US Safety Watchdog Warns Against Onewheel Boards After Reported Ejection Injuries (engadget.com) 71
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) warned Americans against buying or using any Onewheel self-balance skateboardings, ranging from the original through to newer models like the GT and Pint X. Engadget reports: The vehicles can forcefully eject riders, the CPSC said. The Commission added that here have been reports of "at least" four deaths and multiple serious injuries between 2019 and 2021 after the boards either stopped balancing properly or came to an abrupt stop.
Onewheel creator Future Motion has refused a recall and rejected the CPSC's stance. The company believes the Commission's warning is "unjustified and alarmist," and that its boards are safe if they're used responsibly with appropriate safety equipment. Board owners are "adults" who know that there's always a risk to any board sport or even riding a bike, Future Motion argued. To that end, it noted that the CPSC itself prized safety education over warnings when snowboarding took off in the 1990s.
The firm said it had studied boards affected by sudden stops, and hadn't found any inherent technical problems. Onewheels have lower serious injury rates than bikes, ATVs and motorcycles, Future Motion claimed. It also accused the CPSC of preferring a "sensational" alert over cooperating on safety improvements.
Onewheel creator Future Motion has refused a recall and rejected the CPSC's stance. The company believes the Commission's warning is "unjustified and alarmist," and that its boards are safe if they're used responsibly with appropriate safety equipment. Board owners are "adults" who know that there's always a risk to any board sport or even riding a bike, Future Motion argued. To that end, it noted that the CPSC itself prized safety education over warnings when snowboarding took off in the 1990s.
The firm said it had studied boards affected by sudden stops, and hadn't found any inherent technical problems. Onewheels have lower serious injury rates than bikes, ATVs and motorcycles, Future Motion claimed. It also accused the CPSC of preferring a "sensational" alert over cooperating on safety improvements.
Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:2)
...expects it to be safe, completely lacks common sense.
Re:Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:5, Funny)
> It feels fucking great to come home scraped up, sore and bloody after an afternoon of skateboard.
If I wanted that, I'd return to dating.
Re:Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:5, Funny)
Your idea of dating sounds like fight club. Which app hosts that scene? Asking for a friend.
Re: (Score:2)
Your idea of dating sounds like fight club. Which app hosts that scene? Asking for a friend.
Bruisr.
Re: (Score:2)
> Your idea of dating sounds like fight club. Which app hosts that scene? Asking for a friend.
The first rule of fight club: you don't talk about fight club.
Re: (Score:1)
Let me just warn you to stay away from Klingon cosplayers.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:5, Insightful)
Getting "ejected" as they call it is part of the game. You're going to fall and you're going to get injured and tore up,
Not sure getting ejected from a (non-powered) snow/skate board is the same thing. From TFS/A:
Meaning the boards suddenly stopped working as the user would expect them to -- while in use. They fell due to (alleged) mechanical failure. If people kept getting ejected because the brand of snowboard or binding you/they used kept failing unexpectedly while using them, you'd probably consider another brand, or model anyway. If your car suddenly stopped for no reason, while you were pressing the accelerator, you'd probably think there was something wrong with the car.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
So it's like Deathrolling.
Fry: What's deathrolling?
Child: It's like skateboarding.
Spike: But half the time someone dies.
Fry: Oh. So it's a little safer than skateboarding!
Re: (Score:2)
Nice. I was just watching Futurama.
Re: (Score:3)
They fell due to (alleged) mechanical failure.
It might also be software malfunction. That was my first thought upon reading the summary.
Re: (Score:2)
They fell due to (alleged) mechanical failure.
It might also be software malfunction. ...
Granted, and more likely; I should have been more inclusive.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
They fell due to (alleged) mechanical failure.
If you think this doesn't happen to skateboarders, or BMX bikers, I suggest you jump on Fail Army and watch the endless stream of people hurting themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
How's this different than a rock in the road?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If a skateboard is a parachute, than a Onewheel is a helicopter. What's keeping
Re: (Score:2)
Getting "ejected" as they call it is part of the game. You're going to fall and you're going to get injured and tore up,
Not sure getting ejected from a (non-powered) snow/skate board is the same thing. From TFS/A:
I haven't skateboarded, but I have done a lot of inline skating. All it takes is a small rock to stop a skate dead. I'd imagine it's similar for a skateboard. At least with the inline skates, you learn to take weight off of that foot and pick it up while maintaining balance on the other foot, but I'd imagine a skateboard would put you on your face pretty easily in that situation.
I think the real problem is that fun often entails some risk, and the lawyers and people that can't evaluate risk or accept respon
Re: Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's like sticking a metal rod into the spokes of a bike while it's moving.
Re: (Score:2)
The only people I've seen using these are not using helmets, kneepads, or any other protective gear. They're using them as to commute possibly.
Re: (Score:2)
Cons
Re: Anyone who buys something like that and (Score:2)
So are unicycles really too hard? (Score:2)
The true risk will be when those batteries start burning.
Re: (Score:2)
Same risk IMHO. Also if safety rules are followed Lawn Jarts [wikipedia.org] are even more safe.
The true risk will be when those batteries start burning.
Unicycles are human powered and balanced. The report is that these powered boards abruptly stop and throw the rider.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because the company's probably not negligent. What they're doing is pretty easy, a lot of people have made their own knockoffs without too much trouble. Some things are just inherently dangerous and they're not trying to deceive anyone about it. Wear a serious helmet and proper wrist and knee protection, and if you are getting really froggy, a back protector too.
You could trip while walking, fall over, hit your head and die. Life isn't safe. There's no evidence that the people making onewheel are negligent.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No matter how safe the company thinks they are, if enough people get hurt it will go the route of the Three Wheel ATV.
40 people die rollerskating or rollerblading every year in the US alone, most from falling (and most of the rest from being hit by a car.) There's a long way to go before it would be worth banning the onewheel.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but are those roller blades/skates causing death because the equipment failed due to poor design decisions or because people were just using them and fell and hit their head?
Is it worth banning something because a percentage of users are injured or killed, or should it be based on the total number of people injured or killed?
Are there in fact poor design decisions in the onewheel, or is it just inherently unsafe to have a one-wheeled vehicle?
Were the people killed wearing the kind of protective equipment you would expect to need while riding a one-wheeled vehicle?
The deaths caused by the onewheel are caused due to a mechanical failure of the device.
[citation needed]
If people were dying because they were running their onewheel in the road and getting hit by a car, that would be equivalent to the roller blade/skate deaths. But that isn't the case.
3/4 of the skating deaths are due to falls. Skating is inherently dangerous.
You're also more likely to die just from walking across the street, do we ban walking? No, just like we won't ban roller skates/blades.
Those two things are no
Re: At least 4 deaths? (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
What what is the percentage of deaths? Vastly more people swim than use these one-wheelers. Or is math too hard to understand this?
Very fast (Score:4)
These are not like the peloton machines that required pets or children for sacrifice. That was a design flaw and parents who donâ(TM)t supervise children. This is likely just a matter of lack of attention.
Because only the rider is likely to be injured, and it is likely a user problem, a recall is not necessary. A strong warning yes. Maybe a refund for those who want it. Maybe a speed limiter for the first 100 miles?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe a speed limiter for the first 100 miles?
While that might help, an fall due to a sudden failure like what's described in TFS/A (below) could be really dangerous at almost any speed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I have a friend's colleague who is suing after traumatic brain injury.
Maybe a speed limiter for the first 100 miles?
This is why they need to be recalled. They can't limit their speed. They don't have mechanical brakes.
This is like riding a bicycle with brakes that can't stop the bike and if you exceed the speed limit will eject the front wheel. It's inherently absurd.
Too steep downhill? Regen braking can't slow you down, you exceed the motor's limits. Nosedive.
Too steep uphill? Motor overheats can't balance. Nosedive.
Battery low? Nosedive.
Battery
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Very fast (Score:4, Informative)
This is why they need to be recalled. They can't limit their speed. They don't have mechanical brakes.
You don't have any experience with electrics, do you? At all?
Too steep downhill? Regen braking can't slow you down, you exceed the motor's limits. Nosedive.
You step off. You're not strapped to the board.
Too steep uphill? Motor overheats can't balance. Nosedive.
You step off. You're not strapped to the board.
Battery low? Nosedive.
There is a battery meter on the board. Look at it.
Battery too full? Nosedive.
Don't expect it to regen when it's full. Onewheel GT has an option to charge to 90%.
At the VERY LEAST they need to add an alarm to sound to alert the rider that they need bail or start slaloming or if possible, come to a stop immediately.
Onewheel GT has a warning beep.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Ok, you please step off when it is at a speed it can't handle
No, step off before you go down the steep hill.
If you can't think ahead before you do that, onewheel is not for you.
It's not for me, either. I have an awareness of my limitations. I take responsibility for that myself.
Re: (Score:1)
You can set your max speed on a one wheel. It is highly recommended that the user does not enable the advanced mode to unlock full speed until very comfortable. I work with several people that have these and use them on a regular basis, and most don't unlock full speed for the very reason of being thrown off at 20+mph is very uncomfortable.
Haven't seen any Onewheel being used responsibly (Score:2)
> boards are safe if they're used responsibly
In California (and probably elsewhere) using a Onewheel on the sidewalk is as illegal as driving a car on the sidewalk, yet the only place I see them used is on sidewalks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The only place I've ever seen them used is at festivals. They're really quite scarce. Apparently most people are risk-averse enough to prefer more wheels.
Shocked (Score:1)
Of course its statistically safer... (Score:2)
"Onewheels have lower serious injury rates than bikes, ATVs and motorcycles,"
Well, I suspect that statement is due to Onewheels being used exponentially less than Bikes, ATVs, and motorcycles.. By that measure, alligator and hippopotamus serious injury rates are also lower than bikes, ATVs and motorcycles.
Re: (Score:2)
I have noticed that death from alligators is extremely low in California.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends what they mean by "rate", or what is in the denominator. 1 year? 1 million miles? 100,000 hours? 100,000 customers? The first one would be quite misleading, but the others would account for the differences in how much each is used (to some extent - measuring by number of customers doesn't quite).
Physics says onewheels are more dangerous (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Danger is relative to consequence of failure. The practical difference between these devices and any kid doing stupid shit on their skateboard isn't the complexity, but rather the fact that these things are considered incredibly fast commuter vehicles. If skateboards travelled at 35km/h you'll see a lot of deaths and injury too (and likely banings).
Re: (Score:3)
And here lies the problem, if you demand too much from the motor it will not have the power to keep you level and the deck will dig into the ground, catapulting it's unsuspecting driver off at speed.
So, just like if you drive your car too fast around a sharp turn, it will catapult you off the edge of the road at speed?
User failure. Everything has limits beyond which operation is unsafe.
Re: (Score:2)
Watch this video (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Lots of people being randomly thrown off and injured with no obvious cause
Re: (Score:2)
All sales final, clearly the company doesn't care for the customer. The safety fender is an added expense, and is clearly a money grab.
Once you hit the unit's top speed you are essentially going to be thrown off when it can't keep up and nosedives. They don't even have sensors for both feet - wtf is that? The CPSC has a case here, the company can do better.
As designed (Score:2)
Unsafe at any speed (Score:2)
"lower serious injury rates" is probably a lie (Score:3)
The OneWheel recently passed the 50 million mile mark [prnewswire.com].
So if there have been at least 4 deaths, per mile, they're roughly an order of magnitude more likely to kill you than if you were riding a bicycle.
Re: (Score:2)
I would certainly expect the injury rate to be higher than cycling. There are more exciting failure modes. The more wheels the better for stability, even three wheels (which is worse than two wheels in some ways, but better in others.) Interestingly e-bikes seem to only have about the same death rate as normal ones, but most of them are limited so I guess that makes sense.
Aftermarket has already addressed this.... (Score:2)