Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet

Playboy Wants To Build a New Mansion In the Metaverse (cnbc.com) 40

Playboy has plans to reboot its brand in the digital world through NFTs, digital subscriptions and a new mansion in the metaverse. CNBC reports: The company has dropped thousands of Playboy NFTs featuring bunny avatars, launched a digital social platform called Centerfold and has plans to build a new Playboy Mansion in the metaverse. These plans are unfolding while an A&E documentary focuses on the company's unflattering past. "Secrets of Playboy" is a 10-part series making headlines by featuring former employees, playmates and past girlfriends of the company's founder, Hugh Hefner, alleging Playboy had a dark side. Even before the series' debuted in late January, company leadership posted an open letter to its website noting, "today's Playboy is not Hugh Hefner's Playboy."

The futuristic moves come almost five years after Hefner's death and two years since the last legacy print magazine hit the newsstands. Staging its digital reinvention for the next wave of internet innovation, which technologists call Web3, is the next big challenge. "The magazine was one product of the company. But it was really that rabbit head that's worth billions and billions of dollars and not replicable," Playboy CEO Ben Kohn told CNBC in a recent interview. While the brand drives billions in consumer spending worldwide, much of it through licensed products sold overseas, Kohn said that business model is broken and that the company needs to make changes.

The CEO's fixes rely heavily on that not-so-secret weapon: the world famous bowtie-wearing rabbit. [...] The company is focused on trying to leverage that "inherent value" in the digital world. For example, a Playboy SEC filing last year shows the company paid $12 million to purchase a Bombardier Global Express BD-700 so Kohn could unleash that priceless bunny logo across not just the sky, but also on the internet. The plane is an homage to the black-painted DC-9, known as the Big Bunny, flown by Hugh Hefner in the '70s. The Global Express, which started off white, was gut-renovated before re-emerging five month's later with a sleek all-black body emblazoned with bunny logos and the same tail number used on its predecessor that whisked Hefner, celebrities and an entourage of Playboy bunnies around the world...

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Playboy Wants To Build a New Mansion In the Metaverse

Comments Filter:
  • by NateFromMich ( 6359610 ) on Friday February 11, 2022 @07:25PM (#62260671)
    So, when you say metaverse, you're not talking about the facebook thing anymore, right?
    I assume this is now a completely generic word referring to "cyberspace" or "virtual reality", thanks to the media.
    • So, when you say metaverse, you're not talking about the facebook thing anymore, right?

      After reading the article, when he says "Metaverse," it's just a vague marketing term without any concrete plan behind it.

      Basically the guy interviewed in the article is saying they are going to take the Playboy Bunny logo, and use it wherever they can to make money.

      • Pretty much. It's like SEO for investor cash. Hit all the keywords. Next week: Playboy is all-in on NFTs.

    • So, when you say metaverse, you're not talking about the facebook thing anymore, right?

      I assume this is now a completely generic word referring to "cyberspace" or "virtual reality", thanks to the media.

      It always was a generic term referring to cyberspace/vr.

      Facebook is attempting to corrupt the term into their own personal brand.

  • Just stay away from that sticky mess!

  • by Chelloveck ( 14643 ) on Friday February 11, 2022 @07:30PM (#62260679)
    I know it's only February, but I'm calling it. "Metaverse" is officially the most over-used word of 2022.
    • I know it's only February, but I'm calling it. "Metaverse" is officially the most over-used word of 2022.

      Metaverse? Inconceivable!

    • by Osgeld ( 1900440 )

      yea its getting a little tiring, most of the planet got tired of metaverse type stuff 10-15 years ago (though MMO's and Second Life) Then there's out of touch Zuk over here bashing it in your head like he is a congressman that just discovered E-Mail

    • by waspleg ( 316038 )

      crypto blockchain nft are all still miles ahead in the scam world shell game. But, meta is definitely making a strong showing - so you could be right in the end.

    • Somehow this all seems familiar, eh Larry?

    • by Z80a ( 971949 )

      Most forced word.
      Instead of letting it grow organically and people think the word is useful etc.. they just keep blasting the damn thing, hoping people will accept it instead of associate the thing with pure annoyance.

  • Get a first life" [blogspot.com] with special emphasis on the 'fornicate using your actual genitals' bit
  • by cjonslashdot ( 904508 ) on Friday February 11, 2022 @07:37PM (#62260707)
    There is no metaverse. There are only simulations created by a bunch of separate companies that want to monetize people by getting them addicted to fake stuff, while the owners of those companies relax on their real world yachts.
  • by rpresser ( 610529 ) <rpresser&gmail,com> on Friday February 11, 2022 @07:46PM (#62260735)

    As obsolete as the Sears catalog. A classic brand, from a bygone era; a brand that no longer produces any unique or useful product.

    • by Osgeld ( 1900440 )

      I doubt it was ever classic, it had its waves of pop culture but it never had staying power outside of its subscription base ... its up there with professional wrestling vs something like Disney

      • Playboy published stories by Kurt Vonnegut, Vladimir Nabakov, Norman Mailer, Shirley Jackson, Ray Bradbury, and many others... not to mention classic interviews with Ernest Hemingway, Henry Miller, Truman Capote, you name it. Name another mainstream magazine that was more important from a literary perspective. *Maybe* the New Yorker, back in the Harold Ross years, when they had authors like James Thurber and J. D. Salinger.

        The "Playboy philosophy" is just as controversial, and just as relevant, as it was

  • I thought they missed the boat on the whole hardcore online porn thing and kind of faded into obscurity like most print media magazines. Granted, I never paid much attention to straight adult entertainment, but it seemed like cable TV cornered the market for straight guys who were into the softer stuff (which earned Cinemax the nickname "Skinnimax"), and later the internet came along and rule 34'd everything (if it exists, there is porn of it on the internet).

  • TM (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymouse Cowtard ( 6211666 ) on Friday February 11, 2022 @07:47PM (#62260741) Homepage
    All Playboy is is a trademark. That's all they have. This is a smart move because licensing agreements expire or decline in value. Tricking people into imagining a different form of value and paying for that is clever. After all, aren't registered trademarks built on precisely the same intangible thing?
  • "I'm Hef, welcome to my party"

  • No, wait... (Score:4, Funny)

    by jddj ( 1085169 ) on Friday February 11, 2022 @07:56PM (#62260767) Journal

    You mean _I_ can actually _have_ fake ownership of this fake tit?

  • How will they simulate the slight smell of pee from the real thing?

  • Playboy's market cap is just $650M, so if the bunny is worth billions, and they can pull any of this off, the stock should at least quadruple. Today I bought a small amount as a pure gamble. Might be worthless, might be a nice score. Seems like a positive EV though.
  • is going to be so confused by this scam they won't be able to fall for it.
    • Don’t worry, they’ll find some way of working blockchain and NFTs into it, and that’s enough buzzwords to get “investors” salivating.

  • Market-wise, Playboy once had something to offer. It used faux-sophistication to make soft porn acceptable. That, and you could hide it in the closet, under your old homework ...

    It became a victim of its own success though. It made porn (or nudity, anyway) acceptable, and the culture moved on from Playboy, through R rated VCR tapes, to today's gigantic river of nudity and porn available from the internet. Why would someone need Playboy?

    • It made porn (or nudity, anyway) acceptable, and the culture moved on from Playboy, through R rated VCR tapes, to today's gigantic river of nudity and porn available from the internet. Why would someone need Playboy?

      why do people buy Coca Cola or Pepsi when house brand cola is cheaper. name recognition. with a name brand you know what quality of a product you will get. where some no name distrubuter will get away with lesser quality because they don't have to worry about tarnishing there reputation because if they do they can just up and change names and start again with little loss where a name brand has to keep up quality or loose prestiege they have earned (see new coke).

      In this case they are well know they having

    • Believe it or not, it wasn't just a joke -- for a while, anyway, Playboy really did have some good articles.

  • What, they want to put porn on the internet now? Nah, that'll never take off.

  • How can that possibly fail to make money. Just think, you prove you OWN a real life simulated playboy bunny. Or something.

    Actually does anyone under the age or 60 even know what playboy is?
  • The Meta avatars I saw in a demo didn't have anything below the waist.
    Or was that just the first (dis)embodiment?

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...