Cloudflare Blocks Site Linked To Hate After Weeks of Pressure (bloomberg.com) 373
Cloudflare blocked Kiwi Farms on Saturday, days after hinting it will continue working with the controversial discussion forum despite weeks of pressure. From a report: The company has blocked Kiwi Farms content from being accessed through its infrastructure after an escalation in rhetoric and "specific, targeted threats" over the past 48 hours, Chief Executive Officer Matthew Prince said in a blog post. "This is an extraordinary decision for us to make and, given Cloudflare's role as an internet infrastructure provider, a dangerous one that we are not comfortable with," Prince said. While we believe "it would have been appropriate as an infrastructure provider for us to wait for legal process, in this case the imminent and emergency threat to human life which continues to escalate causes us to take this action." Previously, Cloudflare offered security services to Kiwi Farms. Visitors to Kiwi Farms sites that use any of its services will now see a Cloudflare block page and a link to Prince's post.
It wasn't about hate (Score:5, Insightful)
The website and question is called kiwi farms and it's famous as a place you can solicit swattings and other violent Acts. There are people who are dead because of stalkers from that website. There was apparently an imminent threat of violence being coordinated on the site and everybody knew it. Somebody was going to get killed with that site didn't go down.
The argument will be that the people in question will just go somewhere else that is boogie2988 over it YouTube pointed out there really isn't anywhere else for them to go. Reddit and 4chan and 8-chan all have cracked down on coordinated violence and abuse. And in order to make this work you need an entire community dedicated to it and staying focused on it. A handful of people occasionally popping up on a forum or discord channel isn't enough to sustain it.
I suppose it also helps that the authorities are tired of being used for SWATtings. It's getting to the point where people are having serious discussions about whether or not they need SWAT teams. Or whether it's worth having a military force that can be used as a moments notice to brass and or kill someone with little more than a phone call. So a lot of pressure is coming down to get the SWATters under control
Re:It wasn't about hate (Score:5, Insightful)
In 2022, It's ridiculous that SWATting is still a thing. It's been happening for over a decade now, it's time for authorities to close this loophole. It was time a while ago.
Re:It wasn't about hate (Score:4, Funny)
Right-wing politicians are afraid that if they close it up, actual hostage situations will get missed (or cops will show up and get shot at by a hostage-taker while trying to verify the situation
Uvalde shows there's no worry about that.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering that consumer camera drones are good enough to determine that a suspect is unarmed, shooting someone for answering the door is absolutely inexcusable. The worst thing that should happen if you're SWATted is that you have to put your hands up in front of a drone, and then get to experience a cop apologizing profusely for wasting your time.
Yeah we need new training for SWAT teams.
Re: (Score:3)
The only way SWATing will stop is if you defund the police so they can't afford to do it.
That's really not the only way.
Re: (Score:3)
"Defund the police" is a fine example of why branding and messagine strategies matter and the people who whinge and try to shoot you down over "tone policing" are full of shit.
The bottom line is that the name of the movement is such a liability that if the branding isn't changed, it's just not going to happen. "Demilitarize the police" or "prioritize mental health services" or "hire more social workers" or... well... pretty much anything would be a better slogan for the movement. And it could use some peo
Re:It wasn't about hate (Score:4, Informative)
Harassment
The targets of Kiwi Farms threads are often subject to organized group trolling, harassment, and stalking, including real-life harassment by users.[2][4] Tactics include publishing their victims' personal information ("doxing"), trying to get them fired from their jobs, reporting crimes at their addresses in an attempt to have police dispatched to their homes ("swatting"), and harassing their family members and friends. Some of Kiwi Farms' harassment campaigns have continued for months or years, and some aim to drive the targets to suicide.[3][21] The website originated to harass an autistic and transgender webcomic artist, but now hosts threads dedicated to harassing many individuals—particularly minorities, women, LGBT people, neurodivergent people, and people considered by Kiwi Farms users to be mentally ill or sexually deviant.[2][3] According to Le Monde, other targets have included feminists, journalists, Internet celebrities, video game or comics hobbyists, and far-right personalities.[7]
Re: (Score:2)
Worth also mentioning recent events.
A Twitch streamer became the target of their hate. She was both doxed and SWATed, and her family were targeted as well. She actually left the US and moved to Europe, but they doxed and attempted to SWAT her again. The attacks are on-going to this day.
Several people have been killed by users of Kiwi Farms, often driven to suicide. Obviously SWATing is an imminent threat to someone's life. They also provide "violence as a service", matching up people with a grudge with peop
Re:It wasn't about hate (Score:4, Informative)
Catch all term for people who have a brain wired in a non-typical manner. Autism, ADHD, anxiety, depression, etc. All sorts of things that affect your manner of thought.
No, it has nothing to do with gender identity.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, you're the one who is lying. Obviously lying. The activities of that site are very well known.
As is the site's owner, who is a proud neo-nazi. The company he operates the site under is called "1776 Solutions, LLC" formerly "Final Solutions, LLC".
Yet here you are, carrying water for them. Are you one of their shitbag members or something?
Re: (Score:2)
If this Keffals person is doing what you say then:
1). Campaigns of harassment aren't the right solution
2). Law enforcement should be involved. Not Kiwi Farms.
If the law doesn't currently allow prosecution of this behavior, then change the laws. But it's probably true that most states in the United States, as well as the Feds, would not support a "BDSM for kids" site. That would likely be a jailable offense on its own.
Law enforcement is involved (Score:2)
There have been people murdered by stalker
Re: (Score:2)
If the FBI is using Kiwi Farms as a honeypot, then nobody should have been pressuring Cloudflare to dump them.
Re: (Score:2)
Additionally, if Keffals is actually running a BDSM site targeting children, that merits its own investigation. Maybe some of the Kiwi Farms idiots could make themselves useful by providing information to law enforcement. InterPol has gone after international trafficking rings before, as well as child porn peddlers, though it is not always easy to get the ball rolling on things like that.
In any case, self-styled Internet vigilantes on Kiwi Farms aren't helping things much.
Re:Boy that was fast (Score:4, Funny)
I stick around because I've been here for 20 years and it bothers me to see these chuds trying to take it over.
If you were here for 20 years, why is your uid so high?
I was here 20 years ago and I don't remember you.
Re: (Score:2)
If you were here for 20 years, why is your uid so high?
I was here 20 years ago and I don't remember you.
I joined in either 1999 or 2000 and my UID is even higher ...
For The Dicksizery (Score:2)
=)
I'm not waiving my /. dick (Score:3)
I'm not going to let them. I'm too beat up to hit the streets and fight them there. Old. Back problems. etc, etc. But I'm at least not letting them have
They can pry my greased up Yoda doll covered
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately none of this is resolvable, since you can only navigate people's comment histories back to around 2008. I've tried it with my own, and I've tried it with some of our 4-digit UID members - still can't go further than that.
I'm pretty sure I joined no later than 2003 because the co-worker who introduced me to this site left late that year.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately none of this is resolvable, since you can only navigate people's comment histories back to around 2008. I've tried it with my own, and I've tried it with some of our 4-digit UID members - still can't go further than that. ... I'm pretty sure I joined no later than 2003 because the co-worker who introduced me to this site left late that year.
Ya, I tried that too and could only go back as far as Nov 2008 -- still almost 14 years ago -- but I remember reading/posting here while I was working for a specific company from Spring 1998 - Fall 2001. It's possible that I was simply lurking and posting AC then and actually joined later, but that's not my recollection. It's also remotely possible that I remember something about /. changing the way UIDs were allocated at some point. Anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
I have no idea if it was my first post, but I did find one I made on November 28, 2003 [slashdot.org]. Man it's harder than I thought it would be to search for such things!
Yes, I am anal-retentive - thank you for asking.
Re: (Score:2)
I have a six-digit ID that is lower than previous poster. The oldest artifact I can find for my account is from 2009, but I feel like I've been here longer than that...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'd like to think you bought your low id, but I know for a fact that
Re: (Score:3)
> there are no right wing people on here
Sure dude... Just try expressing an opinion insufficiently worshipful of dear leader, and watch the -1 mods from his lackeys roll on in. If I were the wagering sort, I'd be willing to bet pretty decent money that I've had more -1 mods, and comments nuked down to -1, since the 2016 election than I had in the entire *decade* preceding that fiasco.
Re: (Score:2)
You guys are thinking you are waging some online war that matters.
Wow, utter lack of self-awareness from the sad troll who has multiple (dozens? hundreds?) of sockpuppet accounts with subtle (or not so subtle) misspellings of other posters handles. Do you have any idea how sad and pathetic you are?
Re: Boy that was fast (Score:2)
I've been here for over 20 years too. First just browsing. Then got an account finally. It was 5 digits I believe maybe low 100k. But then, got busy, stopped for a bit and lost access to that account and the email address associated with it. There are valid reasons some long timers might not have a low uid.
Re: (Score:2)
If you were here for 20 years, why is your uid so high?
I was here 20 years ago and I don't remember you.
rsilvergun has been on Slashdot since at least 2007 under that name. Possibly earlier, but maybe they did get a new account around that time. I know I mostly lurked and only occasionally posted a comment AC for quite a while (since just after the name change to slashdot) before I finally got an account.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair it took me years to register an account too, because I thought posting AC was cool back then.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"half-million UID does not jive with a 20 year account."
Uhhh, actually, yes. I joined Slashdot in 2002.
Re: (Score:2)
I am not trolling him...
You are 100% definitely a troll. You're pretty much trolling everyone, all the time.
Dependence on cloudflare (Score:4, Insightful)
You can't "open source" it (Score:2)
I mean, these guys couldn't get the Russians to host it. They host Storm Front. Literal Nazis. And they said "Kiwi Farms is too much".
Re: (Score:2)
Why doesn't law enforcement shut down the actual site, rather than the cloud services company offering them DDoS protection?
Re: (Score:2)
Because law enforcement takes time.
Re: (Score:2)
How long do they need? Kiwi Farms has been active for quite some time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gossip is one thing. Doxxing, harassment, and assault planning is another. It's not clear what's actually going on there since many are making allegations without there being much evidence for or against. Kiwi Farms does have a reputation, but it takes more than that to prosecute.
Re: (Score:2)
What dependence? They're perfectly allowed to just not use Cloudflare.
Of course, considering the type of site it is, not using Cloudflare would take it offline just as hard.
Illegal behavior (Score:5, Informative)
>"Cloudflare Blocks Site Linked To Hate"
No, that is inaccurate by omission, leading one to believe they simply blocked a site for the undefinable, non-illegal, constitutionally-compatible nonsense category called "hate speech." Apparently they are blocked due to what clearly appears to be illegal behavior. There is a big difference. Quote:
"Cloudflare contacted law enforcement in several jurisdictions over âoepotential criminal acts and imminent threats to human life that were posted to the site.â
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
There's something else going on. Even as a casual observer of news, I learned that the Marge Green SWATters were claiming to be Kiwi Farms admins.
That was quickly shown to be a frame-up job but apparently the miscreants figured out that posting wild threatening shit will cause CloudFlare to censor Kiwi.
Everything about this situation glows.
Kiwi has a reputation for non-censorship so it's teeming with obnoxious weirdos who say things that would melt any delicate flower. Maybe it was unwilling to engage in t
Re: (Score:2)
>"That was quickly shown to be a frame-up job but apparently the miscreants figured out that posting wild threatening shit will cause CloudFlare to censor Kiwi."
Which would amount to a false flag type operation, if true. I haven't followed any of it, so have nothing to add. My posting was only about the misleading summary title.
>"Also Cloudflare is now a liability, which is a shame. If critical Internet infrastructure must be centralized then we need to try again."
Yes, it is disturbing. It would be
Re: (Score:2)
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THEY WERE HOSTING THEM.
Kiwi Farms can host their own site. If they face DDoS attacks, they can counter the attacks themselves or they can pay someone else to deal with it for them. There is not yet an internet police force that exists to bust skulls when people get funny ideas about internet property so they're kinda left to whatever they can figure out themselves.
I feel almost dumb explaining this because surely slashdot readers understand capitalism and free markets.
Do you know literally anything about Kiwi Farms? (Score:5, Informative)
Kiwi farms was where you went to destroy someone with Stochastic Terrorism. It got to the point where nobody could pretend it was anything else. That meant anyone doing business with them was in danger of at least civil if not criminal negligence charges.
Not all speech can or should be protected. There, I said it. This isn't even "paradox of intolerance" stuff. This is literally psychos trying to touch off other psychos to see if they can get people killed. And doing it in an organized fashion that made it highly effective. You can't let that many psychopaths congregate in one place planning and executing violence. Not if you want a functional civilization.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Seems like an attempt at justification.
Mainstream news outlets commit "Stochastic Terrorism" by editing flash point stories to try and create mass rioting and they face no censoring or even any backlash.
Re: (Score:2)
What is the "Missouri federal filing"?
Re: (Score:2)
Missouri will probably sue over this too because defending hate speech is what Eric Schmitt does best.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't a free speech issue. These shitbags were responsible for the deaths of innocent people. They should be in prison
You know what went on on that site. Why are you lying about it? Are you one of their shitbag members?
Re:Illegal behavior (Score:4, Interesting)
One of the site users in Germany has been charged with harassment and more.
Re: (Score:2)
If there's illegal activity, the summary doesn't even bother to mention it, and if Cloudflare didn't get a prompt response from "law enforcement in several jurisdictions", how serious is it really?
Re:Illegal behavior (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or people are used to "woke" disinformation campaigns and realize when they're being lied to and are sick and tired of it.
I could make the argument that in 2016 people who voted for Trump were woke. Is that not the correct term? To be politically awake. Trump was considered anti establishment not being a politician and everything.
Re:Illegal behavior (Score:5, Insightful)
That Cloudflare dropping them means they disappear from the web is a very, very bad thing.
Bullshit. These shitbags weren't just saying nasty and vile things, they were doing illegal things and getting people, innocent people, killed.
In a just world, they'd all be rotting in prison.
Response from KiwiFarms operator (Score:2)
https://archive.ph/damIX [archive.ph]
Possibly the wrong course of action (Score:4, Insightful)
If individuals on Kiwi Farms are posting direct threats and encouraging harassment, shouldn't law enforcement take action either against the individual posters or the site admins? Or both? Kicking them off Cloudflare seems pointless. They'll just pop up somewhere else.
Re: (Score:2)
Law enforcement tried, but the site refused to cooperate by e.g. handing over logs or IP addresses associated with posts, although I suspect many of them will be using VPNs or other proxies.
Kicking them off isn't pointless. Look what happened to 8chan. It's still around, but a shell of its former self. The "community" scattered to a bunch of different replacement sites and can't do nearly as much damage now. The admins were forced to clean up the worst of it to get hosting.
There are people alive and safe to
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are ignoring the body of my post.
Re: (Score:2)
If anything they should cooperate with authorities to help bring down anyone involved with the site committing actual crimes.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, but again if specific threats are being made against people, that in-and-of itself is against the law. Merely removing the content does not solve the problem of people actively conspiring to attack people. In general I do agree that if laws are not being broken that content censorship may be a bad idea. Someone in law enforcement still needs to make a determination as to whether the content in question is actionable.
No loss (Score:4, Interesting)
So a site that exists to DOXX and collate information on how to target people who have the audacity to be transgender and not secret about it.
Sounds like a real winning formula.
Maybe that site should consider dedicated hosting, rather than a company that might have moral indignation over publishing information that could lead to violence.
If only the law worked (Score:2)
If only there was a network of institutions out there that could make a decision as to whether material was illegal. If only companies with an internet presence always paid attention to what these institutions said...
They're called courts and should be able to make interim ruling that material on a site is illegal, though ones that would rapidly result in definitive rulings. No company should be making these calls.
It wasn't a few bad apples (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to work at a fast food restaurant. Owner kept the lobby open late. Stores kept getting robbed. Again and again. Cops finally had enough when somebody got pistol whipped. Told the owner "you have a right to keep these lobbies open, but you know it's not safe. Next time this happens you might be liable". Lobby was closed at 10pm, robberies stopped.
When you know you're doing something that is going to get people hurt or killed you run the risk of liability. The guy running the site didn't care, but his hosts do. And this isn't idle speculation. Go look up Boogie2988's video on the subject. People have been killed thanks to posts from this site. Stalkers & SWATters.
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:5, Funny)
If you think third parties can do whatever they want on private property, PM me so I can post a "Hitler did nothing wrong!" sign in in the front yard of your parents house in whose basement you reside.
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
From wikipedia:
Kiwi Farms, formerly known as CWCki Forums (/kwki/), is an American Internet forum dedicated to the discussion and harassment of online figures and communities. Their targets (often people who are minorities, women, LGBT, or neurodivergent) are often subject to organized group trolling and stalking, as well as doxxing and real-life harassment.
This is what needs to be protected? A hate site? Why protect it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:5, Insightful)
As averse as I am to this kind of activity by bandwidth/hosting providers, kiwifarms is pretty much a site where theres *only* bad apples.
We're not talking 4chan with a couple of horrific boards, and a whole stack of actually reasonable, if slightly unhinged, boards. Kiwifarms primary activity is stalking people. Its an Encyclopedia Dramatica type operation, without EDs editorial hand that restrained it , when things got dangerous for the victims. This was a website with a death toll.
So yeah, if folks want to get a poster child for "the libs are censoring the internet", I'd advise looking elsewhere. This was a website dedicated to hurting people who where different. I'd save the upset for something that deserves it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:4, Informative)
You know exactly the kinds of horrific things that site was famous for doing. That makes you a lying asshole.
So I was wondering what the fuck (Score:5, Informative)
Basically unfounded accusations. A trans activist wanted to create a means of sending hormone therapy drugs into states that criminalize it. No talk of sending them to kids against their parents wishes, the goal wasn't to bypass parents it was to bypass state legislatures who ignore doctors and science.
A bunch of right wingers, notably Matt Walsh, made up stories for clicks and started talking about children's hospitals. He managed to cause a bomb threat [reddit.com]. Which is exactly the kind of stochastic terrorism that's at issue here.
And again, none of this would be an issue if people would listen to *doctors* instead of extremists preachers who have never read their holy books and don't know or care that their God never talked about trans folk (imagine that, the all powerful creator of the universe having better things to do).
And that brings us to today, with me fact checking crap on
Re: (Score:2)
And again, none of this would be an issue if people would listen to *doctors* instead of extremists preachers who have never read their holy books and don't know or care that their God never talked about trans folk (imagine that, the all powerful creator of the universe having better things to do).
I'm not an extremist preacher; but I have read the holy book. God is not completely silent on the issue. Here are a couple of verses that touch on the subject:
Deuteronomy 22:5 [lsbible.org] “A woman shall not wear man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to Yahweh your God."
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 [lsbible.org] Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, no
Re: (Score:2)
It's called stochastic terrorism (Score:2)
The idea is very simple you say things that you know your audience is going to react violently to and you say it to a large enough audience you can be guaranteed they'll be at least one lunatic in and then your hands are clean but you get the violence that you want it. That's what Matt Walsh did and he's rather famous for it
Re: It's called stochastic terrorism (Score:2)
That wouldn't make sense. I remember reading a while ago where he called out somebody for making threats against the federal government, and openly stated that they were a dumbass, banned them, and said that the feds had contacted him about it and that he was cooperating with them 100%. The rest of the forum seemed to be in total agreement about the action taken against that person.
It's not the site mods (Score:2, Informative)
Right wing extremists Target websites like slash dot because it's full of nerds and nerds are a fertile breeding ground for extremism because we tend to be disaffected and angry.
Re:It's not the site mods (Score:4, Insightful)
THERE ARE LITERALLY LIKE 40 GUYS LEFT THAT POST ON HERE REGULARLY.
Yeah, and you're ten of them. If this site is so insignificant, what does it say about you that your hobby is trolling it? You must be the most irrelevant human that ever "lived", if you can call this living.
Re: (Score:2)
She wasn't selling drugs .. she's not a doctor and has no ability to do that.
What KF was doing was making information "available" that could have led to violence against LGBT persons who were being targeted for the crime of being LGBT in public.
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:2)
If what is stated here is true...
https://worldnewsmonthly.com/e... [worldnewsmonthly.com] ... then that is a pretty dangerous thing. Doctors really don't like it when people self-medicate, and it sounds like this is exactly what Eli is encouraging. FWIW, right here on slashdot, Barbara Hudson used to do exactly that, basically trying to tell people that taking estrogen is somehow good for men to do.
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:5, Insightful)
Doctors really don't like it when people self-medicate
Grossly misleading.
A doctor absolutely doesn't want you to self-medicate, if you can medicate under physician supervision.
I grew up poor. Real poor. When you can't afford a prescription, and a doctor knows you can't afford a prescription, they'll tell you what you need to know to self-medicate.
This isn't to justify what this person is doing, but it's similar to the role clinicians played for me and my family when I was young.
The medical profession as a whole agrees with this treatment. States are trying to impose their religious beliefs on the medical profession, and people are finding workarounds.
This is going to happen.
The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:5, Informative)
Anyway, last I looked cloudflare couldn't block anything because they were only a reverse-proxy service. If cloudflare doesn't want to provide you with their reverse-proxy service, just have your site name pointing to your own server IP like I do. I don't need cloudflare has a big brother in between. Anybody can even run its own reverse-proxy with mod_security (Web application firewall) and mod_qos and what not. That's also what I do.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's the kind of world platforms like Kiwi Farms seem to want, where might makes right. They're just pissed when they get the short end of the stick and call foul making demands for safe-spaces where they don't have to face reality, because they can't fathom that they are themselves are not the apex predator out there.
It's really difficult to empathize with such entities when the table is turned. Don't fall into the paradox of tolerance trap.
Re:This is bullshit. (Score:5, Interesting)
What it comes down to is Kiwi Farms is a terrorist site full of klan trash, violent neonazis, and other white supremacist / gamergate hatemongers who routinely crossed the line into criminal behavior. It SHOULD have been nuked off the internet years ago, and it's shameful that it took CloudFlare so long to stop protecting it. It was literally worse than the neonazi site Stormfront (and it should be noted that the terrorist owner of the site name-checked Stormfront in his conspiracy-theory cuckoo rants the past couple days).
It's some of the same trash that keep modpoint farms around here for sole purposes of trolling, and especially the ones who think that posting various nazi tracts and other nonsense on Slashdot every time a new thread comes up is funny.
As for "The site was documenting someone who distributes drugs to children without their parent's knowledge"??? That's a false claim. She sponsored a website that helps individuals, of any age, access medical care. But I notice the same klan-member bullshit artist ("Train0987) that made this false claim is routinely misgendering Keffals so... yeah Train0987, eat shit you fucking nazi. I'm glad Kiwi Farms is going down and if Slashdot had any sense they'd ban your nazi terrorist ass.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What it comes down to is Kiwi Farms is a terrorist site full of klan trash, violent neonazis, and other white supremacist / gamergate hatemongers who routinely crossed the line into criminal behavior. It SHOULD have been nuked off the internet years ago, and it's shameful that it took CloudFlare so long to stop protecting it. It was literally worse than the neonazi site Stormfront (and it should be noted that the terrorist owner of the site name-checked Stormfront in his conspiracy-theory cuckoo rants the
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:2)
I think if that's what they really were, they'd probably have just merged with storm front ages ago. I can still remember seeing at least one thread where a German demanded that Null take down some posts making fun of her because it's illegal in her country, which resulted in him saying something like "your country lost two world wars, you don't get to sit at the table and make decisions." I really don't think the Nazis would take kindly to that. Just saying.
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:2)
Gamergate is a really strange thing to get defensive over.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Gamergate is a really strange thing to get defensive over.
Gamergate are a bunch of incel losers with no life. Same for Nazis.
Just because they act in similar ways, doesnt make them the same. Hate is hate, but not all hate is the same.
You want to equate all hate to all hate for whatever extreme bullshit thing happend *this week. buy a mitt, catch a clue.
Re: (Score:2)
Fallacies that unsophisticated are employed by 2 classes of people really. Those trying to manipulate the stupid, and the stupid.
I wonder which you are.
Re: This is bullshit. (Score:4, Insightful)
One is tempted to presume that there is substantial crossover between gamergaters and neo-nazis, but even putting that aside completely there is enough similarity between them to make the comparison (and grouping) apt. They are packs of dumbfucks who use terrorism to achieve their garbage political goals. Both utilize swatting in attempts to murder their victims with a phone call, and both are too cowardly to confront people themselves, except in groups or behind the veil of anonymity. Both cry about how unfair life is when they are held accountable for their violent crimes.
Free speech does not mean only from the government (Score:3)
The First Amendment provides a legal framework to ensure that (to a fairly strong degree) speech cannot be regulated by the government. This is where the government i
Re: (Score:2)
SA was a humor site. The forum goons were (and are) their own thing. Outside of Photoshop Fridays, very little of what the goons did bled into the main site. Well that and the ridiculous hentai game reviews they wrote (that were mostly just ads for j-list).
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They don't "speak openly" about the transgender community. They harass, doxx and swat them. I have a /. account, but I'm posting anonymously because I am a member of the trans community and I'd rather not face harassment. Those fuckers at Kiwi Farms need to be sued into oblivion and then jailed.
Re: (Score:2)
I have a /. account, but I'm posting anonymously because I am a member of the trans community and I'd rather not face harassment.
I'm just as openly gay online as I am IRL. I live in a state where we have castle doctrine and stand your ground. Not everybody on the left is anti-2A, and I'll leave it at that.
Re:It was a dormant account. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
What's causing the problem right now is that the forum speaks openly about the "transgender community." They don't llke that.
We have Republican representatives and leaders who are openly bashing the entire LGBTQ+ community in the mainstream media and facing minimal (if any) repercussions. Ron DeSantis in Florida essentially called us (as a gay man, I've got a dog in this fight) all a bunch of groomers and is still favored to win his re-election bid. You've really got a twisted perception of reality if you think an oppressed minority community actually wields that kind of power.
Also, Westboro Baptist Church is still online. So