Many People Aren't Sticking Around Mastodon (theguardian.com) 160
The number of active users on the Mastodon social network has dropped more than 30% since the peak and is continuing a slow decline, according to the latest data posted on its website. There were about 1.8 million active users in the first week of January, down from over 2.5 million in early December. The Guardian reports: Mastodon, an open-source network of largely independently hosted servers, has often been touted as an alternative to Twitter. And its growth appears connected to controversies at Twitter. But for many it doesn't fulfill the role that Twitter did and experts say it may be too complicated to really replace it. [...]
There were about 500,000 active Mastodon users before Elon Musk took control of Twitter at the end of October. By mid-November, that number climbed to almost 2 million active users. [...] The surge in new Mastodon users continued throughout November, peaking at over 130,000 new users a day. The upticks often coincided with controversial decisions made by Elon Musk. Data from Google suggests there was also a surge in searches for Mastodon in April 2022, around the time Musk announced he had become Twitter's largest shareholder.
"Twitter, in its most basic form is simple," Meg Coffey, a social media strategist, said. "You can open up an app or open up a website, type some words, and you're done. I mean, it was [a] basic SMS platform." For many, Mastodon may have proved too hard to port over their communities and was just too complicated. Some may have gone back to Twitter, while others, said Coffey, may have dropped social media entirely. "Everybody went and signed up [on Mastodon] and realized how hard it was, and then got back on Twitter and were like, 'Oh, that's, that's hard. Maybe we won't go there,'" she said. "It's like the people that said 'I'm moving to Canada' when Donald Trump was elected," Coffey added. "They never actually moved to Canada."
There were about 500,000 active Mastodon users before Elon Musk took control of Twitter at the end of October. By mid-November, that number climbed to almost 2 million active users. [...] The surge in new Mastodon users continued throughout November, peaking at over 130,000 new users a day. The upticks often coincided with controversial decisions made by Elon Musk. Data from Google suggests there was also a surge in searches for Mastodon in April 2022, around the time Musk announced he had become Twitter's largest shareholder.
"Twitter, in its most basic form is simple," Meg Coffey, a social media strategist, said. "You can open up an app or open up a website, type some words, and you're done. I mean, it was [a] basic SMS platform." For many, Mastodon may have proved too hard to port over their communities and was just too complicated. Some may have gone back to Twitter, while others, said Coffey, may have dropped social media entirely. "Everybody went and signed up [on Mastodon] and realized how hard it was, and then got back on Twitter and were like, 'Oh, that's, that's hard. Maybe we won't go there,'" she said. "It's like the people that said 'I'm moving to Canada' when Donald Trump was elected," Coffey added. "They never actually moved to Canada."
FFS (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: stupid name (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it would be calling a spade a spade and a brain wank a brain wank.
Because, let's face it, 99% of the crap posted on such services is just that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's called mastodon. Maybe start with fixing name.
Yep.
If Twitter users "tweet" then what do Mastodon users do?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: FFS (Score:5, Informative)
They toot.
https://news.yahoo.com/mastodo... [yahoo.com]
Re:FFS (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: FFS (Score:2)
"Twitter" is a nice name, right? (Score:2)
Re: "Twitter" is a nice name, right? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the silly name is the elephant in the room.
Re: FFS (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: Nope. (Score:2)
Re: Nope. (Score:2)
It sounds like much of your life is consumed by social media. That can't be healthy.
It's more than it seems (Score:5, Insightful)
First, It's hardly "most people" if it's dropped 30% after jumping by 3-400%.
Remember that the percentage move of 400% higher, was from a fairly low number... while the 30% move is starting from a much higher point.
Let's say Mastodon started with 10 people (just keeping numbers simple, obv they have way more, don't get offended). A 400% gain gives you 50 people.
Now let's take away 30%. That is 15 people! That is not a tiny number out of 50, leaving you with 35...
The real question though is if this is a one time thing, or a trend.
My own personal experience with Mastodon is trying to switch to it long ago, before all these hipsters tried to hang out there. I just didn't like it. I don't like the UI, the federation in practice is annoying, I thought it was too technical a space even for me, a software developer... I really am pretty surprised the drop is that low, and kind of expect it to accelerate. And really the final straw is "toots" for the mainstream. Yeah I know they tried to retire it but it seems a bit late.
I just do not think people will find what they are looking for on Mastodon, especially since some switched expecting Twitter to die at any second which obviously did not and will not happen (handling World Cup traffic alone was the final nail in that coffin).
Re:It's more than it seems (Score:5, Insightful)
My own personal experience with Mastodon is trying to switch to it long ago, before all these hipsters tried to hang out there. I just didn't like it. I don't like the UI, the federation in practice is annoying, I thought it was too technical a space even for me, a software developer... I really am pretty surprised the drop is that low, and kind of expect it to accelerate.
This really seems to me to be the big thing. The level of user experience. I did join and I started trying to find stuff. When I wanted to follow something on a remote server I had to cut and paste a URL. Surely that's something that could just be a single button click? I'm guessing that the fact that you don't see mastodon embedded in other pages is similar. In twitter it will be a single click type thing and in mastodon probably needs much more understanding?
Re: (Score:2)
Guess what - it's a single button .. Labelled follow ...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Nope. (Score:5, Informative)
Kind of the whole point of Mastodon is that it's not Twitter. Being used by the same people in the same way would not be success.
Twitter's business model isn't built on serving its users, it's built on serving them up to advertisers. Twitter wastes your time by design. That's called "engagement" a marvelously inhumane success metric that covers everything from swapping recipes to doomscrolling and cyberstalking. Twitter is to social interaction what Cheetohs are to nutrition. The whole point of Cheetohs is that unlike real food, they will never satisfy you.
I actually *do* enjoy certain aspects of social media; keeping up with old schoolmates and colleagues, sharing plans and pictures with family. What I don't enjoy is social media's incessant attempts to draw me into flamewars with people I don't know or to dump me in algorithmically selected clickbait rabbit holes. I rather *like* the fact that Mastodon doesn't even have a place in its interface for "trending". It just shows me the people and hashtags I'm actually following. It's actually designed to serve its users' needs.
Mastodon can't replace Twitter without promoting the same kind of mindlessly addictive behavior Twitter does. But if that's what you *want*, well, just use Twitter. It doesn't really matter which sociopath is running the company; the entire enterprise is sociopathic.
Re: (Score:3)
Twitter's business model isn't built on serving its users, it's built on serving them up to advertisers.
Given Twitters history of quarterly profit announcements I'd argue their business model is built on hopes and dreams that one day they can figure out a viable business model.
Re: Nope. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"Mastodon can't replace Twitter without promoting the same kind of mindlessly addictive behavior Twitter does. But if that's what you *want*, well, just use Twitter. It doesn't really matter which sociopath is running the company; the entire enterprise is sociopathic."
Perfect and, for sociopathic people, increasingly sociopathic management is a feature.
Twitter needs to be destroyed, not replaced. There's a reason Musk wanted greater control over it, a reason he's not interested in being public.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly.
Twitter is a commercial social network whose purpose is to intentionally get people to view ads and stay on the site. And they do that using the algorithm - getting people worked up to retweet whatever idiotic thing they heard about is the whole point. Just get their first innate reaction and move on.
Mastodon is the opposite - its purpose is to communicate, so it's going to serve up communications and communities that you want to engage in and contribute to. If you have a question, you ask it, and s
Re: (Score:3)
I'd use Mastodon more if there was a mobile client or web client that let me use both it and Twitter at the same time. Post to both, read both.
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck with that .. It's unlikely to happen as the people running the servers on both systems do not want you to ...
One because it will drag people away, and the other because they left for a reason
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure about cross-posting, but AndStatus [github.com] can combine feeds from Twitter and Mastodon (and a few others). I haven't used it myself, but it's been around a while.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, I will give it a try as it's on F-Droid.
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine if Canada's population quadrupled, then fell by 30% after a few months.
That Coffey isn't able to see that, suggests wishful thinking on their part.
Re: (Score:2)
First, It's hardly "most people" if it's dropped 30% after jumping by 3-400%.
Secondly what's happened is the massive growth line has straightened out, which means the "People who joined for five minutes and then decided it wasn't for them" factor is finally appearing, a month behind in the stats because the stats can't really figure out who's active and who isn't on the basis of five minutes of usage, and because the massive increases were hiding those who were leaving.
What I expect, assuming Musk doesn't do another massive fuck up with Twitter, is for the line to curve back up, but much, much, more slowly, by the end of this month.
Mastodon's doing well. I'm on it, I'm literally flooded with so many posts at the moment I'm about to start pruning my follow list, and it's still only half the length of my old follow list on Twitter, where I never felt I had to prune.
(And I'm not even on a main server, I set up my own. Which means my data is my own. You should too. It's social networking without people sucking down your data and trying to monetize it by selling it to groups who want to use social media to get people to kill each other. It's genuinely much more pleasant, people are actually nice to one another. Who knew that was possible?)
Beyond that you're getting a whole bunch of people realising they don't need either Twitter or Mastodon and just getting on with other things in their lives. It just took Musk breaking the back of Twitter for a lot of people to realise how little they got out of it.
Re: (Score:2)
"And it's fully expected that those that remain will be the worst offenders..."
Remain where? And worst offenders of what?
"...just like it happened with initial far right purges into alternative networks."
Purges? LOL. Alternative networks? LOLOL. You mean when extremists couldn't openly violate terms of service so they created their own failed alternatives?
"...centre right and centre left figures started to get banned off twitter for rules specifically targeting them"
Conspiracy central. Who's the "centre
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, extremists like this that really need to be removed from mainstream left and put back to far left where they belong. So left can be liberal again, rather than authoritarian.
The latter (Score:3, Informative)
But I didn't re-subscribe to Twitter. At first, watching Musk's mental state deteriorating was kind of funny, but now it's just sad.
Re:The latter (Score:4, Insightful)
But I didn't re-subscribe to Twitter. At first, watching Musk's mental state deteriorating was kind of funny, but now it's just sad.
What exactly did you used to do on Twitter that you can't do any more?
Re: (Score:2)
But I didn't re-subscribe to Twitter. At first, watching Musk's mental state deteriorating was kind of funny, but now it's just sad.
What exactly did you used to do on Twitter that you can't do any more?
And there in lies the problem.
People are realising they never got much off of twitter in the first place. So they've left Twitter, didn't find much on Mastodon and realised that they didn't find that much interesting on Twitter before hand and not bothered going back.
However I suspect this is more a case of a number of people who signed up to see what it was all about and just didn't go back, like the people who join gyms every January, clog the car park for a few weeks and stop going.
Re: (Score:3)
Did he do anything? Twitter has far less people working for it than it did when he started, in particular seemingly almost the entire Trust and Safety team.
I'm not even saying that's an issue per say but all this points to is a statement he made, not a demonstration there was a problem and what happened to correct the problem.
It feels like the whole issue entirely is overblown and a new version of "stranger danger" paranoia. Whats better than accusing your enemies of being pedos right? No ones going to jum
Re: (Score:2)
Have any evidence of that? No? Why am I not surprised...
Re: (Score:3)
"Elon Musk fans claim he's eliminated child abuse material on Twitter - experts say otherwise"
https://www.dailydot.com/debug... [dailydot.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Oh c'mon, you can't tell me you're not having a popcorn moment every time the oversized Richy Rich throws another tantrum.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh c'mon, you can't tell me you're not having a popcorn moment every time the oversized Richy Rich throws another tantrum.
Well, I'm sad, but it doesn't last long. But the lad needs some intervention. When you start trying to make twitter profitble by not paying your bills, there's some noggin problems a-happening.
I wonder how they keep him under control at Spacex? The Starship (or what I call the N1 reboot) is becoming a bit of an Ol Muskie shitshow, but there appear to be portions of the company that don't show his talent for screwing things up.
Or is the Starship the 21st century Spruce Goose?
Re: The latter (Score:2)
Mastodon isn't for everybody (Score:3)
I have, for now, given up on social media thing. And I am discovering that I am much better off for it. I am assuming Slashdot is not considered social media. Side question. What is a cool category name for dying websites that old timers refuse to give up?
Re: Mastodon isn't for everybody (Score:3)
Reddit.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, don't knock my favorite trolling playground. If it wasn't for Reddit, a lot of people wouldn't have a sensible outlet for their inner troll and would instead litter sensible discussion media with it.
Reddit serves a very valuable social purpose. It keeps the garbage collected on one side of the internet.
Re: Mastodon isn't for everybody (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
--
We will soon have the option to harvest our farts, so we can post & comment on stats about them.
Re: Mastodon isn't for everybody (Score:2)
Re: Mastodon isn't for everybody (Score:2)
What is a cool category name for dying websites that old timers refuse to give up?
HotGrittspotts? Goatsewebz? AllYourWeb$itezBelongs2Taco?
It's just for anyone that use Twitter (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What is a cool category name for dying websites that old timers refuse to give up?
I am partial to the name "anti-social media", especially when there are frequently cutting remarks and gratuitous personal attacks.
Re: (Score:2)
Pick a server at random .. you can move ....
What features ? Being advertised at? Having people trolling you .. ?
The problem is a lack of content (Score:3, Informative)
You would need some major people to flee Twitter to really see another social network pick up from them. Other than that or a total collapse of Twitter that's probably coming due to finances. I doubt anyone is going to keep pouring money into Twitter and the advertisers are unlikely to come back. One of the major problems you have when you chase your advertisers off is that online advertising doesn't work and when they pause their ad campaigns for any length of time it becomes real obvious that it doesn't work.
It took YouTube close to 5 years to recover from the Adpocalypse when a bunch of Coca-Cola ads showed up on Nazi videos and the advertisers got spooked and left. Even now they never fully recovered in a large amount of the advertisements are either political, scams, or generic branding emails. That and taco bell. Dear God Taco Bell advertises a lot on YouTube. But mcdonald's? Not so much. Heck even Coca-Cola isn't bothering anymore.
Twitter needs about five or six years to recover and for the advertisers to forget how useless it is. But I don't think a company losing over a billion dollars a year has that long to live
Advertisers already back (Score:2)
I doubt anyone is going to keep pouring money into Twitter and the advertisers are unlikely to come back.
Most advertisers are back (Apple is back for example). a lot of them came back when they realized Twitter is actually doing something about child porn which it wasn't before. It's actually a safer realm to present advertisements now and has more people using it than before.
There is a lot of fantasy notion that Twitter is going to expire any day now for all sorts of reasons, but in the end every reason h
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is advertising on the world's largest white supremacist / anti-vax / conspiracy theory noise machine? That's just one more reason to never buy Apple crap.
Keep in shilling for sociopathic billionaires, Kendall. I'm sure they've noticed your endless supportive posts and think you're super cool...
Re: (Score:2)
"Elon Musk fans claim he's eliminated child abuse material on Twitter - experts say otherwise"
https://www.dailydot.com/debug... [dailydot.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Apple never truly left ... they just scaled back a bit ...
Twitter Adverts are a very minor part of their advertising budget .. and insignificant to them as a whole ... ... it's relatively small, and some of it's user shout very loudly...
The Myth is that Twitter is huge and influential
Post.News IS growing though (Score:3, Informative)
Post [post.news] is growing dramatically as the new alternative for Twitter refugees.
Re: (Score:2)
Yay, you've gone from being a commodity mined by Twitter to a commodity being mined by Post.
Virtue signaling needs an audience (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The likes of Rihanna, Ronaldo, Taylor Swift and Lady Gaga all have around 100 million Twitter followers. Twitter has 450 million users. Mastodon has 1.8 million users in total. We've already had the big event that was supposed to shift everyone across to Mastodon, but in reality things have barely changed. Most ordinary Twitter users just want to hear news and gossip and make a few comments.
Anybody who wants an audience is going to stay on Twitter.
Re: (Score:2)
Twitter has many Bots ... ... and has been steadily growing, by it's nature explosive growth is neither possible or wanted
Mastodon has 9 million users
Famous people get a PR company to post on twitter on their behalf ... Many people can read the same on other sites ...
Re: (Score:2)
We've already had the big event that was supposed to shift everyone across to Mastodon
I think that declaration is premature. It would not surprise me if Twitter went completely down and stayed down for days or weeks. That could shift a lot more people somewhere, whether it's Mastodon or not. It could also go bankrupt and have all its assets sold off. Which again users may or may not go to Mastodon, but they sure won't be on Twitter any more.
Alcoholics falling off the wagon... (Score:2)
"It's like the people that said 'I'm moving to Canada' when Donald Trump was elected," Coffey added. "They never actually moved to Canada."
More like alcoholics who finally got to the AA meeting, but fell off the wagon again..
Also, many people return to drinking, using drugs (Score:2)
Having sworn with the new year to stop their addictive behavior, many return to Twitter.
They'd never really stopped drinking and doping, so no real change there, lol.
Good slashvertisement! (Score:2)
The word "Mastodon" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a woolly mammoth ...
Twitter is as silly ...you just got used to it ...
Re: (Score:2)
"T Rex" sounds like a dude who shoots roids until his balls shrivel. But anyone who's not a retard knows it's a dinosaur, and they think of that first.
Hyping Mastodon was cap (Score:2)
Mastodon seems like a reasonable alternative to Twitter for those folks who cannot stomach any diversity in their social media feeds. I'm not entirely sure why elements of the tech community are so bent on serving that niche, though.
Re: (Score:2)
"By "stomach ... diversity" do you mean tolerate exploitation of social media as a propaganda tool?
"I'm not entirely sure why elements of the tech community are so bent on serving that niche, though."
You mean serving the "niche" of trying to provide what people want?
Re: (Score:2)
"By "stomach ... diversity" do you mean tolerate exploitation of social media as a propaganda tool?
No, I don't. They all tolerate that. Slashdot is awash in it, and you're here!
Lazy Journalists don't like it ... (Score:3)
Because they can't mine stories as easily ...
But the growth is steady with a few people joining, seeing it's not for them and leaving, and a few making accounts on multiple servers rather than moving them....
All the complaints I have heard boil own to "it's not like Twitter" ... than the whole point is it's not like Twitter ..
Re: (Score:3)
Yep, it's conspicuous what journalists say about Twitter. They need it and spend a great deal of time on it. Why? Because they get a lot of professional benefit. That alone tells you what Twitter's true nature is. It is not "social" media, it is propaganda; it is not where people talk, it's where manipulation of the public happens.
of course they aren't (Score:4, Insightful)
...these are pretty much the same period that insisted they'd move to Canada if Trump won.
Or if any Republican candidate won any presidential election since Clinton.
Somehow, they're all still here.
Re: (Score:3)
While I'd agree with you in principle, I'd assert this makes it even more puzzling: Trudeau leans ever-harder into the Socialist Utopian plan (like his *ahem* father), so why aren't these Americans FLOCKING north of the 47th parallel?
I mean if you're a deep blue American, you can
- stay in the failed state of Kalifornia, stepping around human feces every day
- move to Austin where you might have this tiny happy place of soy-lattes and cruelty-free vegan tofu but are surrounded by the most feral of Red Staters
So 'mastodon' is rapidly going extinct? (Score:2)
Webrings (Score:3)
Please go (Score:2)
As with Any Revolution... (Score:2)
As with any revolution, rebellion, or resistance, if there isn't a good enough replacement to the leader being overthrown, people just fall back in line with whatever egotistical dominator is willing to claim leadership.
Ya, people ran away from Twitter because Musk's douche-baggery, but there is no functional alternative to Twitter... so they'll end up crawling back (just not advertising that they're doing so).
FUD (Score:3)
Straight up FUD. There was a very clearly stated content policy against *all* porn when I signed up, and just the other day I commented about how it's so much cleaner than Twitter. Maybe there's an alternative Fediverse cluster that does this, but you're not going to find it unless you're looking for it, and if you do the guy who runs the server might be an FBI agent.
That said, we'll have to see how well content moderates if it ever scales. I actually got feedback from an admin when I posted, which is a
Re: FUD (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I went to the secjuice.com main page and it’s more terrible than I imagined.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The ignorance of this fact seems intentional.
Funny how there's this big push for people to join some ephemeral, federated network where nothing but text is discoverable, content moderation is limited to complaints to disinterested admins, and privately-hosted servers can be added / removed with a minimal amount of effort.
It's almost as if someone realized the available tools for identifying CSAM have become more sophisticated and a new platform that's harder to monitor is now a necessity.
Re: (Score:2)
It was different before the internet. Speech itself was more free with fewer consequences, but the economics of anybody actually hearing it were different so only select voices were amplified. Which sounds bad, but maybe it wasn't so bad.
Re:Too much child porn? (Score:4, Insightful)
"Free speech ain't all it's cracked up to be" ought to be the slogan of Web 2.0.
There's a total truth in this. Full freedom of speech involves the right to go around town with a loudspeaker car. That's kind of okay if only a few people can afford it a few days a year. If everybody can afford it and does it all day and night then nobody else can hear themselves think, let alone talk. The internet very easily gets like that. You either get into a closed off neighbourhood where one person controls the speaker car or you end up with communication drowned out by idiocy.
The real trick is to think of the underlying reason for free speech - freedom of expression. People need to be able to communicate their political and social ideas freely. Protecting that is the real trick.
Re:Too much child porn? (Score:4, Insightful)
For freedom of speech to work properly, you first and foremost would require an educated population. Without, it runs the danger that someone with the relevant publishing power will drag the idiots to his side by bombarding them with enough convoluted lies that they actually believe him. There's plenty of examples in history, and we currently live through one such example.
Our education sorely lacks learning the ability to tell content from bullshit. With good reason, a lot of teachers aren't exactly fit for that job (you know the old saying, those who can do, those who can't teach...) and if they taught their students to question what they hear and ask for confirmation for assertions, they'd themselves quickly end up in hot water because they themselves never learned to actually explain why they assert something as fact.
Re: (Score:3)
"lol pedos" seems to be the go-to insult for Muskovites when they really, really hate something but don't have a legitimate criticism. That ploy wins points among Q-anon types, but it's starting to sound really tired to normal people.
As for the furries? Maybe the algorithm's manipulated your perspective enough that you don't see them, but they're all over Twitter.
Re: Too much child porn? (Score:2)
Hi, Elon.
Re: (Score:2)
Give it time, the Russian trolls are currently busy elsewhere.
Re: (Score:2)
So your Twitter echo chamber has not changed ... mine did drastically ... because I am not politically right wing, but now my entire feed is ...
Re: (Score:2)
Can you show me on this doll where the evil woke touched you?
Re: Mastoda is a Safe-Place for Communists... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but it's Canada.
Obligatory (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure thing, comrade. You're "son" is straight and you need the whole world to know it.