Russians Liquidating Crypto in the UAE To Seek Safe Havens (financialpost.com) 58
Crypto firms in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are being deluged with requests to liquidate billions of dollars of virtual currency as Russians seek a safe haven for their fortunes, Reuters is reporting, citing company executives and financial sources. From the report: Some clients are using cryptocurrency to invest in real estate in the UAE, while others want to use firms there to turn their virtual money into hard currency and stash it elsewhere, the sources said One crypto firm has received lots of queries in the past 10 days from Swiss brokers asking to liquidate billions of dollars of bitcoin because their clients are afraid Switzerland will freeze their assets, one executive said, adding that none of the requests had been for less than $2 billion.
Blooded money... (Score:3)
They profitted from bloody regime killing Chechens, Georgians, Ukrainians and their own citizens...
Re: Blooded money... (Score:2)
I think he's referring on the attack by Georgia on an unruly area in their own country that was declared to be part of Russia by Putin. Apparently they didn't take that too well, but after the customary shelling of the civilian population by Russian artillery it was settled.
Re: I still don't understand (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You can spend it, it's just difficult. And if you didn't have your own personal bitcoin wallet then you stuck that money in an "exchange" which is essentially just a bank with even less regulation. So if you've got $2 billion in your bitcoin wallet, then just go and meet someone IN PERSON who accepts bitcoin and buy with that. But if they go through an exchange then it's just like any other online purchase or money transfer.
But these oligarchs are not using bitcoin as "cash", almost no one uses bitcoin as
Theres other issues (Score:2)
I'm not getting it either but for the opposite reasons you cite. If you have your crypto in an exchange then it can be seized . But if you just move your crypto to your own keychain then it's safe aside from someone forcing you at gun point to give it up. You can still spend it.
Thus it would make sense for people to liquidate their assets held in a crypto exchange. But it would make more sense to just keep them as unseizabke crypto in their own wallets.
The reason to turn it to a hard asset is secondary
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Theres other issues (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Theres other issues (Score:2)
Move it into gold, until it's made worthless by gold markets being randomly flooded by gold miners or by gold asteroid mining missions.
Re: (Score:2)
But if you just move your crypto to your own keychain then it's safe aside from someone forcing you at gun point to give it up. You can still spend it.
You can spend it as long as you can find someone willing to accept crypto directly as payment. But as far as I can tell it's still the case that only a vanishingly small percentage of retailers will actually do that. Realistically most people holding crypto that aren't just speculating on its future price are doing so because they think that it will be a non-deflationary store of value. If you have other more traditional currencies to use in your day-to-day spending it doesn't matter if your crypto isn't
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The main problem with bitcoin as it exists today is you are very limited in what you can do with it if you don't have access to exchanges - no one is selling 100M luxury yachts or mansions for bitcoin. The reality is if you are on a sanctions list, you run a very real risk your bitcoin becomes radioactive and no one will touch it - worth less than the bits it is printed on.
Valve had a 50% fraud rate (Score:2)
Any way you cut it legitimate financial systems have a lot of
Re: Valve had a 50% fraud rate (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not to mention the blockchain permanently links the buyer to the seller - so as soon as the seller becomes known as a sanction target, the buyer now has a serious risk of being marked as an "associated person" and having their assets seized by exchanges.
Re: (Score:1)
The way it works on an exchange is that crypto buyers place buy orders (which may or may not get filled, depending on the price and current market conditions) and the fiat is typically held in escrow. In a nutshell, at any given time there are a number of buyers essentially screaming “shut up and take my money!” for your crypto. The catch is, you might be less than thrilled with the price if you’ve got a lot of coin to unload.
Any business that accepts massive amounts of crypto without im
Re: (Score:1)
"it's all my fault ollie..." *scratches head* *que silly music...*.
Aaah, the real owners of Bitcoin emerge (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I was just wondering this last week. Well I guess now we know who owns Bitcoin
I wish I could mod this up. Posting this in the hopes that maybe others will do so.
Re: Aaah, the real owners of Bitcoin emerge (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds more like a bank run, no?
Re: (Score:2)
"Russians" (Score:2)
And by Russians they probably don't mean the 99.99% of Russians that aren't corrupt aparatchiks...
Same as with Germans or Nazis... (Score:2)
Most of Germans and most of Nazis did not kill anyone yet...
Also vast majority of this 99.99% support the capo di tutti apartchiks ....
Israel is so rarely mentioned (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The Times looked at how Israel's legalised money laundering for "new citizens" and actively prevents outsiders, such as America, from investigating the money trail.
"prevent" is a bold claim. If the US really wants to investigate the activities of Russian oligarchs, it probably needs the cooperation of Russian authorities, not of Israeli authorities. Most likely, their headquarters are located in Russia.
Besides, when former government officials from other countries come to the US with their stolen millions/billions, the US welcomes them with open arms.
[...]
American authorities are supposed to vet visa applicants to make sure they are not under active investigation on criminal charges. But the ProPublica examination shows that this requirement has been routinely ignored.
One of the most prominent cases involves a former president of Panama, who was allowed to enter the United States just days after his country’s Supreme Court opened an investigation into charges that he had helped embezzle $45 million from a government school lunch program.
Ricardo Martinelli, a billionaire supermarket magnate, had been on the State Department’s radar since he was elected in 2009. That year, the U.S. ambassador to Panama began sending diplomatic cables warning about the president’s “dark side,” including his links to corruption and his request for U.S. support for wiretapping his opponents.
Soon after Martinelli left office in 2014, Panamanian prosecutors conducted a widely publicized investigation of corruption in the school lunch program, and in mid-January 2015, forwarded their findings to the country’s Supreme Court.
On Jan. 28, 2015, just hours before the Supreme Court announced a formal probe into the charges, Martinelli boarded a private plane, flew to Guatemala City for a meeting and then entered the United States on a visitor visa. Within weeks, he was living comfortably in the Atlantis, a luxury condominium on Miami’s swanky Brickell Avenue. He is still here.
[...]
https://www.propublica.org/art... [propublica.org]
I can help. (Score:2)
Would be more plausible to invest in China, India (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For one thing, crypto currency is illegal, or close to it, in both China and India..
Re: (Score:2)
The real NFT (Score:2)
I feel like some agreement amongst the anti invasion countries to treat any of these coins (if identified) as seizable indefinitely could destroy their value, and have a secondary effect of undercutting crypto in the future (if identified).
I assume these transactions are being done by exchanging the wallet, not actual Bitcoin transactions, but if one piece can ever be tracked back to an oligarch's wallet they can taint any coins that came from it.
If people start losing their Bitcoin 5 years from now because
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I derped.
You're correct.
But the fact that there's going to be big moves on the Blockchain is going to make these coins even less fungible.
If this where true (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
why are crypto prices not falling? I call this clickbate reporting.
I can think of a few possible reasons.
One might be they haven't actually tried liquidating it yet. I'm guessing that kind of sell is far from a routine transaction.
Another is if the exchanges might be reluctant to carry out the request.
For instance, do you have $2 billion in cash lying around?
If there's not enough people willing to buy then the price will crash to whatever the floor on their sell order is. And if I'm an exchange I don't want to be responsible for crashing the price of bitcoin, nor do I want
Re: If this where true (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't liquidating crypto to hide your assets (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They're expecting that some form of internet regulation, or possibly foreign state hackers, will prevent them from accessing their crypto wallets or plainly steal it from them.
Good old fashioned tax havens have helped the rich stash their money away during old times, it's only natural that they go back to that in the verge of increased risk around crypto...
Re: (Score:1)
Seems like making all transactions public in a permanent distributed ledger is the exact opposite of hiding assets...
crypto crash??? (Score:2)
I smell BS (Score:2)
Dutch Tulip Syndrome (Score:2)
Re: Dutch Tulip Syndrome (Score:2)
well, golly! (Score:2)
so much for the assertion that the rich in Russia know nothing of what's going on in the outside world, in service of an implication that they're not responsible for what Putin's doing. The rich in Russia clearly know that there are huge sanctions against Russia and that much of the outside world is operating in extreme outrage, to the extent that many countries are now seizing assets of rich Russians. Nobody in that position is going to talk to outside financial operators and get advice on how and where to
People have $ 2 Bn in BTC ? (Score:2)
People have $ 2Bn in BTC ??
So it yo-yos from $ 1Bn to $ 4 Bn every few weeks ? Balls of steel I say.
Unless it was all earned with crypto biz I guess. Even then...
Or maybe it's all proceeds of real shitty crime so there's no place else to keep it