Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Technology

Philips To Cut 13% of Jobs in Safety and Profitability Drive (reuters.com) 22

Dutch health technology company Philips will scrap another 6,000 jobs worldwide as it tries to restore its profitability and improve the safety of its products following a recall of respiratory devices that knocked off 70% of its market value. From a report: Half of the job cuts will be made this year, the company said on Monday, adding that the other half will be realised by 2025. The new reorganisation brings the total amount of job cuts announced by new Chief Executive Roy Jakobs in recent months to 10,000, or around 13% of Philips' current workforce.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Philips To Cut 13% of Jobs in Safety and Profitability Drive

Comments Filter:
  • by mspohr ( 589790 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @04:27PM (#63251945)

    Those pesky people keep making unsafe products so the brilliant Philips managers have decided to cut people so they won't make unsafe products?

    • Nah, it's OK, they've only laid off all the annoying QA, reliability engineering, and QC people who keep warning about problems in their products. If no-one says there's a problem then it's all good, right?
  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @04:28PM (#63251949)
    These layoffs are literally because the growth was less than what they told Wall Street it was going to be. 6000 people are going to lose their livelihoods because enough is never enough. Like Jim Sterling over on YouTube said, corporations don't want to make money corporations want to make ALL the money.

    They're going to keep trying to cause a recession and get us all fired. And we don't have any bargaining power because we gave that up in the 90s. I can't even tell you what we got in return for that. I guess an extra $20 a month in our paycheck versus the couple thousand in pay cuts we took over the same period of time?
    • by hey! ( 33014 )

      I think underlying this is the economic fact that the value of an income stream is discounted by the perceived riskiness. So it's not enough to turn a profit, you need to turn a profit that is large relative to the risk entailed. That's how Philips has endured a 70% reduction in market cap even *after* it has dealt with the huge recall. The business looks riskier than it did five years ago.

      • I'm pretty damned sure the risk is minimal. People aren't going to wake up one day and not need light bulbs. Unless all of civilization collapses because we kept feeding the gaping maw of unregulated capitalism.

        At this point you're just making excuses. It's weird and eerie. Like a Stockholm syndrome or a stepford wife... It's a fundamental worship of Wall Street style capitalism where your mind is boxed in and you can't think of any other way. I'm sorry man but you're working backwards from your conclu
        • by Burdell ( 228580 )

          One part of Philips makes light bulbs. Aside from the fact that LED bulbs last a lot longer on average than incandescent (so people are generally buying fewer light bulbs), do you think it takes a company of 46,000 people to make light bulbs, but 40,000 won't be able to do it?

          • Well, 40K or 46K people, it still took them quite a number of years to finally release a slim HUE ceiling light.

          • what a literary device is.

            My point is that their risks aren't all that high. They make various packaged good electronics. It's a well established market and a well established brand with a very, very well established distribution network in a world where anti-trust law enforcement has long since gone the way of the dodo.

            That was a bit much to type so I wrote "they make light bulbs" and counted on my audience to extrapolate. I guess I over estimated...
        • by hey! ( 33014 )

          Yeah, it's the Procter and Gamble theory of stock investing. When things get so bad people stop buying soap, you've got bigger problems than your stocks underperforming. But that said, you can lose a *lot* of money in medical devices, and lightbulbs are commodity that is no longer protected by a cartel like they were in the old days. That means Philips is competing with cheap off-brand Chinese bulbs. DVDs used to be a cash cow too, but the world moves on.

        • by Njovich ( 553857 )

          Philips does not make light bulbs anymore. That's spun out into a different company called Signify. In fact they don't make any household electronics anymore. Philips is purely a healthcare company now. There will remain a need for MRI scanners but the question is how many and at what profit margin.

        • Nope. Philips today is a healthcare company. It produces devices ranging from the innocuous (shaver, electric toothbrush) via various medical imaging systems to the potentially lethal (respirators)

    • They're going to keep trying to cause a recession and get us all fired.

      You've used this line over and over again which makes me think you don't have a clue how recessions work. Recessions aren't good. Not for you, not for me, not for the government, not for the central bank, not for trade, not for corporations, not for Wallstreet suits.

      No one is trying to cause a recession. It's literally the one thing everyone in the world wants to avoid.

  • Perhaps they should have stuck to light bulbs... /s
  • I am happy to see them get punished for their absolutely disastrous handling of their faulty (and in some cases seriously dangerous) CPAP gear. AND they knew there were problems with their gear: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/1... [nytimes.com] (sorry for paywall)

    While I do feel for the employees who were probably not part of the business decisions, it took TWO $#@%@ YEARS, yes YEARS, to finally resolve this issue and replace my CPAP. First, they were promising quick repairs, then it was going to be longer, then I got anot

    • by ffkom ( 3519199 )
      What I totally don't understand in the story of this recall is: Why on earth did they design the devices such that they cannot just replace the foam? I mean every adult has seen various kinds of foam deteriorate over time, so it should be an obvious choice to make it replaceable...
    • They won't talk to you without a current prescription. My machine is over a decade old and I'm still using it nightly, it's all I have.

  • Correct headline (Score:4, Interesting)

    by sonamchauhan ( 587356 ) <sonamc@NOsPam.gmail.com> on Monday January 30, 2023 @06:53PM (#63252357) Journal

    Philips To Cut 13% of Jobs in Profitability Drive Required due to Expensive Safety Mistakes

  • The first time I read the title, I read "Probability Drive".

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Working...