AARP’s 200,000 mile estimated lifespan of an internal combustion car."
https://www.vehiclehistory.com... [vehiclehistory.com]
Re:I'm optimistic (Score:5, Informative)
The batteries don't die of old age in 10 years, who told you that? And the average miles driven per year for cars in the US is about 14k, so 140k miles in 10 years. At that rate a Tesla should last as much as 28 years on a battery (400k / 14k).
Re:I'm optimistic (Score:4, Informative)
The batteries are repairable. From my cite; "Gruber Motor Company can do the necessary repairs (not replacement) for around $5,000".
Re:I'm optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Yes... I once thought so too. I maintained my 2001 sedan quite well I thought. I had the transmission rebuilt at 60k miles, then around 150k it lost some compression (but the ca
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"far longer than most ICE engines" - I have 3 ICE cars, 2004, 2007, 2008. 2004 - 107,000 miles, 2007 - 135,000 miles, 2008 - 130,000 miles. All three engines are still running very strong with no issues. As long as I maintain the drive train properly and take care of the vehicles with regular maintenance I see no reason why I can't double these numbers on each vehicle. These cars are 14 to 18 years old. EV batteries would not last that long, 10 years at most. I can't afford all the dynamite it would take to blow my cars up after 10 years because I can't afford battery replacement.
There are already Chevy Bolts at 100,000 miles, still with 92% battery capacity [torquenews.com]. I expect EVs with actively cooled batteries will probably make it past 200,000, and far further with a battery replacement (which would be expensive but still a lot cheaper than a whole new car).
Re: (Score:2)
with regular maintenance I see no reason why I can't [get over 200K miles on my three ICE cars]
I used to drive a VW Passat wagon. I live close to a good shop and I took the car in for regular maintenance. One year after the car had driven over 100K miles, the transmission failed and I paid to have it rebuilt. After that repair was done, there was an emission control problem plus an oil leak. Then after that was fixed, the brakes had a problem. Then the engine just started randomly dying (which turned
Re: (Score:3)
As long as I maintain the drive train properly and take care of the vehicles with regular maintenance
The maintenance cost of your vehicles over time will equal if not exceed the cost of a battery replacement. Seriously it's not 2015 anymore. The "EVs are too expensive to maintain and run" excuse stopped being valid many years ago. Try to keep up.
Re: (Score:2)
There are Nissan Leafs with more miles on them than your ICE cars, and the batteries are still just fine. Taxi companies love them because they are cheap to run and extremely reliable.
You can replace or upgrade the batteries in old Leafs too. $20k is what a brand new Tesla battery costs, the price for other cars is much much lower. Look at the price difference between a 39kWh and 64kWh Kona or eNiro, it's about 4k Euros and that's retail.
On the other hand someone I know bought a rather expensive Jaguar, and
Re: (Score:2)
The average price paid for new cars these days in the USA is about $37k. You can get a very nice Hyundai Ioniq 5 for $40 before incentives, and batteries usually last a lot longer than ICE motors.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Your average ICE engine can last multiple decades if you don't mind rebuilding it and the transmission, replacing the exhaust and cooling systems, etc.
https://riverdaleautomotive.co... [riverdaleautomotive.com]
"New designs, better technology and improved service standards in recent years have increased this average life expectancy to about 200,000 miles, or about 10 years."
Re: (Score:2)
Good point. The source I had looked at was from 2018, new and used cars are much more expensive now.
"the average price of a used car that is one to three years old is down 2.1% to $41,121 from about $42,000 in early January"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news... [yahoo.com]
Re: (Score:3)
I get 100% electricity from wind power that's available on the grid, and millions of people have rooftop solar. And even if it were mostly electricity from methane, ICE engines get only about 35% efficiency from gasoline so EV's would be a big win.
Re: (Score:2)
10% to 30% loss in the grid? You've got one lousy electric utility.
But even with that much loss, since combined cycle natural gas plants are twice as efficient as ICE engines, and natural gas plants are less polluting than gasoline or diesel engines, you're still ahead going EV. And for my utility, it's about 50% nukes, averaging near much as 8% wind, a smattering of other renewables, and the rest split between coal and natural gas. So defini
Political Pandering. (Score:2)
"A "generous" tax-credit system for EVs in the US may be influencing new car buyers..."
Oh yeah. Tax credits. That must be the reason.
Couldn't possibly be gas prices that have doubled in the last 2 years, rampant inflation, 30% mark-up on new and used cars, and generally dismissing everything else that politics has managed to fuck up.
Wait a minute: plug in hybrids are EVs? (Score:5, Interesting)
Woah Nellie. From the fine summary:
In Europe, 2.3 million electric cars were sold in 2021, about half of which were plug-in hybrids,
That is not what I hear when I hear "EV". Sure, a plug-in hybrid might travel entirely on battery for some trips but they're going to be burning gas for many others. For example, I couldn't drive to my office and back without recharging, not in most models.
Just curious: how many other people think "electric vehicles" includes plug-in hybrids?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: I do. I drive a 2016 Ford Fusion SE Hybrid EV (Score:2)
I think the 150 Lightning is a really smart move. Many people I know have truck for local jobs and work, and a car for actual long distance driving, so making the local vehicle electric is just smart. Add into that the extra torque of the EV and it's a no brainer for a work vehicle. I think ford has also been marketing it well as a natural improvement upon pickups, rather than an eco-alternative.
Re: (Score:2)
Just curious: how many other people think "electric vehicles" includes plug-in hybrids?
50%. I mean it's literally half of the PHEV acronym :-P
Re: (Score:2)
Just curious: how many other people think "electric vehicles" includes plug-in hybrids?
50%. I mean it's literally half of the PHEV acronym :-P
And if the headline, article summary, or my comment used the term "PHEV", that would all be perfectly clear. But none of them did.
It seems to me having a "PHEV" acronym implies "EV" (the term actually used) doesn't include "PH". That's what I found misleading. Maybe I'm just out of date and EV has become an umbrella term for any electrically powered vehicle, both battery and hybrid.
Re: (Score:2)
EV is a class of vehicle that has an electric drivetrain to drive at least 1 axle of the vehicle. EV tells you nothing about the power source for the electricity.
Unfortunately, many people use the term EV when they mean BEV which is a Battery Electric Vehicle. A BEV is a sub-class of EV.
A hydrogen fuel electric vehicle is a FCEV which a sub-class of EV.
A plugin-hybrid electric vehicle is a PHEV which a sub-class of EV.
The answer to your question of "how many other people think "electric vehicles" includes p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't fully consider a plugin an "electric vehicle", but my 2014 Volt has 140,000 miles with at least 90,000 of those miles being purely electric.
So, it's been an "electric car" (running off of grid energy) for more than half of its miles driven.
Thanks. I was wondering about that. Do you know if there's any fleet-wide statistics on this? IOW, across the entire US, what portion of miles driven by a plug-in hybrid are using electricity from a wall socket versus generated by the on-board ICE?
Assuming I was still commuting to an office, my guess is it would be about 50/50. I think I could generally make it one way on battery and would use gas on the way back. I don't personally see myself recharging at work (and perhaps that's why I don't have a plug-i
What kind of comparison is that? (Score:2)
130,000 cars sold globally each week, roughly equivalent to sales for the entire year in 2012
Ok, sure, and more EV cars have been sold than gas-powered cars sold during the roman empire.
Seriously though why chosen 2012?
I'll buy one tomorrow (Score:3)
...if someone can sell me a comfortably-sized (ie a Tesla-comparable, not some micro-mini) car with even as little as 200 mile range AND the ability to recharge in 5 mins.
I routinely drive 400-600 mile trips because frankly I find driving 10 hours vastly more comfortable than driving an hour to the local airport, arriving 2 hours early for the flight, flying for 1-2 hours, then screwing around for 30+ min to get my bags, to screw around for another hour to get a rental car, to drive to my customers who are often 1-2 hours from THEIR airport.
Re: (Score:3)
I routinely drive 400-600 mile trips
Wait. And you do so taking sub 5min breaks? Why are you so reckless endangering yourself and others on your roadtrip. Be a responsible driver and take a minimum 15min break every 2 hours before you kill someone through your drowsy inattentiveness.
Oh but I guess you don't get tired driving long durations. It's okay. I only had half a bottle of vodka but I'm still good to drive! Yes I'm comparing you to a drunk driver because studies have compared people who drive more than 2 hours without a relatively long b
Re: (Score:2)
I routinely drive 400-600 mile trips
Wait. And you do so taking sub 5min breaks? Why are you so reckless endangering yourself and others on your roadtrip. Be a responsible driver and take a minimum 15min break every 2 hours before you kill someone through your drowsy inattentiveness.
Oh but I guess you don't get tired driving long durations. It's okay. I only had half a bottle of vodka but I'm still good to drive! Yes I'm comparing you to a drunk driver because studies have compared people who drive more than 2 hours without a relatively long break (not 5min) to drunk drivers, and you share a lot in common.
Citation needed.
I too routinely drive 400-600 mile trips. One frequent trip is Toronto to Thunder Bay, which if you're unfamiliar with Ontario, is a 16 hour drive and I usually split that into two days (although on rare occasions I'll do it in one day), with a stop for lunch. On some routes, there isn't even a suitable place to take a break the roads are so desolate.
What you're not realizing is that for me, the long drive *is* the relaxing part of the trip. On such a long drive, most of it is done on mostly
Re: (Score:2)
Citation needed.
No there really isn't. There's a good reason truck driving duration without a break is regulated. If I told you the sky is blue and you wrote citation needed I would tell you to go fuck yourself. Consider this me being marginally nicer.
What you're not realizing is that for me, the long drive *is* the relaxing part of the trip.
No I understood that. Like I said I too can down a bottle of vodka and *THINK* that I'm okay to drive like the fucking moron that we both are. Here's a hint: Drowsy drivers die because they think they're fine and relaxed. As do those with waning attention.
Now you have some re
Re: (Score:2)
Hello European or City-Dweller, welcome to the bulk of America.
A 15 min break every two hours - what sort of medication are you ON?
As far as truck driver rest breaks, at least in THIS country they are required to take 30 min of breaks over an ELEVEN HOUR span of driving (out of 14 hours).
15 min every 2 hours is asinine. Just because you apparently have restless leg syndrome and can't sit still doesn't mean the rest of us can't sit comfortably for hours at a time and be just fine.
I must be a hell of a drive
Re: (Score:3)
Most Teslas are actually quite small. They are very low because it makes them more efficient, so it's not hard to find another EV that has the same or more space than say a Model 3.
I don't know which are available in your country, but meeting the 200 mile range requirement around here you have:
Polestar 2
Hyundai Kona
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Kia eNiro
Kia eSoul*
Kia EV6
MG ZS EV Long Range
Nissan Leaf 62kWh
Jaguar iPace
Opel Ampera-e
Audi Turd
Mercedes EQC
Mercedes EQS
Porsche Taycan
Xpeng P7
Peugeot e-2008
VW ID3
VW ID4
Ford Mach-E
Re: (Score:2)
Curiously, Hyundai makes both a gasoline and electric version of the Kona. The latter is specifically called either "Kona Electric" or "Kona EV."
Niche market (Score:2)
"We estimate there are now around 16 million electric cars on the road worldwide, "
There are approximately 1000 million cars on the road worldwide.
You do the math. At say 35 million cars a year (currently 6.6 million) it will take 30 years to replace the fleet.
Re: (Score:2)
It will take about 15 years to replace the fleet of ICE cars with BEV. You have not considered that the size of the fleet of cars will shrink, especially in the short-term over the next 7 years.
You can already see in Europe that 1 new BEV car is sold for every 2 ICE cars. The ICE market is collapsing while the BEV market is ramping up rapidly. This is know as the Osbourne effect.
Also you need to consider that fuel stations will be closing down during this transition period due to reduced demand for fuel. Th
The writing is in the wall for ICE cars (Score:2)
Speculative timeline:
2035: Sales of EVs exceed those of ICE cars.
2045: No more new ICE cars made.
2055: Sales of second hand ICE cars below those of EVs.
2065: ICE cars become collector's items than only the well-off can afford to run and maintain.
2075: ICE cars not allowed in public roads. The vast majority of gas stations transitioned to electric charging stations.
2085: Running an ICE car is affordable only for the really wealthy.
22nd century: Any existing ICE car in a working condition is a museum item wor
Re: (Score:2)
Most countries have banned new ICE production from 2035, and some (e.g. the UK) from 2030.
So your timescale is at least 10-15 years out. But otherwise accurate.
Re: (Score:2)
so what's your solution?
Re: (Score:3)
The first answer is to improve public transport, cycling and other infrastructure and encourage people to use their private cars less.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
The first answer is to improve public transport
Unless you've got plans to build that magic bus from Harry Potter, it's always going to be more convenient for me to hop in my car.
cycling
This one you're going to have to fix the weather for. Also, there's no fucking way I'm providing the power to any vehicle I'm riding on. I'm not living in the Flintstones age. I don't care if it runs on gasoline, batteries, or unicorn farts, just so long as it's not powered by my feet.
and other infrastructure and encourage people to use their private cars less.
Solar.. freakin'.. delivery.. drones!
Now that I can get behind. I'm not going to go out to
Re: (Score:2)
Also, there's no fucking way I'm providing the power to any vehicle I'm riding on. I'm not living in the Flintstones age.
And to think, people wonder why America has an obesity problem.
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:4, Insightful)
The first answer is to improve public transport, cycling and other infrastructure and encourage people to use their private cars less.
That is 90% fantasy. Most people live in suburban sprawl where neither bicycles nor buses will work.
Promoting bikes and buses is a small part of the solution, but it should be done in parallel with the gas-to-electric transformation, not as the "first answer."
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe we need to change how we design new developments so that they are more friendly to transport options other than the private car.
Its absolutely possible to have residential suburbs that people will want to live in AND that can have decent alternative transport options. I myself have lived in a number of such locations including one place that was ~200m from a bus stop with frequent service.
Re: (Score:2)
Riiiight. We can't get Congress to increase fuel efficiency by 10% and you believe there is the political will to redesign cities.
Re: let's stop pretending (Score:3)
Before I left the city to live where my commute is a five minute walk, my commute door-to-door was the same whether I drove, took public transit, or cycled. All were about 30 minutes. So I cycled year round, excepting only the days that were colder than -25C or when there was more than 3cm of fresh snow, when I would take the bus.
Essentially, I got my cardio for the day in for no time and no money. I've been in better shape since, but not much and not without a much larger investment of time and money.
Re: (Score:3)
i don't think that would impact the people you think it would.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't subsidize anything.
You're talking about effectively ending the most common market regulation tool, a tool that has been there and used since the beginning of markets. It's on par with theorizing that it would be better if everybody ate exactly the same thing everywhere on the planet. It's possible in the theoretical sense, but it's so far removed from practical reality - something that could and might happen - as to make it a useless suggestion. (I'm just going to ignore that you seem to be implying t
Re: let's stop pretending (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmmm. Subsidies have been removed from almost everything in New Zealand.. Save for a few things like the film industry... And maybe petroleum... And we are still functioning as a country... And we still have regulation.
A complete reversal from when we were the most tightly regulated country on the planet.
Though, to put a fly in my argument. The subsidising of electric vehicles will soon commence, funded by a tax on SUVs.
Re: (Score:2)
NZ did a fair amount of reform in agricultural and fisheries subsidies, but still has them in all sectors, including technology, energy, etc etc.
Just like every country with a developed economy. As I noted above, the question isn't "having subsidies", the questions is where and how much, as appropriate, and that changes with time.
Hardly a denouement of the applicability and suitability of them as a legitimate and important economic tool in the toolbelt.
Re: (Score:2)
that's adorable
Re: (Score:2)
"Inflation is a good thing, here's why"
Thank you CNN.
the problem is doing that w/ gas prices is that it is effectively a very regressive tax on people who actually have to drive to work everyday; or on the poor, who for obvious reasons would be forced to spend more money on gas just to survive. So nothing really changes. Still a ton of cars on the road, people are still having to commute. Mass transit isn't always a viable option for folks living outside of the urban core (for whatever reason; but i'd w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Inflation is a good thing, here's why" Thank you CNN.
the problem is doing that w/ gas prices is that it is effectively a very regressive tax on people who actually have to drive to work everyday; or on the poor, who for obvious reasons would be forced to spend more money on gas just to survive. So nothing really changes. Still a ton of cars on the road, people are still having to commute. Mass transit isn't always a viable option for folks living outside of the urban core (for whatever reason; but i'd wager a lot of that is due to housing prices)
Meanwhile the tech bro who can afford a god damn tesla in the first place is going to be largely unaffected. Traffic is slightly reduced, the poor are subjected to even more misery and privation, and oil companies probably make even more money.
progressive policies in a nutshell actually.
What the heck is the obsession with making *everything* about supporting the poor? If you want to help the poor then run social programs, but do not make every damn thing a social program because that has unintended consequences. Stop the gas subsidies, use the money for social programs for the poor if you're afraid of it affecting them, but do not remove incentive for middle class who *could* afford Teslas to actually do so via subsidizing gas.
Re: (Score:2)
A budget electric vehicle (EV) selling in China for $4,500 (£3,200) is now outselling Tesla's more upmarket cars.
The compact car is proving a big hit for state-owned SAIC Motor, China's top automaker.
The Hong Guang Mini EV is being built as part of a joint venture with US car giant General Motors (GM).
Re: (Score:2)
The increase in income has led to a rising middle class in China. While there is no standard definition of “middle class,” most metrics use income bands to differentiate between economic classes. For instance, the Chinese government defines incomes ranging from $7,250 to $62,500 (RMB 60,000 to 500,000) per year as middle class. McKinsey uses a range of $11,500 to $43,000 (RMB 75,000 to 280,000) per year.
https://chinapower.csis.org/ch... [csis.org]
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:5, Insightful)
Second, in terms of the "long tailpipe" fallacy, thats just what it is. For one, not all electricity is dirty. In California, where I live (I am a Republican), Natural Gas + Coal + Petroleum Coke + Oil + BioMass make up about 50% of our energy. Nuclear, Hydro, Solar PV, Solar Thermal, Wind, Waste Heat, and GeoThermal make up the other half (Citation [ca.gov]).
Third, I have a Tesla Solar + Powerwall installation in my home that provides about 75% of my energy use. That includes my car when not taking a long distance drive and stopping at Superchargers. So for me, the 25% of the power I import from the grid is still 50% clean, which means only 12.5% of my energy is dirty. Even when it is, it is not as dirty as burning gasoline out of a car, since Natural Gas is more efficient and doesn't pollute like gasoline or even coal does. Speaking of burning gasoline...
Fourth. The main environmental savings from driving electric cars is the energy efficiency that have. I have a Tesla Model X P100D that has a 100KWh battery. That battery takes me 289 miles if charged to full (realistically about 270). The battery stores about 3.5 gallons of gasoline's worth of energy. I wouldn't get 60 miles with an equivalent luxury SUV with close performance specs (none of them would actually beat me off a line, but lets not split hairs. Compare a BMW X5, or Porsche Cayenne which gets 17/22 Mpg). This is where the vast majority of savings come from. Even if I connected my car directly to an oil power plant, I would still be cleaner, BY FAR, because of how little energy it takes to move it around vs an ICE car that gets ~20% efficiency at best. My Tesla's motor puts 90% of the energy into movement. The 10% is the loss in the chargers and inverters to get it from my solar roof to the batteries of the car.
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:5, Insightful)
"So "Big Oil" isn't going anywhere, and we still need oil for plastics, fertiliser, pharmaceuticals, lubricants, explosives, etc." - correct. the main complaint about oil is the pollution emitted when you burn it.
"Buying an EV is nothing more than a needless geek toy. The average person cannot afford to spend AU$50k on an ENTRY-LEVEL car, when they can get a brand new MG for about $30k less" - EVs will come down in price as production ramps up, all new tech is expensive at first.
"EVs are actually more polluting per KM than Petrol cars" nonsense, even if your grid is 100% coal, EVs still work out to be cleaner, plenty of reports out there to show that.
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:5, Informative)
It's worth pointing out that Electric Jesus' SpaceX Falcon rocket runs on kerosene that comes out of petrol refineries.
No it isn't. It is just condescending and adds nothing of value to the conversation. We are discussing electric drivetrains, not rocket ships. If you cant tell the difference, best you go fuck a kangaroo and leave the intelligent conversations to adults.
So "Big Oil" isn't going anywhere, and we still need oil for plastics, fertiliser, pharmaceuticals, lubricants, explosives, etc.
No one suggested it does. The conversation centered around the pros and cons of electric powertrains vs. ICE powertrains. However, since you brought it up, burning gasoline accounts for 45% of a barrel of oil and a further 29% is diesel. If we can shrink oil consumption down by that much, we can double the effective useful life of our oil reserves. It isn't infinite. Also, since burning it in our cars is so fucking inefficient, we can get further by converting that oil into electricity at at a power station where the conversion ratio is much higher than the ICE in your MG, and reap the gains there.
Buying an EV is nothing more than a needless geek toy. The average person cannot afford to spend AU$50k on an ENTRY-LEVEL car, when they can get a brand new MG for about $30k less.
That "needless geek toy" will spank just about any ICE car you can buy for the money. Down under however, you can have an MG ZS SUV for $21,490 (citation [carsguide.com.au]). It is more expensive than the $18,990 ICE version, but at $2500 difference, especially the way gasoline prices are going, you'd be a fool to think the total cost of operating the ICE machine is cheaper over its life vs the electric car. I won't even get into maintenance costs because the electric powertrain has such an edge over the ICE it's downright embarrassing.
You can do the maths, but in Australia, based on the mix of energy, EVs are actually more polluting per KM than Petrol cars
No, they are not. Even if powered with 100% coal, they need so much less in terms of joules of energy to go that KM, that they produce less CO2 and other pollutants overall. Much less. When you then add that 24% of Australia's energy is renewable, you are ahead of the game still. Another 20% comes from Natural Gas, which is simply cleaner than gasoline, especially in the hyper-efficient conversions within a power station compared to an ICE vehicle. Those combined will make your KM much, much cleaner in an electric car. It's just a fact. The only way to get the electric car more polluting, would be to power it exclusively with a 2-stroke generator.
(See the Volvo XC40 vs XC40 Recharge study for the facts). And that's not even taking into the account the extra 9300kg eCO2 used to make the XC40 Recharge over the XC40.
Can you cite your study? A quick google search only returned Motortrend's comparison which ended up recommending the Recharge despite multiple flaws in their study. I'd be interested in reading the one you are referring to.
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:4, Insightful)
so what's your solution?
Let prices rise on their own and people stop driving so much. Just as importantly, stop flying so much, etc.
Perhaps you should tell that to all the airlines who literally flew thousands of empty planes around for the last two years, in order to maintain contract requirements with airports and plane vendors.
Ah, nothing quite like burning millions of gallons of fuel, for shits, giggles, and profits.
Re: (Score:2)
You fucking liar. EVs do address noise. EVs are much quieter than gas cars. Pedestrian and traffic safety can only be fixed by autonomous vehicle or advanced active safety systems .. and you guys are against that. "Car culture" ?? Fuck off and walk then, and get robbed?
Re: (Score:2)
EVs do address noise.
One problem with EVs is that they are so quiet that pedestrians don't notice them.
A solution is to add speakers to generate a hum at low speeds in parking lots and near crosswalks.
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:5, Insightful)
A solution is to add speakers to generate a hum at low speeds in parking lots and near crosswalks.
Already required by law, and already included in new Teslas since 2020.
https://cleantechnica.com/2019/09/11/this-is-what-a-tesla-will-soon-sound-like-at-low-speeds/ [cleantechnica.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If pedestrians can't be bothered to look around when crossing the street it's their damned fault.
They leave dents and scratches on the bumper. Who's gonna pay for that?
Re:let's stop pretending (Score:5, Insightful)
> the constant noise that 6 lane roads make
Actually, they do. The two loudest parts of an internal combustion engined car are the engine and the exhaust. The loudest part of an electric car are the tyres.
The rest of your argument is akin to saying vaccines are useless because they don't stop people getting murdered.
Re: (Score:2)
At highway speeds, the loudest part of an internal combustion engined car (if well tuned) is the tires.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Earth-destroying Lithium
You know you can extract lithium with saltwater, and most of the lithium is along the coast in Chile, right?
Child-mined Cobalt
None in the latest batteries
Filling up landfill with dead battery packs that can't be economically recycled
Automotive batteries are recycled by existing law.
And that's before you even think of the economics
Which are superior for EVs, which have lower TCO.
Re: (Score:2)
Once there are more EVs out there I imagine battery packs will be recycled as much as lead acid batteries are today. There just needs to be enough of them to make recycling plants worth the cost
Much better than the earth destroying child killing oil burned and released into the atmosphere. But I'm sure you have sources produced by big oil companies that say otherwise so no reason to try to convince you