More Than 30% of Steam Users Now Run Windows 11 (neowin.net) 77
The latest Steam Hardware and Software Survey results are now available, showing a significant milestone for Microsoft's operating system. From a report: According to Valve, Windows 11 crossed a 30% share on Steam in January 2023. Windows 11's growth on Steam is directly related to Windows 10's decline. The latter remains the most popular OS among the gaming audience, but its market share lost 1.96 points in January 2023.
Windows 10 holds approximately 63.46% of all Steam customers. Windows 11, on the other hand, gained 1.91% points. This allowed the operating system to cross the 30% mark and reach its all-time high of 30.33%. Despite being out of support since 2020 (no paid security updates since January 2023), Windows 7 still has 1.6% of all Steam users. In January 2023, its 64-bit version lost 0.06 points. Overall, 96.02% of all Steam customers use Windows (0.13). macOS is second with 2.61% (+0.13), and Linux is third with 1.38% (no changes last month).
Windows 10 holds approximately 63.46% of all Steam customers. Windows 11, on the other hand, gained 1.91% points. This allowed the operating system to cross the 30% mark and reach its all-time high of 30.33%. Despite being out of support since 2020 (no paid security updates since January 2023), Windows 7 still has 1.6% of all Steam users. In January 2023, its 64-bit version lost 0.06 points. Overall, 96.02% of all Steam customers use Windows (0.13). macOS is second with 2.61% (+0.13), and Linux is third with 1.38% (no changes last month).
I finally installed it in a VM (Score:5, Insightful)
With some simple registry tweaking Win 11 will consent to be installed on a potato, and my first impression is, what a sad wannabe OSX. It does actually look pretty nice, but it doesn't look or feel as nice as 7 so fail, fail.
Why has everyone got to ruin a good thing?
Re:I finally installed it in a VM (Score:5, Interesting)
Because it's Microsoft.
It's not a new OS unless they've dicked around with the UI to the point of being unrecognizable. And made various control panel applets harder to find, and harder to use, or just removed them altogether without giving any form of replacement for the functionality.
The whole world shines shit and calls it gold.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine being able to choose...
To not be forced one way or another.
Re: (Score:2)
Were you around when XP launched?
It was universally HATED, especially for the "fisher price UI". Consumers wanted win98V3, and corporate users still like 2k.
7 everyone loved, but XP no way. It eventually morphed into something people liked by SP2, but that's some rose coloured glasses.
I personally loved it.
Re: (Score:2)
Were you around when XP launched?
It was universally HATED, especially for the "fisher price UI".
I remember that. But I also remember it being as solid as win2k (which also needed to be service packed before it was at its best) and also being able to turn that candy coated crap off.
Re: (Score:2)
We loved 7 except for new EGREGIOUS licensing mechanism. Windows 7 is phoning home! It needs an internet connection to continue working! If only we knew how much worse it was going to get. I still run 7 for gaming and I'm going to build a new computer next month with Linux only :)
Re:I finally installed it in a VM (Score:5, Insightful)
The business model is to make something deliberately poor so that fault fixing looks like progression. This was documented in office, MS PowerPoint was consistent under developed so that it deliberate room for improvement.
The priority was to sell a version next year, not to make good software.
CPU and GPU manufactures demand bloat (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Microsoft is still one of the richest companies out there, so I guess we haven't gotten to that point of diminishing returns yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Clearly we need government-run chip makers. That would protect the public.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not sure anynoe can complain. Microsoft warned us that Windows 10 would be the final version.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty easy to change it to mostly Windows 10 style (more like 7). I think you need 3rd party tools to fix the disaster of a start menu.
Re: (Score:2)
Why has everyone got to ruin a good thing?
Extra income from trainings, certificates, etc. - they hold de-facto desktop monopoly and use this position to the maximum.
Re: (Score:3)
Why has everyone got to ruin a good thing?
This is a loaded question [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
what a sad wannabe OSX
It sounds like you judge an OS by the justification of its menu bar. Thank god Windows is nothing even remotely at all like OSX. If you like OSX, fine. I don't. But saying Windows is an OSX wannabe just shows what an incredibly shallow and superficial view you have.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well of course it is, just like it's just Windows NT. But I just don't get why the endless need to rearrange shit on the screen in ways which actually compromise UX. The start menu with the button in the lower left (and clickable from the lower left pixel, so you don't have to look) is such a fantastic paradigm that everyone has copied it. Even Apple did in classic Mac OS, with the... wtf was that little dark grey strip thing called in the lower left? I remember it showing up on powerbooks in the later Syst
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are not stupid, you just don't yet know what I didn't know before the other day — if you hit Shift-F10 during the Windows install (at least of 10 and 11, not sure about others) you will get a command prompt and you can run regedit. Adding some DWORDs to HKLM\System\Setup\LabConfig (BypassTPMCheck, BypassSecureBootCheck, BypassRAMCheck, BypassStorageCheck, and BypassCPUCheck) and setting them to 1 will skip the various checks during the install, and you can literally do this at any point.
If you get
Re: (Score:2)
linux (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The KSP problems are always to do with PulseAudio.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
a version of Linux preconfigured with gaming in mind
You mean like SteamOS? [steampowered.com]
And if you are thinking that might be TOO task-specific for your tastes, then I would whole-heartedly recommend Ubuntu, which is officially endorsed and supported by Valve to run Steam.
When I switched from Fedora to Ubuntu, seriously I never looked back. Updating Fedora was always an adventure, and every other major update completely bricked my OS and I had to wipe and re-install (and no, I was not doing any weird tinkering of my own
Re:linux (Score:4, Informative)
So, now that I have written the above post about how awesome Ubuntu is....
I went to launch Battle.Net through Lutris, which worked beautifully yesterday, and today it hangs. I went through an amazing online journey of unhelpful posts and diagnosis efforts to discover that this is because Steam updates sometimes break Lutris. Apparently, waiting around a bit will result in a fix for Lutris which will auto-download when you launch lutris....but not if you have IPV6 enabled! So you have to disable that so the self-update can work but even then you still have to wait for a fix.
OR you can fix it yourself by editing a python script hidden deep within a folder tree that you can only find by running lutris from terminal to see the python error it gives, and making a specific hack to it.
THIS is why Linux is not ready for the desktop. THIS is why people are afraid to make the switch. If you don't have the technical chops to make fixes like this, let alone the tenacity to track down helpful posts about it online, you are as helpless as a worm dangling on a hook when something like this happens.
As great as Linux is, and it IS great, it has a serious fragility problem, and that rightly scares people away from using it.
Re: (Score:2)
I run Steam on Linux .... never had any issues ....
Just slowly the number of games I still have to reboot into Windows to play is dwindling it's in single figures out of a large collection
The thing that breaks games in Lunix is the same thing that breaks them on Windows - badly written launchers and anti-cheat systems ...
Re: (Score:2)
Linux will never be ready for the desktop if the goal is to make it flawlessly and performantly run software made for other different operating systems.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
MicroShaft
The "Windows guy" right here everybody.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure let me flash a Linux distro to one of my drives and spend hours trying to figure out why a certain driver isn't working.
Thank the gods that never happens on Windows.
Except when it does.
Re: linux (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:linux (Score:4, Insightful)
I agree that everyone should be on linux! But 20+ years in, the Linux desktop is still a fragmented mess, that even seasoned computer professionals shy away from.
With windows, 99.9% of problems are a matter of getting the correct drivers, the correct setting in a menu, or in extreme cases, perhaps a registry change. That's it. Download a program and double click. Done and we're up and running.
With Linux, good luck trying to do the simplest of things without days of research. Want to install a program? OK, Do I go to software manager? Package manager? Use Snap? RPM? Do i download the Deb file? (you can but it's out of date) Do I use apt? apt-get? aptitude? (are they the same? who knows??) yum? pip install? curl? git clone and compile? Good grief. Try to install even simple applications and you're liable to wade through pages of commands and dependencies and config file changes that don't even work half the time, if you can even figure it out.
Ok so now I've got it installed, where is it? Why doesn't it show up in my menu? Why is the scrollbar all screwed up? Which GTK config file do I edit? 2.0? 3.0? In which directory?? Why doesn't the config file already exist?? Why does it have the wrong permissions?
And on and on... Why doesn't my usb 3.0 port work? Why doesn't my graphics card work. Why is my standard usb mouse acting funny? Why is bluetooth not working? Why is my sound all screwed up? Why is x.org taking over my CPU? What is Caja and why is it lagging when I open a directory? Why isn't there a simple menu option for this simple config? Which desktop do I pick (cinnamon, mate, kde)? Which distro do I pick ("try them all! see which one you like!!")?
Uggh. I don't want to spend my life trying to get a basic desktop to work; a computer should be a tool- not a lifestyle. Linux is great. But the desktop and home user solutions are a fragmented mess. Sure, give a choice, have the option to support legacy. But make it the exception! STANDARDIZE ON SOMETHING! Put a GUI on top of the config file. Software and drivers should be a pre-compiled binary I can click on to run! I don't care whether it's Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, MX, Arch, whatever. I think the distro that manages to solve these problems AND get major companies/hardware vendors on board is the one that will ultimately win. But until then, it's going to be the same story of the last 20 years- a fragmented mess!
Re: (Score:1)
I agree that everyone should be on linux! But 20+ years in, the Linux desktop is still a fragmented mess, that even seasoned computer professionals shy away from.
Actually, in the last 10 years or so it's felt pretty seamless.
With windows, 99.9% of problems are a matter of getting the correct drivers, the correct setting in a menu, or in extreme cases, perhaps a registry change. That's it.
Most complicated thing I've had to do was install an nvidia driver. And that was only tricky because of Tensorflow compatibilities which are a pain whatever OS you're on.
I can't even remember the last time I needed to edit a file in /etc/.
Download a program and double click. Done and we're up and running.
That actually sounds terrifying and complicated. I hate downloading software that I had to find via google (are you even getting the legit site??).
90% of the stuff I install is "apt/snap/dnf install foo", which
Re: (Score:2)
You are10 years out of date .. Linux is not anything like this anymore for the regular mainstream distros ...
I have Steam running on Linux Mint with an NVidia card ... I have never had to edit a config file, never opened a command prompt - everything is graphical - and just works .... to the point where things I have had to find, download a driver for and install manually on Windows ... just worked
Re: (Score:3)
I DID switch. For about a year or so.
The experience can be summed up as "compromises".
There is no good OS out there. They all suck, just in different ways...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: linux (Score:2)
My problem is, the games i normally play on steam. If i play them on linux, or through a VM of windows. I will get banned. Bungee bans people for playing Destiny 2 on linux or a vm. Because of their cheat detector software.
I would be all over gaming on linux if this wasnt a problem.
Microsoft dosen't care about old pcs anymore (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Microsoft dosen't care about old pcs anymore (Score:4, Insightful)
Backward compatibility thrown out the Window.
Honestly. Good. A large portion of Windows complaints are the result of systems running the OS which frankly shouldn't run the OS. We need to get past a few ideas.
Get past the idea that everyone needs the latest shiny OS.
Get past the idea that every old piece of shit should run the latest OS.
Get past the idea of supporting legacy (for critical equipment Windows was a poor choice in the first place).
and Get past the idea that your computer should run forever.
When Windows 10 goes EOL Windows 11 will be supported by all computers made in the preceding 8 years. Time to move on.
Re: (Score:1)
Get past the idea that every old piece of shit should run the latest OS. Get past the idea of supporting legacy (for critical equipment Windows was a poor choice in the first place). and Get past the idea that your computer should run forever.
I don't know, we're past the days when actual useful, revolutionary new features are added to hardware and the OS, it's really just minor increments in speed and such now; there's increasingly less reason new versions shouldn't run on old hardware. But things like TPM or whatever the hell they're adding these days which really provide no benefit to end users are driving requirements of new versions/hardware. We're at a point where I think we should expect all of those things; they are, of course, highly unp
Re:What's the point of Steam on macOS? (Score:4, Informative)
More like "What's the point of macOS?" Shitty looked up toy store for imbeciles that never left middle school.
Re: (Score:2)
Misleading statistics (Score:2, Insightful)
Steam isn't representative. Their audience is way more likely to own a recent gaming rig.
I'd love to see those stats compared to some others. An appropriate title would be more like 'Gamers more likely to install a new OS on a new PC'
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Misleading statistics (Score:5, Informative)
Steam isn't representative. Their audience is way more likely to own a recent gaming rig.
You clearly don't know Steam users. The two most prominent GPUs in the hardware survey are the two cheapest and most basic GPUs you can buy followed by a laptop. The most popular CPUs are 6 core followed by 4 core with 8 core machines making up less than 20% of the total. The overwhelming majority of monitors are standard HD resolution.
No my man. The overwhelming majority of Steam devices are not at all "gaming rigs". The are nothing more than PCs with Steam installed. Including the likes of my underpowered 7 year old thermally throttled cracked screen Surface Pro 3 because let's face it, the vast majority of games on Steam run just fine on a potato.
Re: (Score:3)
I'd say you are both right.
Pretty much 100% of people running actual gaming rigs, or even gaming laptops are going to have steam installed.
But even with pretty much that entire demographic represented on steam, the overall majority of users are still using regular systems and whatever they have in front of them.
Hell... I have a gaming rig with steam installed. But I also have 2 laptops, both ultraportables (not really gaming capable at all) with it installed too for less demanding stuff when im on the go.
Obvious conclusion is obvious (Score:2)
PC gamers are the most likely to buy/build a system utilizing the latest hardware and software.
Re: (Score:2)
Look at the stats ... these people run Steam , but so do everyone else .. with old, cheap and just barely at minimum spec machines ... and they are the majority
Only gamers will use it. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Look carefully and you will see that Steam is full of webgl games in desktop wrappers already. Steam does not skew towards power user. Steam does not skew towards the high end. Steam skews towards desktops and laptops from big box stores. Whatever is selling.
Re: (Score:2)
Windows is no longer usable for science or business.
I can't speak to what it means to use a PC for science. But business? Does the Office suite not run on Windows 11? Have they dropped SCCM and Active Directory support? Hell, most business users could probably get by just fine with the versions of Outlook/Word/Excel/Powerpoint at office.com that'll run in your browser.
Impressive drivel (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Dismsal Amount Given That It Was Free Upgrade (Score:2)
Only 30% of Steam Users run Windows 11 (Score:2)
Its good (Score:2)